<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Take: Are Genre Jumpers Ruining Country Music?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/</link>
	<description>The latest country music news and reviews.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-67149</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-67149</guid>
		<description>A lot of genre jumpers are older artists in genres that are not that far removed from country.  Bon Jovi and Jewel do not have far to go to be country.  Neither does Mellencamp.  

One problem I have with country music is it's love for anyone from outside country music who wants to show it some attentionl.  Hannah montanna hosting  CMT awards?  Snoop dogg presenting?  Whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of genre jumpers are older artists in genres that are not that far removed from country.  Bon Jovi and Jewel do not have far to go to be country.  Neither does Mellencamp.  </p>
<p>One problem I have with country music is it&#8217;s love for anyone from outside country music who wants to show it some attentionl.  Hannah montanna hosting  CMT awards?  Snoop dogg presenting?  Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 9513 &#187; Month In Review: February 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>The 9513 &#187; Month In Review: February 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>[...] Your Take: Are Genre Jumpers Ruining Country Music? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Your Take: Are Genre Jumpers Ruining Country Music? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texastentialist</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>texastentialist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>Country music cross-genre-dressing is like any other cultural mutation. It either is a benefit (Springsteen, Mike Ness, Van Morrison, Solomon Burke, Lynyrd Skynyrd...) or it's a detriment (The Wreckers, Jewel, 99% of Nashville product..), and sometimes it's a wash (Eagles). Jumping genres isn't inherently bad, but the results often are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Country music cross-genre-dressing is like any other cultural mutation. It either is a benefit (Springsteen, Mike Ness, Van Morrison, Solomon Burke, Lynyrd Skynyrd&#8230;) or it&#8217;s a detriment (The Wreckers, Jewel, 99% of Nashville product..), and sometimes it&#8217;s a wash (Eagles). Jumping genres isn&#8217;t inherently bad, but the results often are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 9513 &#187; Hank Jr. And Terri Clark Announce Divorces And Rascal Flatts Bash Dixie Chicks</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>The 9513 &#187; Hank Jr. And Terri Clark Announce Divorces And Rascal Flatts Bash Dixie Chicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>[...] a mighty good discussion going on in the comments for the post Your Take: Are Genre Jumpers Ruining Country Music?. Be sure to check that out, see what everyone else has to say, and leave your own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a mighty good discussion going on in the comments for the post Your Take: Are Genre Jumpers Ruining Country Music?. Be sure to check that out, see what everyone else has to say, and leave your own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt C.</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>Taylor:  Cross Canadian Ragweed is more country than Faith Hill? Wow, we have different ears. Maybe if you compare the "Breathe" album to the most country thing CCR has done, but taking their careers as a whole I disagree with your assessment. 

And just because the Eagles wouldn't sound out of place on country radio today doesn't make them a country group. Same with Mellencamp and others. The Eagles charted only one country song during their recording career and that many young artists confuse them with actual country acts is among the reasons why country radio has swung the way it has. If John Mellencamp doesn't have anything better to offer the genre than the pandering "This is Our Country," I'd ask that he stay away from country radio.

The consensus seems to be that we're not concerned with strict and often arbitrary genre boundary lines as far as quality crossover music is concerned. I agree. Indeed, there is a rich history of excellent pop-country (and country-pop) crossovers and, in retrospect we can identify many non-country artists who have had a significant influence upon the genre. However, there's no need to rewrite the past to suit the present. Ray Charles made an excellent country album but was not a country artist. The Eagles may sound more country than Rascal Flatts but they certainly didn't get any airplay alongside the country greats of the 70's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor:  Cross Canadian Ragweed is more country than Faith Hill? Wow, we have different ears. Maybe if you compare the &#8220;Breathe&#8221; album to the most country thing CCR has done, but taking their careers as a whole I disagree with your assessment. </p>
<p>And just because the Eagles wouldn&#8217;t sound out of place on country radio today doesn&#8217;t make them a country group. Same with Mellencamp and others. The Eagles charted only one country song during their recording career and that many young artists confuse them with actual country acts is among the reasons why country radio has swung the way it has. If John Mellencamp doesn&#8217;t have anything better to offer the genre than the pandering &#8220;This is Our Country,&#8221; I&#8217;d ask that he stay away from country radio.</p>
<p>The consensus seems to be that we&#8217;re not concerned with strict and often arbitrary genre boundary lines as far as quality crossover music is concerned. I agree. Indeed, there is a rich history of excellent pop-country (and country-pop) crossovers and, in retrospect we can identify many non-country artists who have had a significant influence upon the genre. However, there&#8217;s no need to rewrite the past to suit the present. Ray Charles made an excellent country album but was not a country artist. The Eagles may sound more country than Rascal Flatts but they certainly didn&#8217;t get any airplay alongside the country greats of the 70&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The World Jewel Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>The World Jewel Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>The truth is so called "crossover artists" have been a part of country music for decades.  The newest "Genre Jumpers" are nothing new.  Besides the people mentioned so far you should also consider artists like Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan, Johnny Cash, The Grateful Dead, Neil Young, and plenty more.  The lines between Country and Rock have been blurred for decades.

