<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Satellite Radio&#8217;s Opportunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/</link>
	<description>The latest country music news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:52:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sara Evans Engaged To Alabama Talk Show Host -- The 9513</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-62747</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Evans Engaged To Alabama Talk Show Host -- The 9513</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-62747</guid>
		<description>[...] still must approve the deal, DOJ approval was seen as the greater obstacle for the merger. Read Matt C.&#8217;s argument for why the FCC should approve the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still must approve the deal, DOJ approval was seen as the greater obstacle for the merger. Read Matt C.&#8217;s argument for why the FCC should approve the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanibug65</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-62639</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanibug65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-62639</guid>
		<description>Well, the merger finally got its first green light last night....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the merger finally got its first green light last night&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleavo</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-59561</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-59561</guid>
		<description>You obviously have never worked for Clear Channel, and give them far too much credit for creativity that they simply don&#039;t have. If they bought all 20 stations in market X, they&#039;d just simulcast the most popular 5 or 6, because that would be far cheaper than developing the diversity you speak of, and they&#039;re not going to put any more money into any market than they have to (and if they own all the stations, where else are you gonna go?). Besides, they have to program what they can SELL. Furthermore, if you think the subscription price for satellite is high now (it&#039;s not, BTW, IMHO), wait until there is NO COMPETITION! Thirdly, NO COMMERCIALS is EXACTLY why I pay for satellite service, and I don&#039;t think I&#039;m alone in that regard, either. You are right about one thing - the depth and variety of music on satellite is very appealing - another factor (again, IMHO) of the COMPETITION between the two services - if they merge, then why bother working so hard to have great content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You obviously have never worked for Clear Channel, and give them far too much credit for creativity that they simply don&#8217;t have. If they bought all 20 stations in market X, they&#8217;d just simulcast the most popular 5 or 6, because that would be far cheaper than developing the diversity you speak of, and they&#8217;re not going to put any more money into any market than they have to (and if they own all the stations, where else are you gonna go?). Besides, they have to program what they can SELL. Furthermore, if you think the subscription price for satellite is high now (it&#8217;s not, BTW, IMHO), wait until there is NO COMPETITION! Thirdly, NO COMMERCIALS is EXACTLY why I pay for satellite service, and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m alone in that regard, either. You are right about one thing &#8211; the depth and variety of music on satellite is very appealing &#8211; another factor (again, IMHO) of the COMPETITION between the two services &#8211; if they merge, then why bother working so hard to have great content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A commentary on a commentary: The proposed Sirius - XM merger &#124; BluegrassJournal.com</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-59329</link>
		<dc:creator>A commentary on a commentary: The proposed Sirius - XM merger &#124; BluegrassJournal.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-59329</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt C. of The 9513 Country Music blog has written a very interesting article on the effects of the consolidation of radio ownership. He makes some very strong points in favor of consolidation of America&#8217;s media outlets, in regards to the proposed merger of XM and Sirius. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt C. of The 9513 Country Music blog has written a very interesting article on the effects of the consolidation of radio ownership. He makes some very strong points in favor of consolidation of America&#8217;s media outlets, in regards to the proposed merger of XM and Sirius. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-55302</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-55302</guid>
		<description>Amen, Brady, and thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Brady, and thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady Vercher</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-55294</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady Vercher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-55294</guid>
		<description>Charlie, could you cut out the crass comments? They offend some of our readers and don&#039;t really contribute anything positive to the conversation. We value your opinion and hate to censor anything, but if your comments continue to be offensive, we&#039;ll have to start editing or removing them. Thanks for understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, could you cut out the crass comments? They offend some of our readers and don&#8217;t really contribute anything positive to the conversation. We value your opinion and hate to censor anything, but if your comments continue to be offensive, we&#8217;ll have to start editing or removing them. Thanks for understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Mack (First outta the Limo)</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-55280</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Mack (First outta the Limo)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-55280</guid>
		<description>Willies Place on XM is the best radio station on the planet.  Guaranteed never to hear a Quesney, McGrawww, or Rascall fags on there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Willies Place on XM is the best radio station on the planet.  Guaranteed never to hear a Quesney, McGrawww, or Rascall fags on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemski</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-54198</link>
		<dc:creator>nemski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-54198</guid>
		<description>Like many of you I got XM with my new Honda (yeah, yeah, I didn&#039;t buy American) and I have been smitten ever since. If XM/Sirious merge, I&#039;m fine with that as long as they don&#039;t take my X Country away. Seriously, don&#039;t touch X Country.

