Your Take: Polite Company

Karlie Justus | November 7th, 2009

Sammy Kershaw once sang that there are three topics he’d just rather not get into: “Politics, Religion and Her.”

However, Kershaw may be in the minority, considering the recent string of country songs and news items that don’t necessarily fall into the conversation outlines for polite company.

On Halloween, Q Notes published “City bans Country performer after anti-gay lyrics,” recounting controversial lyrical additions singer Matt Boswell and the Hillbilly Blues Band made to a Merle Haggard song during a city-sponsored concert in Reidsville, North Carolina:

In his rendition of Haggard’s “Are the Good Times Really Over for Good?”, Boswell sang, “Well you’ll never take my guns, and I’ll pray anywhere that I please/My daddy always told me, if you were able, and didn’t work then you don’t eat/All you Wall Street bankers, as far as I’m concerned, you can all go to Hell/And you can’t get married, you stupid gays and queers, so why don’t you go somewhere else?”

On a different note, Jim reviewed Lee Ann Womack’s new single “There is a God” this week, which some readers disliked not for its content, but its presentation. Commenter Noeller said:

Yep – as much as I love Country music, I can’t stand the Christian overtones in a lot of it, and this song really really rubs me the wrong way. It’s just too preachy and too “in my face”. I’m sure there’s a lot of people who will eat it up, but I just can’t see it getting a lot of spin up north of the 49th.

Historically, country music (and its roots in Southern traditions and beliefs) has been built upon conservative and religious foundations. About a year and a half ago, we had a Your Take that focused on mixing politics and country music, so this time around we want to hear from you on a slightly different question: Despite the examples above, do you think country music, as a genre, is unfairly stereotyped as being bigoted, backwards and preachy?

Thanks to That Nashville Sound’s Ken Morton, Jr. for his suggestions on this week’s Your Take subject.

  1. Paul W Dennis
    November 7, 2009 at 8:20 am

    I prefer that politics be kept out of songs except in general terms – I don’t mind it being an implied theme, as in many good songs, but Boswell clearly crossed the line with his gay-baiting lines. He has the right to say and think whatever he wants, but, as they say, actions have consequences, and if he finds himself a pariah at outdoor festivals, he has only himself to blame.

    The genre is not backwards, preachy and bigoted any more so than jazz,rock and hip-hop, but every genre (actually every walk of life and every political persuation) contains individuals that are backwards, preachy, and bigoted

  2. Leeann Ward
    November 7, 2009 at 8:49 am

    Couldn’t have said it better than Paul.

  3. Jon
    November 7, 2009 at 8:54 am

    Unfairly stereotyped, sure. But there’s a faulty premise there, Karlie: “Historically, country music …has been built upon conservative and religious foundations.” Religious, yes, but “conservative” is a bit misleading, at least with respect to politics and economics.

  4. Razor X
    November 7, 2009 at 9:48 am

    I prefer that politics be kept out of songs except in general terms – I don’t mind it being an implied theme, as in many good songs, but Boswell clearly crossed the line with his gay-baiting lines. He has the right to say and think whatever he wants, but, as they say, actions have consequences, and if he finds himself a pariah at outdoor festivals, he has only himself to blame.

    I agree and will take it one step further: if you want to exercise your right to free speech in such a manner, at least put some effort into it and write an original song, instead of altering someone else’s to mean something that they never intended.

  5. Collin
    November 7, 2009 at 11:20 am

    Even as a pretty fundamental Christian, the religious content in a lot of country music annoys me. I feel like the vast majority of mentions of God aren’t because the singer has any sort of a relationship with God, but because they hope people can identify. “He just said he prayed! Hey! I’ve prayed before! We’re the same! I love this song!”

  6. Nicolas
    November 7, 2009 at 11:40 am

    Glad they banned him, that was downright wrong.

    And I don’t mind country music containing some religious terms a little bit, but it probably shouldn’t be overdone either

  7. Jane2
    November 7, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    I agree with the previous commenters, particularly about writing something original if you feel strongly about something. There’s a difference between social commentary and ideology, and between expressing something in cuulturally religious terms (for example, “If I could hear my Mother Pray Again” is about missing a dead parent, not theology) and “butterflies and teddy bears are from God” pap.

    The same with politics…if you decide to share your fringe views (Right or Left) with your audience, be prepared for the reaction. This isn’t confined to country music…it is no more preachy and ignorant than other forms of music.

