Your Take: Teen Sensations
Brody included Craig Shelburne’s CMT article “Fifteen Teens Who Found Country Music Success Before Taylor Swift” in Monday’s News Roundup. On the heels of Swift’s nearly unstoppable rise into country royalty, Shelburne took the opportunity to look back on other teen sensations in the genre:
Taylor Swift is undeniably country music’s most popular teenager today. At age 18, she spent six weeks at No. 1 with “Our Song” — which she wrote for a school talent show. By the time she turns 20 in December, she’ll have sold 10 million albums, sold out an arena tour, graced countless magazine covers and solidified her spot as one of the most popular musicians of the decade.
However, she’s certainly not the first fresh-faced youngster to make a name for herself in Nashville. Here are 15 more whippersnappers who ultimately found brilliant careers in country music.
Shelburne went on to list some of Swift’s teen predecessors, including Lynn Anderson, The Everly Brothers, Crystal Gayle, Alison Krauss, Brenda Lee, Barbara Mandrell, Dolly Parton, LeAnn Rimes, Jean Shepard, Ricky Skaggs, Keith Whitley, Marty Stuart, Tanya Tucker, Hank Williams Jr. and Wynonna.
Here are a few of the highlights:
The Everly Brothers
Phil Everly was 18 when “Bye Bye Love” and “Wake Up Little Susie” spent a combined 15 weeks atop the country chart in 1957. (Don Everly had turned 20 earlier that year.) Highly respected for their wholesome harmonies, as well as keeping their business affairs in Nashville, they were elected to the Country Music Hall of Fame in 2001.Ricky Skaggs and Keith Whitley
These two friends put a bluegrass band together at age 15, and when Ralph Stanley heard them play, he hired them both within a year. The young Kentuckians eventually found their way to Nashville, collectively notching 16 No. 1 hits. Skaggs remains a Grammy favorite, and Whitley is often cited as a key influence among the generation that followed.Hank Williams Jr.
The family tradition was strongly encouraged by his mother, Audrey. Thus, his first single charted in 1964 when the 14-year-old took his father’s “Long Gone Lonesome Blues” to No. 5. He duplicated that feat at 17 with his own “Standing in the Shadows.” Today, at 60, he remains a popular live draw and an apparent shoo-in to the Country Music Hall of Fame.
Who is your favorite artist to get an early taste of success in country music? Have you followed them their entire careers, or did you catch on later in their lives? If you’ve followed them the whole way, do you prefer their earlier performances, or their more seasoned offerings?
If you enjoyed this article, be sure to subscribe to our feed or receive updates via email.
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Current Discussion
- bputt: WOW how old are you guys that are knockin the new upbeat country songs? if you dont like it go ...
- glasnost: Well Done! I Like it!
- Jon: *facepalm* By an reasonable way of understanding the term, Juli is a professional journalist. I don't know that I would ...
- john: I remember watching the night the Duke of whatever was inducted and was just amazed because i fully expected Webb ...
- Thomas: ...does "being better off in a pine box on freight train back to georgia" count a as burial instruction? doug ...
- Thomas: ...this is a hit song. there's tons of fools out there, who will recognise themselves in those lyrics. how do ...
- sam (sam): I think K was right to call the review "unprofessional." It was also "immature and juvenile," in my opinion. And ...
- K: "@K Agree with her assessment or not, there is absolutely nothing unprofessional about Juli’s review. OK, proffesional was probably the ...
- Laura: First, while I agree that Carrie's main strength is singing, she does show potential as a talented songwriter in Temporary ...
- Kim: Hey...I shop at vintage boutiques and I drink smoothies and I still don't like this.
While the voice of country’s future took home this year’s big honor, a legendary voice from country music’s past scored a win for Album Of The Year. Check out the winners in The 9513's 2nd Annual Country Music Awards now!
Josh Turner's fourth album, Haywire, furthers his reputation as one of the leading men in contemporary country, a true, traditional voice in an ever-changing Nashville scene.
Having played on more than 500 albums and toured with artists that range from Hank III to Dolly Parton, Randy Kohrs has become one of the go-to musicians when there’s a need for a resophonic guitar
Sammy Kershaw – “Better Than I Used To Be”
As the title track off his upcoming album, “Better Than I Used to Be” is a straight-up look back on the career of a country music staple.
