Darryl Worley – “Tequila on Ice”

Jim Malec | August 4th, 2008 Email Share

Darryl Worley TEQUILA ON ICESongwriters: Rivers Rutherford, Marty Dodson

Darryl Worley hasn’t had a hit since 2004’s “Awful, Beautiful Life.” If there’s any justice in the country music world, that’s about the change. “Tequila on Ice” is a groovy mid-tempo that sways, a refreshing reprieve from the exhausting pace of a format that clamors for loud music and swelling choruses.

Worley’s comeback effort–the debut single for newly formed Stroudavarious Records–features a delightful interplay between the singer’s quintessentially country voice and the well-spaced and smartly placed guitar which underlines the track, and which serves, by comparison, as a jarring reminder of just how bland and unimaginative so much of today’s country music has become.

So this, I found myself thinking, is what musical instruments sound like when they’re not compressed into a nearly indistinguishable wall of noise.

Likewise, it’s refreshing to hear lyrics that, while not meant to be life-changing in their depth or construction, stretch the songwriters’ creative muscles. The sentiment of “I was looking for a saint who was a devil of a lover/but every girl I found was either one way or the other,” isn’t groundbreaking by any means, but Rutherford and Dodson phrase it in a way that’s unique and clever nonetheless.

“Tequila on Ice” doesn’t push or prod; it just flows coolly, a three minute exercise in chilling-out. “She said, thank you I think/I’ll have tequila on ice/And I said, nice,” Worley sings.

I couldn’t agree more.

Thumbs Up

Listen to: Darryl Worley – “Tequila on Ice”

  1. Thomas
    August 4, 2008 at 6:25 am Permalink

    what a pity that they didn’t find a place for the word “pirat” in the lyrics of this song.

  2. Tony
    August 4, 2008 at 6:29 am Permalink

    I really like it as well and agree with you on the instrumentation-the sound is incredibly warm. I thought his last cd, Here and Now, was great as well. Hopefully he will have some radio success this time around.

  3. Chris N.
    August 4, 2008 at 9:31 am Permalink

    I think it’s tasty and it goes down smoothly. Get it? Get it?

  4. Thomas
    August 4, 2008 at 9:34 am Permalink

    no!

  5. Kelly
    August 4, 2008 at 9:39 am Permalink

    I need tequila to forget about him posing in playgirl..no, i havent forgotten….

  6. Stormy
    August 4, 2008 at 9:45 am Permalink

    Kelly: Do we begrudge you Playboy?

  7. Kelly
    August 4, 2008 at 9:49 am Permalink

    You can have it, I prefer Paste, Harp (RIP), and Country Weekly (shout out to Chris N.) to that actually….

  8. Chris N.
    August 4, 2008 at 9:55 am Permalink

    Women read Playgirl?

  9. Stormy
    August 4, 2008 at 11:33 am Permalink

    Yeah, like mean read Playboy. Actually, though, as a woman, if you get around the pictures, Playboy isn’t a half bad magazine.

  10. Chris N.
    August 4, 2008 at 11:34 am Permalink

    I was under the impression that Playgirl’s readership was 99.9% gay men.

  11. Rick
    August 4, 2008 at 11:46 am Permalink

    I wonder what Darryl would think about the direction the discussion on this thread has taken…….(lol)

    I like it and I hope radio plays it, but when I like a new single it normally means mainstream radio won’t play it. They’d rather play something like Sucky Covington to please the AI fans in their listening audience as most fans of real country have already tuned out…..

  12. Stormy
    August 4, 2008 at 12:20 pm Permalink

    Chris: You don’t have to be a man to appreciate gay men.

  13. J.R. Journey
    August 4, 2008 at 1:23 pm Permalink

    Ha! This is too funny!

    This song is pretty good IMO – good not great. But certainly head and shoulders above a lot of what’s in the Top 40 right now.

  14. Thomas
    August 4, 2008 at 2:21 pm Permalink

    have i missed the discovery of another gender today, after all this tequila on ice?

  15. Chris N.
    August 4, 2008 at 3:08 pm Permalink

    I’m not saying Playgirl’s models are gay, I’m saying a high percentage of the readers are.

  16. Jim Malec
    August 4, 2008 at 3:11 pm Permalink

    I’m glad this comment thread has stayed on topic.

  17. Thomas
    August 4, 2008 at 3:43 pm Permalink

    what do playgirl readers do on a straight tequila night, then?

  18. leeann
    August 4, 2008 at 3:53 pm Permalink

    Actually, though, as a woman, if you get around the pictures, Playboy isn’t a half bad magazine.”