  8. Noeller
    November 7, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    Country music has always talked about “free speech”, and I look to a line from Montgomery Gentry, who said “I’ll pray to God anyplace, anytime” but I wonder if that same fight for speech freedom would be as welcome if someone attempted to write a song and wasn’t fundamentalist Christian. What if someone worshipped another God, in a different church?? What if someone wanted to speak about not praying, from an Atheist stand point? Would Country music still rally around “free speech!” if it’s something that the majority don’t agree with? What if a Country singer was gay and wanted to write a song from his position?

  9. Paul W Dennis
    November 7, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    There are gay country singers and there is a gay country music organization – their sound tends to be too traditional for modern country radio, not that they would get played anyway

  10. Stormy
    November 7, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    I grew up in the 1980′s when country was solidly blue collar democrat.

  11. Paul W Dennis
    November 7, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    actually, during the 1980s country was “Reagan Democrat”

  12. kevin w
    November 7, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    “I grew up in the 1980’s when country was solidly blue collar democrat.”

    Um, not exactly

  13. kevin w
    November 7, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    I don’t mind christian messages in songs, heck country has a tradition of christian messages in songs, along with the cheating and drinking songs

  14. Steve M.
    November 8, 2009 at 1:17 am

    I don’t mind songs with political overtones-after all, Woody Guthrie wrote most of his tunes with a solid political bent, even if not apparent to modern listeners. Many songs contain political overtones that people don’t catch such as Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the USA.” And I don’t mind religious overtones-country and gospel have been closely linked since birth. But when it crosses a line I have a problem. The recent Leeanne Womack song that was the subject of an intense thread for one. And when the political overtones turn to what is essentially xenophobic hate such as Buddy Jewell’s tribute to ignorance, then its no longer about free speech but good taste. You have a point-make it without being insulting to your audience.

  15. Rick
    November 8, 2009 at 2:59 am

    Speaking of polite company, King Rat Obama and his fellow democrat vermin in the U.S. House of Representatives (and one moronic republican in name only from New Orleans) opened the door for the US federal government to take over 1/6th of the US economy last night! In total violation of the Constitution (which democrats only value as a means to wipe their asses or start a fire) this nationalized “Obamacare” debacle is outright socialism/fascism at its worst. Obama and the democrats are doing their best to reduce the US to a third world banana republic and now that he’s taken control of most large banks, two of our major auto companies, and Wall Street, he’s now comandeered our health care industry to boot.

    The primary goal is of course to massively increase the power and control the federal gov’t has over all aspects of our daily lives (i.e. Socialism). Also, can you Obamavoters not openly admit that the democrats are doing this partly to strengthen their grip on the poor and under-educated underclass voters consisting primarily of blacks and latinos? This is nothing more than “Health Care Welfare” for the poor whether you admit it or not. And yes all those illegal, undocumented future democrat voters will get Obamacare once he gives them blanket amnesty! These are the same types of government support dependent “useful idiot” peasant types that elected Hugo Chavez in Venezuela! Now we have Commandante Obama-Chavez right in our own white house thanks to everyone who votes for democrats.

    What little still remains in force of our tattered Constitution will soon be shredded to bits when the Obamanation signs the Copenhagen Climate Treaty and effectively surrenders large portions of our nation’s sovereignty to the United Nations. The U.N. will gain the authority to “enforce” the terms of the treaty on the nations that ratified it including mandating taxes.

    To all you folks who voted for Obama and the democrats in November 2008, all I can do is mimic Ernest Tubb. Thanks, thanks a lot. You’ve totally f’ed over America, that’s what we’ve got! You should all be ashamed, but I know you’re not. You’ve trashed our future, suckers, so goofy thanks a lot….

    PS – If anyone is offended by my above comments, Good, you should be! People who voted for Obama in ignorance but who have since seen the error of their ways and repented will be forgiven, but only after they vote Republican in November 2010…

  16. Erik
    November 8, 2009 at 5:07 am

    You amuse me, Rick.

  17. Marc
    November 8, 2009 at 9:11 am

    unfairly? no.. that’s what a lot of country is.

    On a similar note, this “blog” I subscribe to hit the nail on the head: http://survivingtheworld.net/Lesson488.html

  18. Wade Patry
    November 8, 2009 at 9:38 am

    Has Rick never even read the definition for socialism?

  19. Stormy
    November 8, 2009 at 9:44 am

    Rick: What part of the Constitution does universal health care violate?

