Vince Gill Surprised, Jack Ingram Probably Not So Much; ‘Wine, Women, & Song’ Heads to Atlanta Area
- Pop & Hiss’ Ann Powers on Taylor Swift’s opening performance:
Swift started things out with a version of “Forever and Always” that was glitzy and high-concept — and off-tune, a consistent characteristic of Swift’s live outings that gave the lie to her one undeserved triumph, for best female vocalist. The prize should have gone to Carrie Underwood, country’s most powerful young singer and the evening’s co-host with Brad Paisley.
- Vince Gill, pre-CMA Awards, commented on the likelihood of Taylor Swift winning entertainer of the year:
“I’ve been around a long time, and I know people are predicting early that she’s going to win, but I would be surprised if she did.”
Jack Ingram, pre-CMA Awards, commented on the likelihood of Taylor Swift winning entertainer of the year:
“I think she’s going to be the surprise of the night,” he said. “I think the entertainer category is going to have a lot people talking. I don’t want to call it a changing of the guard, but that’s what it is, regardless of what happens tonight. Tonight is going to stir things up.”
- Ingram isn’t the only one calling last night a changing of the guard, The New York Times‘ Jon Caramanica noted that the “coming sea change” could be seen in several categories.
- That Nashville Sound created its own categories (The Hell Hasn’t Frozen Over After All Award, The Dry Cleaners Appreciation Award, etc.) to honor the best and worst of last night’s awards show.
- EW.com’s Ken Tucker rounded up is own list of best and worst moments.
- If you haven’t claimed your free download of a CMA Awards nominated artist from Amazon yet, may I suggest “The Devil Went Down to Georgia” by the Zac Brown Band, which was performed last night. If that doesn’t suit your fancy, perhaps the karaoke version of Taylor Swift’s song “Fifteen” will.
- KNBT FM has an audio interview with Darrell Scott on the subject of his latest album, Modern Hymns, his skills on the guitar, an upcoming project, and thoughts on Americana.
- Music Fog: BettySoo – “Whisper My Name”
- Wine, Women & Song — the tour featuring Gretchen Peters, Suzy Bogguss, and Matraca Berg — is heading to the Atlanta area, which also gives me the excuse to link to their MySpace again.
- CMT’s Edward Morris recapped Tuesday night’s BMI Country Awards.
- John Rich confirmed that he and wife Joan are having a baby boy and that his name will indeed be Cash.
- Johnny Burke’s new EP The Long Haul EP is currently available for free on Internet Archive. (via Alt-512 Music Musings)
- Richard Elliott believes the new Rosie Flores record, Girl of the Century, suffers from the briefness of the majority of the tracks.
- Self.com has video interviews with Kellie Pickler before her acoustic performance at the Country Music Hall of Fame and Miranda Lambert while she was getting ready for the red carpet.
- Listen to Mac Leaphart’s song “Confederate Roses” at The Gobblers Knob.
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Bettysoo // Brad Paisley // Carrie Underwood // CMA Awards // Gretchen Peters // Jack Ingram // John Rich // Kellie Pickler // Matraca Berg // Miranda Lambert // Rosie Flores // Suzy Bogguss // Taylor Swift // Vince Gill // Zac Brown // Zac Brown Band
Current Discussion
- Razor X: I honestly don’t think Josh Kelley is being crass about it at all. I suspect it’s more inline with ...
- Stormy: Gabrielle: "When I say no I mean maybe or maybe I mean yes." No. When I say no, I ...
- gabrielle: Fancy was another song that should get people mad either whats wrong with ppeople these days people getting mad for ...
- gabrielle: Holly Dunn's maybe i mean Yes had nuttin to do with rape or anything people mistook this song these ...
- Kelly: oh yeah...
- Matt B.: Kelly is that a "30 Rock" reference?
- Kelly: “A girl can get a lot of heat these days by going country.” "That's a deal braker ladies..."
- Dan Milliken: I do like the Everly Bros version of "Brand New Heartache," but this is yet another solid sampler.
- Matt B.: I honestly don't think Josh Kelley is being crass about it at all. I suspect it's more inline with ...
- Dan Milliken: "Now, there’s a perfect reason not to listen to his music." Ha! I mean, I'll welcome anyone to country music who demonstrates ...

Is Dave Haywood going solo? This and many other of country music's most pressing questions answered in the September edition of The 9513's world famous Mailbag!