Emily West Featuring Keith Urban – “Blue Sky” Emily West turns in a gorgeous performance on “Blue Sky,” hitting notes few of her contemporaries can reach.
What does Alan Jackson like on his eggs?
Cheese and corn; he still likes bologna; a load of salsa; hens? Answers to the questions you'd never dream of asking. (
In each and every instance, the best country albums of the past ten years were built on the backs of songs -- stories about you and me from birth to death and stories that paint landscapes rooted in every region of America and beyond. These are the top country albums of the decade.


56 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
October 17, 2009 at 7:27 am Permalink
The current country teen queen rage is killing the music. Hell, they ain’t even country artists. There are a few folks out there that like country that are not 18 year of girls that broke up with their boyfriend. I fear the music is going through a long bad stretch, at least out of Nashville. It’s time to retreat to the fringes. At least Jamey Johnson has a new one coming out.
October 17, 2009 at 8:08 am Permalink
Given that teenagers are easily to manipulate, its no surprise producer driven Nashville loves them. Sure they can surprise, Leeanne Rhymes “Blue” sounded like Patsy Cline had come back in a 13 year old body. But given the drama worthy of a VH1 “Behind the Music” episode with her personal life, I have to ask why any parents allow their children to either act or perform until they are adults.
October 17, 2009 at 8:35 am Permalink
Generally I tend not to be a big teen artist fan, mostly because often the material they choose isnt very believable for their age or they are so pop sounding it turns me off.
That said, I really like Hank Jr’s earlier recordings, I still love his outlaw stuff, but prior to that he recorded some really good traditional Country songs, namely “I’ll Think of Something”.
I also thought Blaine Larsen had a lot of potential, but he seems to have slipped to the indie record label scene and doesnt appear to be much of a player in Nashville at this time.
October 17, 2009 at 9:17 am Permalink
Jessica Andrews hit big at what, 15, 16?
October 17, 2009 at 9:21 am Permalink
What about Marie Osmond? She was 14 when Paper Roses hit #1 on the country and adult contmporary charts and #5 on the pop charts in 1973!
October 17, 2009 at 9:22 am Permalink
What about Marie Osmond? She was 14 when Paper Roses hit #1 on the country and adult contemporary charts and #5 on the pop charts in 1973!
October 17, 2009 at 9:22 am Permalink
…but come on…. I mean, Donnie is a little bit rock’n'roll.
October 17, 2009 at 10:56 am Permalink
Letting my 80’s roots show, probably my favorite teenage singer was Tiffany. And I remember telling my dad that she was the greatest singer ever and would be a lengend.
October 17, 2009 at 11:18 am Permalink
BWAHA! Wow Stormy, that second sentence was (possibly accidentally, possibly not) comical genius when read in a sarcastic tone.
October 17, 2009 at 11:38 am Permalink
I’m not a fan of the teen stars of today so much, and I wasn’t old enough to remember the artists I do like as teen stars. Hank Williams Jr., Tanya Tucker, and Wynonna were all singing adult songs when they hit as teenagers, so when I found their music and even knowing they were basically children when they recorded that music, I don’t usually think about that Tanya was only 15 when she recorded ‘What’s Your Mama’s Name Child’ or that a teenage Hank Williams Jr. recorded ‘Standing In the Shadows’ or ‘Cajun Baby’. It’s all good music to me.
That’s the main difference I see with today’s teen stars – way back when, they were trying their damnedest to appeal to the adult market, since adults made up the bulk of the record-buying public. But now that the tides have turned and labels are focusing their energy and resources on selling to the teenage crowd, the tone and mood of the music is bound to change to reflect actual teenage problems. And in the process, the adult fans of the genre are left very disenchanted.
October 17, 2009 at 12:31 pm Permalink
@zaynjones
Thank God for Miranda Lambert, Jamey Johnson & Keith Urban.
Taylor is a great POP writer. That’s it. She isn’t country. I’m disgusted by the majority of Nashville right now. Y’all remember the steel guitar? Fiddle? Let’s get back to it. I know music evolves, but it shouldn’t evolve into another genre. Most of the real country music sucks, too.
