Your Take: The Expansion of Country Music

Brady Vercher | March 15th, 2008 Email Share

It seems like artists that wouldn’t typically be considered country are joining the country genre with greater frequency and a few of them and their fans are adamant about being accepted in the genre despite the disconnect between their music and traditional country music. They argue that such artists expand the visibility of the genre and lead to increased sales for everyone. The argument may be true to a certain extent, but at what cost? Country artists have been crossing over to the pop charts for far longer than the past decade or two and even Patsy Cline chose songs with crossover appeal. Pop artists didn’t have the same luxury of crossing into multiple markets, but what if they start out as country….

Do artists who preach music without prejudice and proclaim that genres will become unimportant have the interests of country music at heart when they try to expand it and take it to new audiences, or is it about the money, no matter the costs? The real question I’m getting to is this: Is the expansion of country music at all costs a worthwhile goal? It’s a loaded question on multiple facets, but I’m hoping y’all have some interesting ideas on the topic.

  1. Lucas
    March 15, 2008 at 11:43 am Permalink

    I say, let’s get as much watered-down pop on country radio as possible. It will only help guys like me that maintain a sense of tradition in the long run. It’s happened before multiple times!

    Fans just start getting tired of it after a couple years.

    All the pop singers take over country for a while then… out of apparently nowhere…. BAM! A new line of neotraditionalists come in that are more fun than the pop singers with a much better sound and just take it back over. The neotraditionalists stick around for extremely long amounts of time while the pop singers have only a couple years on the charts. Refer to Alan Jackson, Garth, Strait, Kenny, you get the drift.

    That’s my take.

  2. Lucas
    March 15, 2008 at 11:44 am Permalink

    That sounded wrong, refer to them as the neotraditionalists, not the pop singers. :)

  3. bobby
    March 15, 2008 at 11:50 am Permalink

    i don’t have a problem with artists who expand the country genre if they do it well. artists who take the best elements of rock or pop and mix them with the best elements of country can make great music. unfortunately the artist nowadays who i think really stands out for doing htis is keith urban. i just love the mix of all the genres that he puts into his music and the end result is so unique.
    artists such as rascal flats on the other hand have poor lyrics, poor vocals and all of their songs sound the same, but yet they are one of the main bearers of country music to non country listeners.
    i think taylor swift is talented, but she isn’t really the singer i would want non-country listeners to listen to at this time, but when the themes of her songs mature i think she might represent country music better

  4. bobby
    March 15, 2008 at 11:52 am Permalink

    oh, and i find it annoying that artists such as jessica simpson who are not country are just joining the genre for another chance of success

  5. Lucas
    March 15, 2008 at 12:57 pm Permalink

    Oh… come on! Jessica Simpson is country THROUGH AND THROUGH! Haha, just kidding. I agree.

  6. Paul W Dennis
    March 15, 2008 at 2:44 pm Permalink

    It’s a long standing argument with no clear answer. The expansion of the music is important but where to draw the line?

    Eddy Arnold , the “Tennessee Plowboy” transitioned his music over time to where there was no trace of Tennessee twang or grit left in either his voice or musical arrangments. After 1968’s “Then You Can Tell Me Goodbye” there was nothing to distinguish him from any other bland middle-of-the-road pop singer. His post 1968 output was even more bland and un-country that Rascall Flatts is today, if you can imagine such a thing

    Ray Price had a period of producing bland pop music before turning back to the “Cherokee Cowboy” sound that made him famous.

    Even the legendary Webb Pierce produced some bland pop records although his voice was nothing but country.

    Lose not hope, the next neo-traditional tidal wave is on the horizon. Patience, it’ll get here and it may be led by someone from the pop side like it was when Conway Twitty “went country”

  7. john
    March 15, 2008 at 7:57 pm Permalink

    No one should think consciously of “expanding the genre” or “bringing in a wider audience” at all. Record labels should just concentrate on signing really original and super-talented singers and bands. Not signing average-talent, sound-the-same-as acts like they keep signing. There’s GOT to be better talent than some of these folks getting major label deals.

