Your Take: Country Stereotypes
Last week in news magazine Newsweek, Steve Tuttle discussed the changing aesthetics of the county music genre in his article “Murder on Music Row: Taylor Swift? Songs about cute little kids? What has happened to country music?!”
Tuttle, a general editor for the magazine, bluntly expressed his disapproval of artists like Rodney Atkins and Lonestar, as well as the current state of the genre:
…I could go on, but you can see where I’m going with this. Country music just ain’t what it used to be. That might be good or bad, depending on your outlook, but it’s bad. When CBS airs the 44th Annual Academy of Country Music Awards this Sunday from Las Vegas, the parade of hot bodies onstage will rival the Miss America contest. If past concert appearances are any indication, the nominees for vocalist of the year will be dressed in skintight, revealing tops, some with long, flowing blond hair and deep golden tans.
And that’s just the men. Miranda and Heidi and Taylor and Carrie—all four gorgeous, all four blond, all four real names, all incredibly talented—will be vying for the top female prize. There are still some throwbacks, however. Somehow, Lee Ann Womack, also beautiful, also sometimes blond, managed to become the fifth nominee, even though she actually sings country music and is more than twice the age of 19-year-old Taylor Swift, today’s Nashville “it” girl. …
Tuttle drew this response from Alison Bonaguro over at the CMT blog:
… You say you turn bright red with shame every time Atkins’ “Watching You” comes on. You say Garth Brooks was the final nail in the honky-tonk coffin. And you jump to the conclusion that country music has somehow lost its outlaw charm. Well, guess what? That could very well be a good thing. With the precarious state our nation’s in, why in the world would country fans want songs about senseless killings, prison life and heavy drinking? And why must you (and a handful of others like you) assume that music loved by moms driving to Target in their minivans is bad. Do you have something against Target? Minivans? Or Moms?
You also seem to take issue with of those hot bodies on the ACM Awards. That just makes me wonder if you’d prefer that only ugly people sing country music. The fact that singers have long, flowing blond hair and deep golden tans is irrelevant. They can sing, write music, play instruments and look good doing so. Is that really so wrong? …
Although the “is it or isn’t it?” argument about progressive country vs. traditional country can be an interesting and valid discussion, it can also be redundant and tiresome. So what we do want your take on is this quote by comedian Bob Newhart, which Tuttle used to preface his article:
I don’t like country music, but I don’t denigrate those who do. And for the people who do like country music, denigrate means “put down.”
Newhart, Tuttle and Bonaguro reference caricatures often associated with the genre. What stereotypes—from soccer moms to rednecks to outlaws—about country music do you encounter most often, and which bug you the most? How do you respond to people, like Newhart, who take digs at country music?
If you enjoyed this article, be sure to subscribe to our feed or receive updates via email.
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Alison Bonaguro // Bob Newhart // CMT // CMT blog // Garth Brooks // Lonestar // Newsweek // progressive country // Rodney Atkins // stereotypes // Steve Tuttle // traditional country // Your Take
Current Discussion
- Matt: I'm glad you chose to review this as opposed to the new Joe Nichols album. Instead of complaining about bad ...
- Terry Ridont: I think its cool. Thats what I like about indy rock artists, everything isn't the same high budget packaging and ...
- Stormy: Jon: The problem is that the progressive country music is now being called Americana. And why is it ...
- Razor X: Maybe his brother did talk him into it but what’s to say he hasn’t ‘always loved’ and ‘wanted’ to ...
- Brian: Josh Kelley will be fine. At the very least it means Katherine Heigl may show up on country award shows regularly. ...
- Razor X: Change may be inevitable but we aren't required to support it and if enough people boycott it, it doesn't last ...
- Jon: "You can’t stop “progress”… We can if we try hard enough. Um, no. Not that I think "progress" is a good ...
- Joe: When she moved from Mercury to BNA, I think we were all just allowed to think there'd be some grand ...
- sam sam: Well, Suzie, maybe if I saw his live show I'd love him. But I'm not interested in attending concerts. Radio ...
- JOHN: Personally Sherrie s voice is as pure as it gets to me. Just listened to her demo songs after reading ...

Is Dave Haywood going solo? This and many other of country music's most pressing questions answered in the September edition of The 9513's world famous Mailbag!
Caroline Herring likes to sing songs about life in the South. No, not exactly like Justin Moore and Jason Aldean...
The 9513's resident historian Paul W. Dennis sits down for a chat with country music legend Gene Watson.
As much as we love girl singers, we love songs about girl singers even more. Here's just a few of the many tribute songs out there.
Step away from the river and up to a jukebox, because heartbreak is only temporary, but a good song about drowning yourself—like a diamond—lasts forever.
What do you think about music labels "testing the waters" with a single before providing access to an artist's entire album?
What country artist, young or old, would you recommend as a must-listen artist to a newcomer on his/her journey through country music, and what would your essential song picks be?


116 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
April 11, 2009 at 7:25 am Permalink
I think its stupid to sterotype the younger blonde country artists
Especially since Miranda Lambert is really good, and real country
April 11, 2009 at 10:22 am Permalink
I think its stupid to have the stereotype idea that country pop is not a subgenre of country in this blog.
April 11, 2009 at 11:08 am Permalink
It’s funny that you’re having this discussion because my husband and I quite often have this discussion ourselves. I like modern country and he’s more a classic country sort of fella. Our discussions have gotten pretty heated in the past. I’m of the mindset that everything progresses and changes over the years, including music. Personally I think people just like to complain about change, some people adapt better than others I suppose. And that’s okay, it takes all kinds to make the world go round. I’m sure if there had been bloggers back in the day there would have been bloggers pining for the days of the horse and buggy once cars came along. Change is sometimes tough.
Anyway, the one stereotype that drives me the craziest is how people are under the impression that country music is all depressing and makes people want to kill themselves. I mean seriously, where does that come from?
April 11, 2009 at 12:13 pm Permalink
Country music was always one of the few places that working class and especially rural working clas people had their stories told. If Allison does not see the loss of that as a loss someone should buy her the whole of Sharyn McCrumb’s Ballad Series.
Also, can we please stop lumping http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4OzP9NImTU in with Taylor, Carrie and Kellie?
April 11, 2009 at 1:40 pm Permalink
“Country music was always one of the few places that working class and especially rural working class people had their stories told.”
Very true. but what is working class and rural nowadays? I’m one of the younger country fans, and your rural and working class sure as hell ain’t mine. I live in a town of about 2,000 and we are a very rural community. That’s not to say we’re all ranchers or farmers. Both my parents are computer programmers. Nobody thinks anything about it, its just what they do, even though their occupation does not fit the stereotype given to people born lived and raised in small town Texas. I graduated from the same high school as my mom, and so will my brother. But I am confident when I say I am not wide-eyes and awed by being in a city, and I have been on a few planes. I fit some stereotypes, and I flat out refuse to be some others. Even the country world must change (slowly, granted) with the times. I feel some stereotypes in older country music are obsolete. So a modern artist writing about them wouldn’t make any sense.
