John Rich – “Shuttin’ Detroit Down”

Jim Malec | February 2nd, 2009

John Rich - Shuttin Detroit DownEqual parts used car salesman and revival tent preacher, John Rich reminds me of a miracle man. A showman by definition, Rich loves to open his coat in a flourish, showing off his latest and greatest gimmick. He’s only selling snake oil, but he is charismatic and convincing enough to make quite a few of us believe that his product is the perfect tonic to cure what ails us.

With “Shuttin’ Detroit Down,” Rich is attempting to provide an anthem for these troubled economic times, in doing so embracing a familiar narrative arc which vilifies “bankers” and “the boss man” while glorifying the “regular guy” that makes the real America go around.

It’s a song designed to be embraced by the red-state crowd which views bankers, lawyers, and politicians as the root of evil in America, with Rich even managing to slip in a coy knock against liberalism with the line, “You work hard for your dollar and you never pass the blame/When it don’t go your way.”

Of course, the position being put forth here is one more in line with a liberal ideology. After all, a true market-centric conservative would show little sympathy for a dying industry, probably encouraging that the government let that industry fail if it can no longer be efficient and competitive in the marketplace. Rich is right that, when it comes to bailouts, there has been a significant difference in the treatment of the financial sector and the auto industry, although it is somewhat unexpected to hear that confessed by someone as starkly conservative as this former Fred Thompson-for-President supporter.

Like snake oil, however, what sounds good on the surface is often found to contain little of substance. Aside from the fact that there’s something unsettling about a celebrity-obsessed multi-millionaire preaching about the plight of the everyman, “Shuttin’ Detroit Down” is a topical attempt at discussing a very complicated problem. It doesn’t consider any of the reasons why the economy is in such a bad position in the first place, nor does is discuss why the Detroit auto industry is teetering between life and death.

Instead, Rich boils the problem to its most jingle-like form, bringing a hook that rings hollow. Who, after all, is shutting Detroit down? The song spends most of its time attacking bankers, but it would be a hard sell to say that bankers are responsible for the downturn of the auto industry, which was struggling well before the broader financial crisis. Is Rich implying that the government is shutting Detroit down? We don’t know, because Rich doesn’t find it necessary to develop the thought behind the title.

That’s a problem the plagues every area of this song. Born and raised in Michigan, I have to make a disclaimer: I understand the character of the Detroiter. And I don’t think Rich does, because he doesn’t talk about that character at all in this song. Detroiters are some of the hardest-working, most loyal individuals on the face of the planet. They’re as tough as the neighborhoods they grew up in and as sharp as the sub-zero wind chills that sometimes blanket the city. And for a song that is supposedly about the plight of a city and the industry that defines it, “Shuttin’ Detroit Down” doesn’t seem especially concerned with Detroit.

Rich paints what is possibly the most stereotypical portrait of the Detroit auto worker in today’s society—that of the aging GM veteran who has had his pension “cut in half,” and who now “can’t afford to die.” True enough, it’s a real struggle for many as they watch their jobs downsized or shipped away for cheaper labor.

But this song gets lost in the plot. Great stories are not about the what, they’re about the who. Great writing is about characters and place, plot being only those events that drive the story forward. “Shuttin’ Detroit Down,” is only concerned with what we already know—that bankers are taking advantage of the bailout, that the auto industry has been treated differently in its quest for assistance, and that the state of the economy is hard on the Detroit worker. It never gets to the heart of what it’s like to live in that society. Rich never makes us feel like we should care about what happens to the average Detroiter. Instead of making the Detroiter human, he reaffirms the stereotype.

This is why John Rich will never be a great songwriter—he seldom (if ever) seems interested in writing a story for the sake of the story. His narrative voice is always filtered through a lens of commercialism, always crafted in a way that places its saleability ahead of its character.

And that’s what’s happened here. Rich’s voice is serviceable on a song that makes refreshing use of definably country instrumentation and embraces a throwback melody that is honestly a joy to hear. From a musical construction standpoint, it’s a surprisingly engaging track that implies Rich might be capable of more than some of us have been giving him credit for.

But when it comes to Rich’s lyrics, there’s nothing refreshing or engaging, only more of the same stale shtick we’ve come to expect. Detroiters deserve better.