Nashville.. The music was at it’s best when it wasn’t about money. I’m willing to bet you would make more if it wasn’t about money. Y’all need to build artists, not one-hit wonders!!
I’m so disappointed.
I love country music. It’s what I’m gonna do with my life. Hopefully, I can be a part of what brings it back to the basics.
October 17, 2009 at 1:31 pm Permalink
Zany Jones I’m not going to get into the Taylor thing right now, but I’ll tell you I agree with the rest of what you said, good music is not about the money.
To quote Dusty (George Strait) Chandler, “In the early days, it was all about the music. We did it because we loved it. Lately it seems like it’s just for the smoke, and the glitz, and the money. And it’s real easy to get caught up in that.”
Finally someone who gets it and plans to do something about it. Good Luck with changing the Country Music ‘Industry’.
October 17, 2009 at 2:35 pm Permalink
Adam Gregory was making hits in Canada when he was 16 or so, always have been a fan of his (“What it takes” being ignored.)
October 17, 2009 at 3:18 pm Permalink
It isn’t so much about Taylor ever being a teen sensation as it is about the Industry’s failure to realize that it is hiding under a false Pop Business Model facade with a Traditional Country Music Model in place. And I agree…the fact that Country Music seems to be too focused on one demographic of listener is making it difficult to take any of the Artists it is promoting today as “serious” artists, let alone the music they are playing on the radio by them. Taylor is simply playing a role to bring in a younger demographic of listener, and that is her only role. To me, the Industry is shooting itself in the foot and has a foolish strategy because it has let personality and image take over quality, creativity, and talent to appease that audience they are catering to exclusively. They are basically just playing poker with a pair of Queens (Taylor and Carrie), and trying to bluff the audience into believing they have a Full House. They keep throwing cards down on the table hoping they can somehow turn a Deuce into an Ace (Daughtry performing at the CMA’s just to bring in more fans who otherwise would not watch the show, Crossover Artists like Kid Rock, Jewel, and Darius Rucker going to Country are good examples). The problem is they have thrown out the good hand that got them to the table in the first place. I just hope they kept an Ace up their sleeve somewhere, and play it. But right now, I’m not sure if there are any Aces left in the deck. Maybe it’s time they threw out their hand they are currently playing and reshuffle the deck and deal a new hand before it’s too late and they put all their money on the hand they are currently playing that is sure to get beaten eventually. A royal flush always beats a pair anyway.
So my answer to the question is…There really is no comparison of Taylor and the other teens who made it in Country Music. Because back then it was all about the money for the love of music, and today it is obviously about something else entirely…music for the love of money. There roles have been reversed, and it is killing the Industry and the quality and creativity of art. And to use another analogy, instead of the Country Music Industry creating something new, they simply change the color of the taco and put a fancy new name on it: “Black Jack Taco” (“New Country”)…and act like it’s something new. I’m just wondering what they will come up with next when people stop buying their current offering. And if people will buy it. Stay tuned…
October 17, 2009 at 3:55 pm Permalink
The best that I can recall were Louie Roberts, Tanya Tucker and Hank Jr.
October 17, 2009 at 4:07 pm Permalink
Phil: When do you suppose people will stop buying this current offering? It’s here and people are buying it by the truckloads. Do you have a guestimation of when you believe this current state of country music will fade away? When will the “Industry” have to count their losses, because it looks to me like they will be counting their winnings?
Daughtry singing at the CMA’s will only add to an already entertaining group of performances!
October 17, 2009 at 4:15 pm Permalink
So I am a teenage girl who loves country music. I love Miranda Lambert, I love Jamey Johnson, but yet I enjoy the occasional Taylor Swift song (as long as its not you belong with me.) People keep saying that teens like to relate to teens. But I don’t get it, some of my favorite artists are Dierks Bentley and Trace Adkins. I just don’t get the hype that being young brings in record sales. I understand that in many other genres, being yound is a requirement, however, in country music I love the old ones, just as much as the young ones.
October 17, 2009 at 4:23 pm Permalink
I have to say, I agree with Phil. The way that industry executives are over promoting new artists, and trying to force out what little older, quality country music there is out there will bring some interest in the short term, but eventually people will get sick of it.
