Buddy Jewell - “This Ain’t Mexico”

Brady Vercher | February 26th, 2008 Email Share

Buddy Jewell Songwriters: Buddy Jewell and Al Sostrin

Buddy Jewell hopes to resuscitate his flagging career with his latest single, but for many his career may as well have ended. “This Ain’t Mexico” is an ignorant commentary on the issue of immigration–or invasion according to Jewell–backed by Mariachi inspired instrumentation, which makes it all the more insulting.

Social commentary in country music can be powerful, but only if the issues are given the thought they require. In this instance, Jewell just comes across as pandering to the perceived country music audience as he attempts to address the situation in absolute terms and speak for every red-blooded American while singing, “‘Cause this ain’t Mexico / Sorry partner, but we don’t hablo / We love margaritas, and them sizzlin’ fajitas / But we still remember the Alamo.” Let me get this straight, it’s alright to pick and choose elements from a certain culture as being acceptable, but perfectly fine to deny those people? And this crap about remembering the Alamo is simply a dumbed down catch phrase for the ignorant.

The Alamo was a battle in which Texians, white AND Hispanic, fought for their independence from Mexico, just like the United States did against England only sixty years prior in The American Revolution, and just like Mexico did against Spain. Texas was annexed by the U.S. nine years later and is no longer a nation. “Remember the Alamo” was and is a battle cry for Texans to remember the bravery of those who fought that battle, not for excluding a race of people from seeking freedom, and certainly not a rally cry for all of the U.S. citizens favoring deportation, never mind the fact that the U.S. is a nation of immigrants itself.

The truth is that in American society today, no single solution is going to appease everybody and extreme solutions are rarely ever the answer, except maybe in cases of egregious offenses. Deportation is not the answer nor is complete amnesty, rather the answer lies somewhere in between. The sentiments in the song are understandable to a degree, but the way in which they’re expressed reeks of racism and comes across as completely offensive. I can’t imagine a scenario in which a couple of songwriters get together and decide it’s a good idea to tell only Mexican immigrants to get out because this country is ours and then decide to back it by instrumentation typically associated with their culture. A situation like this requires a more thoughtful response than a dumbed down, arrogant, three and a half minute song. If radio hasn’t completely lost all sensibility, this song won’t get any airtime.

Thumbs Down

1 Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URI for this post
  1. […] Russell has a song called “Who’s Gonna Build Your Wall” that stands opposite of Buddy Jewell’s controversial “This Ain’t Mexico.” The Pitch has a short interview with Russell where he shares […]

  1. Zack
    February 26, 2008 at 9:10 am Permalink

    Wow…just wow. I really hate that he name-checks Johnny Rodriguez. How did this get released?

  2. Chris N.
    February 26, 2008 at 9:40 am Permalink

    This just makes me sad. It’s a sign of complete desperation.

  3. Brady Vercher
    February 26, 2008 at 10:09 am Permalink

    Zack, the naming checking Johnny Rodriguez is just continuation of picking and choosing things from that culture to accept, although, Rodriguez was born in the U.S. and therefore is an American citizen just the same as anyone else, so it is odd to be mentioning him. Rodriguez is a pretty funny character to accept though, considering he’s always shooting himself in the foot. If you want to read a good book that has a little about the discovery of Johnny Rodriguez, check out One Ranger, an autobiography of Texas Ranger Joaquin Jackson. I’m sure any Texas Ranger could string together a bunch of captivating stories, but Jackson’s book is especially interesting.

    Oh, and according to his MySpace, Jewell isn’t on a label, but we were tipped off to this release by a reader who wanted an honest review.

  4. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 10:23 am Permalink

    I think the songs speaks to what many people think and want to say. I don’t see it as a racist song.

    Hank JR has had some songs like this. “If the south would’ve won” comes to mind instantly. It was a tongue in cheek song about how things would be different if the south had won the civil war.

    Charlie Daniels also had a song I don’t remember the title but I do remember this verse. “We tell our kids just say no then same pantywaist judge lets the drug dealer go. If I had my way for people selling dope we’d take a tall tree and a short piece of rope”.

  5. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 10:39 am Permalink

    CCF, I agree that there are people who have certain points of view when it comes to immigration, but “agreeing” with those lyrics doesnt make it a good song or even a song with intelligent lyrics. “We remember the Alamo”?? You cant sit here and act like that’s a fair or even remotely intelligent lyric. If there are peole that think those thoughts and even want to say these things, as you suggested, it speaks more negatively on that individual than it does positively for this song. Brady is right that it is beyond ignorant to pick and choose the most superficial aspects of a culture to accept, and then manufcture other aspects of a cutlure (the alamo, johnny rodriguez) to bash or have fun with. If there is one thing worse than an obvious, desperate attempt at holding on to a career, its an ignorant, obvious and desperate attempt. It’s sad when such ignorance is worn as a patriotic badge.

  6. Brady Vercher
    February 26, 2008 at 11:02 am Permalink

    CCF, I wrote this in the review: “The sentiments in the song are understandable to a degree, but the way in which they’re expressed reeks of racism and comes across as completely offensive.

    I can understand not wanting to foot the bill for illegal immigrants who don’t pay taxes, but I can’t fault them for seeking freedom or a better life for themselves or their children. And I can’t condone the ignorant way in which this song portrays the deportation side of the argument. Kelly makes a lot of good points if you read his comment.

    Hank Jr’s song isn’t comparable and you even mentioned it was tongue in cheek yourself. A song isn’t automatically about slavery or race because it mentions the civil war. The Charlie Daniels song isn’t comparable, either, as it only addresses injustices in society and not race, unless you think there isn’t such a thing as non-black drug dealers.

  7. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 11:08 am Permalink

    I didn’t say they were intelligent lyrics. I do think people should come to this country though legal channels. I do think illegal immigrants are costing this country money.

  8. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 11:21 am Permalink

    Fair enough, but you did validate the lyrics by claiming that they were thoughts that plenty of people have and things that plenty of people want to say and that is what i took issue with. Facts are facts, and yes immigration should be done legally in a perfect world, but lets not claim that Buddy Jewell actually cares one way or the other about it. He cares about pandering in order to save his job. In fact, if the peole that “agree” with this song would get out from under their rebel flag long enough and think about it, they should be offended that Jewell thinks his fans or listeners are so thick as to accept this as true social-political commentary…

  9. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 11:49 am Permalink

    I don’t think of the song as a social political commentary.
    As far as cutting the song to save his career, I think it is beyond saving. I would say 5 of ten will say the song is something they can agree with, especially in border states.