Thumbs Down

Listen: John Rich – “Shuttin’ Detroit Down”

2 Pings

  1. [...] Doesn’t Know His Friend Bob is From Detroit? Posted on February 2, 2009 by Aunt B. Everything Jim Malec says in this post is almost spot on.  From his take on John Rich’s apparently never having considered what people in Detroit are [...]
  2. [...] “Shuttin’ Detroit Down” is a topical attempt at discussing a very complicated problem.  The 9513.com With "Shuttin' Detroit Down," John Rich not only has gotten himself on the radio, he's got himself [...]
  1. Marc
    February 2, 2009 at 10:49 am

    Thumbs up…. for the review

  2. Baron Lane
    February 2, 2009 at 11:18 am

    A millionaire “country” musician that wrote a song for the McCain campaign trying to cash in on the troubles of the “common man” that McCain and his ilk helped create. Great business plan that results in crap music.

    I notice you guys are giving an awful lot of thumbs down on that Nashville drek being pumped into the airwaves….careful you may end up actually not caring who Taylor Swift is dating. ;)

  3. Brady Vercher
    February 2, 2009 at 11:41 am

    John Rich makes it incredibly hard to root for him and I wouldn’t mind if he disappeared, but I don’t think I can agree with this review.

    I can’t purport to know what Rich was trying to accomplish with this song and wouldn’t put it past him to come out as confirming a political motive, but any political motivations behind this song seem to be secondary and I think you’re creating an ideological line where there isn’t a clear delineation. Are you suggesting that all Republicans think bankers, lawyers, and politicians are the root of evil and that no Democrat thinks so?

    And then it doesn’t make any sense to say that the song is meant to be embraced by the red-state crowd but purport that it expresses liberal sentiment. Coy knock?

    I’d say there’s a fairly obvious disconnect between the everyman and those in the government and at the levels of the financial industry that created this mess. This song seems to be searching for that common thread regardless of political ideology.

    Aside from the fact that there’s something unsettling about a celebrity-obsessed multi-millionaire preaching about the plight of the everyman…

    But it’s fine for someone like Bruce Springsteen as long as he’s bashing Bush? I can’t speak to his obsession with celebrity, but considering the money in commercial music, I’m not sure it’s a valid criticism in this instance.

    Born and raised in Michigan, I have to make a disclaimer: I understand the character of the Detroiter. And I don’t think Rich does, because he doesn’t talk about that character at all in this song[...]And for a song that is supposedly about the plight of a city and the industry that defines it, “Shuttin’ Detroit Down” doesn’t seem especially concerned with Detroit.

    To attempt to limit the song to Detroit is to purposefully narrow the scope of the song and pretty misguided. I think it’s fairly obvious that Detroit is symbolical and meant to represent the plight of the everyman in America. Detroit isn’t the only place being hit hard in America, but it’s the most readily accessible image to represent the plight.

    I’d agree that the song isn’t all that and wouldn’t be upset with a negative under the right pretext, but it’s not terrible and it at least strives for something more. I don’t think it reaches the level of artistic social commentary that it’s striving for and it is a little too simplistic, but I think you’re misreading the song quite a bit.

  4. Jim Malec
    February 2, 2009 at 11:54 am

    I agree that the song’s political undertones are secondary, which is why my criticism of the song is based on substance. I only pointed out the political considerations to give the review some context. I think you’re misreading my review.

  5. glory2001
    February 2, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    This review was written by a John Rich hater, I do not believe I have ever seen a song so nit picked to death. I have read your review before and you do not usually review a song to death. So the only ones who can write songs about our financial problems are poor people. This is a good song, and a good statement. You would have liked it if John Rich had not wrote it.
    You will delete this comment, but I stand by it.

  6. Chris N.
    February 2, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    “I have read your review before and you do not usually review a song to death.”

    Actually, they pretty much review every song to death.

  7. Brady Vercher
    February 2, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Granted I didn’t give you enough credit for the substance portion of your review in my reply, I still think the political portion goes beyond simple context and the Detroit-centric view purposefully narrows the scope of the song.