I think country is going through one of those redefining periods, because things change. I think there will always be a group of country people who will hold on to their roots, bring them with them into the modern world, and wonder why on earth all the invading California natives are so afraid of thunderstorms when they lived with earthquakes. From where I am, country culture and tradition are in the same state of chaos that country music is. I think people have to decide which change is good, which are bad and go from there.
April 11, 2009 at 3:39 pm Permalink
I think one of the bigger steroetypes I have come across is from musician friends. Alot of rock musicians tend to assume that country music is pretty simple to play, and more so than that, they assume that the simpler things that may be played comes from lack of talent, as opposed to the elusion of desire (for lack of a better term).
April 11, 2009 at 4:23 pm Permalink
“Alot of rock musicians tend to assume that country music is pretty simple to play…”
…right up until the moment they first try to play it right.
April 11, 2009 at 4:43 pm Permalink
KIM: That’s percisely the problem with mainstream country–so much of it is still pretending that rural working class American is really the sterotypes LA screenwriters came up with for The Dukes of Hazzard.
April 11, 2009 at 4:52 pm Permalink
Stormy:”Also, can we please stop lumping http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4OzP9NImTU in with Taylor, Carrie and Kellie?”
Amen. I love Miranda, she’s real country and better than all of them.
April 11, 2009 at 5:08 pm Permalink
Oh, no kidding Jon. Musics real simple when you can get by on power chords and distortion.
April 11, 2009 at 5:12 pm Permalink
Nicolas: Plus, she has a genunine love for real country which the others seem to lack.
April 11, 2009 at 5:22 pm Permalink
Change is inevitable. Trouble is, for the last decade and a half… “change” in country music has been in the hands of the enemy. Marketing hacks at the record labels….and conservative programmers at radio. Between them, they have hijacked what was once a solid, honest and stimulating genre. Artists that were just a little different were prized by both radio AND records.
Today, I fear that people like Johnny Cash, George Jones and Waylon Jennings would not be able to get a record deal. But you know what, there’s no use whining about it!
April 11, 2009 at 6:24 pm Permalink
Stormy: but part of that same issue is “authenticity” for fans. Country fans still want to hear that some star grew up on a farm rather than suburbia. why else would Taylor Swift be publicized as growing up on a Christmas tree farm rather than in a wealthy family with a stockbroker dad who happened to raise some Christmas trees? Mainstream fans (or maybe fans in general, I’m sure we’re all a little guilty) to seem to want stars to fit into that obsolete stereotype, but then demand not to be stereotyped like that (like I did) because they are “country”. Is it possible that stereotypes in the music is a problem because the (main) audience is a little hypocritical?
April 11, 2009 at 6:34 pm Permalink
Like your Dukes example; that was offensive to the general “country” person but music that does the same thing isn’t. Why? Because the person doing it has authenticity from the country world for whatever reason, true or not. The industry can’t be totally to blame for the clique ridden mainstream music.
April 11, 2009 at 7:10 pm Permalink
Country generates new stereotypes all the time. Young pretty boys singing about Johnny Cash is one that Eric Church recently identified. If you listened to a few hours of country radio you’d probably think that most country songs were about how great it is to be a dad,
April 11, 2009 at 7:37 pm Permalink
If Willie Nelson walked into a major label today , he wouldn’t get past the front desk. Looks should be the last thing on the list for the labels to consider. There is a video by a guy named Chris Cummings called Cowboy Hats.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJPqu4F4Au4
What that and tell me that isn’t the way it works
I miss the outlaw music but I still find plenty of it. The country music I love is still around if you know where to look.
April 11, 2009 at 9:06 pm Permalink
Can we please stop lumping Taylor and Kellie in with Carrie? Please…her gifted voice is way above anything that Taylor and Kellie could try to sing. They are both weak in that area.
Can I say, I like what you are calling “True Country” and the country of today. Well, some of the country of today. But this argument again is about faithful people for the past and people who want to join the country genre for the new sound of today. It’s the same with my church which argued the differences for 3 years before finally deciding that the 8:30 service will be traditional (with hymns out of the hymnal, robes, chancel choir, the Lord’s prayer said each service and kneeling prayers) and the 11:00 service be contemporary (Glory singers who sing in the beginning then sit in the pews, drum set, electric guitars, bass, big screen with praise song words listed, no robes, no organ). Me? I go to the 8:30 service.
April 11, 2009 at 9:13 pm Permalink
“Nicolas: Plus, she has a genunine love for real country which the others seem to lack.”
That’s why she headbangs and has a guy with a mohawk in her band! LOL! I like Miranda but she’s no more “real” country then the rest of them.
April 11, 2009 at 11:55 pm Permalink
At least she isn’t currently singing a former GNR song for a pop TV contest.
April 11, 2009 at 11:57 pm Permalink
@Northtexas: “That’s why she headbangs and has a guy with a mohawk in her band! LOL! I like Miranda but she’s no more “real” country then the rest of them.”
What difference does the hairstyle of some guy playing in her band make? That’s a real shallow way to determine if she’s real country or not … sorry Miranda, you can’t be country until you’re band member gets rid of his mohawk
And who gives a crap if she headbangs to “Gunpowder & Lead”… that song is pretty heavy, its still country though … and you won’t see her headbanging to “Famous in a Small Town” or “More Like Her”
Go watch her 2008 CMA performance of “More Like Her” (the one highly-praised by 4-5 critics as “best of the night”) and you’ll see that she’s “real country”
April 12, 2009 at 4:36 am Permalink
For those interested the writer of this article wasnt as onesided as some snippets of this article may suggest
I wonder if Allison fully read the whole article judging her snarky blog ..
Here some other parts:
As the years have passed, I’ve learned to relax about the changes in the music I love. I’m past the anger and denial, and fully in the acceptance stage. I could never in my lifetime listen to all the traditional country recordings that already exist, so who cares if only a handful of alt-country types are still at it? Besides, I knew my habit of mindlessly clinging to the past was finally licked last year when even Merle Haggard, he of the late-1960s anti-hippie anthem “Okie From Muskogee,” wrote a campaign song for Hillary Clinton: “Let’s Put a Woman in Charge.” Uncle! Uncle!
In the old days, there were many, many songs like “Banks of the Ohio,” in which a man stabs his girlfriend and heads down to the river, where he “threw her in to drown, and … watched her as she floated down.” (Dirty secret: folksy, gosh-darny traditional country songs have violence that would make 50 Cent blush.) Today’s producers are just giving people what they want, navigating the market as best they can. It’s a business, after all. Today’s suburban music buyers don’t labor in coal mines or cheat on their wives. Well, they don’t work in coal mines, anyway. Songwriters and hit makers write about what they know, just as their forefathers did, except now what they know is driving the kids to Target in the minivan, or staying at home because they’re unemployed.