I am personally more optimistic, because I think that with the internet and mass communication devices available it will be easier for people to find some level of quality music, from those who do it because they love it. But sadly, the industry probably will just reach the point that the fans will stop caring, the mainstream will pick up the bulk of ‘country’ fans with the pop garbage, and country music will fade into obscurity to the point that no station will find it viable to play anything close to traditional country. Those of us who do like country will be left to reminisce in the glory of some old Haggard and Strait.
Hopefully, time will reveal musicians from today to be great, just as it did with the greats of the past. We would never know of the longevity of the emotions in any of Hank’s music if we didn’t have decades to hear it, evaluate it, and re-evaluate it. Classics are not made over night.
October 17, 2009 at 4:46 pm Permalink
I’d have to say that Hank Jr. is my favorite teen star. His old stuff really showcases how emotive he could be back then.
October 17, 2009 at 5:14 pm Permalink
I’m digging Blaine Larsen, but maybe it’s just the local connection.
October 17, 2009 at 8:38 pm Permalink
Dan…to answer your question, I don’t know when. But it will happen eventually. And to say that Country Music is bringing in money by the bucketloads is only a short term solution to a larger problem they have created for the future. And since when does money equate to quality? McDonald’s sells million of hamburgers every year. Does that mean they’re good? I am optimistic that something good will eventually come out of it and that this is just a phase the Industry as a whole is going through. But something must be done soon to get it back on course or it will continue down this path of no return. Like I said, it has always been about money. But the Music being created has taken a backseat to personality and image. It’s time the Industry put the actual music back in the front seat of the car, and let the artists have control of where they want to take that music. Let the artists define a generation again, and the audience decide what they want to hear…not some corporate big wig who sits in his office all day staring at the latest numbers on wall street all day decide what to play on the radio, and what the public will hear 3 days before it even gets put on the radio. It’s no wonder nothing new gets created and we end up being served the same songs by the same artists day after day. All you have to do is look at the Country Charts to figure that out. Just my opinions of course. But only time will tell how it all plays out in the future.
October 17, 2009 at 10:34 pm Permalink
I think it has always been about the money, its a business and if they dont sell product they go under. In the old days if a record label had one big artist they could make enough money they could sign a lot of smaller artist and take a chance. It is not that way anymore. I remember when the Beatles came out and every band in England got signed to a record deal then Jefferson Airplane came out and every San Francisco band got signed, then Guns n Roses and every band in L.A. got a record deal, now its Nashvilles turn. Every pretty blonde girl in Nashville that can sing will get a deal but its not Taylors fault. She was just a 16 year old girl that put out a record that people liked enough to go out and buy it. I wonder how many of the people that complain about where country music is go out and buy cds of the artist they like? Put your money where your mouth is. All record labels are hurting and they are not going to put out music if it does not sell. Its ok if you dont like Taylors music but like it or not Taylor is helping to keep the boat afloat for awhile.
October 18, 2009 at 12:02 am Permalink
I’m not blaming Taylor…and I already said it’s always been about money. I am blaming the Industry though for the direction they have taken, and what I said was that it used to be about money for the love of music, and today it is about the music for the love of money. Big difference. And I wish I had artists that I do like today that I could go out and buy (Kristy Lee Cook is the only CD I have bought in the last 10 years, and even her single and CD was marketed exclusively to the one demographic the Industry is focusing on…but I have a very extensive music collection that expands many genres from the 60’s thru the 90’s). But this isn’t about me anyway. Or any one particular artist. It’s about the big picture and what it is doing to the quality of music overall and what the Artists of today are being forced to produce by the Industry to appease the new audience they are bringing in and focusing all of its attention on exclusively. And I will say right now that they are missing out and ignoring a huge audience they already had in the process…and I’m not sure if it’s too late to get that audience back or not (or even if they care enough to try). Dan basically said it best when he said those who don’t like the “New” Country Music can leave…and that is exactly what the Industry is telling some of its most loyal fans. That’s pretty sad (and dumb) if you ask me. It will come back to haunt them because the new audience they are bringing in are not loyal to Country Music…only to their “favorite” artist and the image and personality that is masquerading as Country Music at the moment. That is the Catch 22 the Industry finds itself facing in the future. All because of the short term profits and brainless marketing decisions it is making today.