  10. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 12:11 pm Permalink

    Cool, Iagree that it isnt, but I think you underestimate how many people will agree with it because they “feel” the same way, thus making it socio-political commentary for them anyway…

    I live in Texas and you may be right about 5 out of 10 border state dwellers “agreeing” with the song, but again, what are they agreeing with? Are they agreeing with what the song is actually saying in its lyric or with what they determine the song means? If they are agreeing that “we remember the Alamo”, what is that worth? If they agree that illegal immigration is bad, does that make the song not suck?

  11. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 12:22 pm Permalink

    I’m saying most will be feed up with paying for the free ride the illegal are getting and costing this country.

  12. Chris N.
    February 26, 2008 at 12:24 pm Permalink

    I’m sure some right-wing morning-zoo DJs will play it, but I sure can’t see this rescuing Buddy’s career. Songs this divisive get a momentary burst of publicity followed by a great big nothing.

    And it really doesn’t matter where you stand on this issue, the song is pretty awful — badly written, woefully misconceived pedantic junk that would be terrible no matter what position it was espousing. (Buy a metaphor, folks.) As I’ve said many times here about many songs, just because you relate to a song doesn’t make it a good song.

  13. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 12:35 pm Permalink

    Amen Chris! My point all along has been about the song, not the issue. I can write words about me loving my son or wife that the whole world can relate to, but that doesnt make it good (it would make it generic, most likely).

  14. hairandtoenails
    February 26, 2008 at 12:46 pm Permalink

    Kelly and Chris N. both make a great point. Wherever you stand on the issue, these lyrics don’t cut it.

    I don’t see what fajitas, margaritas or the Alamo has to do with the current debates over immigration.

  15. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 12:57 pm Permalink

    No the lyrics don’t cut it but the issue of illegal immigration rings true.

  16. Lucas
    February 26, 2008 at 1:01 pm Permalink

    Next time try reviewing the song, I could care less about political opinion.

  17. Mike
    February 26, 2008 at 1:51 pm Permalink

    I think the song is very racist either way you stand on the issue. I am guessing this isn’t being released on a major label? If Buddy Jewell was popular right now would he even release something like this?

  18. Leeann
    February 26, 2008 at 2:30 pm Permalink

    “I can understand not wanting to foot the bill for illegal immigrants who don’t pay taxes, but I can’t fault them for seeking freedom or a better life for themselves or their children. And I can’t condone the ignorant way in which this song portrays the deportation side of the argument.”

    So many good points were made here, especially Brady’s comment, I don’t even know where to start!

    I don’t think this song represents five out of ten people’s view on immigration. He’s just taking a nasty tone that panders to an issue that keeps coming up in the news cycle since we’re coming up on an election. I don’t really need to say more on the content of this song, because it has already been well said here.

    As for Lucas’ request for a song review rather than political commentary, here’s mine. It sucks! Buddy is hardly singing here. The horns work well in “Ring of Fire”, but are dumb in this song. The tune is dull…need I say more?

    There! I didn’t even have to comment on the politics. The song is just bad all around…not to mention the lyrics…which is a huge part of a song, by the way. As Kelly said, “I can write words about me loving my son or wife that the whole world can relate to, but that doesnt make it good (it would make it generic, most likely).”

    Sorry Lucas, I couldn’t help but go back to the political message of the song, after all.

  19. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 2:40 pm Permalink

    Lucas, dude. In this case, the song and political opinion go hand in hand. If you look at the above comments, only one person keeps going on about whats right and wrong on that issue without adressing the song itself. the review, along with the majority of comments have adressed the lyrics, which are politically slanted. your simplistic request is an impossibility in this case…

  20. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 2:45 pm Permalink

    BTW, using the wannabe mariachi horns is lame too. Buddy,dont belittle the contributions of another culture and then try and rip it off….

  21. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 2:45 pm Permalink

    Leeann,

    You don’t think 5 out of ten people are feed up with illegals getting a free ride and us paying for it?

  22. Jim Malec
    February 26, 2008 at 2:48 pm Permalink

    How are these so-called “illegals” getting a “free ride”? There is nothing free about living lives that most of us would consider absolute poverty.

  23. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 2:57 pm Permalink

    right jim, and these folks are also working most of the jobs that americans would consider beneath them. I dont mean to speak in generalities, but that is true in many many cases.

  24. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 2:59 pm Permalink
  25. Hollerin' Ben
    February 26, 2008 at 2:59 pm Permalink

    Lucas
    I know you like to play the contrarian, but when the song opens up by saying “there’s a big debate in the country and here’s my opinion”, most any review of the song will take a look at the opinion expressed. This time you’re reaching.

    I think we can all agree that immigration is a difficult issue and that there are valid concerns on both sides.

    That being said, discussion of this song really, truly, should not boil down to where you stand on the issue of immigration.

    Let’s run down why this song is disgraceful.

    1.The threatening tone of the lyrics. For example,THE PARTY’S OVER, DO I MAKE MYSELF CLEAR?. The tone is condescending and bullying. This sort of tone is completely inappropriate and has no place in an examination or debate on immigration. And the fact that Buddy lists himself as a Christian artist on his myspace makes the bullying tone of the song all the more disgusting. I’m pretty sure that Jesus was all about bullying and mocking the impoverished, right?

    2. The use of mexican style music to mock immigrants. This was really bad. I challenge anyone to explain what purpose this serves other than to mock.

    3. The complete disregard for any human rights issues involved in the debate. The stance that the song takes is essentially the following “This is our country son, no we don’t speak your crazy spanish, in America we speak American. Stop abusing my freedom by demanding to be fed. Please be a polite and starve on your side of the border…or else.” Once again, Buddy is overflowing with the Holy Spirit. Of course, even if he wasn’t playing a Christian on myspace, the dehumanization of immigrants would be offensive and inexcusable.

