The Year in Review: Everybody’s Trying to be the Next Alabama

Matt C | December 28th, 2007 Email Share

Alabama was the story of the 1980s, one of the few artists from that decade that I don’t wish to forget. Alabama was country music’s first supergroup and one of its first superstars, so it’s surprising that their success didn’t immediately spawn a generation of successors. Nineties groups like Blackhawk, Ricochet, Shenandoah and Lonestar were obviously influenced by Alabama, but their sound was more correctly classified as country-pop than Alabama-style country-rock. The third generation of country supergroups, population Rascal Flatts, bears even less resemblance, both in tone and quality, to anything that Alabama ever recorded.

Apparently Music Row decided that 2007 was the time to finally appoint a successor to the 1980s artist of the decade. The result was a dizzying ensemble of debuts from country-rock and southern rock-leaning vocal groups. I frequently turned on the radio in 2007 to hear power chords and vocal harmony and tried to guess whether I was hearing the latest offering from Whiskey Falls, Rio Grande, Heartland, Halfway to Hazard, Lady Antebellum, Crossin’ Dixin or Flynnville Train. I can’t distinguish the music of most of these artists and probably have already forgotten some of them. It’s clear that Music Row has itself a glut of young country rock groups. While normally a war of attrition would ensue, with one or two groups surviving, I seriously doubt that any of these new country-rock groups will establish a lasting presence in the genre.

Problem number one is that the music of these groups sounds exactly the same. Heartland scored one hit by cornering the sissy portion of the fan base, but every other new group suffers from the same limited airplay problem that would plague an artist who released six singles at one time. Each group will release some good singles and some bad singles, and any group that gains limited chart success from one good single will be buried beneath its competitors when its next single is inevitably mediocre.

Problem number two is that, to my ear, none of these groups are particularly good. Most of the artists grew up listening to Alabama and can probably cite them as an influence, but it’s clear that their roots run no deeper. Alabama sounds traditional to artists who are more interested in imitating John Mellencamp, the Eagles and even Van Halen, and the result is near-elimination of the “country” from country-rock. The only group that stands out to me is Capitol Nashville’s contribution to the “Who Wants to be the Next Supergroup?” reality show, Lady Antebellum. My opinion may sour with their 2008 album release, but I consider “Love Don’t Live Here” to be the best of the debut singles from the 2007 vocal group clones and the male-female harmony helps to distinguish Lady Antebellum’s sound from that of other groups.

I think it’s worth considering that Alabama’s formula precludes succession. They struck a perfect balance between arena rock energy and traditional country elements and opened the door for artists like Dwight Yoakam, Travis Tritt and Garth Brooks. However, artists who attempt to build on Alabama’s success but have listened only to Alabama are doomed to failure. Successfully recreating their sound requires a musical heritage that is equal parts country and rock, and few artists who wish to break into country music with an Alabama sound can tell Webb Pierce from Mel Tillis. The result is music that isn’t particularly country and isn’t particularly good.

To paraphrase a familiar lyric: If you’re going to be the next Alabama, you gotta have some country in the band.

  1. M.C.
    December 28, 2007 at 1:49 pm Permalink

    I do think there’s a new trend toward rocking bands, but I think it follows what’s going on with Nashville and country radio in general, which tends to rock more and twang less these days. I don’t think it has much to do with Alabama, although I think Matt describes why they were so successful. There was much better country rock in that era, though, some of it from Nashville–Hank Jr. and CDB, for instead, at least before Charlie went vigilante on us. I think a lot of these bands have as much to do with that sound as with Alabama, who didn’t really rock much at all.

    Few of the new bands have actually received much airplay, but unlike Matt, I like some of them, and I think radio is making a mistake. I particularly like Cole Deggs & the Lonesome, who Matt doesn’t mention, and Flynnville Train. Lady Antebellum shows promise too, and of the harmony groups he mentions, Whiskey Falls had moments I thought were good and less formulaic and cloying than some of the others.

    I think some other of Matt’s generalizations are hugely flawed, though. He says he doesn’t think any of the bands are any good, although contradicts that with his Lady Antebellum comments. I disagree, and I think in some ways the trend away from Lonestar and Diamond Rio–who were direct Alabama acolytes–is a good one.

    Also, I don’t think all those bands sound alike, as Matt says they do. I don’t hear much similarity between Lady Antebellum and Halfway to Hazard, for instance. If you cant distinguish between them, or between Whiskey Falls and Flynnville Train, then you’re not listening very closely.

    I’ve always thought Music Row’s idea of a country band was weak and tended too much toward soft sentiments and harmonies instead of a bunch of guys having fun and rocking out. My tastes in country bands go to the Kentucky HeadHunters and Mavericks, though, so take that for what you will.

    But mostly I find it hard to believe anyone would describe something as appealing to “the sissy portion of the fan base.” Good god. Do you mean, um, women? Or some women and some guys who you think aren’t as manly as you? What’s next, you going to accuse Taylor Swift of having cooties? That kind of pejorative name-calling lowers you and everything you have to say.

  2. Lucas
    December 28, 2007 at 5:15 pm Permalink

    The bands are no Alabama. I think everybody is trying to copy Lonestar right now, but it’s not working.