October 18, 2009 at 12:33 am Permalink
“I wonder how many of the people that complain about where country music is go out and buy cds of the artist they like? Put your money where your mouth is.”
I’ve wondered about that myself… you’d think that since so many people prefer the traditional country that the latest Patty Loveless and Tanya Tucker albums (i.e.) would’ve sold a lot better than Toby Keith’s latest
October 18, 2009 at 2:41 am Permalink
No matter how much you may want it to stay the same, the only thing certain in life is change. What that means is – when you hope to maintain a standard for country music or any other music genre, you guarantee its demise. Country has to change to keep up with a changing country. The industry knows this and will always honor its pioneers. Taylor Swift is being played in nearly every country on the planet – and that makes her country’s preeminent artist. Like her or not, you should celebrate the fact she is bringing in audience to country that George Strait could never do. Who cares if she can’t sing like Patsy Cline? The next generation will decide what they like all by themselves.
October 18, 2009 at 3:15 am Permalink
It’s called marketing and promotion Nicolas…and right now the Industry is not marketing and promoting Patty Loveless and Tanya Tucker like they are Toby Keith because it does not fit in with their “New” Country brand they are focusing on exclusively. I’ve already explained the Traditional business model that Country Music uses, and how male artists are still given at least 5 times more radio play than female artists (maybe more). And then the Industry focuses its marketing and promotion on a couple of female artists at any given time to be the “Queens” of Country Music (the awards that Carrie and Taylor have won are more about the marketing and promotion than they are about the actual awards). It’s been going on for years. Tanya and Patty have had their day. Which explains why Carrie and Taylor are the only two current female artists who get the bulk of the radio play, make the Top 10 regularly on the charts at the moment, and are selling “truckloads” of music. I’m not even sure if comparing Patty Loveless and Tanya Tucker to Toby Keith is a very good example anyway, or if it even touches on the point I was trying to make about the current strategy Country Music is employing to bring in a new audience of listeners and disregard a huge demographic of listeners in the process. Maybe a better question would be why is it that the Industry is so focused on Carrie and Taylor to bring in these new listeners, and then giving all the radio play to male artists? And then in the process setting up a personality and popularity contest between all the other female artists just to get their songs heard on the radio by trying to copy what already worked for Carrie and/or Taylor by bringing in their own already established fanbase to compete with Carrie and Taylor (which is fruitless since the Industry is spending all of its money marketing and promoting Carrie and Taylor and gives them preferential treatment). It makes no sense to me. It doesn’t take too much thought or analysis to figure out what the Industry is doing…It’s nothing new that’s for sure. I just so happened to disagree with its strategy and dated Traditional business model (and trying to employ the same practices that work under a Pop Business Model in their Traditional Business Model at the same time). It’s a recipe for disaster in my opinion.
But your question is valid, even if the premises of the question are faulty because you do not take into account the male/female Artist gender gap that is still prevalent in Country Music today. The answer and conclusion is still the same either way.
October 18, 2009 at 3:26 am Permalink
Buddynoel…I wish I agreed with you, and it was that simple. But if you really think Taylor did this all by herself, and that the next generation will decide for themselves what they like (somebody else (ie. the industry and the media) will decide that for them by who they decide to publicize, market, and promote), you are only fooling yourself.
October 18, 2009 at 10:21 am Permalink
Personally I don’t care about the age of the performer I just ask that they not be boring.
Teenagers a few decades ago had experienced much more of life (real life, not some mediated version of it) then the teenagers of today, so when Loretta was singing about life in the holler and motherhood and Dolly was singing about a coat of many colors it was more interesting then some mall sentimentality that sounds like it was recited from a Freshman notebook.
As far as capturing new listeners, I’ll come down on the side of Americana for getting new ears that wouldn’t normally listen to mainstream country radio than whatever product needs to be produced to bring in the Disney crowd.
October 18, 2009 at 10:44 am Permalink
Nicholas: Here is where I have to point out that Neko Case’s first week sales were absolutely conprable with Toby’s.
