Welcome to The 9513! If you're interested in country music, be sure to subscribe to our feed or receive updates via email.
Darryl Worley - “Tequila on Ice”
Songwriters: Rivers Rutherford, Marty Dodson
Darryl Worley hasn’t had a hit since 2004’s “Awful, Beautiful Life.” If there’s any justice in the country music world, that’s about the change. “Tequila on Ice” is a groovy mid-tempo that sways, a refreshing reprieve from the exhausting pace of a format that clamors for loud music and swelling choruses.
Worley’s comeback effort—the debut single for newly formed Stroudavarious Records–features a delightful interplay between the singer’s quintessentially country voice and the well-spaced and smartly placed guitar which underlines the track, and which serves, by comparison, as a jarring reminder of just how bland and unimaginative so much of today’s country music has become.
So this, I found myself thinking, is what musical instruments sound like when they’re not compressed into a nearly indistinguishable wall of noise.
Likewise, it’s refreshing to hear lyrics that, while not meant to be life-changing in their depth or construction, stretch the songwriters’ creative muscles. The sentiment of “I was looking for a saint who was a devil of a lover/but every girl I found was either one way or the other,” isn’t groundbreaking by any means, but Rutherford and Dodson phrase it in a way that’s unique and clever nonetheless.
“Tequila on Ice” doesn’t push or prod; it just flows coolly, a three minute exercise in chilling-out. “She said, thank you I think/I’ll have tequila on ice/And I said, nice,” Worley sings.
I couldn’t agree more.
![]()
Listen to: Darryl Worley - “Tequila on Ice”
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Current Discussion
- leeann: I *did* mention the Lauderdale song in my review. I really liked it. He sounds...
- Thomas: "whereas rap was the word of truth, today country is where you go for honesty".....
- Razor X: The Jim Lauderdale track is excellent. Another one that I liked better than I t...
- Dylan Gramm: Why does that statement make Keith a racist?...
- f_t_e: Namely this: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/30/toby-keith-obama-white/ "...
- f_t_e: Yeah, because if there's anyone who would have supported John McCain, it's the m...
- Josh: Rascal's "I'm Moving On" was good.. that's all I got....
- Mirandas2cool: Kenny really has made some bad choices lately. I really like I go back and his o...
- Dylan Gramm: What's the Jim Lauderdale track like?...
- leeann: I didn't mention it in my review, but I didn't like the Skaggs duet either. It ...
In Memory of Don Helms (1927 - 2008) Helms dated back to a time when an excellent four or five piece band and a good singer were all that were needed to make great country music. No drums, no light shows, no production tricks in the recording studio–just good music.
Don’t look now, but Darius Rucker, lead singer of 90s rock group Hootie & The Blowfish, has a country hit on his hands. What you probably haven’t heard is that Rucker is the first black artist to chart a single in the country top 20 since Charley Pride last did it in 1988.
News that former Sugarland member and co-founder Kristen Hall is suing her ex-mates, to the tune of $1.5 million, goes a long way towards providing a bit of context regarding the Atlanta singer/songwriter’s sudden departure from the group.
Josh Gracin - “Unbelievable (Ann Marie)” Despite initial marketing that touted the album as deep and personal, “Unbelievable (Ann Marie)” is anything but deep or personal.
Josh Turner - "Everything Is Fine" Turner is the rare example of an artist who records material that’s both quality and trademark.
Darryl Worley - "Tequila On Ice" A groovy mid-tempo that sways, a refreshing reprieve from the exhausting pace of a format that clamors for loud music and swelling choruses.
Blake Shelton - "She Wouldn't Be Gone" It’s all about nailing the melody rather than providing a legitimate interpretation that accentuates the lyrical content, although Shelton does do a pretty good job of injecting what limited emotion he can.
Forgotten Artist: David Rogers David Rogers (1936-1993) is proof of the adage that it’s great to be on a major label, but only if the label is truly behind you.
Forgotten Artist: Charley Pride For the ’70s, Billboard has Charley listed as its third ranking singles artist behind only Conway Twitty and Merle Haggard.
In this exclusive interview with The 9513, the Show Dog Records trio talks about growing up around Waylon and Jessi Colter, and about how those experiences have helped shaped their music as they set off on their own country music journey.