The country music of today bears little resemblance to early country music including cowboy singers, bluegrass, and "mountain music".  Once country music adopted the electric guitar as it's standard it became more like rock music than traditional country music.  For every country artist that pays "traditional country" there is a dozen that sound just like a rock bands.  Not that there's anything wrong with that.

In particular as a fan of Jewel I'm looking forward to Jewel finally releasing a whole album of country music instead of a song here and there.  IMHO her voice lends itself nicely to country music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth is so called &#8220;crossover artists&#8221; have been a part of country music for decades.  The newest &#8220;Genre Jumpers&#8221; are nothing new.  Besides the people mentioned so far you should also consider artists like Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan, Johnny Cash, The Grateful Dead, Neil Young, and plenty more.  The lines between Country and Rock have been blurred for decades.</p>
<p>The country music of today bears little resemblance to early country music including cowboy singers, bluegrass, and &#8220;mountain music&#8221;.  Once country music adopted the electric guitar as it&#8217;s standard it became more like rock music than traditional country music.  For every country artist that pays &#8220;traditional country&#8221; there is a dozen that sound just like a rock bands.  Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that.</p>
<p>In particular as a fan of Jewel I&#8217;m looking forward to Jewel finally releasing a whole album of country music instead of a song here and there.  IMHO her voice lends itself nicely to country music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Banks</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>I agree with Taylor about the Eagles.  I used to listen to them as a rock-n'-roll loving hippy.  If they were just starting out now, would they just be considered country?  Maybe.  Now I listen to them as an aging-hippy who loves country, and rock n' roll.

I guess I don't mind genre jumping, if the artists are talented!  Of course, I am a Willie Nelson fan, and I can't think of a style of music he hasn't sung.  But after 50 years in the music industry, I guess he can play whatever he wants and enjoy himself.

There can't be anything more country than 'Crazy', sung by Patsy Cline or Willie or anyone.  But as you know, Willie loves to play Jazz (just did a show with Wynton Marsalis in NYC last month), he did that reggae album, with Toots Hibbing, Nightlife is one of the greatest blues songs ever, imho, and the Stardust album of classics was on the charts for a long time.

So, maybe it's my age, but I don't mind hearing artists dabble in other genres. I've lived too long to be a purist about anything.  I love the CMT Crossroads shows for that reason.  Cheryl Crow and Willie was my favorite pairing, but I have enjoyed them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Taylor about the Eagles.  I used to listen to them as a rock-n&#8217;-roll loving hippy.  If they were just starting out now, would they just be considered country?  Maybe.  Now I listen to them as an aging-hippy who loves country, and rock n&#8217; roll.</p>
<p>I guess I don&#8217;t mind genre jumping, if the artists are talented!  Of course, I am a Willie Nelson fan, and I can&#8217;t think of a style of music he hasn&#8217;t sung.  But after 50 years in the music industry, I guess he can play whatever he wants and enjoy himself.</p>
<p>There can&#8217;t be anything more country than &#8216;Crazy&#8217;, sung by Patsy Cline or Willie or anyone.  But as you know, Willie loves to play Jazz (just did a show with Wynton Marsalis in NYC last month), he did that reggae album, with Toots Hibbing, Nightlife is one of the greatest blues songs ever, imho, and the Stardust album of classics was on the charts for a long time.</p>
<p>So, maybe it&#8217;s my age, but I don&#8217;t mind hearing artists dabble in other genres. I&#8217;ve lived too long to be a purist about anything.  I love the CMT Crossroads shows for that reason.  Cheryl Crow and Willie was my favorite pairing, but I have enjoyed them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Trask</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Trask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>I think one should look back to Country's past to best examine this question.  25 years ago - The Eagles and Gordon Lightfoot may have been considered pop or rock, but now they fit in on country radio better then current country artists even do!  John Mellencamp is another of these artists who's songs are genuinely country, falling often on the Americana or Folk-Rock side of things.  Both being subgenres of country.

The truth is the aforementioned artists are MORE country then a lot of so called "country" artists currently on radio.  Rascal Flatts and Faith Hill are perhaps the furthest thing from country music as it gets.  That they're even classified as such is baffling.  