October 18, 2009 at 11:05 am Permalink
Phil you are dead on with the pop model analogy. Nashville is going down the same slippery slope that the rest of the music industry did during the past two decades. Pop hits that radio ready for mass consumption which by their very nature must be short on depth. And we all know depth is needed for quality.
While much of the music biz has been suffering this decade, country music was experienceing some growth. It was built on a solid foundation of artists and a sound that appeals to many ages and demographics. Not so over the past couple of years. Pickin’s getting a bit slim of late.
Good thing the internet allows us all access to so many artists. The Americana scene is going great right now and while artists such as Buddy & Julie Miller will never sell close to what the Taylors and Carries do, at least great music gets out there and is easy to find.
Check out OtisGibb’s Grandpa Walked a Picket Line. Is it Nashville? Hardly. Is it even country? Sort of. What it is is great sonwriting and craft. If you like the Jamey Johnson check this out.
October 18, 2009 at 11:12 am Permalink
Phil,
The main problem with your approach to the marketing argument is the fact that both Tanya and Patty are on a large, major-distributed ‘indie’ which has as much, if not more than Toby Keith’s cash flow. They also were very popular through the same 12 years or there abouts. So the comparison with Toby is relevant. Ergo, the pre-release promotion by Time-Life/Saguaro Road should have matched that of Toby Keith’s own Show Dog Records. Add in the fact that there are audiences out there who claim to want what Tanya and Patty are selling more than what somebody like Toby sold his first week and those two should have sold more.
The thing that does separates Patty and Tanya from Toby is that he spends the radio promotional money to get his music on the charts (and up them). T-L/SR know that contemporary country music radio will not play their roots-y stuff next to Taylor Swift or the bombastic rock-leaning stuff a la Toby so why try to even get in that game. In stead, they used promotional tools on the internet which is on equal footing with Toby’s internet promotion campaign.
As for Neko Case, she has grown an audience that’s outside the fan audience that even Toby Keith attracts. If she had the radio audience that he had, she’d likely have scored a larger sales week than most any country artist has garnered this year.
October 18, 2009 at 12:02 pm Permalink
@ phil . it’s the gunsmoke syndrome , gunsmoke hits tv and bam! nothing on but westerns . that is why we have songs that sound to country not being played on radio , it’s the all or nothing attitude of radio.
Jewel tried for many years (8 i think) to have her songs played on country radio and her label would NOT even attempt it. when her contract was up she signed with somebody else.
It doesn’t bother me that musicians stretch the boundries of there genre but the all or nothing attitude of radio does bother me , they don’t get that we have room in our heads for more than one thought , they don’t understand that some days it’s desperado and others its life in the fast lane.
October 18, 2009 at 12:08 pm Permalink
Good points Matt B…but it’s still harder for female country artists to sell CD’s if the Country Industry continues to be a fraternity that gives preferential treatment to its male artists, and Country Radio continues playing at least 5 times more male artists than female artists. If the roles were reversed, I’m sure Tanya and Patty would be doing better than Toby Keith. So to me, comparing Patty Loveless and Tanya Tucker to Toby Keith is a bit misleading and unfair. Now, if the Country Audience prefers listening to male artists, that is only because that is what the Industry has created and made a demand for in the first place. I just wish the Industry would give a fair playing field to both its male and female artists, and this in turn would give the listeners a little more variety to listen to, and even help music sales across the board for both genders. Instead, they overly promote a couple of female artists (Carrie and Taylor at the moment), and give male artists all the radio play. The funny thing is, even the male artists sales are going down and can’t even compare to the sales of Carrie and Taylor because of the way the Industry has decided to focus almost all of its promotion and marketing on those two artists. It’s not Carrie and Taylor’s fault, but if the Industry continues to follow their Traditional model from the past and incorporate pieces of a Pop Business model at the same time, it is only a matter of time before Country Music will be fighting for its life to survive. I think all the elements are in place right now because of this, and the perfect storm is looming on the horizon for Country Music. But it’s not too late to turn the ship around and try a different approach and take a new direction before that storm hits. But time is running out.