  20. Marc
    November 8, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Rick is just trolling, stop biting. He’s obviously got lifetime supply of FoxNews branded red pills. Common sense, as always, prevails in the middle. :)

  21. Thomas
    November 8, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    george w, cheney, rumsfeld and palin – isn’t that a long enough line of losers for all times?

  22. SW
    November 8, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    Rick, you never answered the original question. How do you feel about politics in song? I think it’s okay in small doses or for a specific purpose, but to be preachy or political for the sake of being political is bogus.

    P.S. I presume the violation of the Constitution you’re talking about is the 10th Amendment which reserves the police power to the states. Is that correct?

  23. TexasVet
    November 8, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    “Rick, you never answered the original question.”

    Rick is a drive by poster…kind of like the stray dog that takes a dump in your front lawn then moves on to the next one. LOL!

  24. Thomas
    November 8, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    …when politics and religon is featured in country music the way it is in jamey johnson’s “in colours” or in randy travis’ “three wooden crosses”, for example, it’s hard to argue: why not?
    however, any kind of propaganda be it political or religious is just off-putting.

  25. Drew
    November 8, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    Good post Rick, well said.

  26. T. Scott
    November 9, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    The writer of “The Fightin’ Side of Me” has a song in rotation on XM that asserts that the founder of Christianity was a (are you ready Rick?) SOCIALIST.

    All genres of music have songs with political and religious overtones and messages. Some you, as an individual ,may agree with,some you may not.An artist that doesn’t express a stance that someone else might disagree with is not a true artist,merely someone looking for payment of one kind or another.

  27. Steve M.
    November 9, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    Kristofferson is hardly the first person to make that assertion. That has been kicked around academic circles since the 1930s, as both a response to the Great Depression and the New Deal.

  28. Chris N.
    November 9, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    Where’s the politics and/or religion in “In Color”?

  29. Chris N.
    November 9, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    Oh, and of course Merle Haggard wrote “The Fightin’ Side of Me.” And while I’m in a correcting mood, Jesus wasn’t technically the “founder” of Christianity. I’d give that to St. Paul.

  30. Steve M.
    November 9, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    I would argue that while Jesus Christ was the founding father (o.k., son) of Christianity, it was Paul who popularized it and spread to the Gentiles, making him the Johnny Appleseed of the religion.

  31. T. Scott
    November 9, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    I’ll give you the founder thing and apparently we are referencing different songs . I am referring to the Merle song currently in rotation called “Jesus Christ”.wriiten by Woody Guthrie in 1940.

  32. Jon
    November 9, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Woody Guthrie most certainly did not write “The Fightin’ Side Of Me.”

  33. T. Scott
    November 9, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Of course W.G. would never have expressed a political or religious point of view in a song …..just to bring the thread back to the point..

  34. T. Scott
    November 9, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Jon read my original post carefully this time. I never said W.G. wrote Fightin’ Side , just as I never said Merle wrote Jesus Christ…But I knew that by posting it the way I did ,no one would read the rest of the post.I also knew I could get a reaction. Isn’t that what an artist in any genre is looking for?

    Is that not the reason an artist would invoke politics or religion.

    Was that not the question at hand?

  35. Jon
    November 9, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    This discussion has been off the point since about the 4th post:

    About a year and a half ago, we had a Your Take that focused on mixing politics and country music, so THIS TIME AROUND WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU ON A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT QUESTION: Despite the examples above, do you think country music, as a genre, is unfairly stereotyped as being bigoted, backwards and preachy? [emphasis added]

  36. T. Scott
    November 9, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    I stand corrected,Jon. So to respond to the question I would need to say it’s only as stereotyped as the artists.After all, Merle was pretty well stereotyped after “Okie” and “Fightin Side”.Yet he has now released a song written by the communist Woody Guthrie…..

  37. T. Scott
    November 9, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    I also return to my original post to restate that an artist that doesn’t offer material that someone might disagree with, is not truly an artist.

  38. Jon
    November 9, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    *facepalm*(tm)

  39. T. Scott
    November 9, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    O.K. simple terms ..If the genre is sterotyped, it is because of lack of exposure for non conformist artists.

    facepalm back at ya

  40. Thomas
    November 10, 2009 at 7:28 am

    @ chris n.

    “where’s the politics and/or religion in “in color”?