    So, you read Play Boy for its articles?:)

  19. Thomas
    August 4, 2008 at 4:07 pm Permalink

    playboy is practically literature with a centerfold. playgirl, however, seems to have become some kind of “country weekly” just a bit more naked, lately.

  20. Stormy
    August 4, 2008 at 4:22 pm Permalink

    Leeann: I read it for research. Believe it or not Playboy is the hardest (no pun intended) market for short (again, no pun intended) fiction in the US.

  21. Stormy
    August 4, 2008 at 4:23 pm Permalink

    Thomas
    August 4, 2008 at 3:43 pm Permalink what do playgirl readers do on a straight tequila night, then?

    You mean you haven’t seen the you tube videos?

  22. Thomas
    August 4, 2008 at 4:41 pm Permalink

    stormy,
    no – but i must have temporarily forgotten the new global paradigm that if it’s not on youtube is probably hasn’t happened.

  23. Jim Malec
    August 4, 2008 at 4:50 pm Permalink

    Tougher than The Atlantic? Tougher than Georgia Review? How did I not know that? Clearly, I don’t read enough Playboy.

    Stormy, are you a writer, too?

  24. Chris N.
    August 4, 2008 at 5:08 pm Permalink

    There are good articles in Playboy, and there are also naked women. Those are two things in life that I like.

  25. J.R. Journey
    August 4, 2008 at 5:14 pm Permalink

    What do playgirl readers do on a straight tequila night? They blame their broken heart on every gland in sight.

  26. hairandtoenails
    August 4, 2008 at 5:31 pm Permalink

    When I was in 11th grade, my English teacher told us that Playboy paid fiction writers better than any other periodical. Not sure if that’s true or not.

  27. Brody Vercher
    August 4, 2008 at 5:59 pm Permalink

    Sounds like Playgirl is going digital only.

    But getting back on topic, this song caught me by surprise. From the title I expected a hard driving, party song. Good stuff, though.

  28. leeann
    August 4, 2008 at 6:23 pm Permalink

    I assumed the same thing from the title as well.

  29. Viola
    August 4, 2008 at 7:41 pm Permalink

    I really like this song. It is a great slow dancing song. And very much on the lite side just what we need in these hard times. Love it and I really hope radio will play this one.

  30. Bobby
    August 4, 2008 at 8:29 pm Permalink

    Jim, you don’t count “If Something Should Happen” as a hit? It got to #9 after “Awful, Beautiful Life”.

  31. Matt B.
    August 4, 2008 at 9:07 pm Permalink

    Let’s not forget that “I Came Back From A War” was a Top 20 hit as well.

  32. Jaime
    August 4, 2008 at 9:15 pm Permalink

    Stormy, you are right. In spite of the ridiculous portrayal of women with silicone and super-high heels, Playboy has very intelligent articles.

    And yes, I really like the groove of this song and I hope it’s a hit.

  33. Stormy
    August 4, 2008 at 9:20 pm Permalink

    Jim: I try. I have a couple of short stories–one published in my college literary journal (slow clap) and a 476 page outline of a novel. (Dammit, how could I have written 476 pages and not said anything?!)

    Hairandtoenails: They pay the most and they have some pretty big names in there.

  34. Jim Malec
    August 5, 2008 at 4:23 am Permalink

    The other “hits” you mentioned barely sputtered to their chart highs, and receive zero residual airplay. I don’t just look to chart position when determining what I consider a “hit.”

  35. Bruce
    August 5, 2008 at 6:35 am Permalink

    To me, Darryl is one of those artists who may be overlooked because he is so talented, and so real.
    I hope he sells 100 million copies.

  36. Matt B.
    August 5, 2008 at 9:21 am Permalink

    Jim,

    I see your agruement but have to (somewhat) disagree with you. You may not deem something a “hit” based on recurrent airplay or residuals for singers but a Top 10 hit is a Top 10 hit. If a “Greatest Hits” package comes out (it will if he gets a few hits at his new label) that “non-hit” will be on it. Also, I’d argue that country radio doesn’t play much of anything by Darryl Worley these days so by your definition he has what, one or two “real” hits?

    C’mon now.

  37. Jim Malec
    August 5, 2008 at 9:29 am Permalink

    Yes, I’d say that’s fair–that he has one or two (ok, three or four) “real” hits.

    His other songs are completely irrelevant. Do you think anyone other than a handful of Worley’s most loyal fans even remembers “If Something Should Happen?”

    That song might as well have never existed. From a “hits” standpoint, it made essentially zero impact in his career. Sure, it went to #9. And if you want to call that a “hit” I can’t really tell you you’re wrong.

