Songwriters: Chuck Cannon, Gary Nicholson and Paul Overstreet.
As contemporary country music seemingly gets wordier by the day, “Bacon Frying” is a charming country song that is beautiful for its simplicity, a musical remnant from a time when songwriters understood that often the best thing to do is just get out of the song’s way.
It’s easy to trip yourself up during the writing process, to stumble by trying to do all the things publishers and writing mentors are always telling a songwriter to do. In the quest to be fresh, to be clever, to be positive, to offer hope, to keep it accessible–in attempting to do all of this it’s easy to forget to tell a truth. And it’s easy to forget that sometimes the best way to tell a truth is to get right to the center of the issue, without pretense and without beating around the bush.
That’s what makes “Bacon Frying” such a rare specimen in today’s musical environment—while so many other songs forcibly hammer home their point with verbose verses that hit us like a frying pan to the head, this song’s point is a frying pan. And the depth of the symbolism of what that frying pan means is far more powerful than a hundred or a hundred-thousand verses comprised of overwrought writing.
So too is it true of Miller’s voice, which, though lacking in dynamics and histrionics, is very capable.
It is also, however, somewhat derivative. Here Miller is taking audible cues from both John Conlee and Merle Haggard, and though that is no doubt pleasing to traditionalists it is also a significant point of concern in terms of the potential for success of this and future releases. Quaint and endearing though this song may be, Miller’s voice isn’t very distinctive, and “Bacon Frying” doesn’t give him much room with which to carve out his own vocal identity. It’s such a focused and compact song that it’s also very limiting.
There is nothing here which will make us remember Lance Miller, and I think that’s true even if “Bacon Frying” winds up being a hit (which I doubt will happen). Strong though it may be in almost every way, it is outstanding in none. It isn’t the kind of material, nor the kind of performance, that is going to lay the foundation for a career, and despite all that it does right in terms of songwriting craft, it simply isn’t a particularly engaging recording.

Listen: Lance Miller – “Bacon Frying”
Jim Malec is Managing Editor of The 9513 and can be reached by email via jmalec[at]the9513.com
26 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
November 19, 2008 at 8:04 am Permalink
Well, I think it’s one of the most country performances I’ve heard in weeks / months / maybe even years …. and I like it. A lot. The song itself is great and Lance’s performance enhances it. (Yes, I can hear the John Conlee sound in it, but that’s not a bad thing.)
November 19, 2008 at 8:26 am Permalink
As a single, this probably isn’t a wise choice, other than that, I’m with Paula.
“Here Miller is taking audible cues from both John Conlee and Merle Haggard, and though that is no doubt pleasing to traditionalists it is also a significant point of concern in terms of the potential for success of this and future releases.”
This is more a knock on an industry that won’t allow a voice like Miller to succeed and I don’t see how we can fault him for being who he is and releasing simplistic, quality material that actually speaks to reality.
November 19, 2008 at 8:31 am Permalink
What I’m not going to do is heap praise on Miller or any artist simply for being country. I think in our desire to hear more country music on country radio, maybe we have a tendency to be too forgiving of country music that isn’t particularly good.
I don’t think this is a very good vocal performance–it doesn’t really define Miller. This could be a demo vocalist. It’s very bland, very safe, very copycat. Sure, it sounds country and that’s great.
November 19, 2008 at 8:45 am Permalink
That’s not at all what I was getting at.
“maybe we have a tendency to be too forgiving of country music that isn’t particularly good.”
This isn’t good in what respect? The first half of the review compliments the song and I think your first paragraph in particular sums up the song well. You said his vocal was very capable in the review before saying it’s very bland, safe, and copycat.
So does it come down to a matter of distinctiveness? Country radio doesn’t remember Merle Haggard or John Conlee.
If the thumbs down were based solely on trying to break Miller as an artist, I’d agree, but like I said, that’s more of a knock on the industry.
November 19, 2008 at 8:51 am Permalink
Maybe I’m niave and overly optimistic, but I cant help but believe if we (more specifically, the industry) gave the listeners a chance to actually hear something other than the “radio friendly” crap that is playing now, they (the listeners) might actually like quite a wide variety of stuff and the pop-bubble-gum-cotton-candy-fluff wouldnt be so popular after all.