So maybe country sounds and lyrics veering a little toward spit-polished pop music aren’t a sign of the end of the world, but something gritty and real has been lost. They borrow the vernacular of country music, the genuineness and masculinity of that hard-knock life, but they morph it into something that’s barely recognizable. The rough edges and authenticity have been sanded off. As the great songwriter Larry Cordle wrote about this very subject in his hit “Murder on Music Row,” “They said no one would buy them old drinkin’ and cheatin’ songs. Well, there ain’t no justice in it, and the hard facts are cold.”
I couldn’t agree more. But to put it in terms Lonestar might understand, at some point, we all have to put on our big-boy pants and move on. The traditional stuff is still out there, if you take the time to look. How can you blame Nashville? Even a legend like George Jones, 77, the man Frank Sinatra allegedly called “the second-best singer in America,” played to an arena that was three-quarters empty last week in the Virginia suburbs. The voice that gave us arguably the greatest country song of all time, “He Stopped Loving Her Today,” went on gallantly with the show. In the so-called good old days, he might not have shown up at all.
April 12, 2009 at 9:03 am Permalink
If the Bob Newhart quote had been aimed at rap fans there would have been a outcry of racism (though most rap consumers are suburban, white, teenage boys.) Working class whites seem to be the last bastion for acceptable discrimination.
Country music stamped by approval by Nashville and country radio will nearly always be inferior to the country music you get off your ass and find yourself. If you’re that lazy you DESERVE to listen to Taylor Cyrus…er…Swift.
April 12, 2009 at 9:28 am Permalink
nicolas, actually the most praised performance that day even if i dont want to admitted because i love miranda was underwood´s just a dream
April 12, 2009 at 10:35 am Permalink
I agree with the musician stereotype about how many people think that country music playing is easy because it SOUNDS easy (except Keith Urban and Brad Paisley fretworks). I have been playing guitar for 5 years (fully admit myself as a novice still) but have learned the ropes of country strumming/picking and can play a decent cover on almost all of the songs, but when it comes to mimicking the exact sounds that you hear on the album, it’s a lot more tougher than you can imagine. It takes a good decade or two to reach that potential of all that bag o tricks to make it sound liike what you hear: radio airplay or album spinning).
April 12, 2009 at 10:41 am Permalink
“Working class whites seem to be the last bastion for acceptable discrimination.”
Discrimination? Hmm. Maybe you meant denigration – but if so, I’d say that around here, at least, the title of favorite acceptable target for denigration would be the nefarious soccer moms.
April 12, 2009 at 11:13 am Permalink
@Danny: “nicolas, actually the most praised performance that day even if i dont want to admitted because i love miranda was underwood´s just a dream”
I’m afraid; one critic said that “More Like Her” and “Just a Dream” were the two best, but all the others said Miranda was the best… one gave each performance a grade, and Miranda received the only “A”
April 12, 2009 at 11:13 am Permalink
EDIT: I meant “I’m afraid not” not “I’m afraid” xD
April 12, 2009 at 11:19 am Permalink
This is the age old conversation. The real benchmark is will the artist stand the test of time? Talking about Jones, or Waylon or anybody from the past means they have made music that mattered and still has meaning. Who from today’s crop has that? Who will we still be interested in 10 years from now and who will fade. Lee Ann Womack is still interesting, will Taylor or Rascal Flatts music matter in 20 years. Real Country is music that tells the story of people’s lives. Despite all the filler out there on country radio, the good stuff finds a way to matter.
April 12, 2009 at 11:31 am Permalink
Stormy, the song for the TV show is actually a Mötley Crüe song.
April 12, 2009 at 11:49 am Permalink
The bottom line is that radio has run the entire music industry for years. These are radio stations made up of self important bafoons that think they actually know music. That is where the ignoring the buying public started.
The sad thing is, in country music, Music Row went with them due to the all mighty dollar. Now, there is just a slew of sound-a-like, look-a-like, song-a-like clones.
It is sad the lack of originality allowed…this is true not only in country, but popular music in general. And if you, as a singer/band/artist, don’t conform to that formula that radio or industry has allowed, they are pushed aside until the act is forced to come around. Two examples…Gary Allan and Marc Broussard. Both very original and unique in the their first 2 or 3 CDs, but as time has gone one, they both have stopped fighting and sound like everyone else…BUT because they didn’t conform early, they were listed as difficult by the powers that be which has held them both back.
Music is made in a factory type of mode…how much can we get out in how little time?? This makes quality suffer. Hopefully with major labels suffering, radio becoming useless and recording technology being affordable enough for TRUE artist to do it on their own and get out in a van and trailer to tour and build a true fan base, there is hope for the return of real heartfelt music, without the big machine interferrence that has gone on for so long.
April 12, 2009 at 12:07 pm Permalink
Matt: It was. Dang, I owe Vince Neill an apology.
April 12, 2009 at 12:11 pm Permalink
The thing I find sad is Bradley Walker who I have the utmost respect for and love. He is talented and genuine etc.
What chance would he stand in mainstream country?
Thanks heavens for the Bluegrass music industry and it’s fans they welcomed him with open arms.
April 12, 2009 at 12:40 pm Permalink
@ Jon: yes denigration is a better choice for the Newhart example. And soccer moms deserve it for what they’re abstract demographic has done to country music! ;)
April 12, 2009 at 12:45 pm Permalink
“Go watch her 2008 CMA performance of “More Like Her” (the one highly-praised by 4-5 critics as “best of the night”) and you’ll see that she’s “real country”
Interesting how folks like to cherry pick critics in order to try and prove a point.
I still believe that Miranda is more modern country then traditonal and who is “real” is a matter of individual interpretation. My humble opinion is that someone like Ashton Shepherd is a much better example of “real” country then Miranda.
By the way, I’ve seen Miranda perform live several times and am a fan.
April 12, 2009 at 12:56 pm Permalink
“At least she isn’t currently singing a former GNR song for a pop TV contest.”
So??
Actually she’s currently singing “I told you so” by Randy Travis but of course you conveniently omitted that fact.
April 12, 2009 at 2:50 pm Permalink
The radio industry has done things in the name of pleasing “soccer moms”; most surveys show that “soccer moms” have much broader and deeper tastes than what the radio industry is presenting to them; but by all means let’s blame the powerless women who are told that a shallow, limited musical diet is what they want rather than the corporations making those statements.
Also, I love Bradley Walker, but I wish he’d stop hanging with the grassers and get himself a pedal steel player, which is what his voice really needs.
April 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm Permalink
Northtexas:
No one would try to make the claim that Miranda is traditional country. That is how the term real country came about–you have artists who are not traditional but are country. Someday, Miranda Lambert is going to take a similar place to the one that Emmylou Harris holds in music history now. Carrie will hold a place similar to the one Lynn Anderson holds.