As far as the Internet and technology goes…well, that’s just one more piece of the puzzle that has hurt Country Music and music in general because the Industry failed to take advantage of it from the beginnig when it had the chance. Instead it went about business as usual and didn’t look ahead to the future. The Music Industry has always been one or two steps behind technology, and has never really done a good job of keeping in touch with what the public wants and demands. The Internet made it easier for more artists to get their music heard, but it also made people believe that music didn’t have a price tag associated with it. Music, like all art and creation, is only worth what the person listening to it is willing to spend in the first place. Oh, and the fact that the Industry went after the people who were downloading music for free only hurt the Industry because they should have been looking at themselves as the cause of the problem in the first place for not looking ahead to the future (and charging $18 for a CD that costs less than a buck to produce and then raising those prices even when the production costs went down even further), and not been blaming the consumer for that problem. The Consumer/Industry relationship has always been shaky at best anyway.
October 18, 2009 at 6:49 pm Permalink
Phil,
It’s been tested time and time again, the female demographic (and many of the male demographics) like to hear male voices more than female voices. While I would love to have even a 60-40% or 50-50%, of male-female split on the airwaves, the testing proves otherwise. Like everything else, it’s not perfect and it never will be unless testing reflects a change in perception.
As for Carrie or Taylor, they’re not focusing their attention on them specifically except for the fact that both have huge cross-genre fan bases which help drive up their album sales #’s.
October 18, 2009 at 8:01 pm Permalink
OK Matt…I think this whole thing got a little off topic from my original point I was trying to make in the first place (which is how Taylor’s only job is to bring in a new listening audience). Somebody asked why Tanya and Patty weren’t as successful as Toby today, and I simply gave the answer. So you basically just helped prove my point, and added to the reason. Which is why I think it is ufair to make any comparisons between Patty and Tanya to Toby Keith.
I’ve already said my piece about Carrie and Taylor and how the Industry is focusing it’s attention on those two female artists. I could give countless more examples…but in the end, it is what it is, and they have done the job the Industry designed for them to do in the first place. Bring in a wider listening audience. Too bad they forgot about the rest of the audience in the process.
October 18, 2009 at 11:04 pm Permalink
Don’t forget that if a station tests a song, more often than not the artist doesn’t get played (at first), even if the artist is liked by 9-10 people.
As for this topic at hand, I don’t mind teen artists if the music fits in with the genre.
October 19, 2009 at 8:55 am Permalink
A late mention about Marty Stuart and why he’s considered by some to be an icon:
1. Although he has been out of the billboard spotlight for many years, his band is considered to be one of the top touring bands.
2. He is taking over as the Grand Ole Opry spokesman and master of ceremonies.
3. His historical knowledge of country music and his memorabilia is incomparable in the industry.
4. He is a great producer – his recent “Coal” CD for Kathy Mattea was Grammy-nominated.
5. He is still considered to be an excellent musician and one of the two favorite guitarists mentioned by Lynyrd Skynyrd’s Metlock.
6. etc., etc.
Many good comments above.
October 19, 2009 at 9:08 am Permalink
“He is taking over as the Grand Ole Opry spokesman and master of ceremonies.”
Huh?
October 19, 2009 at 9:57 am Permalink
There was Billy Gilman who had a #2 and #6 Album on The Country Charts when aged 12/13 but he hasn’t become a sensation? Taylor Swift has given “Country Music” a big uplift bringing an army of young fans to the genre. Hope she writes and collaborates more creatively with writers like Patty Griffin. Agree with a lot of the comments. Some of the music on the American Country charts is quite dreadful, no wonder the CD sales are poor this year. So much of it is bland,souless,rocky and fatiguing dross.
What happened to melodies and being able to hear the words without heavy production techniques.
Do the American labels think everyone has the same taste as them and will swallow so much in the charts. Its lost on me!
October 19, 2009 at 9:59 am Permalink
Waynoe: Don’t forget the hair and the shiney, shiney outfits.
October 19, 2009 at 10:10 am Permalink
Jon- I arranged a backstage tour of the Opry following a performance this July and found out that the Opry considers Little Jimmy Dickens and Marty Stuart the unofficial/official spokespeople for the Opry- as a result they get their own dedicated dressing rooms and will largely be on hand (and behind the mic) for most of the Opry’s major announcements. I think that’s perhaps what Waynoe was referring to.
October 19, 2009 at 10:15 am Permalink
…there are only a few out there, who wear them gracefully. he’s one of them.