    4. The use of the Alamo as a sort of rallying point against Mexicans specifically, not the broader issue of illegal immigration from many countries. The Alamo really has nothing to do with immigration and it’s inclusion says nothing more than “oh yeah, and we have a bone to pick with you Mexicans anyway!”. Using an event that stirs pride and unity amongst Texans as a rallying cry against an “invasion” of Mexicans, and in doing so, treats Mexican immigrants as the manifestation of an historical enemy, is dangerous and hateful.

    So regardless of whether you take a hard line stance against illegal immigration, dehumanizing immigrants, mocking immigrants, and encouraging violence or aggressive behavior against immigrants by classifying them as a new invasion by a historical enemy is wrong and has no place in the public debate.

    God help us radio won’t pick this song up.

    For anyone who would like to hear songs that treat immigrants as fellow human beings (novel concept) check out “Plane Wreck at Los Gatos” a Woody Guthrie song that has been recorded by Dolly, the Highwaymen, and Old Crow Medicine Show.

    Also, check out a duo called Sal and Isela on myspace. They are quite good.
    http://www.myspace.com/salandisela

  26. Lucas
    February 26, 2008 at 3:10 pm Permalink

    The only part in that review that addressed the song, not the ideological differences (because I was referring to the review, not the comments) was “A situation like this requires a more thoughtful response than a dumbed down, arrogant, three and a half minute song. If radio hasn’t completely lost all sensibility, this song won’t get any airtime.”

  27. William
    February 26, 2008 at 3:11 pm Permalink

    The 5 out of 10 argument is always interesting, considering you could apply it to almost anything and doesn’t really have anything to do with the arguement itself.

    To avoid the numerous political examples, 5 out of 10 people likely enjoy Rascal Flatts over Johnny Cash, that is not a compelling argument about who is better.

  28. AMJ
    February 26, 2008 at 3:19 pm Permalink

    I agree completely. As someone who has been a supporter of Buddy’s…I am saddened. I think this is a cheap way to get attention..or at the very least poor judgement.
    AMJ

    “I can’t imagine a scenario in which a couple of songwriters get together and decide it’s a good idea to tell only Mexican immigrants to get out because this country is ours and then decide to back it by instrumentation typically associated with their culture. A situation like this requires a more thoughtful response than a dumbed down, arrogant, three and a half minute song. If radio hasn’t completely lost all sensibility, this song won’t get any airtime.”

  29. Lucas
    February 26, 2008 at 3:20 pm Permalink

    I could care less if political ideas are expressed, that’s part of this country and it’s a good part.

    But I’d just like to see at least a fourth of the article on the actual song itself.

  30. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 3:20 pm Permalink

    Lucas. If we were talking about a love song and didnt like the lyrics the artist chose to tell of that love, wouldnt we criticize what the singer had to say about love? This is a political song period. Any true criticism of this tripe must involve some sort of political commentary that reflects the critics thoughts on the issues that the song itself is adressing. I dont quite understand why this is such a hard concept for you to figure out.

  31. Lucas
    February 26, 2008 at 3:25 pm Permalink

    Because like I’ve said multiple times I’m referring to the article itself, not the comments. Therefore it is an easy concept for me to figure out and it has already been figured out.

  32. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 3:26 pm Permalink

    Also Lucas, as the “good part” of this country, freedom of speech goes both ways. Even critics get to say what they want, even though you are quick to tell them what they should and shouldnt say…

  33. Lucas
    February 26, 2008 at 3:29 pm Permalink

    I don’t know why you insist on trying to bring yourself into the middle of an argument that simply doesn’t exist, all I did was state my opinion. Oh well.

  34. Brady Vercher
    February 26, 2008 at 3:31 pm Permalink

    Lucas, I forgot about asking you what direction the content on this site should take. My bad. I honestly don’t think you can determine my stance on the issue from my review of the song, so good luck trying to pigeonhole this as political opinion. I examined the lyric and content of the song, as well as the Latino inspired instrumentation; if that’s not reviewing it, I don’t know what is. If you want a break down of the review, just ask and I’ll show you how it pertains to the song.

    CCF, the five out of ten number is a complete fabrication and therefore can’t possibly support any logical argument. Furthermore, you haven’t fully explored the issue of cost when it comes to deporting the immigrants. Are you absolutely sure that it would be more cost effective to deport every illegal immigrant? How much would it cost to find every person and send them back? How much would it cost the government to not have a cheap work force? And would the saving really offset the economic burden they place on our society? That’s something worth knowing if you’re gonna use cost as the basis of your argument.

  35. Lucas
    February 26, 2008 at 3:34 pm Permalink

    I wasn’t trying to determine your stance nor fight anybody’s stance on political issues and you know it. But I believe it still qualifies as a political opinion due to the mere fact that the song was briefly talked about from an artistic stance.

  36. Brody Vercher
    February 26, 2008 at 3:47 pm Permalink

    Lucas, this is what I see when I break down the review on a paragraph by paragraph basis:

    The first paragraph introduces the song and sets the tone for the review.

    The whole second paragraph examines the lyrical content of the song.

    The third paragraph gives some historical context to the phrase “Remember the Alamo,” which conveniently happens to be one of the lyrics of the song.

    The fourth paragraph takes a look at how the song applies to a real world issue and concludes with a short summary of what the previous three paragraphs were all about.

    So, despite what you say, the whole review is relevant to the song while at the same time touching on the subject of illegal immigration — the topic of the song.

    I find it odd that it’s ok for the song to express a “political opinion” but the reviewer isn’t allowed to critically examine that opinion without being accused of not reviewing the song.

  37. Brady Vercher
    February 26, 2008 at 3:51 pm Permalink

    I wasn’t trying to claim a bear’s sphincter ain’t pink and you know it. That’s about as relevant as your statement.

    Instead of arguing about whether or not the song is political opinion, how about telling us your thoughts? Is the lyric worthy, how ’bout the production and instrumentation? Does it add or detract? Now how ’bout the message of the song?

  38. Hollerin' Ben
    February 26, 2008 at 3:57 pm Permalink

    Lucas,

    you won dude! You totally didn’t back down! Who wants to read contextualization of a political argument that a song is putting forth anyways? Especially when the whole entire point of the song is to put forth a political argument! I want to read about the art man. Like, in this one part, he goes to a 5 chord. Then in this other part, he rhymes Mexico with Hablo, and then with Amigo. How did he find all those words that end in “O”?