  8. Rick
    March 15, 2008 at 7:59 pm Permalink

    The expansion of the boundaries of what constitutes “country music” will just keep diluting the format until the real, traditional element is erased from the genre. Its like making a soup where you add in every possible ingredient until the taste becomes unrecognizable. These newer totally pop and rock oriented so-called country artists attract fans and listeners who often hate twangy, traditional country music. Some would argue that after extended exposure on radio they will warm to traditional country and embrace it. Although this does likely happen with some listeners, I think many others just want the twangy stuff to go away forever, and I think a lot of Top 40 country radio programmers feel the same way…

    The bigger issue is that many Top 40 mainstream radio programmers are intentionally looking for pop-rock artists with the broadest market appeal. They are leading the charge of those who would marginalize traditional country music in order to gain a bigger listening audience of pop-rock fans. Listeners who primarily like tradtional country are considered expendable and are tossed overboard without a second thought in order to get bigger market share numbers that determine ad revenues.

    As much as I wish a “new traditionalist” movement would sweep mainstream country radio like it did in the mid 1980’s, I’m not expecting it. The consolidation of radio station ownership into the hands of large corporations in the 1990’s radically changed the dynamic between radio stations and their listeners when locally owned stations became part of corporate conglomerates. These corporations have no love of and respect for traditional country music, but they are staffed with people who love pop and rock music to be sure. These people will keep the trend towards pop-rock dominating country radio into the forseeable future.

    The most frightening recent trend is artists like Taylor Swift and Carrie Underwood attracting new young girls to country radio. These same young gals are often huge fans of Hannah Montana who could become the biggest artist on mainstream country radio if these little girls decide to join forces. Billy Ray Cyrus’ recent top 10 single only moved up the charts when they took the original Billy ray solo version and remixed it to include Miley. Will “The Jonas Brothers” be the next Rascal Flatts? It reminds me of a bumper sticker I saw that read: “Never Underestimate The Power of a Large Group of Stupid People”…..

  9. Guy
    March 15, 2008 at 8:01 pm Permalink

    With some of these male acts they are currently promoting, it’s obvious the labels just aren’t looking hard enough for truly outstanding talent to sign. (I mean, Jason Aldean … come on ….)

  10. Baron Lane
    March 15, 2008 at 9:16 pm Permalink

    All genres are derivative and therefore elastic. What we think of as country music is a blend of Irish, African and Spanish influences. In other words, it’s a mutt to start with.

    Some of the artists that move into country seem to be taking as much a bean-counter view of the increase in their market-share approach as they do in producing their image and music. Plotted, calculated and void of any artistic merit or passion.

    Some artists, like Van Morrison and Teddy Thompson (son of folk-rock musicians Richard and Linda Thompson) move into country music seeming to pay respects and give testament to the work of the greats. It’s pretty easy to tell the carpetbaggers from the disciples for those that care to look. I say let ‘em come, country music is stronger than their crap and is here to stay.

  11. Lucas
    March 15, 2008 at 9:36 pm Permalink

    I don’t understand why labels don’t just throw somebody they think is talented to the proper division anymore. If you’re a country label only, heck, open up a pop division and get your pop singer on pop radio!

  12. Jaime
    March 15, 2008 at 9:50 pm Permalink

    Is Jason Aldean low talent? Guy, I am interested in your take on this.

  13. Paul W Dennis
    March 15, 2008 at 10:50 pm Permalink

    Aldean is pretty mediocre by any standard; however, he is not terrible, and given the right song can do a presentable job with it.

  14. Mike W.
    March 15, 2008 at 11:01 pm Permalink

    No, but like a lot of things, the more popular something gets, the less quality it becomes. I worry that the same will happen with the Austin music scene, sure for every REALLY talented artist/band like Randy Rogers, Wade Bowen, Jason Boland, Drew Kennedy, Rodney Hayden, Stoney Larue, Cross Canadian Ragweed, Aaron Watson, Dale Watson, Chris Knight, Radney Foster etc. that we will start to see more artists/bands try to copy their formula and the product will be hurt in the long run. I do think the one thing that might help stop this from happening in Austin is the fact the fans tend to be VERY harsh critics and need to be “proven” that you, as an artist, are worthy of their support.