Caroline Herring likes to sing songs about life in the South. No, not exactly like Justin Moore and Jason Aldean...
The 9513's resident historian Paul W. Dennis sits down for a chat with country music legend Gene Watson.
As much as we love girl singers, we love songs about girl singers even more. Here's just a few of the many tribute songs out there.
Step away from the river and up to a jukebox, because heartbreak is only temporary, but a good song about drowning yourself—like a diamond—lasts forever.
What do you think about music labels "testing the waters" with a single before providing access to an artist's entire album?
What country artist, young or old, would you recommend as a must-listen artist to a newcomer on his/her journey through country music, and what would your essential song picks be?


52 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
November 12, 2009 at 11:35 am Permalink
A coming “sea change” to mainstream country music eh? I’d say the “Young/AirHead Country” tsunami has already struck and washed Top 40 country radio’s links to tradition out to sea. The rising tide of pop-rock crap masquerading as “country” music has washed most of the “countriness” out of the format. Just pathetic…
November 12, 2009 at 12:07 pm Permalink
Any reason that we keep getting updates on the specific choice of name from the Rich family?? hhmmm…
November 12, 2009 at 12:15 pm Permalink
Apparently it was a rumor before and now it’s been confirmed. Feeling a little self conscious today?
November 12, 2009 at 12:17 pm Permalink
okay, i guess i am, but you and i both know the truth, sir…
November 12, 2009 at 12:55 pm Permalink
Cash Rich….I guess Filthy was the backup choice
November 12, 2009 at 1:10 pm Permalink
The sad part about last night is that the only reason i watched it was to see if anyone DID beat Taylor Swift.
Surprise for me the entire show was pretty good, save for a handful of oddball performances the entire program re-vamped my country fandom.
I do want to point something out about last night though, they pretty much told us Taylor would win the entire show. They kept flashing her face everytime someone else was talking, they made several references to the Kanye incident (foreshadowing a moment of redemption i guess)and other Swift related topics, and she was the only one with two performances, what the hell, thats not right. Brooks and DUnn should have had two performances to cap off their final CMA award show as a duo, Not Swift. They just did it for the ratings and thats not right.
All in all I compare Taylor to Jimmie Johnson, because NASCAR is going through the same deal. Both figures have changed the game completely, and everyone who is not a predetermined fan seems to hate them because they keep winning over those who probably should’ve won. However, like it or not, they’re here and we just gotta respect that they have that much going for them I guess or stop enjoying what we have loved so much for so long all together.
I also just realized this was a long rant…damn it
November 12, 2009 at 4:33 pm Permalink
I pretty much lost my mind a few times last night and was beyond angry. I was actually kinda concerned my Facebook status updates might get me in trouble with some of the record label people I’m connected to.
As nice as it was to see Jamey up on stage accepting that award (and scaring the shit outta the suits!) and as sensational as ZBB’s performance was, it wasn’t enough to save us from the travesty that is Taylor-mania.
I can vaguely make some semblance of understanding the Entertainer of the Year award. It’s wrong, but if I’m forced, I can see where voters were coming from.
If the Album Of The Year award is strictly about sales, then I see how Taylor won. It’s NOT about sales, but apparently that’s what voters thought. To give that to Taylor with “That Lonesome Song” in the category is one of the most disgusting things I’ve ever been witness to. That is, until….
The Female Vocalist award. I didn’t know what to say – with Lee Ann Womack, one of the GREATEST pure singers we’ll ever know, looking on, we have to give the award to the least deserving winner in the history of the CMAs????? I was embarrassed for the CMA, and to have LA Womack present it to her was gross and shameful.
Oh, and for the record – since I was a major proponent of Kid Rock being a part of the show – his appearance in Jamey’s song was completely useless. It was very apparent that he was there to try and lend some “mainstream” to Jamey’s performance, which is sad. Jamey was great on his own and shoulda been given his own time. I really think people underestimate just how “Country” Kid Rock is, but last night he shouldn’t have been there.
There were some high points last night, but far too many low ones and some real embarrassment for the CMA and its voters, who should feel ashamed today.