One of an emerging wave of artists empowered by decreasing production costs and a rapidly changing distribution landscape, Kelleigh Bannen has taken a do-it-yourself approach to her debut album, Radio Skies.







63 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
August 4, 2008 at 6:25 am Permalink
what a pity that they didn’t find a place for the word “pirat” in the lyrics of this song.
August 4, 2008 at 6:29 am Permalink
I really like it as well and agree with you on the instrumentation-the sound is incredibly warm. I thought his last cd, Here and Now, was great as well. Hopefully he will have some radio success this time around.
August 4, 2008 at 9:31 am Permalink
I think it’s tasty and it goes down smoothly. Get it? Get it?
August 4, 2008 at 9:34 am Permalink
no!
August 4, 2008 at 9:39 am Permalink
I need tequila to forget about him posing in playgirl..no, i havent forgotten….
August 4, 2008 at 9:45 am Permalink
Kelly: Do we begrudge you Playboy?
August 4, 2008 at 9:49 am Permalink
You can have it, I prefer Paste, Harp (RIP), and Country Weekly (shout out to Chris N.) to that actually….
August 4, 2008 at 9:55 am Permalink
Women read Playgirl?
August 4, 2008 at 11:33 am Permalink
Yeah, like mean read Playboy. Actually, though, as a woman, if you get around the pictures, Playboy isn’t a half bad magazine.
August 4, 2008 at 11:34 am Permalink
I was under the impression that Playgirl’s readership was 99.9% gay men.
August 4, 2008 at 11:46 am Permalink
I wonder what Darryl would think about the direction the discussion on this thread has taken…….(lol)
I like it and I hope radio plays it, but when I like a new single it normally means mainstream radio won’t play it. They’d rather play something like Sucky Covington to please the AI fans in their listening audience as most fans of real country have already tuned out…..
August 4, 2008 at 12:20 pm Permalink
Chris: You don’t have to be a man to appreciate gay men.
August 4, 2008 at 1:23 pm Permalink
Ha! This is too funny!
This song is pretty good IMO - good not great. But certainly head and shoulders above a lot of what’s in the Top 40 right now.
August 4, 2008 at 2:21 pm Permalink
have i missed the discovery of another gender today, after all this tequila on ice?
August 4, 2008 at 3:08 pm Permalink
I’m not saying Playgirl’s models are gay, I’m saying a high percentage of the readers are.
August 4, 2008 at 3:11 pm Permalink
I’m glad this comment thread has stayed on topic.
August 4, 2008 at 3:43 pm Permalink
what do playgirl readers do on a straight tequila night, then?
August 4, 2008 at 3:53 pm Permalink
Actually, though, as a woman, if you get around the pictures, Playboy isn’t a half bad magazine.”
So, you read Play Boy for its articles?:)
August 4, 2008 at 4:07 pm Permalink
playboy is practically literature with a centerfold. playgirl, however, seems to have become some kind of “country weekly” just a bit more naked, lately.
August 4, 2008 at 4:22 pm Permalink
Leeann: I read it for research. Believe it or not Playboy is the hardest (no pun intended) market for short (again, no pun intended) fiction in the US.
August 4, 2008 at 4:23 pm Permalink
Thomas
August 4, 2008 at 3:43 pm Permalink what do playgirl readers do on a straight tequila night, then?
You mean you haven’t seen the you tube videos?
August 4, 2008 at 4:41 pm Permalink
stormy,
no - but i must have temporarily forgotten the new global paradigm that if it’s not on youtube is probably hasn’t happened.
August 4, 2008 at 4:50 pm Permalink
Tougher than The Atlantic? Tougher than Georgia Review? How did I not know that? Clearly, I don’t read enough Playboy.
Stormy, are you a writer, too?
August 4, 2008 at 5:08 pm Permalink
There are good articles in Playboy, and there are also naked women. Those are two things in life that I like.
August 4, 2008 at 5:14 pm Permalink
What do playgirl readers do on a straight tequila night? They blame their broken heart on every gland in sight.