    You stood your ground and you win all the prizes! We may no longer be talking about the song, or the issues it puts forth, but in doggedly refusing to admit that examining the political issue of immigration when reviewing a song that advances a thoughless, hateful stance on immigration, you have proven that you, sir, are no pushover.

    My favorite part is that not once, but twice, you let us know how much you care about the political discussion by explaining that you “could care less”. Most people use the phrase “I couldn’t care less” as in, I could not possibly care less than I do because I don’t care at all. But I know that you are no backpeddlar, you’ve shown that today, so you’ll stand by the fact that you “could care less” meaning that you care somewhat.

    well done sir.

  39. Kelly
    February 26, 2008 at 3:57 pm Permalink

    Lucas, I am not putting myself into the middle of an argument as you claim. You get to express your view, and so does everyone else. I disagree whole-heartedly that the review (not comments) wasnt focusing on the song (the above comment by Brady pretty much told you what is up in that regard, by the way), and I have tried to show that when a song decides to be a political song as this one has done (whether you admit it or notice it or not), that the critic has no choice but to adress the subject matter of the song regardless of the subject matter. All anyone is doing here is stating their opinion. Thats all anyone does on this site and the various sites like this one, so for you to offer that as some weak explanation or defense is just that, weak. The review that Brady posted directly adresses the content and quality of the song and does so extremely well, but hey, thats just my opinion.

  40. Chris N.
    February 26, 2008 at 4:29 pm Permalink

    Linking to World Net Daily kinda speaks for itself.

  41. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 4:46 pm Permalink

    I don’t think I said we ought to deport the illegal immigrants. That would impossible. I do think we need to do something to stop the illegals ones from getting here. I’m a middle of the road democrat.

  42. Brady Vercher
    February 26, 2008 at 5:26 pm Permalink

    My fault for misinterpreting your stance, I guess I got mixed up by your statement that the song speaks to the way many people feel and think. Edit: Oh, and I don’t think there’s any solution that isn’t going to be costly.

  43. Leeann
    February 26, 2008 at 5:45 pm Permalink

    Middle of the road democrat or not, I have to argue with your claim that this song isn’t racist. I don’t think it matters what side of the political isle you’re on, the racism here is glaringly evident.

  44. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 6:13 pm Permalink

    Sorry I don’t see the song as racist. The term is used to quick these days.

  45. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 6:17 pm Permalink

    Brady,
    your right there isn’t a cheap solution. It is a problem and it does need to be dealt with.

  46. helena
    February 26, 2008 at 6:22 pm Permalink

    Hey guys, lighten up. It’s just a song and who made you the thought police anyway. Having control of a countries boarders is the norm worldwide. Have you tried sneaking into Red China lately? I don’t think you’d live to tell about it. Nothing Buddy says in the song has anything against anybody. All he’s saying is simply to follow the rules. What I want to know is how come on a daily basis we Americans have no choice or say about who enters this country. I think what this song is trying to do is simply give voice to the other 5 of 10 who aren’t as pregnant with wisdom as the left leaning more vocal side of this country. Thank God we still have the first amendment.

  47. Hollerin' Ben
    February 26, 2008 at 6:24 pm Permalink

    ccf,

    do you see the song as offensive for bullying, dehumanizing, and mocking a group of people that are defined by their poverty and desperation?

    Do you see it as misleading to claim that a wave of immigrants who come here to work are actually a new invasion by an old enemy and that our view of Mexican immigrants should be informed by The Alamo where the Mexican army killed Texas heroes?

  48. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 6:30 pm Permalink

    Hollerin’ Ben,

    Nope I see the song as just a song with views some people can relate to. I’m tried of being asked press one to contiune in English. I have no problem with people south of the border coming here as along as they do it legally.

  49. Leeann
    February 26, 2008 at 6:43 pm Permalink

    I think that by saying that racist is used “too quickly” these days is a way to attempt to dismiss the fact that it does, in fact, exist in high volume when one does not want to admit it.

    Also, to continue to avoid repetativeness, Brady had already illustrated, in his review (and yes, I think it was a review), why this song was racist:

    “I can’t imagine a scenario in which a couple of songwriters get together and decide it’s a good idea to tell only Mexican immigrants to get out because this country is ours
    and then decide to back it by instrumentation typically associated with their culture.”

    Holler Ben does an excellent and detailed job of supporting Brady’s argument, which, indeed, shows why this song is racist. Seriously, I think the average Mexican would perceive it as such, even those who aren’t here illegally.
    The fact that Jewell so negatively generalizes

  50. Brady Vercher
    February 26, 2008 at 7:22 pm Permalink

    There is a problem when our borders can’t be protected and it’s a problem that there is a tax burden, but it’s also a problem when it comes to people not having the means to get a decent education or the resources to treat health issues or pay for food. Being miffed at having to press one for English is pretty damn lame and on par with the sentiments expressed in the song.

    helena, no one is acting like thought police and no one is arguing against controlling the borders. What Jewell says is directly aimed at Mexicans. This song is highly targeted at a race of people; he didn’t mention anything about illegal Asian immigrants or Cuban immigrants or illegal immigrants who cross over the Canadian border, which I hinted at in the review but hasn’t been picked up yet. I’m a right leaning Texan who has to deal with Spanish speaking people fairly often and vehemently disagree with you and Jewell’s attempt to speak on my behalf and coopt an audience that doesn’t agree with you. I’d like to see if you think the law is so steadfast and right if it ever outlaws firearms or declares eminent domain on your property only to pass it to a private entity. I sure as hell ain’t givin’ up either just because the law tells me to and I’m gonna think for myself on an issue like immigration as well and not try to derive the difference between right and wrong based on the law alone. Immigration has been a problem that’s been ignored for a long time and some catch phrase or ignorant song isn’t going to sum up the solution or contribute to solving the issue.

  51. ccf
    February 26, 2008 at 7:31 pm Permalink

    Your missing the point He is saying that illegal immigrants should wait in line like all others.

    Yes racism exits in this country. I do think the term is used to quickly sometimes.

  52. Leeann
    February 26, 2008 at 8:11 pm Permalink

    Yes, I realize what it is he’s saying. In fact, I even looked up the lyrics in an effort to avoid hearing this mess of a song again.
    I will not dismiss the argument. However, I feel very comfortable in saying that the way in which Jewell presents the argument is extremely disrespectful and degrading. It’s one thing to argue on this side of the issue, but it’s another to mock and degrade a group of people on an issue that is not a singular situation. He simplifies it in a deliberately cruel manner. When it comes right down to it, it’s all in the presentation. In this case, the presentation is downright revolting.