November 12, 2009 at 4:34 pm Permalink
Well, searching the net, looks like there are sane people in this world. By far, the writers agree with most of the night with one exception: Female Vocalist of the year. How can you have 4 terrific singers who all could get that award but give it to the one who sing speaks, has a limited singing range and can’t stay in tune? The CMA should be ashamed of that fiasco. Now, I was so shocked at that award that I forgot to comment on Carrie’s night. Gosh, when she was singing “Divorce” and “Blue” and “Mother’s don’t let your babies grow up to be Cowboys”, I thought girl why can’t you just sing songs like that? Boy, she was just spot on and Brad and her need to do a duet. But that Cowboy Casanova number..First, she was ok but noticed how she was so out of breath near the end? It wasn’t for the dancing or the song, which is a easy one to sing for her, but it was nerves. I think she finally saw the disapproving faces in the front row and realized she just went too far. I hope “Daddy” disapproved and even her boyfriend, “Christian” Mike. Noticed at the start when she spread her legs wide that the lights hit the shiny crotch material and the camera jumped up like the cameraman thought she wasn’t wearing underwear?
November 12, 2009 at 5:40 pm Permalink
@Vicki – Brad and Carrie have duet-ed on Brad’s “5th Gear” (??) album. Very surprising that it wasn’t released as a single, actually – ’cause the song was quite good.
Much agreed on the topic of Carrie singing ACTUAL country music. Nobody can deny the pipes!
November 12, 2009 at 5:57 pm Permalink
i deny the pipes.
November 12, 2009 at 6:12 pm Permalink
I want to forget about the Swift crap. She really isnt worth me talking about her anymore, but can I just say that for a band that had released 3 pretty unspectacular singles, the Zac Brown Band made me proud to be a country music fan last night.
Really. That performance was just as high energy and just as cool as any I have seen in some time.
November 12, 2009 at 6:59 pm Permalink
Antonio, stop being a troll.
November 12, 2009 at 7:02 pm Permalink
Album and Video, we all saw that one coming for Swifty.
But…Entertainer? Female VOCALIST? The CMA has turned into a joke, giving the top awards to a girl who has about as much vocal talent as William Hung.
Taylor Swift is an embarassment to country music…the one making the most money is the one who can’t even sing. WOW.
November 12, 2009 at 7:23 pm Permalink
I definitely like Taylor Swift’s winning the awards. I like what she’s doing and though her voice isn’t that great I think her high school schtick its a much better direction for country than some of the other present alternatives, such as the “I’m Country and Proud” angle or the “Outlaw Schtick” from others.
I’m not a big fan of either, but I can see Swift’s appeal. I just can’t get into Jamey Johnson the singer – though I liked a few songs he has written.
November 12, 2009 at 7:55 pm Permalink
this so call countr ymusic has gone to the dogs and when taylor swift sings , this is exactly what she sounds like is a bunch of dogs howling, come on everyone knows thatit doesn’t matter if you can sing or not , it is about your label and how much money they are willing to pay out to radio programmer s to get them to play your music , which gets you started then there is the publicity that is put out , I bet if anyone knew the truth the whole kayne thing was planned,if taylor is what they are trying to sell as country music , then country music had better get a new name
November 12, 2009 at 8:08 pm Permalink
Fluffy: Nope, sorry, the name is still country and is still sung by country singers such as Taylor who is a country artist.
November 12, 2009 at 8:31 pm Permalink
“…Taylor who is a country artist.”
Dan, what do you base that on? The fact that her label is in Nashvegas and they play her on Top 40 Country radio??
Not my definition of “Country” bro…
November 12, 2009 at 9:56 pm Permalink
The fact that her label is in Nashvegas and they play her on Top 40 Country radio??
You mean the same label who is marketing her as a pop artist in Europe because they said she’s really more pop than country?
November 12, 2009 at 10:19 pm Permalink
Dan: The kind of music Taylor plays was called pop long before it was called country.
November 12, 2009 at 10:24 pm Permalink
Hoo, boy, definition talk again. Maybe this umpteen millionth time will produce something useful, but somehow, I doubt it.
“Swifty cleaned up at the CMA Awards, good for her!”
–Eamon McLoughlin, via Twitter.
November 12, 2009 at 10:43 pm Permalink
I’ve maintained for a long time now that, if this was 1999, Taylor, Carrie and Kellie would all have been marketed to pop radio along with Britney and Christina and Jessica.
There is NOTHING about Taylor that is Country.
November 12, 2009 at 10:45 pm Permalink
Taylor Swift = country that has ability to crossover to pop = country pop = contemporary country
No matter how other people want to categorize her, she is widely known for having some affiliation with the country scene. In my opinion, she is fitting right in (and comfortably so.)