August 4, 2008 at 5:31 pm Permalink
When I was in 11th grade, my English teacher told us that Playboy paid fiction writers better than any other periodical. Not sure if that’s true or not.
August 4, 2008 at 5:59 pm Permalink
Sounds like Playgirl is going digital only.
But getting back on topic, this song caught me by surprise. From the title I expected a hard driving, party song. Good stuff, though.
August 4, 2008 at 6:23 pm Permalink
I assumed the same thing from the title as well.
August 4, 2008 at 7:41 pm Permalink
I really like this song. It is a great slow dancing song. And very much on the lite side just what we need in these hard times. Love it and I really hope radio will play this one.
August 4, 2008 at 8:29 pm Permalink
Jim, you don’t count “If Something Should Happen” as a hit? It got to #9 after “Awful, Beautiful Life”.
August 4, 2008 at 9:07 pm Permalink
Let’s not forget that “I Came Back From A War” was a Top 20 hit as well.
August 4, 2008 at 9:15 pm Permalink
Stormy, you are right. In spite of the ridiculous portrayal of women with silicone and super-high heels, Playboy has very intelligent articles.
And yes, I really like the groove of this song and I hope it’s a hit.
August 4, 2008 at 9:20 pm Permalink
Jim: I try. I have a couple of short stories–one published in my college literary journal (slow clap) and a 476 page outline of a novel. (Dammit, how could I have written 476 pages and not said anything?!)
Hairandtoenails: They pay the most and they have some pretty big names in there.
August 5, 2008 at 4:23 am Permalink
The other “hits” you mentioned barely sputtered to their chart highs, and receive zero residual airplay. I don’t just look to chart position when determining what I consider a “hit.”
August 5, 2008 at 6:35 am Permalink
To me, Darryl is one of those artists who may be overlooked because he is so talented, and so real.
I hope he sells 100 million copies.
August 5, 2008 at 9:21 am Permalink
Jim,
I see your agruement but have to (somewhat) disagree with you. You may not deem something a “hit” based on recurrent airplay or residuals for singers but a Top 10 hit is a Top 10 hit. If a “Greatest Hits” package comes out (it will if he gets a few hits at his new label) that “non-hit” will be on it. Also, I’d argue that country radio doesn’t play much of anything by Darryl Worley these days so by your definition he has what, one or two “real” hits?
C’mon now.
August 5, 2008 at 9:29 am Permalink
Yes, I’d say that’s fair–that he has one or two (ok, three or four) “real” hits.
His other songs are completely irrelevant. Do you think anyone other than a handful of Worley’s most loyal fans even remembers “If Something Should Happen?”
That song might as well have never existed. From a “hits” standpoint, it made essentially zero impact in his career. Sure, it went to #9. And if you want to call that a “hit” I can’t really tell you you’re wrong.
But did it raise his prestige? Did it lead to more career opportunities? Did it drive sales? Did it make people fall in love with his music? I think the answer to all of these is, simply, no. So I don’t consider that a hit.
August 5, 2008 at 9:38 am Permalink
I understand why you say that about that song. I’d argue that the song stalled there because it was the last single from his label deal and it was at the time his label and him weren’t seeing eye to eye (which he sang about on “Jumpin’ Off The Wagon” on his 903 Records album).
I think you could argue the “did it raise his prestige, did it lead to more career opportunities” arguement for almost all of the artists on the charts nowadays. A perfect example is Craig Morgan. He’s had quite a few Top 10 hits but really has nothing that’s all that memorable but maybe “What I Love About Sunday” and maybe “Almost Home” or (sadly) “Redneck Yacht Club.”
August 5, 2008 at 9:45 am Permalink
If a Top 10 isn’t a hit, this town really is boned.
August 5, 2008 at 10:00 am Permalink
Chris, I just don’t think the public gives a damn about chart position anymore. What does “top ten” even mean?
It means that country radio played the song quite a bit…but who listens to country radio for more than fifteen minutes at a time? If a song peaks at #9, given the high proportion of recurrents in the format these days, there’s a high probability that any given listener is only going to be exposed to that #9 song a handful of times.
I mean, just look at the charts this week–there’s a 31% drop-off in the number of spins between #1 (”All I Wanna Do”) and #9 (”Waitin’ On A Woman”). Not to mention an audience loss of 10.0.