    What is the line between racist and not racist, anyway? If the line is blurry, I think it probably lands on the side of racist. And I don’t think the line is blurry in this song.

  53. hairandtoenails
    February 26, 2008 at 8:38 pm Permalink

    I agree with Leeann’s post at 8:11 pm. Jewell presents his views wrapped up in a language of hate and mocking, and that is the problem.

    Also, Helena’s post suggested that people “lighten up.” Hatred and mocking of others is not something to take lightly.

    I don’t know what policy we should adopt on this issue, but I know Jewell makes a horrible case for his preferred policies.

  54. Paul W Dennis
    February 26, 2008 at 8:52 pm Permalink

    This thread is a good example of why it is better to keep politics and the arts separate when it comes to discussion time - let’s stick to Country Music and leave the political discussions to other forums

  55. Leeann
    February 26, 2008 at 9:14 pm Permalink

    Fortunately, country fans are not one dimensional. It’s not like we’re discussing something that a presidential candidate has said in a stump speech or debate, but rather what a country music singer is conveying in a song that he hopes country music fans will embrace. Therefore, it is fair to go down this political road. Obviously, Jewell, in hoping that his song will catch on, expects that the song will spark debate, though he was probably narrow minded enough to assume that the debate would strongly land on his side. So, it’s not out of line for this discussion to occur on this thread.

  56. helena
    February 26, 2008 at 9:25 pm Permalink

    How many countless millions are there around the world whose single greatest aspiration is simply to come here? I personally know people who do it legally and have to jump through hoops and go through mountains of paper work in order to accomplish this. Doesn’t it make a mockery of these honest and well intentioned people including those of Latin origin to have millions of others thumb their noses at them and the rest of us because they choose not to obey the law. I don’t know about the rest of you, but America is my home and one shouldn’t be allowed to come here illegally and ignore our sovereignty. In summation, I think songs such as Fightin’ Side of Me and Okie from Muskogee sum up in a working man’s vernacular how so many of us really feel even if we’re afraid to say it which obviously Buddy Jewell much to his credit is not.

  57. Leeann
    February 26, 2008 at 10:23 pm Permalink

    Like I said, Helena, it’s all in the presentation. Jewell’s delivery, much to his *discredit*, is the argument here.

  58. Brady Vercher
    February 26, 2008 at 10:35 pm Permalink

    They come here and live in abject poverty because it’s better than where they came from, so while they’re barely scraping by, wondering if they can make it, they’re really thumbing their noses at us. Wow, I never thought of it that way…

    I agree with you that something needs to be done to address the issue, but “kickin’ ‘em out” is a myopic solution and telling them to get out while making a mockery of them, as this song does, is racist, elitist, and offensive.

  59. CF
    February 26, 2008 at 10:40 pm Permalink

    I’ve read a good amount of this entry and I gotta say… Brady, Leeann, Kelly, and Hollerin’ Ben: all well put.

    I don’t know why Mr. Jewell would sink this low to co-write and record such a song.

  60. Mike
    February 26, 2008 at 11:00 pm Permalink

    Either way what Jewell thinks is his own opinion and in American he has the right to express that but at the same time promoting racism or hurt towards people because of their race is actually against the law not saying the song is exactly.

    But another thing that Jewell should take into consideration of the alienation of a Hispanic fanbase that is strong in country music in general in places like Texas, Oklahoma, and more in that region that even tho they may not have much they are still purchasing CD’s while american teens are downloading them off of limewire.

  61. Hollerin' Ben
    February 26, 2008 at 11:21 pm Permalink

    Jewell certainly has the right to write this song, record it, release it, make it his theme song, and tattoo the lyrics on his mama if he so chooses. No one is suggesting that this song be “banned” or that it be made illegal.

    As critics, we evaluate the content of people’s expression. And in condemning this, we’ve called a spade a spade.

    Furthermore, the defenses of the song haven’t been substantive. They have been along the lines of “well, I agree that we should harbor ill-will towards Mexican immigrants who don’t fill out the proper paperwork to come here, therefore, this song is good.” I’ve yet to see anyone justify the mocking, bullying tone, or explain why the mexican instrumentation is a good thing, or to justify why the Alamo should have such a prominent place in the song.

    So, Jewell apologists, lets hear it. Setting aside that you think the US government should aggressively deal with the problem of immigration, how do you defend the mocking, the bullying, and the inclusion of the Alamo in this song?

    I’m assuming of course that you don’t think that immigrants should be mocked, bullied, and viewed as being responsible for killing Texas heroes at the Alamo.

  62. Dan
    February 27, 2008 at 12:33 am Permalink

    Wow. I think this is an early front-runner for worst country song of the year. I’m all for taking a stand on an issue, but this is unbelievably condescending. “The party’s over”? As if this sort of decision to dramatically change one’s life - whether the means are justified or not - springs forth from some kind of whimsy? And the horns. And the “fajitas” line. Wow. It’s the sort of heartless, ignorant bile that would be truly appalling to hear from anyone, but it’s absolutely humiliating coming from a professed Christian and representative of this genre.

    I sincerely hope we’re all right about this song’s prospects. The amassed comments on this thread already constitute more attention than this piece of garbage deserves, whether people agree with his position on the political issue or not.

  63. Jaime
    February 27, 2008 at 6:56 am Permalink

    This might be the worst country song I have ever heard. It is songs like this that cause non-country music loving urbanites to categorize country music fans as ignorant hicks.

    The lyrics are asinine.

    But hey, thank goodness U.S. citizens are protected with first amendment rights. Unlike many of the countries from which illegal immigrants originate, in the U.S. we can say what we want when we want to say it.

  64. Chris N.
    February 27, 2008 at 9:56 am Permalink

    Mike and Jaime each make salient points that I don’t think we’ve even gotten to yet:

    – First, that this is not the way to make the inroads into the Hispanic community that country music would like to make; and …

    – Second, that this is just the kind of thing that allows people who don’t already like and understand country music to dismiss the whole genre as ignorant redneck crap.

    Random thought: Wonder what Buddy’s old “Nashville Star” compadre John Arthur Martinez thinks of this little ditty?