April 12, 2009 at 4:01 pm Permalink
Very good conversations and arguments going on about this topic. I have been very critical of Taylor Swift, not so much against her, but the ACM Board who decide the approval of the winner. They really must have been paid off in some way, at least to allow Swift to beat out George Strait and/or Jamey Johnson.
The Troubadour record has got to be one of the best to come out of recent years from any of the country artists. While I respect the talent and artist that Swift is, I find it to be bubblegum country.
Where country music is going, one may not be sure with Chesney and Island Country, Rascal Flatts, the Boy Band Country, and Kellie, Taylor, Carrie, and Julianne, Pop Country…to be able to bring in a variety of fans to different aspects of country is making it the genre widely popular.
As a lover of country music since I was a kid and as a songwriter, I can tell you I have gone to back to traditional country to learn more about the roots and to find topics of interest in my songwriting.
Either way country music will always thrive I believe. I don’t believe or ever believe it will sell out like Hip-Hop did. Top 40 radio with its Rap music, mind you I am a Hip-Hop dancer and grew up listening to Hip-Hop as well, has been commercialized to sell. Eventhough I believe some in the country genre have done the same, I find many of the artists have pure intentions in songwriting and production.
April 12, 2009 at 4:52 pm Permalink
Stormy..wow..good analysis.
April 12, 2009 at 5:03 pm Permalink
somehow i dont see carrie beeing a horse racer ever.. i think of her as a martina or a weird combination of trisha yearwoof(vocally) and shania(commercial)
April 12, 2009 at 5:10 pm Permalink
miranda lambert is very gifted but carrie underwood is the best right now, no one can compite with her in live shows and popularity, she puts country music is a high place in her mainstream performances, she is as much in her elememt singing i told you so with randy travis as paying tribute to eddy arnold, she just needs to have a better mangament, more stripped down songs to showcase her vocals.
@danny i agree with trisha vocally and shania commerciall but hi faith hill looks too
April 12, 2009 at 7:16 pm Permalink
I don’t get where people think that Carrie Underwood elevates mainstream country to any real level. I post on some other message boards with rock fans and Carrie Underwood is one of those singers I have to convince people who “hate country” the singers I am going to introduce them to sound nothing like.
April 12, 2009 at 7:29 pm Permalink
To paraphrase Larry Holmes, Carrie Underwood couldn’t carry Lynn Anderson’s jockstrap. I sure wish I could discover what talent people see in someone who rose to fame in a glorified karaoke contest.
April 12, 2009 at 7:45 pm Permalink
“I sure wish I could discover what talent people see in someone who rose to fame in a glorified karaoke contest.”
Well, you could have a listen to records by Loretta Lynn and Connie Smith, both of whom – and especially the latter – got critical career boosts from talent contests.
April 12, 2009 at 7:48 pm Permalink
“I post on some other message boards with rock fans and Carrie Underwood is one of those singers I have to convince people who “hate country” the singers I am going to introduce them to sound nothing like.”
I don’t understand – are you evaluating Underwood’s contribution to country music by the degree to which she appeals to rock fans? Do you think that rock fans are better people than, say, pop fans?
April 12, 2009 at 7:51 pm Permalink
Steve, Carrie grew up on a farm in a small town, She began singing her first notes in church, got leads in school musicals and played at local fairs. It was in her last semester of college after many friends and her Mom kept saying that she should try out…that she took her last shot at any type of singing chance and auditioned for American Idol thinking she would never have a chance. She competed against over half a million people..and won that show. Mainly for these factors: 1. The girl could sing anything, big powerful AI voice, and was always in tune. 2. She was sweet, nice and darn cute. 3. It was the cinderella story, the American dream -a nobody taking a chance and winning the prize. This does not guarantee stardom as we see from other winners of American Idol who have lost contracts. Carrie has worked hard..yes trying to walk the line between pop and country. I figure she’s trying to please everyone. The AI fans who knew her as a country /pop singer and the country fans who have come to love her. She does have some country songs and performances to her credit: “Jesus Take the Wheel, Don’t forget to remember me” and yes “Before He cheats” she also did a great “Stand By Your Man” at the Opry and “Yellow Rose of Texas” on the Grammys. She plays at the Opry several times a year and just put out Randy Travis’s “I Told You So”. She’s trying to straddle the country/new country line more than other young blondes. Is it her fault, she took a last ditch effort chance, kept her faith in God and hit it big? Like Reba has said, “If AI was around when she was trying to make it, she would have taken a chance at it”.
April 12, 2009 at 7:57 pm Permalink
I don’t care if she grew up on a pig farm. She sounds like a female Michael Bolton to me, all pretense and no soul. All she is lacking is a perm.
April 12, 2009 at 8:10 pm Permalink
Jon: No I am talking about how difficult it is to get people to give country music a try when all they hear of it is Carrie and that sort of thing.
April 12, 2009 at 8:12 pm Permalink
Steve,
To paraphrase Rhett Butler…frankly I don’t give a damn what you think. To me you’re just as bad as the super Carrie fans who think she can do no wrong.
April 12, 2009 at 8:12 pm Permalink
“I love Bradley Walker, but I wish he’d stop hanging with the grassers…”
Nice to see Bradley name-checked, but that ain’t gonna happen; he *is* a grasser.
April 12, 2009 at 8:20 pm Permalink
“No I am talking about how difficult it is to get people to give country music a try when all they hear of it is Carrie and that sort of thing.”
You mean, if they’re not rock fans, they’re not people? Or do you mean that you think that everyone’s a rock fan?
It seems self-evident to me that there are only three ways to explain Underwood’s and Swift’s big sales: either they are selling to a lot of country fans, or they’re selling to a lot of fans of other kinds of music – presumably, according to your experience, not including rock – or both. I’m guessing that it’s the third of those.
April 12, 2009 at 8:23 pm Permalink
“Music is made in a factory type of mode…how much can we get out in how little time?? This makes quality suffer.”
Actually, most of the great country records of the 50s and 60s and 70s were made very, very quickly – much faster than country records today, and using an even smaller pool of musicians. Whatever problems one might perceive in the quality of today’s country music, the speed of production ain’t a cause.
April 12, 2009 at 8:26 pm Permalink
i think that carrie underwood hasnt reached her full potential yet, she has an amazing voice and she is really improving stage presence , i hope she hooks up with a new producer and show us what she is capable of
April 12, 2009 at 8:31 pm Permalink
Jon: No, I mean that Carrie is supposed to be bringing new fans into country music. But, when ever I bring new fans into country I have to go very far afield of her and convince said new fans that the country I am introducing them to sounds nothing like what they hear on the mainstream.
April 12, 2009 at 8:32 pm Permalink
North Texas,
If Carrie needs a “new producer” as Debra claims to bring out her full potential, what does that say about an artist? That she needs to be shaped, liked clay by her handlers? That she needs to find better writers because she can’t write her own? She needs to improver stage presence? Gee, could it be because she never worked her way up on the bar circuit, learning her craft instead of being foisted on country radio by music execuitves?