  8. Razor X
    February 2, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    “After all, a true market-centric conservative would show little sympathy for a dying industry, probably encouraging that the government let that industry fail if it can no longer be efficient and competitive in the marketplace.”

    Just because conservatives may not be in favor of the government bailing out failing companies doesn’t mean that they don’t sympathize wtih the people who lose their jobs as a result. You seem to be implying that conservatives enjoy seeing people out of work.

    “Rich is right that, when it comes to bailouts, there has been a significant difference in the treatment of the financial sector and the auto industry, although it is somewhat unexpected to hear that confessed by someone as starkly conservative as this former Fred Thompson-for-President supporter.”

    Why is it unexpected? You’re implying that conservatives were OK with bailing out the banking industry but not the auto industry. The truth is, conservatives weren’t in favor of either bailout. So why is it susprising that a conservative is capable of seeing that that the financial sector and the auto industry received different treatment?

    I’m no John Rich fan but with all due respect, I think your own political biases have affected this review.

    And Baron — nice try, but this financial crisis isn’t the result of anything that John McCain or his “ilk” did.

  9. Kim
    February 2, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    If you can criticize John Rich for this song, I hope you criticized Allan Jackson the same way for his “small town southern man.” Allan lives like a multi-millionaire, makes no bones about it and sings about the everyday life of the “common man.” He even said he goes to the grocery store about once a year. That is SO much like me and my blue collar life! But I know Allan sold cars and Denise was a flight attendant before fame, so I know that he knows what its like, and I still love his music. I also didn’t read the song in a political context. I thought it had more of a social context.

    Great comments Brady! Thanks a lot. My dad worked in manufacturing for 30+ years starting in his teens. He always wanted the government out and supported whoever would let him work an honest job in peace. He never felt the people in the “ivory tower” (the bosses, the government, whatever) had a clue about him, his job or his needs. There has always been a huge disconnect with the workers and the bean counters going back to the industrial revolution.
    Not a great song but at least John was trying.

  10. nm
    February 2, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    I thought Jackson’s song was about his father, not about himself.

  11. SW
    February 2, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    “His narrative voice is always filtered through a lens of commercialism, always crafted in a way that places its saleability ahead of its character.”

    I could not agree more. Did he write this song while watching NBC Nightly News? I couldn’t get the clip to play, but I found a video of him playing this on YouTube for a radio spot. He tells the DJ it took him an hour to write this song; I’m not shocked! One final gripe from this despiser of all things Big ‘n Rich: great songs do not use buzzwords like “bailout.” Get real! Great review!

  12. Occasional Hope
    February 2, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    “John Rich makes it incredibly hard to root for him and I wouldn’t mind if he disappeared”

    I have to agree with Brady there. Everything John Rich does seems designed to make me dislike him, and predisposed to dismiss his music. However, I thought this particular song was decently-written, and where it falls down for me is in the performance. It’s been mentioned before that Rich’s voice, solo, is a little on the bland side, and it is here. More to the point, to me as a listener, he just doesn’t sound engaged with the lyric – he’s not *angry* enough. He’s singing it like a lullaby, not a protest song.

  13. Nicolas
    February 2, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    Is this really being released as a single? ‘Cause I thought he just released another song pretty recently

  14. Ann
    February 2, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    I think the song is well written, and I think John’s voice sounds great. Springsteen has been singing about the boss man for years. Merle Haggard’s song “The Fightin’ Side Of Me” is simplistic, yet, powerful. You don’t need to dress up the subject of what’s happening in Detroit – or all around the country for that matter. Obviously – you don’t like John Rich. That’s cool – but, this didn’t seem like a song review. It seemed like a personality review. I don’t care about his politics, or his personal life. Just the music please. That’s all I care about.

  15. Rick
    February 2, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    John Rich is mainstream Nashville’s reigning country music pimp and will use anything to further his career, including a song that panders like this. The demise of the American auto industry is the direct fault of both inept and arrogant management and mostly the financial burden placed upon it by UAW contracts over many decades. Free market conservatives would like to see the UAW contracts thrown out the window to get the albatross off the necks of the Big 3 before any financial bailout winds up covering mostly UAW retirement and medical benefits. With the labor unions being huge backers of Obama and the Democrats the odds of such a thing happening under this administration is less than zero.