November 12, 2009 at 11:09 pm Permalink
Here’s an interesting fact: Ok I’ve said many times that I’m a member of Carrie’s fan club. When things are good for her, I post there. When I’m objective, I post here. But this is a weird fact: There’s now a Taylor Swift board in the fan club for all who love Carrie the best but love Taylor too. That started up today. I wonder if the board managers will let that board stay.
November 12, 2009 at 11:09 pm Permalink
I just checked my calendar – it appears to me that it’s not 1999. Which, everything else aside, makes a claim respecting what might or might not have been back kind of pointless.
And Dan E., there is plenty of contemporary country that’s not nearly as pop-influenced as Swift’s or Underwood’s, which makes your equation a little incomplete, to say the least.
November 13, 2009 at 1:32 am Permalink
Taylor Swift winning those CMA awards was totally appropriate because she is defining the current nature of mainstream country to a large part of the audience out there. Taylor has become a pop culture media icon what with all the magazine cover photos, TV show appearances, and now bit parts in movies as well. Taylor’s presence on pop music stations just further expands her reach.
Young women and girls love Taylor because they want to be just like her (and Taylor thinks like them and writes songs they can relate to), and their mom’s love the role model Taylor is for their daughters (unlike wild child Miley Cyrus).
Taylor’s concerts sell out almost immediately and her albums sell in large quantities month after month in a shrinking music market. Taylor is without a doubt the most influential artist in mainstream country music these days. It doesn’t even matter that she can’t sing all that well live, or that her music is far more pop than country, or that her subject matter focus on high school romance is very narrow. Her pop culture appeal is what really counts and she’s the reigning queen in terms of artists associated with “modern country” music as delineated by Top 40 country radio.
Taylor embodies most of the things I don’t care for in the current young/modern country mainstream marketplace and is one of the reasons I quit listening to Top 40 country radio entirely. But no one can deny her current level of success and the CMA rightfully acknowledged that. That’s just the way things go…
November 13, 2009 at 2:47 am Permalink
I wish it was ‘99. Current times suck and not just because Taylor Swift rules the world.
November 13, 2009 at 3:16 am Permalink
@ rick
seeing darth vader being vulnerable was quite an experience at the time but your post…
November 13, 2009 at 6:35 am Permalink
In 1999 Shania was Entertainer of the Year. That’s not much of an improvement.
November 13, 2009 at 6:50 am Permalink
1999 was also the year that Vince Gill and Patty Loveless won Vocal Event of the Year for “My Kind of Woman, My Kind of Man”, despite its failure to crack the Top 20 at country radio. Something like that seems inconceivable today.
Even though commercial success was always a huge factor in determining who was awarded a CMA award, it didn’t always completely trump artistry. Yes, Shania won Entertainer of the Year in 1999, after a few years of being completely shut out by the CMA despite all of her commercial success. Remember how they were afraid she would be booed by the audience when she performed on the show? Remember how they made up that bogus International Artist Achievement Award to give to her in 1999 because they felt they had to acknowledge her and were afraid she’d be shut out again?
November 13, 2009 at 7:31 am Permalink
@razor x: Remember how they were afraid she would be booed by the audience when she performed on the show?
I don’t remember that at all. Is there some way I could refresh my memory on that subject other than by relying on yours?
Remember how they made up that bogus International Artist Achievement Award to give to her in 1999…
Now that I don’t remember because it definitely didn’t happen. 1999 was the third year for that award; previous winners were the Mavericks and Trisha Yearwood.
November 13, 2009 at 7:46 am Permalink
I don’t remember that at all. Is there some way I could refresh my memory on that subject other than by relying on yours?
Perhaps someone else remembers? It may not have been the same year she won Entertainer; it might have been the year before. It was the year when she opened the show with “Honey, I’m Home” and there were a bunch of cheerleaders on stage with her to drown out any of the boos they were afraid she might get for not being country enough.
Remember how they made up that bogus International Artist Achievement Award to give to her in 1999…
Now that I don’t remember because it definitely didn’t happen. 1999 was the third year for that award; previous winners were the Mavericks and Trisha Yearwood.