April 12, 2009 at 8:43 pm Permalink
“But, when ever I bring new fans into country I have to go very far afield of her and convince said new fans…”
You mean, said rock fans. So again, do you think those are the only other kind of fans there are? And you think that all the folks buying Underwood’s discs are true-blue country fans?
April 12, 2009 at 8:48 pm Permalink
I think that those are the fans that I talk to on the other message board.
These are people who grew up listening to the pop and rock of their peers and the country of their parents and grandparents.
I think that most of the people who are buying Carrie’s albums are mainstream country fans. With a small side order of American Idol fans. Her last album did not do that imnpressively.
April 12, 2009 at 8:51 pm Permalink
This is interesting to see this discussion from an outside perspective. I agree with a lot of what NorthTexas said, but im gonna refrain from speaking my own opinions, although im sure you can assume what my argument would be ;)
April 12, 2009 at 9:08 pm Permalink
“Gee, could it be because she never worked her way up on the bar circuit, learning her craft instead of being foisted on country radio by music executives?”
Music executives can ‘foister’ songs on country radio all they want but it doesn’t mean a thing unless that artist has an audience that will request and buy their music. The bottom line is that folks such as you will never forgive her for being a Idol alumnus.
Look, I’m going to be 64 years old in two weeks and grew up on the likes of Marty Robbins, Don Gibson, Johnny Cash & Loretta Lynn but I don’t live in the past. I happen to like some of the new artists like Miranda, Carrie & Ashton but unlike the super fans can be objective too. As for Carrie, I liked her version of “Stand by your Man” and her current hit “I told you so” but didn’t care at all for “Last Name” and “All American Girl”. As for Taylor Swift, I’m to old to understand what she’s singing about. LOL!
April 12, 2009 at 9:11 pm Permalink
“I think that most of the people who are buying Carrie’s albums are mainstream country fans. With a small side order of American Idol fans. Her last album did not do that imnpressively.”
Nobody’s albums are doing that impressively any more ;-). But I think you’re probably more or less right with respect to her audience; it’s the country music audience. So when you’re trying to tell today’s rock fans that country’s not all like Carrie Underwood, it’s kind of the way that someone in the late 60s or early 70s would tell the rock fans of that time that country wasn’t all like George Jones’ or Ray Price’s strings-heavy records?
April 12, 2009 at 9:15 pm Permalink
But again, the arguement we hear for people like Carrie making music which is barely distinguishable from pop is that it brings new fans into the genre. Where are these fans and what evidence do we have that she is bring anyone to the genre? My research, small as it is, is vastly different.
April 12, 2009 at 9:26 pm Permalink
I am not living in the past-if one looked on my Ipod I have more Cross Canadian Ragweed then Johnny Cash), but when I look at an artist, I ask myself I would want to see them in a honkytonk or dancehall. Somebody like Underwood or Taylor Swift have no interest for me because I see artists carefully shaped by produces and executives with little or no concert experience. For example, I can’t imagine either singing a controversial song like “The Pill” like Loretta Lynn. They are merely empty vessels designed for executives to milk the latest soccer mom craze.
April 12, 2009 at 9:53 pm Permalink
I have heard a million stereotypes about country music, from “blond Barbie clone songbird” to “funky old biker guy with a few missing teeth.” And you know what? I think that’s good. Some of those stereotypes aren’t exactly flattering, but hey, not everybody’s meant to be a country music fan. What it shows, though, is that country music is NOT any one thing, and that its listeners are as diverse as the music itself is.
And that brings me to my next point: I’d like to see a little diversity in mainstream country, or at least a better outlet for the less commercial stuff. I get that country radio is going to be skewed toward artists like Swift and Urban because they sell a lot of records, and I’m fine with that, but can’t the other side of the coin get at least a little representation? Just because not as many people want to hear something a little more traditional or grittier doesn’t mean NO ONE wants to hear it.
Frankly, my least-favorite stereotype comes from within the country community itself, and that stereotype is that country music HAS to be all one thing. Not all country music has to be upbeat and light-hearted, the way Ms. Bonaguro sees it, and not all country has to be whiskey bent and hell bound, as it were, the way Mr. Tuttle sees it. I just wish the access to every kind of country was a little fairer.
April 12, 2009 at 10:01 pm Permalink
“But again, the arguement we hear for people like Carrie making music which is barely distinguishable from pop…”
And yet according to your own argument, it’s country fans who are buying her records, and they’re clearly capable of distinguishing her music from pop; the same is true – again, according to your argument – of pop fans. They’re capable of distinguishing her music from pop, and they’re not buying it.
The confusion that necessarily attends these kinds of arguments underlines the fact that genre classification isn’t absolute; it’s contextual and, frequently, limited. The fact is that there are many strains of country music, and different ones will be good points of entry for fans of other kinds of music. Some of those fans will never go any farther than enjoying artists making country music that has many points of contact with other genres they enjoy, and some will go further and discover that they enjoy other kinds of country music. I just don’t see where there’s a problem.
April 12, 2009 at 10:04 pm Permalink
Jon: But she isn’t bringing any to country–especially not the ones who have left in the past decade.
April 12, 2009 at 10:06 pm Permalink
“when I look at an artist, I ask myself I would want to see them in a honkytonk or dancehall.”
That’s all well and dandy for you personally, but why should anyone else care about that? It’s a criterion that’s pretty well disconnected from a lot of country music history.
“They are merely empty vessels designed for executives to milk the latest soccer mom craze.”
Ah, yes, those evil soccer moms. Getting back to the subject of country music stereotypes, are we?
April 12, 2009 at 10:08 pm Permalink
“Jon: But she isn’t bringing any to country–especially not the ones who have left in the past decade.”
Well, even if that’s true, so what? Is that a requirement for being considered a good country artist – bringing fans from outside of the genre? There’s a lot of favorites who would fail that test.
April 12, 2009 at 10:20 pm Permalink
So, that takes away the one advantage her fans keep telling us she brings to country.
April 12, 2009 at 10:25 pm Permalink
So an artist that would not excite you if see him/her live would excite you on the radio? I don’t understand that mindset.
April 12, 2009 at 10:39 pm Permalink
So Carrie is being condemned because she doesn’t do controversial songs like “The Pill” and didn’t get her skills at performance because she didn’t come up through the bars and honky tonks? Well, thank God she didn’t. Remember, this girl from the farm grew up Christian. She would have rather stayed in college then go that route and rightly so. She is learning her craft from the likes of Alan Jackson, Kenny Chesney, Brad Paisley and Keith Urban. I saw her concert this year, she moves, she dances, she constantly touches the hands of fans, she talks to them, makes them laugh, she has a time in the middle where it’s just her and two acoustic guitars and talks and talks. She brought up a little girl each concert to sing “All American Girl” with her. In these times, this is refreshing. What is boring to some is absolutely praiseworthy to others.