    But did it raise his prestige? Did it lead to more career opportunities? Did it drive sales? Did it make people fall in love with his music? I think the answer to all of these is, simply, no. So I don’t consider that a hit.

  38. Matt B.
    August 5, 2008 at 9:38 am Permalink

    I understand why you say that about that song. I’d argue that the song stalled there because it was the last single from his label deal and it was at the time his label and him weren’t seeing eye to eye (which he sang about on “Jumpin’ Off The Wagon” on his 903 Records album).

    I think you could argue the “did it raise his prestige, did it lead to more career opportunities” arguement for almost all of the artists on the charts nowadays. A perfect example is Craig Morgan. He’s had quite a few Top 10 hits but really has nothing that’s all that memorable but maybe “What I Love About Sunday” and maybe “Almost Home” or (sadly) “Redneck Yacht Club.”

  39. Chris N.
    August 5, 2008 at 9:45 am Permalink

    If a Top 10 isn’t a hit, this town really is boned.

  40. Jim Malec
    August 5, 2008 at 10:00 am Permalink

    Chris, I just don’t think the public gives a damn about chart position anymore. What does “top ten” even mean?

    It means that country radio played the song quite a bit…but who listens to country radio for more than fifteen minutes at a time? If a song peaks at #9, given the high proportion of recurrents in the format these days, there’s a high probability that any given listener is only going to be exposed to that #9 song a handful of times.

    I mean, just look at the charts this week–there’s a 31% drop-off in the number of spins between #1 (”All I Wanna Do”) and #9 (”Waitin’ On A Woman”). Not to mention an audience loss of 10.0.

    Radio used to be the primary way listeners were introduced to new music. But that’s changing rapidly, if it hasn’t already. And I don’t think you can judge if something was a “hit” or not based primarily on its relevance within a dwindling medium.

  41. B. Jonathan
    August 5, 2008 at 10:21 am Permalink

    These questions about “hits” (which, of course, is a relative term) led me to return to this discussion about chart history. For those who have never seen these statistics, it is a very interesting study as to which artists have experienced the most radio activity. No need to name names, but you will see quite a few surprises, and at times, a distinct difference between commercial success and actual artistic legacy.

    http://pulsemusic.proboards48.com/index.cgi?board=country&action=display&thread=14595&page=1

  42. Stephen H.
    August 5, 2008 at 10:26 am Permalink

    Stormy: “(Dammit, how could I have written 476 pages and not said anything?!)”

    So basically, your novel is “15 Minutes of Shame”? ;-)

    Jim: “But did it raise his prestige? Did it lead to more career opportunities? Did it drive sales?”

    I see what you’re saying about chart position, but this even means that songs like “I Loved Her First,” “Brand New Girlfriend,” “Find Out Who Your Friends Are,” “Good Directions,” and other #1s from lesser artists in the last two years weren’t hits, as it didn’t raise the profiles of any of those artists either.

  43. Chris N.
    August 5, 2008 at 10:29 am Permalink

    I firmly believe that a hit is a hit, whether it impacts the artist’s career or not. There are lots of one-hit wonders out there, but they did have one hit.

    Of course, you could just admit that you forgot the song and we could all move on. There’s no shame in it.

  44. Thomas
    August 5, 2008 at 10:29 am Permalink

    music charts are like stock market indices – a measurement tool. both value the underlying quantitatively and result in a ranking. in both worlds you have to do quite a few things right to get to the top. being a hit in one or the other is an obvious sign of success. do you know one artist, who wouldn’t like to have a #1 hit in his career? Even the dodgiest desertrat of a songwriter wouldn’t mind topping the billboard charts with one of his songs.

    take a look at the upcoming olympics, all that’s going to matter to the competitors is #1, #2 and #3.

    some things never change.

  45. Matt B.
    August 5, 2008 at 10:31 am Permalink

    B. Jonathan. That’s an interesting topic but as with any list, it’s quite subjective because of the ‘point’ system.

    The interesting thing is that Josh Gracin has seen “We Weren’t Crazy” ride the charts for 40-plus weeks and is now a Top 10 hit.

  46. Jim Malec
    August 5, 2008 at 10:35 am Permalink

    Stephen–

    The small number of points I included above should not be construed as my conclusive opinion about what does or does not constitute a hit record. An artist can certainly have a hit record that does NONE of those things noted previously.

    “Find Out Who Your Friends Are” certainly did raise T.L.’s prestige–you could say it briefly resurrected his career.

    The other examples you give are undeniable hits: “Good Directions” penetrated the format–it had people all across the country singing about turnip greens. “Brand New Girlfriend” was memorable, and people are going to be playing “I Love Her First” at weddings for years.