Meanwhile the genre has 3 deeply artistic and satisfying sub-genres in Folk-Rock, Americana and Texas Country that have still yet to be truly tapped.  There is no reason Cross Canadian Ragweed shouldn't be played on Top40 Country radio.........or even the band Eels.

There will be many who will give the cliched "country is something different to everyone" but this is a gross misjudgement.  A genre of music is such due to the instruments, song styling and historical evolution that brought it to be.  Understanding this, we can better know what to expect from the future of country music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one should look back to Country&#8217;s past to best examine this question.  25 years ago - The Eagles and Gordon Lightfoot may have been considered pop or rock, but now they fit in on country radio better then current country artists even do!  John Mellencamp is another of these artists who&#8217;s songs are genuinely country, falling often on the Americana or Folk-Rock side of things.  Both being subgenres of country.</p>
<p>The truth is the aforementioned artists are MORE country then a lot of so called &#8220;country&#8221; artists currently on radio.  Rascal Flatts and Faith Hill are perhaps the furthest thing from country music as it gets.  That they&#8217;re even classified as such is baffling.  </p>
<p>Meanwhile the genre has 3 deeply artistic and satisfying sub-genres in Folk-Rock, Americana and Texas Country that have still yet to be truly tapped.  There is no reason Cross Canadian Ragweed shouldn&#8217;t be played on Top40 Country radio&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;or even the band Eels.</p>
<p>There will be many who will give the cliched &#8220;country is something different to everyone&#8221; but this is a gross misjudgement.  A genre of music is such due to the instruments, song styling and historical evolution that brought it to be.  Understanding this, we can better know what to expect from the future of country music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The World Jewel Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>The World Jewel Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Anybody that has listened to Jewel's music for a long while already know she's been heavily influenced by Country music since breaking onto the music scene in the 1990's.  Jewel was raised on a ranch with a father that sang country music.  Songs like Angel and others are basically country songs.  She plays an acoustic guitar and  she has been riding horses since she was a child.  I'd say Jewel is more country than most of Nashville.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody that has listened to Jewel&#8217;s music for a long while already know she&#8217;s been heavily influenced by Country music since breaking onto the music scene in the 1990&#8217;s.  Jewel was raised on a ranch with a father that sang country music.  Songs like Angel and others are basically country songs.  She plays an acoustic guitar and  she has been riding horses since she was a child.  I&#8217;d say Jewel is more country than most of Nashville.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brody Vercher</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Brody Vercher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/your-take-are-genre-jumpers-ruining-country-music/#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>I agree with your assessment that it's easier to cross over today because the sounds of the two genres aren't as different as they used to be. The jumping back in forth between genres has been going on forever, you mentioned Ray Charles, another that comes to mind is Conway Twitty. But even he had to pay his dues, he wasn't immediately accepted by country fans or country radio.

It would probably be too hard to even change the sound of today's country music back to more traditional sounds since the ball has already been set in motion and the line having already become increasingly blurred.

So should fans of traditional country sounds do like Jack Ingram mentioned in one of his interviews, listen to the old stuff if that's what you like and not pay attention to the newer stuff?

"My impression is that it's just not comparable to what it used to be. It never will be. It's never going to be as segregated … as it was, maybe, back in the '30s, '40s and '50s. So people who yearn for that can just listen to those records, because you're not going to find too many artists these days sounding retro. Country music, for me, has always been America's music. Right now, more than ever, it's a product of its influences."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your assessment that it&#8217;s easier to cross over today because the sounds of the two genres aren&#8217;t as different as they used to be. The jumping back in forth between genres has been going on forever, you mentioned Ray Charles, another that comes to mind is Conway Twitty. But even he had to pay his dues, he wasn&#8217;t immediately accepted by country fans or country radio.</p>
<p>It would probably be too hard to even change the sound of today&#8217;s country music back to more traditional sounds since the ball has already been set in motion and the line having already become increasingly blurred.</p>
<p>So should fans of traditional country sounds do like Jack Ingram mentioned in one of his interviews, listen to the old stuff if that&#8217;s what you like and not pay attention to the newer stuff?</p>
<p>&#8220;My impression is that it&#8217;s just not comparable to what it used to be. It never will be. It&#8217;s never going to be as segregated … as it was, maybe, back in the &#8217;30s, &#8217;40s and &#8217;50s. So people who yearn for that can just listen to those records, because you&#8217;re not going to find too many artists these days sounding retro. Country music, for me, has always been America&#8217;s music. Right now, more than ever, it&#8217;s a product of its influences.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