    And let’s be realistic here, part of the reason, hell the only reason so many pop artists and American Idol rejects are trying to go Country is because it’s one of the few formats around today that, while still being hurt by downloading, record sales are not being hurt as much as other genres, like Pop music. Though really, that’s less fans fault (for people like myself that use itunes) and more the record companies and the RIAA being dinosouars who cannot accept the fact that demand for CD’s where, if your lucky, it has 5-6 good songs on it, is not as high as it once was.

  15. Matt B.
    March 16, 2008 at 2:58 am Permalink

    Mike W., Country sales were hurt DRASTICALLY last year. more than “manstream” genres.

    As for the topic at hand, I believe that Canada’s country charts are a good example of what SHOULD be played on mainstream radio. They have everything mixed in up there. A soul-based artist like Johnny Reid (with some T. Graham Brown-like vocals), traditionalists like George Canyon, mainstream artists like Paul Brandt, folkies like Carolyn Dawn Johnson and so on. It’s really a melting pot.

    That’s always been part of country’s appeal, even when ‘neo-traditionalism’ took over the charts. Country has a wide-ranging audience and it’s a good place for many artists to go and try their luck. “Gone Country?” sure, but the song still is the ‘winner’ most of the time and that’s what’s gonna weed out the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ of the genre.

  16. Baron Lane
    March 16, 2008 at 7:41 am Permalink

    Add to expansion one another I believe does it from the hear, Snoop Dogg…no really. On his new release “Ego Trippin” the Dogg has enlisted Whitey Ford (AKA Everlast from late the Irish hip-hop group House Of Pain, and can be heard on the opening cut of TNTs Saving Grace) to write and play guitar on “My Medicine.” Dogg even gives a shout out the Johnny Cash (A real American gangster) and it’s got chronic references then a Willie Nelson roast (which I hope happens!)

    This will bring more kids to country music than anything Nashville can concoct, and it’s pretty damn good to boot.

  17. Guy
    March 16, 2008 at 7:51 am Permalink

    Yes, like Paul said, Aldean is a flatliner. Just not much there. I’m sure he’s a great guy and a hard worker, but he’s an example of mediocre acts that get signed and promoted. Some even eventually become big stars. Aldean looks like the next Kenny Chesney (the #1 example of my point).

  18. Lucas
    March 16, 2008 at 8:54 am Permalink

    Even though all the pros say the CD is dead, I beg to differ. You start making CDs cheaper than downloading and put more good songs rather than filler on there, you’ll see the sales go back up. Not allowing downloading is a way to go to get the profit back up too. Worked for Garth and the Eagles. Yeah, I know, I know - “but they’re Garth and The Eagles”.

  19. Brady Redding
    March 16, 2008 at 9:31 am Permalink

    The expansion of country music in my opinion is inevitable now days due to the internet! I mean after all everyone has an opinion about the music they want to listen to! Major Labels think they know what the people want to hear, now they can go listen to their favorite artists on the inter net practically for free anyways nowdays and decide for themselves what they really want to listen to. Interestingly enough, I was very fortunate to get to know and write songs with Howard “Crocket” Hausey in Dec.1993 and worked with him for a year until he passed away with cancer in Dec.1994!Howard wrote hit songs for Johnny Horton in the 50’s such as “Honky Tonk Man”, “Whispering Pines”"Slew Foot the Bear,”One Woman Man and many others! He had told me a few times that he thought “Honky Tonk Man” was the worst piece of shit he ever wrote and even told me that he didn’t even like the cut on his song from Dwight Yoakum when Dwight came out with it in 1986-87! He did however go on to tell me that he really enjoyed the royalty checks from (BMI)
    over the last years of his life,lol, from Dwight’s cut on his song and told me he wished he had written a few more piece of shit songs like that one,lol! He did come to respect Dwight for what he did for country music and was always thankful for those checks that came in,lol! But when it came to the subject on the current state of country music in 1994 on the emergence of Garth!He had his own opinion of where he thought country music was headed! He told me right before he died and I really can’t believe it to this day!
    He told me in 1994 that Garth would push country music to far and that after that country would become pop/rock in the future! Interestingly enough, he also told me that music runs in cycles and it will always come back around to the traditional sound eventually and to not worry when country goes pop/rock! But how long will we have to wait for that to happen I mean it’s 14 years later! Country acts such as George Strait, my hero will never have to worry about the expansion of country music because they’ve already made their mark in the genre! But traditional country artists like myself in 2008 have to worry! When I finally received my opportunity to go Nashville and record at the best and with the best in 1999 and 2000 I really thought when I got there that they were going to help me record a pop/rock/ country cd,lol! Boy was I was wrong and was very surprised when I retuned to Texas with my new Nashville cd and realized that I was traditional as they come!
    I can only hope at this point that my friend and mentor Howard Hausey was right about country music
    and how it always swings back in cycles to the traditional sounds! Hey, after all everyone has an opinion! I mean here I am a country music singer/songwriter living in Texas and I don’t even think that the current stream of Texas country artists are really country anymore, are they? I mean ,hey, even I’ve recorded some pop/rock country songs,lol and I love alot of different styles of music! Anyways I thought this was a great topic!

