Rascal Flatts - “Every Day”

Brady Vercher | February 19th, 2008 Email Share

Rascal Flatts Songwriters: Alissa Moreno and Jeffrey Steele

Machoism, patriotism, alcoholism, romanticism… and if emoism isn’t part of the list of country music concepts yet, you can certainly add it with Rascal Flatts’ release of their latest single, “Every Day.” Rascal Flatts is usually an easy target and a lot of criticism might be unfairly levied upon them, but this could be a new all time low–until they choose to release “It’s Not Supposed To Go Like That” as a single. I try to keep an open mind when it comes to their music because I know quite a few people like them and I’m sure they have legitimate reasons, but the group is making it harder to do so every day.

On some shallow, irrational level, “Every Day” might actually be considered romantic or endearing, but I’m failing to comprehend how either of those sentiments would apply to such an overblown, completely emo lyric. Take a look: “I drive myself crazy / Tryin’ to stay out of my own way / The messes that I make […] Every day, every day / You save my life […] Sometimes the place I go / Is so deep and dark and desperate.” What kind of weight does that put on the woman in the relationship to know that if she becomes unhappy and calls off the relationship that she’s simultaneously ending her partners life. Isn’t that equivalent to a woman getting pregnant to keep an unwilling partner in a relationship (other than it being addition instead of subtraction)? And with all the negativity, clinginess, and general depression, it won’t be long before the woman does become unhappy and wants out, so perhaps he really is shooting himself in the foot and can’t “stay out of his own way.” Anyways, you can take away these three words: overblown, irrational emoism.

Thumbs Down

Listen: Rascal Flatts - “Every Day”

1 Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URI for this post
  1. […] of lackluster performances. Are “She’s A Hottie,” “Last Name,” “Every Day“, “Back When I Knew It All,” “Put A Girl In It,” and […]

  1. Chris N.
    February 19, 2008 at 2:40 pm Permalink

    This is part of a fascinating trend that I keep meaning to write about: in contemporary country songwriting, women can do no wrong. The most striking thing about the RF album is that on every song about a relationship the only blame ever placed is on the man. The woman is always sheer perfection.

    That’s smart marketing, since most of their target audience is female. It just comes off as self-loathing over the course of an album.

  2. mikeky
    February 19, 2008 at 2:45 pm Permalink

    you know, the worst thing i had to do today was to go out and get my taxes done. until you had to go and put this abomination up. you win.

  3. SW
    February 19, 2008 at 2:57 pm Permalink

    I wonder if these guys have started “cutting” yet. What is the deal with this chorus?! Add another reason to the list of why I dislike Rascal Flatts.

  4. Zach Parolin
    February 19, 2008 at 5:06 pm Permalink

    Is this a “He Ain’t the Leaving Kind” religious type of song, or is it actually referring to a woman?

    Wasn’t sure if was supposed to be their next version of that song like “Here” is to “Bless the Broken Road” and “It’s Not Supposed to Go Like That” tries to be like “Sarah Beth”.

    Don’t care much for the song myself. Brad Paisley also released his new single today, though, and Chris Cagle’s CD is out today, so we have enough new content to check out for now.

  5. Brady Vercher
    February 19, 2008 at 5:21 pm Permalink

    Chris, that’s interesting. I didn’t listen to half of their new album, so there’s no way I ever would have noticed it. I didn’t notice it as a trend in contemporary country music, either, but do you think it’s a conscious decision or the byproduct of trying to appeal to women?

    MikeKY, you’re welcome.

    Zach, you bring up a good point about the song being overly generic, but I don’t think it works as well in the religious context.

  6. samantha
    February 19, 2008 at 5:27 pm Permalink

    I do not know why people dislike Rascal Flatts I must say that they are trully an amazing group and they can sing. I do not have anyhing bad to say about their music, I think their music is the best that they have come out with and all i can say is keep up the great work guys. hope to see you in concert for the 6 time really soon.

  7. Roger
    February 19, 2008 at 10:01 pm Permalink

    Samantha I dislike them because the powers that be in country music have pushed them to the forefront and taken away the country music I grew up listening to and i miss it on the radio. I can go to a top forty radio station and hear music like this if i want it…they are not bad musicians or singers….they just should not be on country radio. Just one man’s opinion from nashvegas.

  8. Paul W Dennis
    February 19, 2008 at 10:52 pm Permalink

    Samantha - Rascall Flatts is no more country than Aretha Franklin, the difference being that Aretha is the Queen of Soul and Rascall Flatts is the antithesis of soul. If you check the dictionary for the definition of “bland” you will see a picture of Rascall Flatts next to the definition.

    Their music is not terrible, just incredibly uninteresting

  9. alex
    February 19, 2008 at 10:59 pm Permalink

    i know this is irrelevant, but someone mentioned the new brad paisley song. is anyone else dissapointed with the song choice? i just don’t get it, with so mayn good songs on 5th Gear, why would he choose that one??

  10. Chris N.
    February 20, 2008 at 9:43 am Permalink

    @Brady: Both. I wouldn’t necessarily have noticed it myself, except a songwriter friend of mine pointed it out. He said it’s an unspoken rule nowadays that major-label male acts will not cut a song with a lyric in which a woman is faulted.