    As much as I personally dislike John Rich I will admit he can create some truly memorable melodies, like in this song. As mentioned his lyrics usually fall short as they seem far more contrived than sincere, but consder the source…..

  16. CraigR.
    February 2, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    I don’t like John Rich. But I thought that this song is better than its review. There are only two real problems with it: 1. This idea that working people live in the real world while people who in live DC and New York City are aloof insults all the working people in those cities who suffer from the same problems as those in Detroit. 2. The real problem with this song is John Rich’s voice. His emotion is false. I don’t believe he really cares. He is just selling someone’s pain. You can be rich and sing about hard working people, but you have to connect. Alan Jackson, Bruce Springsteen, Ms. Lynn, Dolly, even Elvis carry emotion and connection when they sing about people because they are still connected to their past. John Rich can’t connect so his songs falls flat. I would love to hear what a real singer could do with this song. A real singer would give it detail and shadow. Rich, like many other singers in country music, can’t really connect with the music or the emotion.

  17. Stormy
    February 2, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    You cannot in all fairness compare Bruce Springsteen to John Rich for two reasons:

    1. Bruce Springsteen’s stories are beatufully poetic, specific and well written. John’s are dull, generic and cliche.

    2. Bruce Sprinsteen built his reputation on writing songs about working class America. John built his co-writing party anthems for frat boys.

  18. Rick
    February 2, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    Stormy, I don’t know. “Pink Cadillac” seems like it could have been written by John Rich…..

  19. Mike Wimmer
    February 2, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    Rich should have listened to Chris Knights “A Train Not Running” to get a clue on how to properly and intelligently write a good country song about struggling people.

    Hell, he should have listened to any of the songs on “Moneyland”, which everyone should check out for some really, really, really important and good songs that perfectly sum up the current economic America we live in today and have for some time.

  20. Ann
    February 2, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    Haha! Loved the “pink cadillac” joke. Just so y’all know – I am a full on Springsteen fan from way back. “The River” would be my desert island cd – if I had to pick just one…..I guess the point I was trying to make was that lyrics don’t have to be complicated to make a point, and that people have been writing songs about our countrys tough times since way back. Remember “Okie from Muskogee” ? When that song came out, my baptist mother couldn’t believe he said the word “marijuana”! But, it sure did spark up the conversation around the dinner table…bottom line – we’re talking about one artists view of a current situation that is affecting our country and our people. Stormy – you’re right – Bruce is a poet. And btw – he rocked the crap out of the Super Bowl yesterday! “Shuttin Down Detroit” make me think about how I’m not the only person struggling in these hard times. I think a lot of others related to it too. OK – so what do you say to us all just going out for a longneck?

  21. Matt B.
    February 2, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    Stormy, Springsteen’s song for “The Wrestler” has a line about a one-legged dog being compared to the character in the movie. Last I checked, that is quite wonky lyrical writing as I’ve never seen a one-legged dong in my life. Still, I see yor point otherwise.

  22. Brody Vercher
    February 2, 2009 at 8:13 pm

    A one-legged dong, eh. I’ve never seen one of those either.

  23. Noah Eaton
    February 2, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    While I believe it wasn’t necessary to inject a political undertone into the review, I nonetheless strongly agree with it otherwise.

    I think the problem this song has is similar to what’s wrong with Rodney Atkin’s “It’s America” (which Jim also reviewed). Both these tracks don’t provide any meat on the bones when it comes to either illustrating how lives are PERSONALLY being affected by the economic downturn, rather than just assembling lyrics that sound like they were splicings of newspaper headlines, re-arranged like magnetic poetry until they flowed cohesively together, or offering a personal reflection on what makes America the beautiful, rather than just a symbol or slogan put to music.

    I don’t doubt Rich’s sincerity when he says he’s angry about how special interests in general are not genuinely looking after the interests of the hard-working American, but this song simply lacks character.

  24. Stormy
    February 2, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    Rick: Pink Cadillac could not have been written by John Rich. It was written for a movie and no one would hire John Rich to write a song for a movie. I hope.

  25. vp
    February 2, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    Being a neighbouring city of Detroit I find it somewhat offensive that he is using the hard working people of Detroit to get his political views across.