November 19, 2008 at 9:07 am Permalink
I don’t think this song would have been a hit in 1960, or 1970, or 1980, either. And that has nothing at all to do with the industry. It has to do with the fact that it’s a capable vocal on a very good song that’s sung well, but which is nonetheless essentially disposable.
Advertising jingles can also be sung well, as can they be symbolic and even touching. That doesn’t mean that they are effective as pieces of artwork. I absolutely recognize how well this song is crafted, but I also recognize that it has a major flaw–it gives the vocalist nothing to work with.
There is nothing about this that makes it memorable. And that’s the reason I bring up the copycat issue–if you were to do an audio lineup where you played clips of this song along with clips from five demo singers, I don’t think 99% of the population would be able to tell you which one was the recording artist.
So, you could say that it’s boring, you could say that it’s uninteresting, and you could say that it’s irrelevant. I think those are all partially true, and the fact that it’s technically good doesn’t change any of the above.
November 19, 2008 at 9:07 am Permalink
Regardless of whether his voice is “definitive”, or if this song will be a hit, I really dig it. I agree with Jim that it’s simplcity is its strength. Unlike songs that shoot for “simple” by going for the over-done “slice of life” angle, cheesy metaphors and references to the CVS, this song does get out of it’s own way and to me, it is classic Overstreet.
November 19, 2008 at 9:11 am Permalink
Does sound a lot like Haggard- and I like the simplicity.
Why can’t he be the first to say “I’m sorry.” that seemed a bit strange.
I can’t help but wonder… won’t he feel like an idiot when he walks in and finds her cooking herself a BLT for the road?
November 19, 2008 at 9:11 am Permalink
In defense of Jim, I think what he is saying is that while the singer sounds country vocally and while the production is more country than the stuff on the radio, the SONG itself is mindless drivel, much like like the crap on the radio. To me, it appears the songwriters took the most vivid section of the chorus and added general crap around it.
November 19, 2008 at 9:18 am Permalink
Why do we have to over-analyze the songs? (And I’ve been as guilty as anybody at doing just that). I like the song. Kelly likes the song. Jim doesnt like the song. Why cant that just be enough?
Dr No – I dont think Jim is saying the song is mindless drivel. In fact what he said was “That’s what makes “Bacon Frying” such a rare specimen in today’s musical environment”. (Which makes me wonder why he gave it a thumbs down actually.)
November 19, 2008 at 9:20 am Permalink
I disagree with Jim in that I think the song is indeed memorable. I dont know that it will spark a “traditionalist movement”, or ganrer Miller a ton of CMA noms, but after one listen, I am singing along to the chorus and thinking about the simple images provided in the song in a positive way, which for me, is a sign of a memorable song.
November 19, 2008 at 9:21 am Permalink
By the way, any woman that would cook a BLT for the road is my kinda woman!
November 19, 2008 at 9:35 am Permalink
Just because something’s rare doesn’t make it good. It’s not a bad song, it’s just not very memorable.
As a songwriter myself, picking songs apart(especially ones written by some of my heroes) helps me to be a better writer. Questioning word choices and plot points is something they should be doing in the writer’s room, so why shouldn’t we have that same luxury in the listening booth?
For instance- why in the opening lines does he say they had “another lover’s spat” which has the connotation of a minor argument and then later wouldn’t blame her if she “flew just like a bird”?
Why can’t he apologize first? Why should we care if they stay together? Obviously the fight a lot. They’re hanging on like they’ve been doing for so long- and they have zero communication skills. Is cooking coffee and frying bacon really a valid method of apology? I’ll bet it wouldn’t work for me…
I 1000% agree with the thumbs down- even though the sound is a great throwback.
November 19, 2008 at 9:44 am Permalink
Kelly–come talk to me in three months and let me know how you feel about this song then.
Paula–I gave it a “thumbs down” because I think, as a whole, it doesn’t work as well as it should.
Likewise, I’ve given “thumbs up” ratings to many songs that have weaker lyrics or which have weaker vocals, but which nonetheless work as a unit more effectivley than this.