  65. Mike
    February 27, 2008 at 10:34 am Permalink

    I think more then anything it shows when people get desperate they start doing things that they wouldn’t if they were on top. This is just the final nail in the coffin for his career.

  66. Linda
    February 27, 2008 at 1:44 pm Permalink

    Wow. This song is unreal. What in the world was this guy thinking? He must not have been sober when he wrote this one. And to think I actually used to like this guy. I saw him perform at the Saddlerack in Fremont, California, a few years ago and even got his autograph on a bar napkin thinking someday he would be a big name in the world of country music. Little did I know he had so much contempt for our Mexican brothers and sisters. Now I’ve gotta say “adios” to the one CD I did have in my collection by this apparently racist “pendejo.” Oh well…maybe I can get a couple of bucks for it at the used record store and buy myself a couple of tacos.

  67. andre
    February 27, 2008 at 11:15 pm Permalink

    wow. i used to hope buddy would make it in this buisness. im extemely open minded on everything and i never thought id here anything like this.

  68. Kelly
    February 28, 2008 at 2:22 pm Permalink

    I’ll just say this… does he have any idea how many country music fans he is OFFENDING???? Does he have any idea that huge numbers of Mexican-Americans wear boots, are real cowboys and listen to country music stemming from their roots in Tejano? I’m not in their minority but I feel like I’m part of a majority who will feel like that song choice will only isolate him, not only from his fans, but from country music as a whole.. WOW!!!

  69. Kelly
    February 28, 2008 at 2:24 pm Permalink

    To Linda: LOVED YOUR COMMENT!!!

  70. helena
    March 1, 2008 at 10:03 am Permalink

    Well, gee guys, what exactly do you suppose we should do? Just open the gates. How many more people have to suffer at the hands of the criminals and drug dealers that simply ignore the boarder? At what point is this no longer America but becomes Mexico. Listening to your retort makes me wonder who really is the hater. There’s no hate in the song. It simply says follow the rules. Our own government won’t do anything about it so I suppose we’re just supposed to shut up and put up with it which is exactly what the powers that be want. I suppose most of you who are screaming so loudly live in the barrios of East LA. I don’t think so. Hypocrisy abounds in this era of so called political correctness.

  71. Brady Vercher
    March 1, 2008 at 11:36 am Permalink

    Helena, you sure are throwing out a bunch of empty rhetoric in attempts to paint everyone in a negative light. Coming up with a solution was beyond the scope of this review and conversation. No one suggested that illegal immigration was perfectly fine, nor did anyone suggest that we should just “open the gates.” I only argued that the extreme solutions (deportation and amnesty) were not the right answers. And I don’t see how anyone here that doesn’t agree with you has advocated anything nearing hate.

    The mocking music, the use of cultural elements that address ALL Mexicans rather than just the illegal immigrants, referencing the Alamo; all of those points don’t simply say “follow the rules.”

  72. Baron Lane
    March 1, 2008 at 11:42 am Permalink

    It’s crap like this that gives country music, and it’s fans, a bad name!

  73. Fin
    March 2, 2008 at 6:43 pm Permalink

    I believe there have been many songs in the past that condone the use of illegal drugs or having adultry or many other, worse, socially unacceptable situations. That doesn’t make the music bad. Personally, I believe that an illegal activity is an illegal activity, until our government deems it necessary to change it. As tax paying Americans, I can’t believe any of us want to burden additional tax cost to pay for “any” illegals.
    However, this is niether here nor there. The song has a good beat, makes sense and is much easier to listen to than “shift work”. Give Mr. Jewell a break and listen to the great music he has put forth in his short career.

  74. Cindy
    March 2, 2008 at 7:33 pm Permalink

    OMG! First of all, let me THANK YOU for the PRESS for Mr. Buddy Jewell - talk about “dumbing down” - don’t you know any press is good in the long run? So, thank you for the “opinion”, albeit
    ironically IGNORANT - as you obviously know NOTHING about Buddy Jewell, the MAN who just happens to be affectionally known as “daBEST” among all his legend of FANS! I applaud Buddy for standing up and “telling it like it is” in a fun-loving, but truthful song. If you DID know the man like I know the man, any God-fearing man would be ashamed of himself for the things you have said here and for other IGNORANT types who echo similiar views. Buddy would NEVER intentionally set out to “hurt” or “disrespect” anyone - and the comment about Johnny Rodriquez was a “plug” and a ‘compliment’ to the legendary country music singer, not a put-down as you might like to believe. If you should be outraged about anything it should be that legally born Americans have a birthright to this country and all the “perks” therein and that anyone who wants to share in those same rights needs to go about it the right way - not the ‘typical’ way it is done with pandering political heads conveniently looking the other way. Again, he speaks the truth, just as Toby Keith did in his “controversial” song about America, but you don’t see people like you, Mr. Vercher, writing about some multi-million gazillion dollar singer, no, you think you can “pick on” Buddy because perhaps he is more vulnerable or less known than Keith. You just better be glad some of us loyal Jewell fans couldn’t reach out and touch you after reading your IGNORANT perspective about this great song. If YOU, Mr. Vercher, had thought to do a bit of homework yourself, you would know Buddy Jewell is a very honorable and respected man. He won “Father of the Year” last year, have you ever won anything? Fact is, Buddy is one of the most humble, kind, caring, warm, charismatic, and GIVING country singers out there; giving back far more than he’s ever EVER been given. And all your (once again) IGNORANT comments about “dumb this and dumb that” for your information Mr. Jewell is very well versed in history and could hold his own in any political commentary discussion, not to mention he graduated at the top of his class, so he is anything but ignorant about America, diversity in cultures, or any mentionable current events of the world. No disrespect meant here towards you or anyone who has posted, but we who know and truly love Buddy know he is nothing like you portray and is EVERYTHING that the word “CLASS ACT” encompasses! Ohh, and lest I forget - thanks again for the PRESS!

  75. Mary
    March 2, 2008 at 7:48 pm Permalink

    I don’t think LEGAL immigrants will have a problem with the song because they did it legally. I have several people who I work with that are from the Phillipines that have been here for 15+ years and they just got their citizenship. I would think illegal immigration would bother people like that who do it legally.