    A unique band could make it.

  3. Matt C
    December 28, 2007 at 5:41 pm Permalink

    M.C.: I think that the sound of some of these bands is nearly indistinguishable. I don’t deny that, after listening to every track of their debut albums, some can be distinguished from the others. But for the casual radio listener? Not a chance. That’s what matters for these artists’ future success.

    You don’t like one word I used in describing Heartland, but what about the argument behind the vocabulary? “I Loved Her First” wasn’t exactly written for the gun-toting redneck portion of the fan base. I would also describe much of Lonestar’s (especially recent) and Rascal Flatts’ music as appealing to the same “sissys.”

  4. Rick
    December 28, 2007 at 8:19 pm Permalink

    Matt, I agree with you completely about this glut of sound alike rockin-country harmony groups. I think the labels are trying to target somewhere between Alabama and Little Big Town and mostly failing miserably. I also agree that Lady Antebellum comes across as the most unique sounding and their debut single is one of the strongest of all the acts you listed, barring the mushy “I Loved Her First” which was a fluke for Heartland.

    I saw Crossin’ Dixon open for Craig Morgan at a free Broken Bow sponsored concert and I was bored to tears by their music. That label would be better off finishing up the debut album from Megan Mullins in my opinion.

    Despite the ridiculous name Lady Antebellum fortunately has the gorgeous Hillary Scott going for it as well as the strong voiced male lead singer. As the daughter of Linda Davis she inherited mommy’s good looks if not all of her vocal skills. I’ve heard Lady Antebellum on the Opry a couple of times and Hillary seems to be gaining more control over her vocal pitch as time goes on. If Whitney Duncan fails at Warner’s to be another Taylor Swift, maybe they can recruit Hillary……

  5. Paul W Dennis
    December 29, 2007 at 10:17 am Permalink

    There was an attempt to spawn addtional Alabamas during the 1980s - Atlanta - Exile - Restless Heart but none of them had such sustained success, although Exile and Restless Heart did have runs of hits.

    I think that the group that emerging groups should use as a model wwas Shenandoah, my favorite of all the groups because in Marty Raybon they had the best lead vocalist. Shenandoah could work straight country, country pop and country rock convincingly. Personally, I prefer solo acts because solo artists (generally) can imbue the songs wih more personality

  6. Matt B
    December 29, 2007 at 12:28 pm Permalink

    Lady Antebellum’s “male voice” is Charles Kelley, the brother to singer/songwriter Josh Kelley. While I like some of the groups listed here, I am also of the assumption that they’re too similar. However, the recent winner of “The Next Great American Band, “The Clark Brothers,” might just have the goods to be that ‘unique’ band.

  7. Stephen H.
    January 1, 2008 at 11:42 pm Permalink

    The biggest problem with this is we’re comparing duos (Halfway to Hazard) with vocal groups (Lady Antebellum, Whiskey Falls) with full bands (Heartland). These groups may sound similar in many instances, but it’s more a byproduct of Nashville’s sound in general merging together. I’m a little bit surprised, though, in the putting-down of Diamond Rio I’ve seen from a couple people, as I think their sound is very unique and they had many extremely good songs (basically they were a combination of a vocal group with a full band).

    In general I give more credit to a group that does almost all of its own instrumentation (of the “newer” bands, Emerson Drive most closely fits this bill) as opposed to two or three people who hold microphones (Rascal Flatts, I’m looking in your direction).

  8. Chris N.
    January 2, 2008 at 9:59 am Permalink

    No band can sound distinctive if they’re not allowed to play on their own records.

Leave a Comment


Sponsor

Tagged In This Article

// // // // // // // // // //

Current Discussion

  • Rick: Karlie, I'm a traditional country loving curmudgeon and don't much care for the pop-rock stuff that doesn't sound like country ...
  • Todd: While I haven't purchased this record, nor will I(I like Paisley but HATE instrumental albums), this review seems to be ...
  • Karlie: Yeah, I'm not so sure Morris is a "Texas country artist" so much as she is a Texan singer. It ...
  • julia: LOVE THIS SONG MY FRIEND IS GOING THROUGH THE SAME THING KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK RANDY
  • Karlie: This will definitely be a concert song that gets everyone who's the least bit tipsy to raise their beers and ...
  • Razor X: Why all this hate for Brad Paisley? I won't pretend that he's the greatest thing to ever happen to ...
  • Amazace: Not enough mustard in Nashville to cover that hot dog...
  • mikeky: brad paisley has reached the point where he seems to think that he can put out a cd of nothing ...
  • Pierce: Haha, no worries TAYERS. But to my credit, I did watch several youtube videos of the band. None of them ...
  • CMW: Ben: Must you ruin all good things.

Recently Reviewed Albums

  • Randy Houser - Anything Goes
  • Zac Brown Band - The Foundation
  • Hank Williams - The Unreleased Recordings
  • Kasey Chambers & Shane Nicholson - Rattlin' Bones
  • Taylor Swift - Fearless
  • Amber Digby - Passion, Pride and What Might Have Been
  • Randy Owen - One On One
  • Melonie Cannon - And The Wheels Turn