    Hits have to set themselves apart in some way, and I think all of those did that, to an extent. Obviously, none of them had the career impact that artists would have liked.

    But “If Something Should Happen” made zero impact. In any regard.

  47. Stephen H.
    August 5, 2008 at 10:37 am Permalink

    I agree with that, in all honesty. Only bringing up those songs, which I agree with your most recent post about. (Plus, I’m not a big Worley fan.)

  48. Chris N.
    August 5, 2008 at 10:41 am Permalink

    I still think you forgot it.

  49. Jim Malec
    August 5, 2008 at 10:42 am Permalink

    Chris, I just disagree with you here. But it comes down to whether or not you believe radio defines hits.

    I think the question of “one hit wonders” is an entirely different phenomena than what we’re discussing.

  50. Matt B.
    August 5, 2008 at 10:46 am Permalink

    Here’s a question Jim,

    If you wrote a song and it became a Top 10 hit “just barely” the way that worley song did would you still not call it a Top 10 hit? I think if you’re being honest you would. I think that’s what Chris was getting at.

  51. B. Jonathan
    August 5, 2008 at 10:54 am Permalink

    Any points system likely will not be perfect, but if you look at the list, you will see that it is a fairly accurate portrayal. It follows closely with the list of artists with the most Top 10s.

    The fact that the song is rather forgettable is a larger problem than whether we can define it as a hit. Quite simply, certain songs will always be remembered, statistics be damned.

  52. Matt B.
    August 5, 2008 at 10:59 am Permalink

    B. Jonathan,

    That’s why some of the most memorable songs were never #1 hits (like “Independence Day” for Martina McBride) but are remembered. I had a successful songwriter tell me one day that a Top 20 song isn’t much different than a #1 song in terms of revenue for a songwriter and that some of their most favorite hits weren’t #1’s.

  53. B. Jonathan
    August 5, 2008 at 11:23 am Permalink

    Well said, Matt B. My favorite songs usually struggle to climb the chart, if they do so at all. Country radio is a limited format that way. But as a performer or a songwriter, I would rather have “Independence Day” than, oh, I don’t know, “If Something Should Happen”.

  54. leeann
    August 5, 2008 at 11:42 am Permalink

    I never liked “If Something Should Happen”. I always thought it was manipulative.

  55. Bobby
    August 5, 2008 at 1:59 pm Permalink

    I think a “hit” is certainly a relative term. Sure, “If Something Should Happen” gets zero recurrent rotation, but aren’t there also #1’s that get no recurrent rotation? I mean, when’s the last time you heard “Sittin’ on Go” by Bryan White? I *never* see that song crop up on recurrent listings, not even from oddball stations that play oddball stuff like James Bonamy. Does this mean then that “Sittin’ on Go”, though it was a Number One, wasn’t a “hit”? Or did Bryan just get screwed because he happened to slide in right before the monster that was “It’s Your Love”?

    For what it’s worth, “I Just Came Back…” is my least favorite Darryl song (just because it was so uninspired; I won’t get into the politics involved), and “If Something Should Happen” is my favorite.

  56. Peter
    August 5, 2008 at 3:05 pm Permalink

    Curious if Darryl still performs “Have You Forgotten” live in concert? And if so has he re-written the words, now that we know the truth about the yellowcake? That song was a number one hit, tho it did next to nothing here in Canada.

  57. Chris J
    August 5, 2008 at 3:30 pm Permalink

    I am pretty sure he still does sing it but, I am not sure

  58. Jim Malec
    August 5, 2008 at 4:17 pm Permalink

    @ Matt B (10:46): That’s a good, and fair question. My short answer is yes–of course I would.

    I might also say that my voice is as verdant as a country hillside and as fresh and invigorating as a sip of well water.

    Both might be true–it’s all subjective. And if I implied that “If Something Should Happen” wasn’t a “hit” by any definition, then I made a mistake. Of course it was a radio hit. And in the eyes of those associated with it, I’m sure it’s a genuine hit.

    I still disagree with Chris N’s pronunciation that “a hit is a hit.” I think that’s a gross oversimplification. If a hit’s a hit, does that mean that a #1 is the same as a #10 which is the same as a #40? And if not (because I think even Chris would agree to the answer there being ‘not’), where is the line drawn? And who gets to draw it?

    It’s an arbitrary line. And you get to draw it. (And so do I.) We draw that line for our own purposes–a hit to a member of Worley’s fan club is not the same as a hit to one of his co-writers which is not the same as a hit to his label, and so on.

    In hindsight, however, I shouldn’t have oversimplified my own statement into ‘he hasn’t had a hit since…” That’s an error in judgment on my part.