There is no set equation that I’m working with. I’m looking at artistic merit, craft, performance, production, context, commercial viability, career significance, gut feeling, and a number of other criteria. It’s difficult to make decisions about Up/Down, and sometimes the culmination of all that criteria is reflected more in the rating itself than in the text of the review. Ultimately, you have to be the judge as to whether you agree or disagree with me. I just want to make you really think about the song, and I’m going to put my best case forward to support my rating.
In taking into consideration all of that criteria, perhaps the rating reflects inputs that you or another reader will not be particularly concerned with. So let me say it like this: If I were a judge on American Idol, I would tell Miller exactly what I’ve said here. I’m I were working for his label, I would not have released this as a single. If I were an average country radio listener, I would change the channel when this comes on. And if I were a traditionalist, I would feel like the whole thing is pretty weak when compared to the music I consider great.
If this were a Merle Haggard song, where would you rank it in his catalog? Maybe that’s not fair, but when artist makes a record that, by all accounts, is specifically drawing from such a tradition, that’s how the record is going to be measured.
November 19, 2008 at 10:36 am Permalink
Jim – I made very clear that the song isnt revolutionary, but for me it’s memorable in that I genuinely like the song, so you shouldnt be so confident that I wont still enjoy the song in a few months. I get that you are fond of your opinion, but with all due respect, I would encourage you to not confuse that with my tastes and preferences in this matter.
Having said that,I am cool with you giving a thumbs down verdict while still complimenting the song, I think it makes for compelling discussion and proves that songs are complex and deserving of hard-core analysis, and I hope that more readers will “get that”, so props to you on that sir!
November 19, 2008 at 10:45 am Permalink
I don’t mean to be snarky, Kelly–I just literally want to know if you still like this song three months from now, because I question its staying power. Didn’t mean to rub you the wrong way.
November 19, 2008 at 10:54 am Permalink
Jim – no rubbing the wrong way at all, and like I said last week, “I dont know how to quit you!”
November 19, 2008 at 11:17 am Permalink
Wow, all this heated discussion over what is basically a decent but non-descript traditional sounding single! I remember when Lance was on Nashville Star and his vocals didn’t impress me then either, but this is a likeable song. Okay, back to the heated discussion….
November 19, 2008 at 11:34 am Permalink
…i forgot, what song are we talking about ;-)
November 19, 2008 at 12:45 pm Permalink
I think the song is okay … but how can that guy walk in a straight line with his eyes crossed like that?
November 19, 2008 at 1:34 pm Permalink
I like the song. I don’t love it, but I think I would give it a thumbs up.
JR, check Reba’s “Secret Of Giving” cover out. There you really have some crossed eyes.
November 19, 2008 at 3:22 pm Permalink
Im pretty late for the party here, but ill put my two cents in.
First of all, there are parts where he really does sound just like John Conlee.
Second, I think this is a decent song. Like someone said earlier, classis Paul Overstreet. He cant be the first to say im sorry, because he views her frying bacon as an apology.
Someone asked how frying bacon is such a surefire sign that everythings ok. For my taste, thats a detail that makes me enjoy the song. It is those little things in relationships that are the reality of where they stand.
I dont know if this song has staying power, and i dont know if that has anything to do with the industry or Lance Millers forgettable vocal performance, but I do know I like the song.
November 19, 2008 at 4:04 pm Permalink
Rainbow … Yes, that one and the ‘It’s Your Call’ and ‘Greatest Hits Vol. 2′ covers by Reba all show her lazy eye. You’d think they could have found better photos for album covers.
November 19, 2008 at 8:54 pm Permalink
I agree that the performance is nondescript, but it’s also true that this song knocks the socks off of pretty much everything was performed on the CMAs last week. It’s encouraging to know that there’s somebody out there that’s still trying to make authentic country records. At least it’s a step in the right direction.
Jim, since your ambivalence about the song seems to center around Miller’s vocal performance, could you see yourself giving it a “thumbs up” if it were recorded by a more capable vocalist?
November 19, 2008 at 9:28 pm Permalink
I can’t the link for the song to work.
January 8, 2009 at 7:20 pm Permalink
As a working musician, I really like this song.
It has a commercial sound that lends itself to the guy playing 4 nights a week in a dance hall or bar.
It’s traditional & sticks in your mind.
Currently, it’s getting a lotta airplay in my area.
The more I hear it, the more familiar it feels.
Leave a Comment