Radio used to be the primary way listeners were introduced to new music. But that’s changing rapidly, if it hasn’t already. And I don’t think you can judge if something was a “hit” or not based primarily on its relevance within a dwindling medium.
August 5, 2008 at 10:21 am Permalink
These questions about “hits” (which, of course, is a relative term) led me to return to this discussion about chart history. For those who have never seen these statistics, it is a very interesting study as to which artists have experienced the most radio activity. No need to name names, but you will see quite a few surprises, and at times, a distinct difference between commercial success and actual artistic legacy.
http://pulsemusic.proboards48.com/index.cgi?board=country&action=display&thread=14595&page=1
August 5, 2008 at 10:26 am Permalink
Stormy: “(Dammit, how could I have written 476 pages and not said anything?!)”
So basically, your novel is “15 Minutes of Shame”? ;-)
Jim: “But did it raise his prestige? Did it lead to more career opportunities? Did it drive sales?”
I see what you’re saying about chart position, but this even means that songs like “I Loved Her First,” “Brand New Girlfriend,” “Find Out Who Your Friends Are,” “Good Directions,” and other #1s from lesser artists in the last two years weren’t hits, as it didn’t raise the profiles of any of those artists either.
August 5, 2008 at 10:29 am Permalink
I firmly believe that a hit is a hit, whether it impacts the artist’s career or not. There are lots of one-hit wonders out there, but they did have one hit.
Of course, you could just admit that you forgot the song and we could all move on. There’s no shame in it.
August 5, 2008 at 10:29 am Permalink
music charts are like stock market indices - a measurement tool. both value the underlying quantitatively and result in a ranking. in both worlds you have to do quite a few things right to get to the top. being a hit in one or the other is an obvious sign of success. do you know one artist, who wouldn’t like to have a #1 hit in his career? Even the dodgiest desertrat of a songwriter wouldn’t mind topping the billboard charts with one of his songs.
take a look at the upcoming olympics, all that’s going to matter to the competitors is #1, #2 and #3.
some things never change.
August 5, 2008 at 10:31 am Permalink
B. Jonathan. That’s an interesting topic but as with any list, it’s quite subjective because of the ‘point’ system.
The interesting thing is that Josh Gracin has seen “We Weren’t Crazy” ride the charts for 40-plus weeks and is now a Top 10 hit.
August 5, 2008 at 10:35 am Permalink
Stephen–
The small number of points I included above should not be construed as my conclusive opinion about what does or does not constitute a hit record. An artist can certainly have a hit record that does NONE of those things noted previously.
“Find Out Who Your Friends Are” certainly did raise T.L.’s prestige–you could say it briefly resurrected his career.
The other examples you give are undeniable hits: “Good Directions” penetrated the format–it had people all across the country singing about turnip greens. “Brand New Girlfriend” was memorable, and people are going to be playing “I Love Her First” at weddings for years.
Hits have to set themselves apart in some way, and I think all of those did that, to an extent. Obviously, none of them had the career impact that artists would have liked.
But “If Something Should Happen” made zero impact. In any regard.
August 5, 2008 at 10:37 am Permalink
I agree with that, in all honesty. Only bringing up those songs, which I agree with your most recent post about. (Plus, I’m not a big Worley fan.)
August 5, 2008 at 10:41 am Permalink
I still think you forgot it.
August 5, 2008 at 10:42 am Permalink
Chris, I just disagree with you here. But it comes down to whether or not you believe radio defines hits.
I think the question of “one hit wonders” is an entirely different phenomena than what we’re discussing.
August 5, 2008 at 10:46 am Permalink
Here’s a question Jim,
If you wrote a song and it became a Top 10 hit “just barely” the way that worley song did would you still not call it a Top 10 hit? I think if you’re being honest you would. I think that’s what Chris was getting at.
August 5, 2008 at 10:54 am Permalink
Any points system likely will not be perfect, but if you look at the list, you will see that it is a fairly accurate portrayal. It follows closely with the list of artists with the most Top 10s.
The fact that the song is rather forgettable is a larger problem than whether we can define it as a hit. Quite simply, certain songs will always be remembered, statistics be damned.