    Sincerely, Brady Redding
    http://www.myspace.com/textronictroubadours

  20. Kent
    March 16, 2008 at 10:56 am Permalink

    I agree about Canadian country music being very good. Newcomer Crystal Shawanda has got a huge hit on her hands with “You Can Let Go”. Emerson Drive and Doc Walker are some other great bands of country music. And there is definitely some variety. Although I personally don’t like him, Gord Bamford is continually bringing new and original music. Canada has a lot of non-country talent too, such as pop rock group Hedley, and the rock band Billy Talent. It’s a wonder that so many of these talented people aren’t more popular outside of Canada.

    It is true that “Ready, Set, Don’t Go” only became popular when Miley Cyrus was added to the song. But honestly, I can see why. Billy Ray’s version was completely dull and boring to me, even if the thought was nice. When Miley was added to the song, her vocals livened the song up, and made Billy’s contrasting vocals more appealing. Suddenly, I loved the song. Normally, I don’t like Miley Cyrus, but I thought this was quite good.

    And you guys will probably hate me for this, because I am one of the “stupid people” referred to from the bumper sticker (don’t worry, I don’t take offense): I actually like the Jonas Brothers. I wouldn’t be sad if they became the next Rascal Flatts. But I’m like pop rock music, and that’s exactly what it is: pop rock music, so I don’t expect this kind of music will show up on the country scene anytime soon, because they are very separate genres.

  21. Matt B.
    March 17, 2008 at 5:14 am Permalink

    Kent,

    Someone out there is looking for a “Jonas Brothers” like band for country, you know they are.

  22. Kent
    March 17, 2008 at 2:41 pm Permalink

    I suppose you’re right. What better for a record label than to get another young act to appeal to all of the crazy teenage fans out there, someone who will partly appeal to this young audience because they are partly pop rock based. And I suppose this points directly back to the topic of our discussion. Is this what us as listeners want for country music?

    I think it would be nice to have a few acts like this in country music (and we need a few males too, not just Taylor Swift and Carrie Underwood, not that Carrie Underwood is bad and Taylor Swift doesn’t have her moments), as long as it doesn’t compromise the genre. But I guess it depends who you talk to as to what compromising the genre really means. A lot of people might be turned off by Big & Rich and Rascal Flatts, but there are lots of people that like them too. There are lots of people who like Kenny Chesney, while others think he is dull and boring at times, and should stop wasting our time with songs like Shiftwork and get back to his memorable moments.

  23. Doug
    March 18, 2008 at 9:54 pm Permalink

    It’s impossible to truly judge an artist’s motive for “going country,” after they’ve been established in pop, rock, or whatever. So I think you’ve got to let the finished product speak for itself.

    Bob Seger, Bon Jovi, Jewel, Sheryl Crow, etc. Use your own ears to determine their authenticity.

    The one thing I can say for absolute certainty, is that in my opinion, it’s pretty sad when Van Morrison, an Irishman known for his “blue-eyed soul,” jazz and mystical influences, puts out the best dang country album in years (Pay The Devil).