    …the great depression (1935) and world war II (1943) provide the political background for 2/3 of the song. these two periods are so closely connected with the roosevelt-era that it’s almost impossible not to make the link – at least for me.
    there’s not much religion in this one, unless you count the holy matrimony part as a religious statement. since “in color” didn’t make it into the “power source top twenty” it’s message there doesn’t seem to be strong enough for the purpose of the christian hardliners. all in all, a little masterpiece of subtlety.

  41. Jon
    November 10, 2009 at 7:36 am

    So, is “In Color” pro- or anti-New Deal?

  42. Thomas
    November 10, 2009 at 8:29 am

    …since farm incomes increased significantly in the first three years of the new deal (1933 – 1936), the narrator having been a cotton farmer in 1935 most likely was pro-new deal.

  43. Jon
    November 10, 2009 at 8:54 am

    And that’s enough for you to say the song “features” politics and religion?

  44. Thomas
    November 10, 2009 at 9:09 am

    …i didn’t use it as an example for religion in my original post. when it comes to politics, however, clearly “yes” or is my writing illegible?

  45. Jon
    November 10, 2009 at 9:23 am

    You speculate that the narrator of “In Color” would “most likely” be pro-New Deal because of one of the time periods in which the song takes place, and then say that the song “features” politics?!

  46. Chris N.
    November 10, 2009 at 9:37 am

    Well, that tears it: Jamey Johnson is clearly a socialist.

  47. Thomas
    November 10, 2009 at 9:40 am

    …no, i just thought your question about it was kind of intriguing and tried to answer it by weighing the likelihoods. i don’t know any farmer who’d be against a programme that puts more money into his pocket. actually, i don’t know anybody at all who’d refuse more money. furthermore, i consider world war II an outstandingly political period in the history of mankind. by the way “features” is spelled correctly: features

  48. Jon
    November 10, 2009 at 9:51 am

    I’m glad to see you know how to correctly spell “features,” but it looks to me like you don’t know what it means.

  49. Chris N.
    November 10, 2009 at 10:06 am

    I’d argue that World War II was outstandingly apolitical.

  50. Thomas
    November 10, 2009 at 10:10 am

    …your question about pro-/anti-new deal was really interesting – why do you try so hard to spoil the favourable impression you made earlier?

  51. Thomas
    November 10, 2009 at 10:12 am

    …fair point, chris n.

  52. nm
    November 10, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    Headdesk.

  53. Thomas
    November 10, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    …before doing to much damage to your forehead, nm, you might consider this: “war is not merely a political act, but also a real political instrument, a continuation of political commerce, a carrying out of the same by other means” by carl von clausewitz in his 1832 publication “vom kriege”.

  54. nm
    November 10, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    I think I just got derailment bingo.

Leave a Comment


Sponsors

Juli Thanki on WAMU's Bluegrass Country

Tagged In This Article

Current Discussion

  • cathy smith: I do not agree with all your information. I was on Wheeling Island near the jamboree in Wheeling,WV 26003 when ...
  • Paul W Dennis: In writing this article, I really should have made mention of Dave Dudley’s German-released recordings During his years ...
  • deer hunting: This article provides clear idea designed for the new visitors of blogging, that really how to do blogging.
  • johnny: My hall of fame picks for 2012 would be Hank Jr., Dottie West,Stanley Bros.,Wilburn Bros.,EltonBritt,Brother Oswald,Bobby Bare,Jimmy C.Newman,Tanya Tucker,Wilma Lee ...
  • HGH: Greetings! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you ...
  • the pilatesbiz: As far as me being a member here, I am glad though that I am a member. When the ...
  • thepilatesbiz: Thanks for making the sincere strive to give an explanation for this. I believe very robust approximately it and would ...
  • thepilatesbiz: Dear Cris,
  • diagnostic immobilier: Salut vous quel est votre avis de mon nouveau site sur le diagnostic immobilier?
  • iPhone Unlock: Fantastic website. A lot of useful info here. I'm sending it to a few buddies ans also sharing in delicious. ...

Recently Reviewed Albums

  • Blind Boys of Alabama - Take the High Road
  • Del McCoury Band & Preservation Hall Jazz Band - American Legacies
  • Aaron Lewis - Town Line
  • Josh Kelly - Georgia Clay
  • The Gibson Brothers - Help My Brother
  • jesse-brewster_wrecking-ball
  • Lucinda Williams - Blessed
  • Joe Mullins & The Radio Ramblers - Hymns from the Hills