August 5, 2008 at 10:59 am Permalink
B. Jonathan,
That’s why some of the most memorable songs were never #1 hits (like “Independence Day” for Martina McBride) but are remembered. I had a successful songwriter tell me one day that a Top 20 song isn’t much different than a #1 song in terms of revenue for a songwriter and that some of their most favorite hits weren’t #1’s.
August 5, 2008 at 11:23 am Permalink
Well said, Matt B. My favorite songs usually struggle to climb the chart, if they do so at all. Country radio is a limited format that way. But as a performer or a songwriter, I would rather have “Independence Day” than, oh, I don’t know, “If Something Should Happen”.
August 5, 2008 at 11:42 am Permalink
I never liked “If Something Should Happen”. I always thought it was manipulative.
August 5, 2008 at 1:59 pm Permalink
I think a “hit” is certainly a relative term. Sure, “If Something Should Happen” gets zero recurrent rotation, but aren’t there also #1’s that get no recurrent rotation? I mean, when’s the last time you heard “Sittin’ on Go” by Bryan White? I *never* see that song crop up on recurrent listings, not even from oddball stations that play oddball stuff like James Bonamy. Does this mean then that “Sittin’ on Go”, though it was a Number One, wasn’t a “hit”? Or did Bryan just get screwed because he happened to slide in right before the monster that was “It’s Your Love”?
For what it’s worth, “I Just Came Back…” is my least favorite Darryl song (just because it was so uninspired; I won’t get into the politics involved), and “If Something Should Happen” is my favorite.
August 5, 2008 at 3:05 pm Permalink
Curious if Darryl still performs “Have You Forgotten” live in concert? And if so has he re-written the words, now that we know the truth about the yellowcake? That song was a number one hit, tho it did next to nothing here in Canada.
August 5, 2008 at 3:30 pm Permalink
I am pretty sure he still does sing it but, I am not sure
August 5, 2008 at 4:17 pm Permalink
@ Matt B (10:46): That’s a good, and fair question. My short answer is yes–of course I would.
I might also say that my voice is as verdant as a country hillside and as fresh and invigorating as a sip of well water.
Both might be true–it’s all subjective. And if I implied that “If Something Should Happen” wasn’t a “hit” by any definition, then I made a mistake. Of course it was a radio hit. And in the eyes of those associated with it, I’m sure it’s a genuine hit.
I still disagree with Chris N’s pronunciation that “a hit is a hit.” I think that’s a gross oversimplification. If a hit’s a hit, does that mean that a #1 is the same as a #10 which is the same as a #40? And if not (because I think even Chris would agree to the answer there being ‘not’), where is the line drawn? And who gets to draw it?
It’s an arbitrary line. And you get to draw it. (And so do I.) We draw that line for our own purposes–a hit to a member of Worley’s fan club is not the same as a hit to one of his co-writers which is not the same as a hit to his label, and so on.
In hindsight, however, I shouldn’t have oversimplified my own statement into ‘he hasn’t had a hit since…” That’s an error in judgment on my part.
And I appreciate you all holding me to it. It makes me a better writer.
August 5, 2008 at 4:25 pm Permalink
Some hits are bigger than others, but you’re never going to convince me a Top 10 isn’t a hit. If only for a week, it was one of the 10 most popular (or at least most played) country songs in America.
August 5, 2008 at 4:31 pm Permalink
…And if I implied that “If Something Should Happen” wasn’t a “hit” by any definition, then I made a mistake…
August 5, 2008 at 5:05 pm Permalink
Darryl sang it at CMA Fest.
August 10, 2008 at 7:00 am Permalink
I’m surprised that “Have You Forgotten?” still gets so much rotation. It just seems so dated now. (What the heck is yellow cake in this context?)
By the way, Jim, I caught the Carter’s Chord reference. And I lol’d.
August 11, 2008 at 3:07 pm Permalink
Yellowcake was the non-existant radioactive material that S. Hussein was alleged to have been buying to make his WMD, which of course he was not, thus rendering Mr. Worley’s (and Mr. Bush’s) linking of 9/11 and Iraq inexplicable.
Leave a Comment