October 19, 2009 at 10:31 am Permalink
Is Marty Stuart the last major artist to wear nudie suits?
October 19, 2009 at 11:22 am Permalink
Steve: Marty does not wear Nudie, he wears Manuel.
October 19, 2009 at 11:41 am Permalink
I hope that is a brand name and not what first leaped to my mind.
October 19, 2009 at 12:24 pm Permalink
Nudie was a deigner. Manuel studied under him. Probably clothed.
October 19, 2009 at 1:12 pm Permalink
…any ideas about his coiffeur, stormy?
October 19, 2009 at 1:29 pm Permalink
I remember many many years ago. I went to Opryland they use to have an Opry Star of the day show. It was Lester Flatt the day I was there. He had the cutest mandolin player back then. Any care to guess who it was :D
October 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm Permalink
Glad to see the Everly Brothers mentioned, one of my favorites of all time. While her debut cd at 17 was nothing to brag about, Canadian country singer Lisa Brokop has followed it up with 6 outstanding cds that few outside of Canada know about. I only discovered her music a little over a year ago and then got to see her earlier this year. Can’t believe any singer this good can go virtually unnoticed. She has also co-written almost all of the tracks on her last 4 cds. At least I get to enjoy her music.
October 19, 2009 at 1:52 pm Permalink
re: Marty’s coiffeur (and clothing)
Entertainment Weekly writer Kate Meyers raved, “Marty Stuart reeks of style. Country style.” Stuart outlined his key to success: “The four things a hillbilly singer needs are a Cadillac, a Nudie [cowboy] suit, the right hairdo, and a pair of pointy-toed boots.” And don’t forget about the hair; curious about his massive pompadour, Meyers wondered, “What does it take to achieve such a resplendent coiffure?” The answer, according to Stuart: “About four minutes, a 60-mile-an-hour wind, a $1 hairbrush, and an 87-cent can of Aqua Net.”
http://www.martystuart.com/Bio-MusGuide.htm
And from an EW article: (1992)
Starting at the top, Stuart’s striking black mane, specked with well-earned gray, is ”a cross between Albert Einstein, Porter Wagoner, and a few Apaches,” he says, hybridizing again. Often tied in a black or pink bandanna headband, his hair is fastidiously sculpted. What does it take to achieve such a resplendent coiffure? ”About four minutes, a 60-mile-an-hour wind, a $1 hairbrush, and an 87-cent can of Aqua Net.”
His wardrobe is equally meticulous: The Levi’s must be faded, the T-shirts black or bleach-white (he buys them — and dog food for his bloodhound, Oscar — at Wal-Mart). The only color is provided by his hand-tooled cowboy boots and his rhinestone-studded jackets, made by renowned country designers Nudie and Manuel. (Stuart doesn’t buy the matching pants; if you wore too many rhinestones, he says, ”you’d get beat up.”) Throw in an Indian concho belt here, a silver bracelet there, and you’ve got Stuart wear.
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,311804,00.html
October 19, 2009 at 3:06 pm Permalink
Taylor Swift may grow up yet. Any one that listens to radio for a number of years knows that trends come and go.Terri Gibbs is where, now? Do you remember that she won newcomer of the year over Reba? I believe the cream will eventually rise to the top.
back to the subject of the blog, I was in lust with Tanya (still might be).
October 19, 2009 at 6:36 pm Permalink
Thomas: Secret Vampire?
October 20, 2009 at 4:03 am Permalink
…nice job, thanks paulaw. my best guess was that he shares david bowie’s from the ziggy stardust era, stormy.
October 20, 2009 at 8:26 am Permalink
Thanks for the follow up comments to Marty. He’s unique to say the least.
Jon, you obviously are not knowledgeable about country music. Don’t reply unless you know what you are talking about. LOL
October 20, 2009 at 10:53 am Permalink
Well, now you’ve done it.
October 21, 2009 at 4:55 pm Permalink
Honestly, I only care about genres when I want somebody off my radio – I’ll complain about Gloriana on a country station but not John Mellencamp. Good music is good music, just find us some.
Alan Jackson has some nudie suits, originals – that name makes me uncomfortable.
Leave a Comment