I agree with others, Country does not have to be about sadness, heartache or someone going bad. It’s about emotion and that can run the gamut.
April 12, 2009 at 10:41 pm Permalink
“So, that takes away the one advantage her fans keep telling us she brings to country.”
I think they’ve also been intimating that there’s an “advantage” in her being an awesome country artist ;-); the line you’re describing is one that her fans sometimes bring up when she’s accused of being insufficiently country (whatever that means). But if she’s making music that a lot of country fans enjoy – again, as you’ve already pretty much said she is – then where is there a problem?
April 12, 2009 at 10:47 pm Permalink
“So an artist that would not excite you if see him/her live would excite you on the radio? I don’t understand that mindset.”
Well, in the first place, it’s ok if you don’t understand it. But in the second place, that’s not remotely what I said. What I said was that performing in honky tonks and dance halls isn’t intrinsic to being a country music performer. If you think it is, then you’re missing a big part of the picture; there are plenty of other venues where country music has been performed and is being performed today.
April 13, 2009 at 9:58 am Permalink
Jon: Because these are three year country fans not lifetime country fans. The are people who like country as long as it doesn’t sound country. And in the end appealing to fans who buy an album or two of obsessively popped out country per year causes country music to lose album sales and weakens the entire genre, NOT by completely changing the sound, but by completely eliminating the profit margin in making country.
April 13, 2009 at 10:06 am Permalink
“Because these are three year country fans not lifetime country fans.”
I’m skeptical of that, not only because I haven’t seen much (if any) evidence to support it, but because I remember hearing the exact same thing 15 and 20 years ago about new fans who included, from what I’m able to tell, a lot of people (like on The9513) who in fact stuck around.
“The are people who like country as long as it doesn’t sound country.”
As you know, I think that “sounds country” thing is kind of problematic ;-).
“And in the end appealing to fans who buy an album or two of obsessively popped out country per year causes country music to lose album sales and weakens the entire genre, NOT by completely changing the sound, but by completely eliminating the profit margin in making country.”
Huh? That doesn’t make any sense to me. How do album sales by one artist or several artists cause the genre as a whole to lose album sales? And how do they eliminate the profit margin in making country?
April 13, 2009 at 11:06 am Permalink
STORMY said: Also, can we please stop lumping http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4OzP9NImTU in with Taylor, Carrie and Kellie?
You know there a lot of people that are fans of all four of these young ladies and with the exception of Taylor Swift one fact that seems to have escaped you is that the most common bond between them is they all arrived via talent shows. Are you sure you want to go down that “She’s a product of a talent show” path when it concerns Carrie Underwood and Miranda Lambert? I’m a fan of both so how they came to be really doesn’t matter and yet for you it does, or, maybe it doesn’t. On questioning whether Carrie Underwood brought a new generation of fans with her from American Idol and beyond is pointless because the answer is obviously yes. Your perceived acumen on all things Carrie Underwood is puzzling to say the least since you are obviously not a fan.
The biggest gripe about country has always been the subject matter. Most people not familiar with country music just assumed without question that a country song was about somebody leaving somebody, somebody cheating on somebody, drinking too much, with a dead dog thrown in the mix for good measure. With country music becoming more mainstream the way it has over the last decade or two this myth is playing its way out for the most part.
April 13, 2009 at 11:19 am Permalink
All due respect but I doubt Miranda will ever take Emmy Lou’s place in country music history or be on that level.
April 13, 2009 at 12:06 pm Permalink
On questioning whether Carrie Underwood brought a new generation of fans with her from American Idol and beyond is pointless because the answer is obviously yes.
The question is, are said fans country music fans or just Carrie Underwood fans?
All due respect but I doubt Miranda will ever take Emmy Lou’s place in country music history or be on that level.
Neither do I. Miranda is one of those artists that I really want to like, but so far she hasn’t done anything that has really interested me.
April 13, 2009 at 12:19 pm Permalink
The thing that bugs me is the “quarterback marries the homecoming queen after they’ve dated since they were in kindergarten” suburbanite bull-crapification of “Small Town USA”. A lot of songs about “small towns” written by people who evidently have never been to one. However, instead of beating my head against the wall and still patronizing FM stations that play the Eagles as Classic Country, I’ve moved on to tapes, CDs, mp3s, etc. There’s always been dumb songs on the radio, we just forget about some of them after awhile.
April 13, 2009 at 12:20 pm Permalink
Maybe if Miranda was on an indy label she wouldn’t have to fit the image that the label has created for her.
April 13, 2009 at 2:43 pm Permalink
Merlefan46: “Maybe if Miranda was on an indy label she wouldn’t have to fit the image that the label has created for her.”
Her label didn’t create an image for her, Miranda isn’t a cookie-cutter artist … almost everything on her albums is self-penned by herself, and many of the songs reflect real life things as country music should
April 13, 2009 at 3:24 pm Permalink
The question is, are said fans country music fans or just Carrie Underwood fans?
I guess it depends on your definition of country music but I would guess her fan base would gravitate toward other mainstream country artist such as Brad Paisley, Keith Urban, Kenny Chesney, Sugarland, Taylor Swift, Miranda Lambert and such. Do I think they would rush out and buy a Jamie Johnson CD or download a couple Merle Haggard songs? Doubt it.
April 13, 2009 at 3:43 pm Permalink
i’m tired of people lumping certain artists into certain catagories without even bothering to listen to all the artists music. People who claim that so-and-so is “pop” or so-and-so is a “boyband.” when they don’t even own an artists album or bother to listen to any singles not fed to them by radio.
April 13, 2009 at 3:51 pm Permalink
Hey Jon
Nothing with Grassers :D It’s probably my favorite genre :D
April 13, 2009 at 3:53 pm Permalink
Nicolas: I meant to overproduced music. IT sure sounds different from when she was on Nashville Star I think that was the show.
April 13, 2009 at 5:43 pm Permalink
Am I one of the few who can have Dale Watson (his upcoming “Truckin’ Sessions vol 2″ is excellent) and mainstream stuff happily coexist on my iPod and CD changer?
April 13, 2009 at 6:02 pm Permalink
Can’t wait to get his new cd!
April 13, 2009 at 6:14 pm Permalink
I only got it today and It and David Serby’s upcoming “Honkytonk and Vine” albums are wonderful.
April 13, 2009 at 7:25 pm Permalink
Country music did not used to be sucessful because it had a handful of artists that sold a million copies to fans who bought no other country albums. Country music used to be sucessful because it had a large number of artists who sold less than a million a piece but who all had a lot of overlapping sales. We did not used to outsell pop by having 1 artist sell 1 million copies. We outsold pop because they had one artist who sold 1 million copies and we had five artists who sold a combined total of two million copies. Carrie Underwood may be able to sell a million albums, but she does not have a fan based stteped enough in country to buy that many country albums. If she did, album sales in the genre overall would not be down so much.
