Your Take: A Line Of Impropriety?
I gave it a mention in the latest Kellie Pickler single review, and I’m sure it’s happened before, but no one seemed to pick up on it, so I’ll highlight it here. I’m not trying to call out the producer, but he’s been the one involved in the couple of instances that have recently crossed my radar.
Should there be a delineation of responsibility when it comes to the people who manage an album? Specifically, should a producer contribute songs they’ve written to a project that they’re producing? Marty Stuart contributed his pickin’ skills to Kathy Mattea’s latest project, Coal, but that doesn’t seem to cross any line of impropriety. Fred Rose wrote material for Hank Williams that he also produced, but there is also a history of producers taking advantage of artists for their own gain. In addition to Pickler’s album, Chris Lindsey is producing the upcoming album from Caitlin & Will, the winners of CMT’s Can You Duet, which contains a cut that was co-written by his wife, who was a judge on the show.
When it comes to a song, is an artist or the label being naive or too trusting to allow this to happen? And will such an arrangement produce the best music possible, or at least songs that are advantageous to the artist’s career? There are a lot of angles to look at, so let’s get y’alls take.
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Caitlin & Will // Kathy Mattea // Kellie Pickler // Marty Stuart
Current Discussion
- Terry Ridont: I think its cool. Thats what I like about indy rock artists, everything isn't the same high budget packaging and ...
- Stormy: Jon: The problem is that the progressive country music is now being called Americana. And why is it ...
- Razor X: Maybe his brother did talk him into it but what’s to say he hasn’t ‘always loved’ and ‘wanted’ to ...
- Brian: Josh Kelley will be fine. At the very least it means Katherine Heigl may show up on country award shows regularly. ...
- Razor X: Change may be inevitable but we aren't required to support it and if enough people boycott it, it doesn't last ...
- Jon: "You can’t stop “progress”… We can if we try hard enough. Um, no. Not that I think "progress" is a good ...
- Joe: When she moved from Mercury to BNA, I think we were all just allowed to think there'd be some grand ...
- sam sam: Well, Suzie, maybe if I saw his live show I'd love him. But I'm not interested in attending concerts. Radio ...
- JOHN: Personally Sherrie s voice is as pure as it gets to me. Just listened to her demo songs after reading ...
- Suzie: What is all this hate for Bucky about anyway?? He has one of the best voices in country music ...

Is Dave Haywood going solo? This and many other of country music's most pressing questions answered in the September edition of The 9513's world famous Mailbag!
Caroline Herring likes to sing songs about life in the South. No, not exactly like Justin Moore and Jason Aldean...
The 9513's resident historian Paul W. Dennis sits down for a chat with country music legend Gene Watson.
As much as we love girl singers, we love songs about girl singers even more. Here's just a few of the many tribute songs out there.
Step away from the river and up to a jukebox, because heartbreak is only temporary, but a good song about drowning yourself—like a diamond—lasts forever.
What do you think about music labels "testing the waters" with a single before providing access to an artist's entire album?
What country artist, young or old, would you recommend as a must-listen artist to a newcomer on his/her journey through country music, and what would your essential song picks be?


21 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
June 28, 2008 at 4:09 pm Permalink
if you put yourself in that situation it shows your weak unless the rest of your career you try to pull yourself away from that control. if you continue to put your career in that direction you will be nothing but average with producers taking advantage of you. they need to be more business minded in thier career not just country music stars.
June 28, 2008 at 4:20 pm Permalink
As a music buyer, I guess I only have a problem if the producer-penned song stinks. If the song is good, then I don’t have any real problem with it because I got my money’s worth.
If I buy an album that stinks, I’m less likely to buy that artist’s albums in the future. So if the producer insists upon recording sub-par songs merely because he wrote them, he may cause his artist to lose potential “repeat buyers” who think like I do.
June 28, 2008 at 4:34 pm Permalink
i would rather listen to constant good music each time from an artist that stands up for what they know is good, not be under control of a producers will or opinion, that sounds like total greed me.
June 28, 2008 at 4:36 pm Permalink
sorry, i meant to me.
June 28, 2008 at 5:25 pm Permalink
So much of what happens in Top 40 Mainstream Nashville music production these days reminds me of David Bowie’s lyric “incestuous and vain” from his song “Time”. Those little “insider’s clubs” cliques tend to be very short sighted and insular and don’t benefit anyone in the long run as objective outside opinions aren’t likely to break through the mental walls these folks build around themselves.
If the songs are consistently top notch that result from such collaborations, then it wouldn’t be an issue, but how often is that the case? The artists don’t want to offend their producers and the producer-songwriters can’t be objective about their own creations, so its a real crap shoot.