    But the radio stations here are eating it up since he debut it live on Wed or Thurs, said it was exclusively for Detroit, apparently not anymore.

  26. Michael
    February 3, 2009 at 12:35 am

    Agreed. This song is bland and insincere.

  27. dothanal
    February 3, 2009 at 7:54 am

    i like the song.

  28. mikeky
    February 3, 2009 at 9:15 am

    no, you may no have ever seen a one-legged dog. that’s the point.

    BUT with that said, google ‘one legged dog’. they DO exist. extremely rare, but they do exist. not as strange a lyric as you would think.

  29. SW
    February 3, 2009 at 9:21 am

    VP, I understand that you’re offended, but Rich has a history of doing this sort of thing. If you recall, he evoked Johnny Cash’s name this campaign season saying the Man in Black would have supported John McCain. John Rich is a bozo.

  30. glory2001
    February 3, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    I have a problem with Rosanne Cash being mad because John Rich gave an opinion of Johnny Cash “might think” about the campaign and does not seem to care about a band called bastard sons of Johnny Cash. HUH! What a way to pick a song apart. Every song writer takes a little license with words. get over it.!

  31. Brady Vercher
    February 3, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    If you read the Bastard Sons of Johnny Cash bio, you’ll discover that Johnny Cash himself gave them his approval to use the name. Further reading would reveal that Johnny Cash’s own son produced their first album. I dunno what Rosanne Cash would have to be upset about.

  32. glory2001
    February 3, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    First of all I am a John Rich fan, and a Johnny Cash fan. My problem with the name is my grandkids go through by cd’s and I am not going to have a cd called Bastard sons of Johnny Cash. My belief only.
    I do not care if it John Rich’s song or Bruce Springsteen song, why does everybody have to pick them apart, you like them or you don’t but name calling in the review and making it personal, I do not care for. That is all. I won’t comment anymore

  33. Noah Eaton
    February 3, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    Well it certainly didn’t take long for this to make as much radio presence as “Another You” made in its entirety.

    According to MediaBase’s seven-day roaming chart, “Shuttin’ Detroit Down” is already at #36 with a +545 bullet.

    It appears this listless, soundbyte-structured release will inevitably be eaten up in a way eerily familiar to how Darryl Worley’s “Have You Forgotten?” was in 2003. The real question is “Will this have any kind of staying power after it peaks?”

  34. Drew
    February 3, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    Love the steel and Rich’s performance here… glad to see this one getting used instead of “Another You”, which was just bad.

  35. marcia
    February 3, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    I live in Detroit,rarely listen to country music and I liked the song.

    PS to Brody-I’ve seen a few one legged dongs

  36. grunt
    February 3, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    If the man wants to sing about the way things are happen so be it. He has that right, if people dislike the song they all so have the right to put the song down. I can’t under stand way Jim Malec got his panties in such a wad over a song. He all so has that right. But critics are like butt hole’s every one has one. Why do people care about what critics have have to say. Oh well.

  37. Drew
    February 3, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    And good riddance to Detroit, what a disgusting and disgraceful city.

  38. Noah Eaton
    February 5, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    I don’t doubt Detroit has a host of issues that remain a big problem there, particularly narcotics use/production and violent crime (although lower than in previous years) when you get beyond those two major undesirable images which certainly plague plenty of other metropolitan cities as well, Detroit is a true all-American city that has pioneered much of our nation’s industry, music scene (I’m not talking about Eminem but rather Motown, jazz and some decent rock acts like the White Stripes) health care employment and also technology (Michigan is ranked fourth nationally when it comes to high tech employment)

    I’m sure Malec, being a native Michigan resident himself, can explain umpteen times better than I have what makes Detroit an American city unlike any other that has contributed a lot to our cultural identity, but while few agree in offering a blank check to the Big Three, I’m sure the vast majority also recognize it would be even more irresponsible to turn our back on what truly remains, in many respects, the Arsenal of Democracy.

  39. Leeann Ward
    February 5, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    I don’t know about Detroit in particular, but I thoroughly enjoyed my two years in Michigan. It’s kinda mean to trash a whole city and revel in its demise.