Record labels have tilted their marketing to the model where one artist sells a million albums and does not realize the value of more artists selling fewer albums. Its no surprise that this occurred around the same time that an increasing number of the money people at country labels were former pop label people. This marketing system fails for two reasons: First because it ignores the sucessful method of selling country music and second because it leaves country music with a fan base too small to weather changes in fan fads. Unfortunatly, this lack of revenue means that labels have less money so their roosters become smaller which leaves them with fewer artists to help pull them out of downward trends.
April 13, 2009 at 7:59 pm Permalink
Her label didn’t create an image for her, Miranda isn’t a cookie-cutter artist … almost everything on her albums is self-penned by herself, and many of the songs reflect real life things as country music should
So you’re saying that Miranda really is a crazy ex-girlfriend?
April 13, 2009 at 9:05 pm Permalink
I meant more about the “Gunpowder & Lead” song she wrote while in a concealed handgun class, she wrote “Greyhound Bound for Nowhere” on the front porch w/ her dad, and she wrote “Dead Flowers” when she dumped some dying V-day flowers out on her lawn
It doesn’t all have to be true though, “C-EXG” is just a fun song thats all there is to it
April 13, 2009 at 9:09 pm Permalink
Stormy, with all due respect, your post contains a lot of assertions about the purchasing behavior of Carrie Underwood’s fans that are based on…what? Same question goes with your industry analysis. On what data is your assessment of how the country industry has operated based? And how do you square your claim here that Underwood’s fans aren’t buying other country releases with your earlier claim that her records are selling to country fans? In what sense did you mean “country fans” then? It seems to me that you’re changing the terms of your argument on the fly to address points as they come up.
April 13, 2009 at 9:24 pm Permalink
Her records are selling to country fans, who are short term fans and not loyal fans of country. If they were, they would be buying more country cds and country music would not be dropping sales.
April 13, 2009 at 10:08 pm Permalink
“Her records are selling to country fans, who are short term fans and not loyal fans of country. If they were, they would be buying more country cds and country music would not be dropping sales.”
I’m sorry, but that is just outlandish. How do you know they’re short term fans, when she hasn’t been around but a couple of years? And in case you hadn’t noticed, CD sales have been declining across virtually every genre; in fact, country sales have been declining less rapidly than those in most other genres. So maybe Underwood’s fans are buying other country albums left and right, and without them things would be even worse. I’d say that at best you simply have no idea which is the case. And blaming – or, for that matter, praising – one artist for another’s sales, or lack thereof, is a debatable argument, to put it mildly. Where’s the evidence?
April 13, 2009 at 10:27 pm Permalink
Because album sales continue to decline year after year.
April 13, 2009 at 10:37 pm Permalink
Erm, it’s the cause-and-effect relationship you’ve asserted that could use some evidence. Right now, anyone who claimed that country album sales would be even lower without Underwood’s fans snapping up every album they could get their hands on would be every bit as credible as you.
April 13, 2009 at 11:01 pm Permalink
Stormy, I find a similar problem to get people who say they hate country music but that’s because of traditional outdated country and to get them to like country show them Carrie, Taylor, and Keith music.
Taylor Swift and Carrie Underwood wont bring listeners to Jamie Johnson but they do to Sarah Evans and Miranda Lambert.
and “We outsold pop because they had one artist who sold 1 million copies and we had five artists who sold a combined total of two million copies.”
With sales going down country artist are still selling close but problems with this in 2000 biggest pop acts were selling over 10 million now the biggest pop singer sold 2 million more than 80 percent drop. Country music hasn’t saw that much of a drop in sales
April 14, 2009 at 10:18 am Permalink
I know one thing…If I hear another damn song from some idiot singer proclaiming how friggin’ “country” they are, we should drive to music row and string up every dumbass writer putting out such crap.
April 14, 2009 at 10:18 am Permalink
What stereotypes—from soccer moms to rednecks to outlaws—about country music do you encounter most often, and which bug you the most? How do you respond to people, like Newhart, who take digs at country music?
I grew up in a beach town in Southern California (near a large city) so the stereotypes I encountered most often associated with country music were that country music was for hicks, rednecks, people who talked slow and didn’t have a clue. I’m not trying to offend anyone, but that’s what I encountered. I went to Vanderbilt my freshman year in college and I can’t count how many coonskin cap/Daniel Boone-esque references I got. There was absolutely nothing remotely cool or hip about country music. Even these days, some of my friends like the occasional Keith Urban or Dixie Chicks song, but that’s about it. If I take a friend to a country music concert, I definitely still have to buy the ticket!
That said, I think a lot of my friends would like a lot of country music if they ignored country radio and what was being promoted as country music and discovered the depth and breadth of the genre. The quality of music is there – even today. It’s the quality that I care about, not whether it’s pop/traditional, etc. (although, if there is no relation whatsoever to country, I do get annoyed). Great music has a tendency to transcend genre and overcome prejudices.
April 14, 2009 at 1:39 pm Permalink
Are we talking about Country Music or Nashville Pop?
Pop music is all Nashville puts out anymore. People I consider to be ‘real’ country musicians are living and recording primarily (to the best of my knowledge) in NYC and Texas. This article got me to thinking quite a bit about the state of the genre- but I don’t feel that they’re even focusing on country music here.
I’ve been often described as a country guy- I don’t mind it, really. But the country I play came from American roots music of the early 20th century. Old timey, blues, gospel, folk etc. To me that’s the real country music-and if people think it’s dead they’re dead wrong. Don’t put me on the bandwagon with every punk rocker who thinks Johnny Cash is great because they can only play the 3 chords he could either, I’m talking grass roots, honest to goodness country music is the foundation of most of what we call rock n roll, or at least one half of it. Rockabilly and surf rock came out of honky tonks- which led to punk rock- for me it’s about coming full circle. Country ala American roots is the true foundation of many forms of American music and popular culture. With that said- I can’t tell you how much flack I get for being part of the genre called ‘Country’. Most rockers dismiss me, and people that listen to modern country radio can’t stand me. It’s a no win situation anymore! Here’s why I do it…
This music speaks to me like God spoke to Moses- like devil whispering in a sinner’s ear. It’s about attitude, feel and emotion. And as long as it does- that’s what I’ll be doing.
You can’t teach it’s inspiration- you can’t explain the spirituality of it…it just is. For those that don’t get it- they never will. It’s like talking to a fish about how good it feels to breathe the free air- or preaching to a snake about digging his toes into a red dirt road. Either you get it or you don’t. Just be sure you’re talking about real country music…not Nashville Pop
April 14, 2009 at 1:46 pm Permalink
“Country” can’t be confined to one stereotype. It is an evolving genre that brings the traditional and new American styles together. For example, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bct8LS6Nwrw.