The vast majority of my country CD purchases are from singer-songwriters on the fringe of the mainstream, so this is mostly an academic issue for me. I don’t really care what the big name Top 40 artists do as I rarely if ever buy their music, but this issue could be a contributing factor to Airhead Country’s decline in quality. I have no personal interest in Will and Caitlin either, but The Coppola Twins are another matter entirely even if their new YouTube video is pretty weak……..
June 28, 2008 at 8:27 pm Permalink
I don’t know if I find it exloitative for the simple fact that if a producer puts too many songs on albums that don’t work, they won’t be producing much.
While Don’t You Know You’re Beautiful doesn’t appeal to most of us on these board, I also don’t know that it is supposed to. But it did do what it was supposed to do, which was get her back in fron tof her target demographic and make her the bestest teen role model since the last one. In fact, I would be curious to know if Lindsey and Co wrote the song and then presented it to Kellie, or if Chris saw Kellie’s AI performance not give her a bump and wrote the song to cater specifically to that need.
June 28, 2008 at 9:11 pm Permalink
I think the artist should have final say on all songs but shouldn’t be pressured into a song because somebody has a better connection in the industry. I like the idea of blindly listening to demos without knowing who’s pitching it. Take the labels off, mix them up, and let them play.
If your producer is a horrible songwriter, no thanks. If your producer is a good songwriter and wrote a song specifically for you, that could be a good thing.
June 28, 2008 at 9:48 pm Permalink
I don’t know how much say who should have, but I know this: If I was investing money into a new artist (as record labels do) I’d expect some say over the final project.
If I didn’t have some control over which songs were/weren’t recorded, how the album was marketed, et cetera, I would take my money elsewhere and invest in some other business.
The level of control need not be direct: It would be enough to simply be able to hire managers who would make those decisions for me.
But I couldn’t imagine investing in any new artist with the intent of getting that artist on Top 40 radio and not expect some sort of control over that artist’ recording choices, the image he/she projects, and the marketing.
June 29, 2008 at 1:35 am Permalink
Rick, just when I start to take you serious again, you stand up for The Coppolas again when compared to Caitlin and Will. I have no idea whether Caitlin and Will will make it but I do know that The Coppolas are the kind of act that is currently succeeding in Top 40 Country music. To be specific, if they can’t find a way into country music, they’ll go the rock route, or whatever route gets them there. They come across as just another couple of pretty faces and bodies to match, and they can sing a little.
This isn’t an attack on them, but I would love to hear what a guy who claims to be such a country purist sees in their act. Given that this thread is about producing, between the two acts, The Coppolas seem to be the kind of act that would gladly give up control if the producer can produce what matters to them: record sales success.
June 29, 2008 at 5:12 am Permalink
i guess i have always looked more too the straight and narrow ways of sucess within a career with the songwriter(with a little outside help like friends)being the artist and having control of thier situation. i understand its a rough business, but it just does not attract me to think a producer/songwriter has great songs to give to artist which could make the album a multi-platinum seller, but they opt out to give a song to one artist and couple too another and if their lucky it might hit gold. how exactly does this work, does the artist get to choose the songs they didnt write or our they forced? thats why i prefer artist that make and play their own music because the emotion is there already and it just seems real and more natural.
June 29, 2008 at 9:21 am Permalink
While the producer-written song may be ‘good’, aren’t the artist and producer limiting themselves if they aren’t looking at every possible song? They could very well miss an opportunity for a ‘great’ song that could really break an artist or revive a slumping career. So if producer-written songs or songs from only a handful of publishing companies are considered, then the producer and the artists are seriously handicapping the project.
And with all the great tunesmiths in Nashville and beyond, isn’t it a little arrogant and/or self-indulgent to automatically decide other songs are sub-par. Simply because someone else owns the copyrights? It’s also interesting that so many artists fought for years to record original material while producer-written tunes have appeared as album filler for decades …
June 29, 2008 at 9:54 am Permalink
so do ya think it’s a position of power being played by the producers to make sure the artist does not become huge to make it easier for them to keep a noose around the artist career, so they dont run off at the first sign of more money or more song opportunities. thats why i feel if you do it all yourself you can find the producer to fit your style easier instead of putting up with all that bull of being forced and told what to do.