    Just my opinion, but he grew up listening to old-time country, and you can tell that it just drips from every pore in his body on this album. It sounds to me that he put his heart and soul in to this project, and is paying tribute to music he loves. It’s the most authentic country music I’ve heard in a long, long time.

  24. Robb
    April 21, 2008 at 6:35 pm Permalink

    Kid Rock has probably turned more kids onto Country and Southern Rock than anybody else I can think of in the last decade. But then again I don’t think too good sometimes.

  25. James
    April 21, 2008 at 6:51 pm Permalink

    I love country music in all it’s forms. I disagree with the dispersions cast on Taylor Swift and Jason Aldean and I do NOT subscribe to the belief that somehting sucks just because it is popular. I have always thought southern rock belonged on country radio and folk as well. They are country music’s cousins.

    Expand country all you want, it’s good for it and the fans will alwys know when you have crossed the line to pop.

  26. Thomas
    April 23, 2008 at 12:47 pm Permalink

    yes! it’s a worthwhile goal to expand country at all costs. in order to find the next genre-defining artist the industry has to test and try quite a few people (and their music). of those only a few eventually make it to the top and probably less than a handful per decade can confidently try to “fill their shoes” over time.

    this is not cheap and requires reaching the biggest possible audience, which is the pop market.

    if the next generation of country fans gets in touch with country music via kenny chesney, rascal flatts, carrie underwood or taylor swift so be it - i can’t see any fault with that.

    some of them will not stop exploring till they reach that famous sign that says: beer, bait and ammo …and by then they are hooked.

    by the way, my first country experience was when i watched glen campell singing “galveston” on an italian tv-show, broadcasted in switzerland, back in the sixties. i was a 6 or 7 year old swiss kid back then but hooked ever since.

  27. Razor X
    May 20, 2008 at 9:56 am Permalink

    The problem with pop and rock acts crossing over into country music is that they are pushing real country performers off radio playlists, as radio programming directors are all too happy to make room for the pop/rockers that they think will bring in more listeners.

    The argument that this kind of cross-genre activity would attract more people to country music used to be a valid one, in the days when it was still possible to hear traditional country music on the radio alongside the newer, more progressive stuff. But sadly, the only thing this new “poptry” has succeeded in doing is sweeping real country music off the charts, and alienating long-time country music fans like me, who now have to listen to Americana stations if we want to have any chance of hearing some decent music.

  28. Peter Durward Harris
    May 20, 2008 at 11:06 am Permalink

    I have eclectic tastes in music, ranging over a time span of 90 years from the 1920s to the present, and covering a variety of genres including pop, rock, jazz, soul, easy listening, folk, bluegrass and crossover classical as well as country music in all its forms. When all is said and done, my favorite of all is what we now call traditional country music. As I’ve pointed out previously, very little of it was traditional at the time it was created because country music is ever-changing. It was never a pur-bred pedigree dog - it was a mongrel from the beginning, evolving from folk music and creating its own path by the absorption of other influences. Hank Williams is now seen as the embodiment of traditional country music, but he was revoutionary in his day as you’ll realize if you compare his music to that of Roy Acuff and the others that preceded him. For a variety of reasons, I haven’t followed the contemporary scene closely in recent years. I think there has to be continuous evolution, but I just hope that country music doesn’t lose touch with its roots.

  29. Stormy
    May 20, 2008 at 11:39 am Permalink

    What “expansion” of country music? More artists doesn’t mean anything is expanded, it just means more of the same old same old.

  30. Razor X
    May 20, 2008 at 11:43 am Permalink

    Peter Durward Harris said: ” … I just hope that country music doesn’t lose touch with its roots.”

    It already has.

  31. Thomas
    May 30, 2008 at 12:19 pm Permalink

    that’s impossible - it would mean that country music is dead.

  32. Razor X
    May 30, 2008 at 12:55 pm Permalink

    Thomas, it’s not dead yet but it’s definitely on life support. Have you not heard some of the pitiful excuses for country music that’s playing on radio these days?