  40. Mike Wimmer
    February 8, 2009 at 8:39 am

    The most interesting part of this whole song, is how it does on the charts. Thus far, mainstream Country music and entertainment as a whole has pretty much avoided the economic crisis. If this does well on the charts, it might lead to some better song writers actually getting songs about struggling people onto the radio and lead to some good songs.

    So in a odd way, I’m kind hoping this songs at least comes close to cracking the top 10.

  41. Stormy
    February 8, 2009 at 11:05 am

    There is a whole other avenue of country open to good singers and songwriters.

  42. Paul
    February 9, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    I couldn’t disagree more with the review. Strongly object would be more like it (with all due respect). I agree with comment #3 (Brady). This review is personal and political and completely off the mark.

    This song is SOOO well written. This is how songs should be written. A rare thing in Nashville. Simple and to the point. It’s not a ‘kitchen sink’ song that Nashville loves to write (and generally suck).

    Like him (or his political views) or not, John is a writers writer – every bit as talented with words as some of the greats – and I’ve written with some of the greats.

    And CraigR. Great comment about his voice and connection. That’s a valid point I can agree with – and here’s the thing – it’s uptempo. If it was made with ballad tendencies, completely different. If it’s missing it’s feel, it’s no less well written, it’s just not how we want to hear it – and that’s the point.

  43. Nashville4U
    February 11, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    We didn’t review the song but did feature it on our website. I thought the song was a pretty good attempt but not exactly great. The only thing I found funny about it was this guy drives around Nashville in a Bentley, is building a multi-million dollar house on a hill atop suburban Nashville, and then does numerous other things, but yet is fighting for the common man when he is a figure for greed?

  44. Noah Eaton
    February 18, 2009 at 9:00 pm

    This should have no problem making the Top Ten, given it is consistently rivaling Rascal Flatts’ lead single from their forthcoming album in audience impression growth.

    Again, I believe the real question is “Will this have any post-peak longevity?” Because, frankly, I believe this song is not only bereft of character; it feels most dated as well. One may point to the longevity Darryl Worley’s “Have You Forgotten?” had following its rapid ascent to the top of the singles chart in 2003 as our nation prepared for war in Iraq, but I believe much of that was simply due to the fact public opinion toward the war remained relatively popular even through the 2004 presidential election……….but once public opinion shifted, it seems to me “I Miss My Friend” is once again increasingly claiming the title of the hit most will especially remember Worley by, instead of that pandering call to arms.

    This is a similar situation to me. There’s no doubt this will be a smash ultimately, but the question here is if this is merely a fluke that’s achieving mass callout because it is riding a populist wave of unprecedented economic discontent, or if it is actually achieving success on its own artistic merit. I’m inclined to believe the former is the case, and those who think this will end up becoming this decade’s “Take This Job And Shove It” are in for disappointment.

  45. RideThisBlackCowboy
    March 14, 2009 at 9:14 am

    Yeah,Malec,and you probably voted for George Dummy Bush(you
    know,the war criminal and profiteer who should be sitting in
    the dock at The World Court in The Hague,Netherlands along
    with-literally,that is-”Dick” Cheney,Condi Lice and Co.an-
    swering for their war crimes)and I KNOW McCain was your boy
    in ’08.(Somehow,I just can’t picture your like voting for
    someone resembling one of the words in my user name.)
    Anyway,it’s your sort of “Angry White Man” who voted for
    senile Ronnie Ray-guns twice,Georgie’s father,George The
    First twice and call Limbaugh,O’Reilly,the Savage Weiner,
    Gallgher,et al and complain about us blacks,women,Hispanics,
    etc.and why we won’t stay in our place.(Which in my case,
    would be FAR AWAY from the buxom blonde daughter who’d be my
    girlfriend the day I met her.)
    Of course,while you Bubba losers whine about us,the rich
    swindlers make off with ever more U.S. and Canadian wealth-
    it happens here too,though perhaps,even proportionately,not to the same degree-which the REAL people John Rich mentions are pushed into poverty.(My late father toiled at Ford OF
    Canada here in Windsor,Ont.-across the border from Detroit,Mich.for 36 years,and my best bud,who’s 53 today(and
    looks 65 because of his 32 year-sentence at his job)works at
    a Windsor auto parts plant.I doubt you even know any real workers,just the toffs who pay you to brown-nose them.
    In closing,I want to say that just because you kiss their
    a**es doesn’t mean these shysters are any more kindly disposed to you for enabling them.In fact,they’re probably
    laughing at you as I’m sending you this missive.
    So,Malec,get a clue-and an IQ above room temperature and smell the usury and other economic crimes these folks commit
    daily.