June 29, 2008 at 10:43 am Permalink
Poor example – I don’t think Fred Rose did any harm to Hank Williams career at all. Fred was a top flight songwriter (often writing under the name Floyd Jenkin) and often assisted on Hank’s compositions without taking a co-writing credit, in addition to the ones where he did take a co-writing credit
Do you really think that the writer of such classics as “Be Honest With Me”, “It’s A Sin”, “Pins and Needles (in My Heart)”, “No One Will Ever Know”, “Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain”, “Take These Chains From My Heart”, “Setting The Woods on Fire” , “Hank Your Head in Shame” and “Faded Love and Winter Roses” was a hack writer foisting off inferior material on his artist?
June 29, 2008 at 11:01 am Permalink
And there is something to be said for producers. Rumor has it that Kelly Clarkson and Clive Davis fought over every song on her last album. She won and came out with the most critically and fan panned album of her career.
Likewise, something tells me we won’t be having this conversation if Chely Wright covers a couple of Rodney Crowell songs on her nect album.
June 29, 2008 at 11:08 am Permalink
Paul, I don’t think that at all. I offered the Fred Rose/Hank Williams partnership up as a counterexample and chose it because I figured it would be universally recognized as an instance of a situation where the relationship was mutually beneficial.
June 29, 2008 at 11:24 am Permalink
i thought hank and fred were friend’s? if it was mutually just business do you think hank would’ve been as sucessful? because i think their friendship was the reason for their sucess together because of thier respect of each other. can you really say the same for most of today’s business partnerships.
June 29, 2008 at 11:28 am Permalink
i think you do have a stronger bond if the writer/producer is a friend with the artist. that should make for a stronger and longer career.
June 29, 2008 at 12:44 pm Permalink
Along the lines of Stormy’s point about Kelly Clarkson:
“He Stopped Loving Her Today” is often considered one of country’s best songs, but George Jones hated it and recorded it only because his producer Billy Sherrill hounded him into recording it.
July 1, 2008 at 8:05 pm Permalink
I understand what you’re saying “HAIRANDTOENAILS,” but at the same time – but I still believe artists should have final say. At the same time, if the artist isn’t smart enough to take some direction from the label they wouldn’t have a record deal in the first place.
January 26, 2009 at 12:08 am Permalink
Brady,
Being as so that I myself have worked with Chris on our new album I feel I should reveal the experience with MY producer and his contributions as far as songwriting goes…(I feel that Will would beack me up on this whole post so I believe I am speaking for both of us)
I am friends with some bands who have gotten record deals and have had a producer who thrust their opinions and songs onto those albums…the bands never did well. So I was aware of that potential “problem” before we ever started the album…
BUT I have to be honest, out every record that I have ever owned, without knowing it, I have always picked out the “Chris Lindsey, Aimee Mayo and Hilary Lindsey” cuts. Those were ALWAYS my favorite songs…and I didnt find this out until I met them and did more research on their “credits”!! It was kind of alarming to me and taught me to respect fate even more. So needless to say I was ALREADY a Chris Lindsey and Aimee Mayo fan to begin with. Quite frankly I always joke with them that they could probably crap in a brown paper bag and I would still like it!(As you come to know me more personally, and believe me I intend you to…you will also know that I am a ridiculously HUGE Hilary fan and I kind of put them in the same group in my mind because they are good friends)
But ok, down to our album. Of the 10 songs on our upcoming album, only two were CO-WRITTEN with Chris and Aimee. They are “Dark Horse” and “Address in the Stars”. Which are up on our myspace if you want to hear em.
Now, I dont know in any other artist cases, but in ours Will and I had almost complete control of the songs we did and didnt do. If we were given a song we didnt like they would toss it. If we were given a song that the label loved and we didnt, they tossed it. So, having said that I think in the longest way possible, if Chris and Aimee pitched a song to us and we didnt like it…we didnt do it.
I dont want you to get the wrong impression of Chris and his job as our producer. At no time did he ever force us to do one of his or Aimee’s songs. It just so happens that the songs of theirs that did make the album, made it because they were the best they/we had to offer.
Chris and Aimee are two of the most talented people (in my mind) and I think their credentials speak for themselves. However we are now brought down to a matter of opinion about their songs…and ya know what everyone says about opinions :)
I hope that one day you get to know Chris and Aimee personally…they really do care about people and they dont “step” on anyone to get to the top.
My opinion though (taking my situation and CL out of the equation) an artist should know who they are and who they arent…if they are being bullied by a producer to do one of their songs they should know what part of the human anatomy their boot goes in…we always talk about individuality in music…and an artist that just sits back and takes it is no atrist at all.
I hope this helps in your quest for the right answer to your question. And I hope it helps maybe in how you view our friend CL and AHEM how you review the C&W album…haha just kidding.
xoxo Caitlin
January 26, 2009 at 12:26 am Permalink
PS…I meant BrOdy…was it once BrAdy??
Leave a Comment