    I’m proud to KNOW Buddy and I know what a huge heart he has. IF you knew Buddy at all, which I’m sure most of you don’t, then you wouldn’t second guess the message behind this song.

    Don’t we all love America because it’s free! Most of all freedom of speech as well as freedom of the press.

    Signed: Daughter of a U.S. Marine

  76. Angie
    March 2, 2008 at 8:20 pm Permalink

    I love the song… and cut it however you want to but the song says.. if you are here legally, then we are fine with you being here but if they are here illegally it is breaking the law and WE are all paying for it.

    “No disrespect meant here towards you or anyone who has posted, but we who know and truly love Buddy know he is nothing like you portray and is EVERYTHING that the word “CLASS ACT” encompasses! Ohh, and lest I forget - thanks again for the PRESS” I second that from Cindy’s post.

    I am proud to be a Buddy Jewell fan.. they don’t come any better than him.

    Gooooo Buddy!! It’s time someone had the guts to stand up and say what you said.

    Angie

  77. Mike
    March 2, 2008 at 8:34 pm Permalink

    Well, the right-wing nuts have taken over this discussion…

  78. Mary
    March 2, 2008 at 8:36 pm Permalink

    Nah, Mike we’re not taking over. We’re just using our freedom of speech like you.

  79. hairandtoenails
    March 2, 2008 at 8:55 pm Permalink

    The last three posts (all of which seem to capitalize certain words in Mid-sentence for emphasis and all of which were written within 50 minutes time) seem to suggest that Buddy is a wonderful person and that legal immigration is fine but illegal immigration is wrong.

    I trust that Buddy is a wonderful person, but that doesn’t make the song good. And nobody is denying that illegal immigration is, well, illegal. The problem is the song expresses its sentiments in the most degrading of ways.

  80. Brady Vercher
    March 2, 2008 at 9:02 pm Permalink

    Cindy, Free press this, free press that. I bet you think Don Imus loved the free press he got over his comments. You might wanna rethink your argument a little.

    Was the battle at the Alamo fought over immigration? So then, tell me why it belongs in a commentary on immigration.

    I didn’t realize Buddy Jewell was personally backed by God himself and that anyone who disagreed with anything he happens to say was a heretic. I’m sorry I don’t worship at the altar of Buddy Jewell. Did God tell Buddy it was ok to plug a guy (Johnny Rodriguez) who killed someone and has been arrested for DUI and drug possession?

    I think we waste too much money on other programs and issues to become “outraged” over immigration. According to a 2002 study, illegal immigration costs us $10 billion per year. The Iraq war costs us more than that every 6 weeks. We’re willing to pay more than that to Exxon alone every single month to buy gas. We spend nearly 20% of that amount on the President’s travel expenses, but when it comes to 20 million people who can’t support themselves needing an education, food, and hospital treatments, it’s tough shit for them. I believe in individual responsibility just as much as the next guy, but you gotta be rational and realize that there are going to be costs no matter what. Would it be ok if we spent that $10 billion on keeping illegal immigrants out of the country rather than spending it to help them survive? Oh, and quite frankly, I don’t need to throw about a bunch of credentials to support my argument.

    You just better be glad some of us loyal Jewell fans couldn’t reach out and touch you after reading your IGNORANT perspective about this great song.

    Sounds like you’re threatening assault to me. That’s pretty ridiculous considering I never personally attacked Mr. Jewell, nor did I say anything bad about the man himself. The review was of the song and not of Buddy Jewell’s character. So quit drinking the Buddy Jewell koolaid and think about the song rationally rather than emotionally.

    ——

    Mary, legal immigrants have a world of opportunities open to them that illegal immigrants don’t have, so I don’t know why they’d begrudge illegal immigrants the chance to live within the same political borders. Illegal immigrants don’t have the same opportunities and they probably prevent legal immigrants from becoming low man on the totem pole when it comes to wages.

    ——

    Angie, The fact is, no matter how bad you want to, you can’t dumb this song down to one line. The Alamo doesn’t factor into a commentary on illegal immigration. “It’s still our country, son…” There’s just one instance of Buddy talking down to immigrants to illustrate the point that the song extends beyond a comment that illegal immigrants should be deported.

    ——

    hairandtoenails, They really are different people, we just got linked to by his fan club messageboard.

  81. Kathy
    March 2, 2008 at 9:04 pm Permalink

    The “right wing nuts” weren’t supposed to weigh in on this discussion????

    I’m proud to be a Buddy Jewell fan and I will continue to be a Buddy Jewell fan.

    I can tell you that I’m tired of my daughter-in-law having to work like a dog to be able to pay for doctors’ visits for her kids while illegal aliens are given free medical care….paid for with our tax dollars. I, too, am tired of having to “push 1 for English”. That should be automatic. You said that Mexico has been singled out. Well, I’ve never heard “push 2 for Chinese” or push 3 for (insert language here). In so many ways we’re being made to learn a language to accommodate them instead of the other way around.

    I don’t approve of bullying and I don’t approve of anyone making fun of anyone else…I don’t believe that Buddy was doing either one.

    Yep, another right wing nut! Just doing what you say you espouse - stating my opinion and I want to be able to continue to do just that!

  82. Chris N.
    March 2, 2008 at 9:08 pm Permalink

    The New Colossus

    Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
    With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
    Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
    A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
    Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
    Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
    Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
    The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
    “Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
    With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
    The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
    Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
    I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

    – Emma Lazarus, 1883

  83. Luke
    March 2, 2008 at 9:55 pm Permalink

    I love the “Right wing nutts” comment. As a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and someone who has fought in the war on terror, I am personally sick and tired of the media making excuses for people who are coming into our country illegally, using our tax dollars to pay for their medical bills when they have a kid in America so that kid will be a citizen of this great country, yet someone wants to get mad when an artist finally has the testicular fortitude to sing the TRUTH?

    I have MANY friends who are of the Mexican decent who are here LEGALLY, and I have no problem with that, but if we are going to allow people to live and prosper in this country illegally, why have jails? Why lock up rapists and murderers, after all, if we are going to allow one law to be broken, why prosecute any at all?

    I am personally sick and tired of the LEFT WING MEDIA reporting a bunch of BS instead of the TRUTH. I spent time in Iraq, and was DISGUSTED at the crap the so called media was reporting about what was happening there, because over half of it was BS. The media in a lot of cases have been doing the soldiers who fight and die for this country a great injustice, as well as the American People.