Also, I can&#039;t remember the last time I listened to commercial radio. Here in the Philly area, we are blessed with XPN and a great NPR station as well, so there is no need in my home or car for commerical radio. So count me as a big vote no for commercials on satellite radio. Commercials I do not need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many of you I got XM with my new Honda (yeah, yeah, I didn&#8217;t buy American) and I have been smitten ever since. If XM/Sirious merge, I&#8217;m fine with that as long as they don&#8217;t take my X Country away. Seriously, don&#8217;t touch X Country.</p>
<p>Also, I can&#8217;t remember the last time I listened to commercial radio. Here in the Philly area, we are blessed with XPN and a great NPR station as well, so there is no need in my home or car for commerical radio. So count me as a big vote no for commercials on satellite radio. Commercials I do not need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt C.</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-54050</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-54050</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know much about the technology that is being developed in this area. I do know that existing internet access on the road (RVs, etc.) is almost exclusively from satellites or cell towers.

I think economics and logistics are more important concerns than technology. You seem to take for granted the reality of &quot;once wifi is everywhere and all cars have receivers.&quot; In its present form, I can&#039;t foresee the day when wifi is &quot;everywhere.&quot; In particular, the U.S. interstate system runs through some of the country&#039;s greatest vast nothingness. If wifi infrastructure is installed along these routes, I don&#039;t expect that it will be free. I&#039;m sure that it will be a subscription service and might even be more expensive than a satellite radio subscription is currently. I don&#039;t work in this field so I don&#039;t have cost estimates, but I&#039;d estimate that covering the entire country with wifi is vastly more expensive than launching a satellite. I expect that if internet access does become standard in cars, it will at least initially be satellite-based.

Also, most &quot;internet radio&quot; is essentially websites with audio streams. Given that we&#039;re currently considering banning cell phone use by drivers, I find it hard to envision a time when a computer console sits on the dash and drivers are free to surf the web. For use in automobiles, I&#039;d think that internet radio would have to be assembled into discrete channels that could be navigated like a satellite or AM/FM radio, and this would require a service that would at least structurally, if not technologically, resemble satellite radio and probably would not be free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know much about the technology that is being developed in this area. I do know that existing internet access on the road (RVs, etc.) is almost exclusively from satellites or cell towers.</p>
<p>I think economics and logistics are more important concerns than technology. You seem to take for granted the reality of &#8220;once wifi is everywhere and all cars have receivers.&#8221; In its present form, I can&#8217;t foresee the day when wifi is &#8220;everywhere.&#8221; In particular, the U.S. interstate system runs through some of the country&#8217;s greatest vast nothingness. If wifi infrastructure is installed along these routes, I don&#8217;t expect that it will be free. I&#8217;m sure that it will be a subscription service and might even be more expensive than a satellite radio subscription is currently. I don&#8217;t work in this field so I don&#8217;t have cost estimates, but I&#8217;d estimate that covering the entire country with wifi is vastly more expensive than launching a satellite. I expect that if internet access does become standard in cars, it will at least initially be satellite-based.</p>
<p>Also, most &#8220;internet radio&#8221; is essentially websites with audio streams. Given that we&#8217;re currently considering banning cell phone use by drivers, I find it hard to envision a time when a computer console sits on the dash and drivers are free to surf the web. For use in automobiles, I&#8217;d think that internet radio would have to be assembled into discrete channels that could be navigated like a satellite or AM/FM radio, and this would require a service that would at least structurally, if not technologically, resemble satellite radio and probably would not be free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollerin' Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-54036</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollerin' Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the9513.com/satellite-radios-opportunity/#comment-54036</guid>
		<description>Matt - great article.  really interesting.  especially &lt;i&gt;&quot;On a cross-country trip last year, I marveled at how ironic it is that my GPS navigator can follow me inch by inch from coast to coast yet I have to surf through radio static every 45 minutes to find a new station. Why, in the age of satellites, do we remain reliant on a land-based communication system that requires entirely new infrastructure every 100 miles?&quot; &lt;/i&gt;  

very clever sir.

Can you go a little more into why Satellite and Internet are essentially the same.  Once Wi-Fi is everywhere and all cars have receivers, wont they be super different in the sense that satellite radio has had to pay for their own infrastructure while the internet stations will get to piggyback on existing infrastructure, i.e satellite radio has to actually put up satellites?  I could be totally wrong and I freely admit that I have very little idea of how any sound is sent through the air and comes out of speakers in my car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; great article.  really interesting.  especially <i>&#8220;On a cross-country trip last year, I marveled at how ironic it is that my GPS navigator can follow me inch by inch from coast to coast yet I have to surf through radio static every 45 minutes to find a new station. Why, in the age of satellites, do we remain reliant on a land-based communication system that requires entirely new infrastructure every 100 miles?&#8221; </i>  </p>
<p>very clever sir.</p>
<p>Can you go a little more into why Satellite and Internet are essentially the same.  Once Wi-Fi is everywhere and all cars have receivers, wont they be super different in the sense that satellite radio has had to pay for their own infrastructure while the internet stations will get to piggyback on existing infrastructure, i.e satellite radio has to actually put up satellites?  I could be totally wrong and I freely admit that I have very little idea of how any sound is sent through the air and comes out of speakers in my car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