  33. Ellie
    May 31, 2008 at 8:58 pm Permalink

    You tell ‘em, RAXOR X.. I like all kinds of music but I love my real country. I don’t believe in calling it country when it’s NOT. Wake up people!!

  34. Vicki
    June 13, 2008 at 11:55 pm Permalink

    I like a lot of genres of music. I admit that I never watched American Idol until about the 5th show of the 4th season. Something about the shy Oklahoma girl singing with the big voice, caught my attention. Then I was hooked and had to see the outcome. Even though I loved songs by Randy Travis, George Strait and Martina McBride, I never really got deep in country music until Carrie showed me through her singing how good it could be. I think she surprised a lot of Americans on that show what country was about. Everything was fine it seemed until every girl singer that hit it big after Carrie was blonde it seemed. Now we have Julianne and (cough, vomit) Jessica. Where are the new brunette singers? I can think of one power singer and that’s Ashton Shepherd. Two girls of country are going too far to pop. Jennifer Nettles..”All I want to do” is totally a pop song with a Georgia accent. I have Sugarland’s first CD. I bought the second one and was totally disappointed how “Pop” sounding it was. Only “Stay” had merit. Taylor Swift..has a MTV show? What? Oh and the Jonas brothers are doing to Pop what Taylor has done to Country, their album is swashing albums by Justin Timberlake and Madonna. Do you ever get the feeling that teenagers are running the charts? and life in general?

  35. Vicki
    June 14, 2008 at 12:06 am Permalink

    Oh and I also can’t stand Carrie and Taylor being lumped together as one. Carrie can sing, Taylor can’t. But other’s notice it too: John Rich on Nashville Star (Disaster show of the year) says “Taylor has the best Country sensibilities and that’s why she is country’s biggest star” Note he said sensibilities (business savvy chrisma) but not singer? Also, Joe Don Rooney says of Taylor: “Taylor is absolutely a bright spot in the business right now, and she’s [an] amazing, talented, great songwriter, great performer,” Note did he say singer? I admit she can work the crowd, she’s a performer/songwriter.

  36. Tim
    June 22, 2008 at 6:28 pm Permalink

    It’s not about the money in my opinion, it’s just an example of how much country music has influenced many different styles of music and people’s lives. Jessica Simpson is nothing but an example because she has enough fame and money as it is(where’s the need for more). She just has more control over her career than she did when she was younger(father and mainstream media). Will she be accepted, that’s up to the fans, and that’s the way it should be. Country and Gospal music has influenced every style of music since the begining of this great country. Has it changed?, yes and for the better. Because the true meaning of gospel and country has and always will be understood and appreciated by all music fans, if not, then they are more than likely angry and very judgemental. Let them come in and take a shot, and let the fans decide because i think country music lovers know what is acceptable and good.

Leave a Comment


Sponsor

Tagged In This Article

Current Discussion

  • bresenolouie: In this haunting tale of the young widow, she is confused about the sudden tragi...
  • Julie: I'm only an occasional reader of this site, and I'm beginning to see why. This ...
  • bresenolouie: Chris N. is perfectly right!!! This is a universal situation - the "REALITY IN ...
  • Dustin: JMO: Matt, just wait for this video to come to help you understand, its ok to ad...
  • Stormy: Well then,revenge first and investigation later. The song has a huge poblem wit...
  • Brady Vercher: Nice try, but I didn't suggest the song wasn't about vengeance. My willful inter...
  • Chris N.: Yeah! It’s just like how the Europeans learned to speak the Native Americans...
  • JR: I love this song! Where can I get a copy to balst from my speakers as I drive th...
  • Stormy: How does one interpret the song to be about something other than vengance?...
  • Sarah: I don't care what anyone says the song "Back that thang up" is AWESOME!! Justi...

Recently Reviewed Albums

  • Randy Travis - Around The Bend
  • Ray Scott - Crazy Like Me
  • Reckless Kelly - Bulletproof
  • Mark Chesnutt - Rollin’ With The Flow
  • Becky Schlegel - For All The World To See
  • Jewel - Perfectly Clear
  • Eleven Hundred Springs - Country Jam
  • Julianne Hough