  11. Jim Malec
    February 20, 2008 at 9:48 am Permalink

    Doesn’t that sort of violate the other unspoken rule that a major label artist will never cut a song that makes themselves look bad? Or am I getting my unspoken rules mixed up again?

    I really need to pay more attention to what people don’t say at those NSAI meetings.

  12. Kelly
    February 20, 2008 at 10:15 am Permalink

    So, “Papa Loves Mama” wouldnt get made today??? I tell ya, I just dont know what to think;)…

  13. Chris N.
    February 20, 2008 at 11:03 am Permalink

    That’s the trouble with unspoken rules — people don’t speak ‘em.

  14. hairandtoenails
    February 20, 2008 at 11:48 am Permalink

    Kelly — I wish radio played more songs like Papa Loved Mama today! Novelty songs usually lose their charm once the joke wears off, but I still love listening to that song after 16 years.

    And I’d much rather hear a singer talking about burying your rig in the local motel than going to a place that is “so deep and dark and desperate.” The Garth song brings the anguish alive (and tempers it with humor,) the Rascal Flatts song makes the anguish seem boring.

  15. Matt C.
    February 20, 2008 at 11:50 am Permalink

    Women have been salvific figures in country music for about the last 15 years, so Rascal Flatts is nothing new. The general formula for the mid to late 90s was bad boy meets woman and/or finds Jesus and becomes good boy. I haven’t really thought of this in terms of country radio’s increasingly female demographic but it makes sense. However, country songs have always been harder on men than on women, which is why I find songs like “The Midnight Oil,” where the woman is unquestionably the bad “guy,” to be so interesting. Fast-forward to the modern day: even in a female cheating song like “Stay,” we get the sense that the woman is the one being wronged.

  16. Kelly
    February 20, 2008 at 1:18 pm Permalink

    Hairandtoenails: I am with you. while i cant say I enjoy that song now as much as you, I appreciate the songs unique method of telling a classic cheating story. it is sad that we’ll hear more “working woman’s holiday” in a million different forms, before another song that attempts such fresh and often-times dark storylines…

  17. Chris N.
    February 20, 2008 at 3:11 pm Permalink

    “Salvific”! Gotta write that down.

  18. joe
    April 3, 2008 at 7:51 pm Permalink

    Your dissection of the song is totally shallow. This song is about Jesus. It has nothing to do with a woman.

  19. Kay
    May 7, 2008 at 4:53 pm Permalink

    I completely agree with Joe. This song is about God, not about a person who someone is dependent on. It’s beautiful.

  20. Brady Vercher
    May 8, 2008 at 7:39 am Permalink

    Wouldn’t an omniscient God know that he’s hanging on to every word?

    But you always say something without even knowing
    That I am hanging onto your words with all my might

    I maintain that the song isn’t about God. In fact, the video concept calls into question whether or not Rascal Flatts even knows what the song is about. It’s ridiculously overwrought and attempts to make the song socially encompassing despite it’s inward focus. How it ties in with the song, I don’t know.

  21. Eve
    May 17, 2008 at 2:40 am Permalink

    It took every ounce of self-discipline for me to stay seated during one of the songwriters’ (I won’t name names!) live performance of this song, and felt completely nauseous by the end of it (and I saw some others in the audience letting out long, deep breaths of ‘thank god that’s over’, too!); frankly, it doesn’t belong in ANY genre; it’s a classic case of two songwriters’ tapping into each other’s ‘deep dark desperate place’ of dysfunction and coming up with lyrics - entirely heartfelt and sincere, if that performance was anything to go by - which belong in a therapist’s office (spoken from a couch!), not a song. Sorry. We songwriters ALL have our musical ‘odes to dysfunction’ (!) but there ought to be some system of checks and balances which helps us to assess which ones belong in the world at large, and which one’s should stay put in (in the bathroom cabinet behind the razors?!). Too bad this team didn’t provide each other with such checks and balances before they shopped the song, thereby inflicting it on the world: THAT said, the damn thing’s a hit…so who are we to fault it?! - Go figure ’cause this is one I can’t figure at all….
    ;)

Leave a Comment


Sponsor

Tagged In This Article

//

Current Discussion

  • bresenolouie: In this haunting tale of the young widow, she is confused about the sudden tragi...
  • Julie: I'm only an occasional reader of this site, and I'm beginning to see why. This ...
  • bresenolouie: Chris N. is perfectly right!!! This is a universal situation - the "REALITY IN ...
  • Dustin: JMO: Matt, just wait for this video to come to help you understand, its ok to ad...
  • Stormy: Well then,revenge first and investigation later. The song has a huge poblem wit...
  • Brady Vercher: Nice try, but I didn't suggest the song wasn't about vengeance. My willful inter...
  • Chris N.: Yeah! It’s just like how the Europeans learned to speak the Native Americans...
  • JR: I love this song! Where can I get a copy to balst from my speakers as I drive th...
  • Stormy: How does one interpret the song to be about something other than vengance?...
  • Sarah: I don't care what anyone says the song "Back that thang up" is AWESOME!! Justi...

Recently Reviewed Albums

  • Randy Travis - Around The Bend
  • Ray Scott - Crazy Like Me
  • Reckless Kelly - Bulletproof
  • Mark Chesnutt - Rollin’ With The Flow
  • Becky Schlegel - For All The World To See
  • Jewel - Perfectly Clear
  • Eleven Hundred Springs - Country Jam
  • Julianne Hough