April 14, 2009 at 1:53 pm Permalink
I’m reminded of a song by Dale Watson
Lord, help me Merle I’m breaking out in a Nashville Rash-I’m too country now for country- just like Johnny Cash”
You remember Johnny’s album “Unchained” was country album of the year in 1996 if memory serves. With NO HELP from country radio, Nashville or it’s elite…
I’ll never forget opening my Rolling Stone and seeing the late great Mr. CASH holding a bird in hand to the powers that be.
It doesn’t get anymore country than that.
Far be it from me to detract from what another person enjoys. Nashville is putting out some very catchy stuff and it’s sold very well. No getting around that.
April 14, 2009 at 11:47 pm Permalink
Popular country music is far too sugary sweet now. I totally take issue with the CMT blog quote “with the precarious state our nation’s in, why in the world would country fans want songs about senseless killings, prison life and heavy drinking?”
Songs about killing, prison, and drinking got us through the Great Depression. Thank you Carter Family.
April 15, 2009 at 12:51 am Permalink
And why do people think songs about that stuff can’t be catchy, cool and fun to listen to? Cocaine Blues is fun, High Cost of Living is fun, Gunpowder and Lead is fun, Goodbye Earle is fun… All songs about murder and/or substance abuse, all hooky and enjoyable to the ears. We’ve traded fun for blandness these days, unfortunately…
April 15, 2009 at 7:23 am Permalink
“Songs about killing, prison, and drinking got us through the Great Depression. Thank you Carter Family.”
Huh? There must have been some other Carter Family singing songs about killing, prison and drinking than the one that’s in the Country Music Hall of Fame, because the latter didn’t hardly do that at all.
In fact, Tuttle repeats one misperception of early country music that’s regrettably widespread – namely, that there are “many, many” songs like “Banks Of The Ohio.” The folks who do that tend to overlook or dismiss the strong gospel and inspirational and comic elements of country music tradition (all of which played a larger part than songs about killing, prison and drinking during the Great Depression), while those who underline these tend to overlook or dismiss the darker ones. Keeping a more balanced, multi-dimensional view isn’t always easy, but it’s the most accurate one.
April 15, 2009 at 9:06 am Permalink
In answer to the question posed: John Rich’s Shuttin’ Detroit Down is the most recent example of what I hate. The whole song is one big, annoying country music cliche. Those red state vs. blue state oversimplifications bother me. Although, as I’m thinking of it the new Hank Jr. release I heard today covers the same material more honestly, and, thus, doesn’t bother me. Huh.
April 15, 2009 at 10:41 am Permalink
Here are my thoughts on this new song – Shuttin Detroit Down. A song about our economy and the sorry state the majority of us are facing or living at this very moment hurts me. I have been laid off from my job, but have returned, but with another layoff expected soon, we never know when my husband is going to work…last week he was called in to work for just 2 days. However, I am fortunate that we are still able to pay our bills, but I am afraid that I will have to be telling my daughter she’ll need to come home from college.
What bothers me the most about this song is that Mr. Rich is more than likely going to make some money from the song. He is using the majority of the citizens of America to make more millions. Obviously, the current situation of our economy has not affected Mr. Rich only that he is looking to make some more money off this situation. Doesn’t he have enough?
I feel this is just taking advantage of the people who already made him a millionaire, before this song I had no problem with it. It is very very inappropriate for Mr. Rich to use our current sad state of affairs to gain more.
Maybe if he would give back what he earns off this song…I could feel a little different about it. Right now, I am feeling used.
I saw his interview on CMT. Writing a song like this? How is it helping anyone? Maybe Mr. Rich
PS As I am writing this, I received a call from my husband…he will be laid off starting Monday and who knows for how long
Thanks for listening
April 15, 2009 at 12:00 pm Permalink
What genius/idiot pushed Taylor Swift to the top of country music? She sings off pitch and has no stage presence. Is this a matter of “who you know?”
April 15, 2009 at 2:01 pm Permalink
Wasn’t “Keep On The Sunny Side” released during the Great Depression?
April 15, 2009 at 3:00 pm Permalink
“Keep on the Sunny Side” was recorded over a year and a half before the Great Depression started. It also does a fair bit to acknowledge it’s not always sunny instead of pretending that everything is perpetually hunky-dory.
April 15, 2009 at 3:04 pm Permalink
The Carter Family recorded a number of songs multiple times, usually for different labels. “Keep On The Sunny Side” was first recorded on May 10, 1928, and several times thereafter.
Taking a quick look through their discography, there’s really only one title that jumps out as related to killing, and that’s “John Hardy Was A Desperate Little Man.” A fair amount of death, not surprisingly, but mostly from illness, accidents, old age and broken hearts, not homicide.
April 15, 2009 at 3:30 pm Permalink
““Keep on the Sunny Side” was recorded over a year and a half before the Great Depression started.”
That would depend on exactly when you count the start of the Great Depression, I reckon, but definitely before – and again in 1935. And, of course, it was an important part of their repertoire in live and radio performances during the Depression.
“It also does a fair bit to acknowledge it’s not always sunny instead of pretending that everything is perpetually hunky-dory.”
Well, yeah, but the essence of the song is pretty much to be found in the title. It’s basically a gospel song, like many of the Carter Family’s others, and in that respective it’s far more representative of their outlook than Zack’s bizarre attempt to set them up as artists with a repertoire built around killing, prisons and drinking. The number of country songs centered around those subjects that were being recorded during the Great Depression is actually pretty small, and a lot of the songs related to drinking were in fact comic tales of moonshining – don’t forget, the Great Depression fell during the Prohibition era. Gospel and sentimental songs were far more prevalent.
April 15, 2009 at 3:47 pm Permalink
““Keep On The Sunny Side” was first recorded on May 10, 1928, and several times thereafter.
Was it not recorded at the session the day before?
“That would depend on exactly when you count the start of the Great Depression”
I figured Black Tuesday was the generally accepted start date.
April 15, 2009 at 3:59 pm Permalink
“““Keep On The Sunny Side” was first recorded on May 10, 1928, and several times thereafter.
Was it not recorded at the session the day before?”
Interesting… the John Edwards discography that was first published in the Sunny Side Sentinel, which is what I was looking at when I wrote that, says May 10, but Russell’s Country Music Records shows May 9. I guess I’d give Tony the edge on that one.
““That would depend on exactly when you count the start of the Great Depression”
I figured Black Tuesday was the generally accepted start date.”
Then it was a couple weeks short of a year and a half ;-).
April 18, 2009 at 11:32 am Permalink
Traditional is still being played
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_a_9MBhP0c
April 19, 2009 at 7:40 pm Permalink
Amongst people I know, when they think of country music, they think of hillbillies, scruffy farmers in hats and overalls playing a fiddle saying “yee haw” all the time and speaking with a heavy southern accent. A friend thinks I listen to Dwight Yoakem (which I don’t).
The Newhart comment is pretty insulting.
September 11, 2009 at 8:02 pm Permalink
You know what. Toby Keith has got to get a life and Taylor swift needs to learn to sing and get a little more figure.
Leave a Comment