  46. RideThisBlackCowboy
    March 14, 2009 at 9:17 am

    And if John Rich had seen me in ’04,he and Big Kenny would
    have written,”Save A Horse,Ride That Handsome Black Cowboy!”

  47. Jim Malec
    March 14, 2009 at 9:41 am

    Huh? If anything this review has a liberal slant.

  48. Stormy
    March 14, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    Yeah Jim–Be more liberl and support the guy who wrote Rasing McCain!

    Dear Ride:
    I am going to put this in terms you can understand. Chicks dig guys with smarts.

  49. John
    March 14, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    Thumbs up for the song.

  50. Emgee
    April 29, 2009 at 11:57 am

    Let’s not forget the inherent contradiction between the first and second verse.

    First verse: “You work hard for your dollar and you never pass the blame when things don’t go your way.”

    Second verse: “It’s a cryin’ shame, because he ain’t the one to blame.”

    Let’s face it: sometimes the people affected in fact are not responsible when “things don’t go their way.”

    But which does Rich believe?

    Also, it’s hard to take Rich seriously as an “every guy” when he can afford to go into a bar passing out hundred dollar bills and buy a double round of Crown Royal for an entire bar.

  51. Terry
    April 30, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Looks to me like most of you are blind to the “facts” of what is really going on. You can knit-pick all you want on Rich’s lyrics, but the truth is, when you start to realize “all” the tax increaes in the next 12 months, that you are going to have to pay (to fund this so-called stimulous package), you’re going to feel like you’re unemployed. Because you are not going to be better off.
    You better start “knit-picking” on what congress is doing, before it’s too late. You’re only going to have yourself to blame if all these polititions are not held ACCOUNTABLE!

  52. Chris N.
    April 30, 2009 at 11:39 am

    I think you mean “nit-picking.” And “stimulus,” and “politicians.” Also, “increases.”

  53. Guy
    April 30, 2009 at 11:42 am

    Chicks dig long division ….

  54. Terry
    April 30, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    Don’t you love the nit-pickers, that miss the message?

  55. Steve Harvey
    July 6, 2009 at 12:13 am

    I do!

Sponsors

Juli Thanki on WAMU's Bluegrass Country

Tagged In This Article

//

Current Discussion

  • Jack Hanford: For those who are interested, there is a new 90-minute documentary video about Tompall & the Glaser Brothers on DVD ...
  • joe morris: how come nobody mentions his fan club which started 1950 and was called the " the penny pushers " which ...
  • jane: I'm reading this article in 2013 and I've yet to hear anything from the album played on the radio.....
  • Catwandy: I guess Matt C. is eating his well-deserved crow 'bout now. Critics....gotta love 'em , bless their little hearts.
  • Ed McClendon: Saw the brothers in Greeley CO on the occasion of Tompall's 50th birthday. The show wasn't well promoted and there ...
  • Roby Fox: I'm sure no one else will know, or even care about this little tidbit of trivia. "Keep Your Change" was ...
  • kate wonders: Roni Stoneman is still on Hee Haw every Sunday night on RFD channel.
  • Marsha Blades: Tommy, You were so kind to me during a tough time in my life and I don't think I ever ...
  • Leona Jones: I seen Chris at the Grand Ole Opry last week.. First time I have heard of him.. He rocked the ...
  • Sonicjar Music: Agree with Lucas, But one thing is certain, for a song to come to existence, so many things have to ...

Recently Reviewed Albums

  • Blind Boys of Alabama - Take the High Road
  • Del McCoury Band & Preservation Hall Jazz Band - American Legacies
  • Aaron Lewis - Town Line
  • Josh Kelly - Georgia Clay
  • The Gibson Brothers - Help My Brother
  • jesse-brewster_wrecking-ball
  • Lucinda Williams - Blessed
  • Joe Mullins & The Radio Ramblers - Hymns from the Hills