Now it’s my turn to ask you to confirm. My recollection is that Shania was the first recipient and this story on CMT.com — announcing Taylor as the 2009 winner (surprise, surprise) doesn’t list Yearwood or the Mavericks as previous winners, though admittedly it’s not a comprehensive list:
http://www.cmt.com/news/news-in-brief/1626178/taylor-swift-awarded-cma-international-artist-achievement-honor.jhtml
November 13, 2009 at 8:11 am Permalink
@razor x: It’s your declarations of the CMA’s intent and motive I’d like to see some verification for, not whether Twain performed in a big production number.
As far as the international award goes, see http://www.cmaworld.com/international/awards.asp#InternationalArtistAchievement (BTW, I missed the first recipient, BR549; sorry about that). And it’s most certainly not a bogus award; international outreach is an important part of the CMA’s mission, and international touring and sales have put a lot of dollars in a wide variety of artists’ pockets.
November 13, 2009 at 8:43 am Permalink
@razor x: It’s your declarations of the CMA’s intent and motive I’d like to see some verification for, not whether Twain performed in a big production number.
Um, yeah. I get that. Perhaps someone else remembers the story being in the news around that time that they were afraid that she would get booed during her performance.
With respect to the international award, perhaps the year Shania got it was the first year it was given under its current name. Or perhaps that was the first year it was presented on air.
November 13, 2009 at 8:49 am Permalink
I’m still a little perplexed over how Paisley/Urban won Vocal Event of the Year for “Start a Band”… maybe musical event of the year, but vocal? They hardly sing! The whole point of the song is that they’re exchanging guitar licks the whole time… that’s not vocal.
I smell a conspiracy.
November 13, 2009 at 8:52 am Permalink
It was Musical Event of the Year, wasn’t it?
November 13, 2009 at 9:02 am Permalink
@razor x: With respect to the international award, perhaps the year Shania got it was the first year it was given under its current name.
It was. But obviously the award was not “made up” that year to give to Twain.
And you’re right – the award Urban & Paisley won was “Musical Event,” a category introduced in 2004; the last “Vocal Event” award was given in 2003.
November 13, 2009 at 9:28 am Permalink
Shania performed ‘Honey I’m Hone’ at the 1998 CMA show, Razor. And I do remember people saying she would probably get booed off stage. At that time, there was still a magazine called Modern Screen’s Country Music that just loved to hate on the mainstream big-sellers like Garth, Reba, Shania, Tim McGraw,etc. – all artists they deemed not country enough. And those guys – Waylon Wahl I believe the man’s name was – had decided Shania was going to get a very cold reception at the show.
The International Artist Achievement Award was actually started in 1996 and Shania was the fourth recipient of the honor. You’re probably right in assuming she was given the honor in 1999 because the Association wanted to give her some sort of award for all her sales and achievements, but the reason you are thinking Shania won it first – and what Jon didn’t mention in his posts – was that prior to 1999 – the year Shania won – the award was called the International Touring Artist Award, and Shania Twain WAS the first one to get what was called The International Artist Achievement Award.
Hope that helps …
November 13, 2009 at 9:46 am Permalink
@razor x: With respect to the international award, perhaps the year Shania got it was the first year it was given under its current name.
It was. But obviously the award was not “made up” that year to give to Twain.
Shania didn’t go on tour until 1998. I don’t think she’d toured outside of North America at the time she was given the International Artist Achievement Award which makes me suspect that the name and criteria were changed so they could give it to her. If that’s not making up an award, it comes pretty damn close.
November 13, 2009 at 10:05 am Permalink
And if that’s not pure speculation, it comes pretty damn close. Talk about making stuff up.
November 13, 2009 at 10:07 am Permalink
Ooops! Must have read that wrong. I guess I can live with that, then.
November 13, 2009 at 10:45 am Permalink
And if that’s not pure speculation, it comes pretty damn close. Talk about making stuff up.
Yes, you’re right. Silly me. I’m sure it’s just a big coincidence that the same year the award’s name was changed from International Touring Artist to International Artist Achievement, it was given to an artist who hadn’t toured internationally.
November 13, 2009 at 10:56 am Permalink
@razor x: I’m sure it’s just a big coincidence that the same year the award’s name was changed from International Touring Artist to International Artist Achievement, it was given to an artist who hadn’t toured internationally.
Well, there you go. Me, I tend to shy away from claiming to be sure about stuff I don’t actually know something about, but I can see that you don’t consider yourself handicapped by ignorance.
November 13, 2009 at 11:06 am Permalink
Well, there you go. Me, I tend to shy away from claiming to be sure about stuff I don’t actually know something about, but I can see that you don’t consider yourself handicapped by ignorance.