    And I appreciate you all holding me to it. It makes me a better writer.

  59. Chris N.
    August 5, 2008 at 4:25 pm Permalink

    Some hits are bigger than others, but you’re never going to convince me a Top 10 isn’t a hit. If only for a week, it was one of the 10 most popular (or at least most played) country songs in America.

  60. Jim Malec
    August 5, 2008 at 4:31 pm Permalink

    …And if I implied that “If Something Should Happen” wasn’t a “hit” by any definition, then I made a mistake…

  61. Matt B.
    August 5, 2008 at 5:05 pm Permalink

    Darryl sang it at CMA Fest.

  62. Bobby
    August 10, 2008 at 7:00 am Permalink

    I’m surprised that “Have You Forgotten?” still gets so much rotation. It just seems so dated now. (What the heck is yellow cake in this context?)

    By the way, Jim, I caught the Carter’s Chord reference. And I lol’d.

  63. Peter
    August 11, 2008 at 3:07 pm Permalink

    Yellowcake was the non-existant radioactive material that S. Hussein was alleged to have been buying to make his WMD, which of course he was not, thus rendering Mr. Worley’s (and Mr. Bush’s) linking of 9/11 and Iraq inexplicable.

  64. Mike
    August 28, 2008 at 12:21 pm Permalink

    I hesitate to comment here after the way Jim and I disagreed so much on Jessica Simpson’s last single, for fear of a bad review on one of my own songs, but I figured since I have a shot at Darryl’s next single, I’d take my chances.

    I know ‘Tequila On Ice’ just came out but there’s talk already on what they want out during the holiday season and a song I wrote is the one they are talking about. Darryl cut a song of mine called ‘You Never Know’ that is on this project and we’re keeping our fingers crossed. (So be nice Jim) :)

    I can’t play you Darryl’s record, but if you would like to hear our demo of it you can listen at http://www.shoalscreative.com/songpages/youneverknow.html

    We wrote this song 2 days after finding out our original bass player in Shenandoah ,Ralph Ezell, had died. He was the inspiration for this song.

    So we are pulling for this first single ‘Tequila On Ice’ to do well and are hopeful for the second single. Keep your fingers crossed with us and pray for a big hit! I could use it.

    And again, hopefully Jim will be nice to us if it is indeed a single. :)

    All the best guys and gals,

    Mike

  65. Pebbles
    August 31, 2008 at 10:18 pm Permalink

    After hearing the title, “Tequila on Ice,” I got really excited that Darryl was finally doing an uptempo turn-it-up-loud song.

    Then I heard the song. Anyone else disappointed?

    What a waste of a title.

  66. Jim Malec
    September 1, 2008 at 3:35 am Permalink

    I’m not disappointed. I’m really tired of turn-it-up-loud songs.

  67. leeann
    September 1, 2008 at 3:57 am Permalink

    While I like a turn it up loud song as much as the next person, I was actually pleasantly surprised by the turn of this song.

  68. Brady Vercher
    September 2, 2008 at 4:23 pm Permalink

    So uhh, how ’bout that preview image for the “Tequila on Ice” video on CMT?

Leave a Comment


Sponsor

New American Voices Video

Tagged In This Article

Current Discussion

  • Terry Ridont: I think its cool. Thats what I like about indy rock artists, everything isn't the same high budget packaging and ...
  • Stormy: Jon: The problem is that the progressive country music is now being called Americana. And why is it ...
  • Razor X: Maybe his brother did talk him into it but what’s to say he hasn’t ‘always loved’ and ‘wanted’ to ...
  • Brian: Josh Kelley will be fine. At the very least it means Katherine Heigl may show up on country award shows regularly. ...
  • Razor X: Change may be inevitable but we aren't required to support it and if enough people boycott it, it doesn't last ...
  • Jon: "You can’t stop “progress”… We can if we try hard enough. Um, no. Not that I think "progress" is a good ...
  • Joe: When she moved from Mercury to BNA, I think we were all just allowed to think there'd be some grand ...
  • sam sam: Well, Suzie, maybe if I saw his live show I'd love him. But I'm not interested in attending concerts. Radio ...
  • JOHN: Personally Sherrie s voice is as pure as it gets to me. Just listened to her demo songs after reading ...
  • Suzie: What is all this hate for Bucky about anyway?? He has one of the best voices in country music ...

Recently Reviewed Albums

  • clark-icon
  • cheticon
  • natural-forces-icon
  • carrie-icon
  • Sam Bush - Circles Around Me
  • Dolly Parton - Dolly
  • Drew Kennedy - An Audio Guide to Cross Country Travel
  • Toby Keith - American Ride