Comments on: Luke Bryan – “Country Girl (Shake It For Me)”

By: goldencountry

goldencountry — Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:57:21 +0000

Hands down the worst song of the year or possibly the worst country song ever.

By: Janette

Janette — Sun, 09 Oct 2011 13:56:50 +0000

The song is awful. When I heard it, I wanted to slap Luke across the face. Any girls that like the song either don’t understand their own value or were never taught that they deserve to be respected. I don’t care if it has a good beat and you like dancing to it, (the excuse for mainstream hip hop and rap), the song is ridiculous, degrading and NOT COUNTRY!

By: Ally

Ally — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:37:34 +0000

Wow.

As someone who as been loving country music since I was six and has been line dancing for years, I LOVE this song.

I understand the points made that yeah maybe the lyrics aren’t perfect and it might not be the most mature song for Luke Bryan to sing, but I am a fan of him because of this song.

Further, the line dance to this song is a thrill. The regulars (guys and girls) beg the DJ to play it, sometimes even multiple times in one night.

I’ll keep cranking it up.

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 23 May 2011 14:54:28 +0000

I have been a Luke Bryan fan since I first heard “All My Friends Say” right when it came out.And he has had some awesome songs like “Rain Is A Good Thing”,”Time To Take my Drunk Ass Home”,”Someone else Callin’ You Baby” and “We Rode In Trucks” and this song is definitely not his best.Don’t get me wrong,it’s fun and it’d be good to listen to while chillin’ at the bonfire or beach or whatever,but let’s hope Luke doesn’t keep going down this road cause I’d say one of these songs is enough.
And at least it’s better than that garbage trace adkins spewed in honky tonk badonkadonk which is hands down one of the worst songs ever written.

By: RowdyRed

RowdyRed — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:27:27 +0000

I heard this song late at night (when there are no DJs on the air nowadays), and hated it so much it kept me awake for a good ten minutes.

The next time I heard it, the daytime DJ identified the singer as Luke Bryan. I was seriously shocked. After the really great lyrics of the previous two singles, I’m impressed with both his writing and singing. Now this!! Talk about one step forward and three steps back!

This is actually trash, Luke boy. So disappointed.

By: Trinitie

Trinitie — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:08:19 +0000

I actually love this song, i’m a country girl and it’s an amazing song.!

By: Stetson

Stetson — Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:02:11 +0000

Ha Ha I LOVE this song! Way to go Luke! Obviously, some people don’t like country girls :)

By: Libby

Libby — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:02:15 +0000

I come here because I am interested in many of the topics that are presented here. There are generally speaking 3 types of regular commenter’s here. The first includes Chris, Barry, Jon and a few others that for the most part comment reasonably and with some authority. I feel like I am actually learning something when they post. The second group may not have the “credentials” that the above have, but they post their thoughts reasonably. They may present an opposing viewpoint, but they do so with respect and an open mind. It’s interesting to read their thoughts. The third group has become tedious.

Mr. Roberts, I understand your frustrations in general, but I loved Barry’s parting comment! :) I just don’t understand how you (and some of the others) can continue to try and justify certain viewpoints. You take the same predictable stand time and time again. Most scenarios can be applied to both the past and the present with the same results, both “good and bad”. The past isn’t always good and the present isn’t always bad.

By: MR.ROBERTS

MR.ROBERTS — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:03:39 +0000

Jon – Don’t chortle too much. Not healthy for the heart.

By: Jon

Jon — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:26:03 +0000

If the claim now is that actually, 47% live in regions in the vicinities of cities that have aggregate populations in excess of 1 million–I won’t argue with that. But the factoid is rather meaningless unless one also indicates just how much of the U.S. population falls into that category.

I believe that would be 47%. It’s hardly meaningless, and it was perfecty clear what Barry meant. Why aren’t you calling yourself “Mr. Literal” now? Oh, wait, I know why.

But this kind of foolishness is what I would expect from someone who so consistently misunderstands or misrepresents things. I’m still chortling over your “song-stealing” whopper.