And you don’t consider yourself handicapped by arrogance and rudeness.
November 13, 2009 at 11:25 am Permalink
Arrogance and rudeness would be attributes of those who make claims unsupported by the facts and then belittle those who question them, not those who point out the deficiency of such claims. Allowing one’s self to be blinded to the facts by ideology is never a good idea, and when the ideology in question has to do with nothing more weighty than musical styles, it’s an especially bad one.
November 13, 2009 at 11:45 am Permalink
This isn’t about ideology. I only brought up Shania’s name in the first place to contrast the initial difficulty she had being recognized by the CMA as opposed to the way they completely rolled over for Taylor.
As for belittling others — pot, meet kettle.
November 13, 2009 at 11:56 am Permalink
@razor x: I only brought up Shania’s name in the first place to contrast the initial difficulty she had being recognized by the CMA…
…by making dubious, unsupported claims. In support of a contention that “commercial success completely…trump[ed] artistry” in this year’s awards. That’s ideology, pure and simple.
November 13, 2009 at 12:09 pm Permalink
My claims were supported. Folks can draw their own conclusions, just as you have.
November 13, 2009 at 12:20 pm Permalink
Razor, your claims were:
1. The CMA was afraid she would be booed by the audience when she performed on the show.
No support for that one, other than J. R. Journey’s recollection of some writer and some unnamed people – not a very good description of the CMA – speculating that she might be booed.
2. The CMA made up that bogus International Artist Achievement Award to give to her in 1999 because they felt they had to acknowledge her and were afraid she’d be shut out again?
No support for that one, either. The CMA didn’t “make up” the award, it wasn’t bogus, and you have nothing other than your own prejudices to support the ascribed reason.
In short, your claims about the CMA’s reasons for doing what it did in 1999 amount to a big fat bunch of nothing. Sorry to be blunt, but I know you wouldn’t want me to be politically correct about it.
November 13, 2009 at 12:34 pm Permalink
Facts:
1. Shania Twain, the most commercially successful act of the day had been shut out in previous years’ awards shows,
2. The CMA changed the name and criteria of an award and presented it on air for the very first time to Shania, who would not have qualified for the award had those changes not been made.
Draw your own conclusions. If you choose to believe it’s all a great big coincidence, that’s your prerogative.
As for the booing, I recall reading in the press at the time that there was concern about the reception she would receive. Someone else has a similar recollection. I don’t know how else to support that claim; if it had happened more recently there would probably be references to it out on the web, but there wasn’t as much of this sort of thing out on the web 10 years ago. I’m not suggesting that Shania — or anyone else — deserved to be booed off the stage, and I certainly don’t have any motive for making up such a thing. Believe whatever you want.
November 13, 2009 at 12:55 pm Permalink
“Fact” #2 isn’t, unless you’re going to produce the “before” and “after” criteria. I’m not holding my breath on that one. As for what you recall reading in the press, you still seem not to get the point: your claim was that the CMA – not columnists, not reporters, not “people,” were “afraid she would be booed,” and further, that that fear was what dictated the production of her performance. And nothing you’ve posted since your initial claim has substantiated either of those contentions. Maybe you’ll come up with something that will, but again, I’m not holding my breath.
As for what I choose to believe, it’s simply this: I believe that I don’t know enough to make a reasoned, credible claim with respect to motives in these various cases. I’m ok with that. You ought to try it some time, and – since you don’t know enough to make a reasoned, credible claim with respect to motives in these various cases either – this one would be a good place to start.
November 13, 2009 at 1:28 pm Permalink
Well let’s just take a wild guess and say that touring internationally is a prerequisite for winning an International Touring Artist award, shall we? And can we further assume that if the word “touring” is taken out of the title and the award is subsequently awarded to someone who hadn’t toured internationally, that it’s no longer a requirement? Or do you need a signed affidavit from the president of the CMA before you will concede this point?
Now, I’m sure that the motives for doing this were as pure as the driven snow and in no way motivated by the need to acknowledge a commercial powerhouse who had been ignored by the awards up to that point. Heaven forbid that anyone should connect the dots and presume otherwise. Any correlation is purely and clearly unintentional and coincidental.
November 14, 2009 at 12:42 am Permalink
Hey, Jon, for someone who is a self-proclaimed agnostic, you sure are preachy.
Leave a Comment