    I dont care where you was born, what Nationality you are, but if this song offends you, then you may need to take a nice long look at your Patriotism.

    All the man is saying in the song is simply if you are an illegal immigrant, we’re tired of your crap. Do it the right way through proper channels, and there is no problem.

    By the way, the song is getting air play, and getting GREAT responces in FAVOR of the song.

    I agree with what was said in another post, what about “If the South Would Have Won” by Hank Jr, we dont hear people complaining about that one. Darryl Worley hit the nail on the head with “Have You Forgotten” because sadly, people have forgotten.

    I am fearful as to where my beloved Country that I dedicated 8 years of my life to is headed.

  84. Tahoerabbit
    March 2, 2008 at 10:10 pm Permalink

    Listen up, all you rednecks. You’re nothing but a bunch of hypocrites and the reason why this country is still in such terrible shape in terms of race relations. You let the Mexicans clean your homes, hotels and workplaces, take care of your kids, cook your food and harvest your crops and then have the unmitaged gall to talk about them with such disrespect. So songs like this one are okay with you, huh? Haven’t you narrow-minded racists learned anything in the last 200+ years? Look, most of these people are just trying to do the best they can just to get by in this world just like you. Instead of chiding them for coming here illegally, why not concentrate on putting pressure on the Mexican government and the Catholic Church to improve the living conditions in Mexico and maybe people wouldn’t be risking their lives to come here in droves. Send the Mexicans back to Mexico, huh? Most of these people do a hell of a lot of work for often very little pay–work most of you people wouldn’t even consider doing–so think twice about that. You’d actually have to start looking for somebody else to wait on you. Oh and by the way…to all you loudmouths who continue to blow your own horns about being born here and insist on waving those American flags all over the place, if you aren’t a Native American, YOU’RE here illegally as far as the indingenous people of this country are concerned so do us all a favor and SHUT UP.

  85. Matt B.
    March 2, 2008 at 10:24 pm Permalink

    Luke,

    Thank you for your service.

    I would counter with the press coverage of the Iraq war as being what the US government wants to be told. Not what ‘left wing’ or ‘right wing’ or ‘liberal’ media has shown.

    To get back on topic of this song, I think that Buddy has the RIGHT to have his opinion just as anyone else in the country does. It’s what makes our country what it is. Even Canadaians don’t have the same right. So, Brady’s thoughts about this song are as good as anyone else.

  86. Luke
    March 2, 2008 at 10:33 pm Permalink

    My problem with the media is how they try to twist things. I mean seriously, listen to the words of the song. There is nothing racist about it. All Buddy Jewell is saying is simply “If you are here legally, great, best of luck to you in life, but if you are here illegally, then I have a problem with that, and you need to do things right and come into this great country legally like the rest have.”

    I agree. Let them come, let them prosper, but do it legally.

  87. Jane
    March 2, 2008 at 11:52 pm Permalink

    I agree with Mary, Angie, and Cindy, not to mention some others. Anyone who says anything bad about Buddy Jewell doesn’t know him, anything about him, or what he’s all about. Buddy wouldn’t do anything to hurt anyone. He is a very good, thoughtful, caring, and sincere person, not to mention a great human being, and an excellent country artist. I always thought that Buddy was an angel sent from heaven. And, anyone who knows him, knows exactly what I’m talking about. Buddy Jewell is what country music is all about. Others can learn by him. He puts a lot of other artists to shame. If there were more people in the world like Buddy, the world would be a better place.

    THIS AINT MEXICO is a great song. I loved it from the first time I heard it. And, I think all the country radio stations in the country should play it, and watch how fast it climbs up the charts.

    I am very proud to be a BUDDY JEWELL FAN. And, this whole thing has upset me tremendously, and has made me VERY ANGRY. Buddy doesn’t deserve to be treated this way. And, I for one, support Buddy 100%.

    Love ya Buddy! You just keep doing what you’re doing, and don’t ever quit singing and writing those great songs.

    Jane

  88. Cindy
    March 3, 2008 at 1:15 am Permalink

    KATHY - you are EXACTLY right on the money!
    BRADY, umm…no - my argument stands and is based on fact; the fact that I KNOW the man. That’s where you’re missing the boat- did you miss the line in the song that clearly states - there’s “no problem” with legals??? Do you support “other illegal” activities? And making mention of JR was an obvious intention to appreciate him as an artist, his MUSIC - not to point out any misfortune in his life. Duh.
    Let me tell you something else - you don’t know ME either. If I were “threatening assault” on you, that is something that you WOULD know. Talk about ridiculous - I even went so far to say I didn’t mean any disrespect. That’s threatening? Maybe you have some wires crossed and you aren’t interpreting anything correctly these days, not least of which is the meaning of this song. Just to set the record straight though, what I meant by “reaching out and touching you” I meant your ears might have been boxed. Are you not familiar with that ’southern right of passage’ thang? (no, not the right-wing-redneck-nut-thang) Well, let me explain further to make it crystal clear. Boxing the ears….is when (for example) an adult teasingly rubs the ears of a child, essentially indicating, “shame, shame on you”. No abuse inflicted whatsoever or intended at all - again, it must be a southern thang. And yes, fyi…Buddy IS, in fact, personally backed by God. That’s what it means when you’re a Christian - God guides and directs and backs us all. That’s why he died, afterall, to save all sinners. As many have said here, it’s just a song for crying out loud. Why haven’t you gotten on your high horse about all the profane and grossly inappropriate ‘lyrics’ that our young people are subjected to? The people who promote that kind of music just to make money would be a more appropriate venue to vent your criticisms towards. (But, oh yeah, this is a country music genre site, so I guess that explains that.) If I may, let me share just a few more pertinent things. I am on the front lines day in and day out working with legals and illegals in an honorable helping profession (for the government, I might add) and during the course of our meetings, I not only am supportive towards their plight, but I also EDUCATE them on how to become LEGAL and how to make good life choices in the future. Suffice it to say, unfortunately, in my profession, there’s not much I haven’t seen. Professionally, I don’t judge anyone I counsel - who are any among us to judge? In the twinkling of an eye, it could be ME or YOU sitting over on the other side of the desk needing help. I advocate for the underdogs just as hard as I do the supermans - both have their own unique situations and my job is to be supportive and educate, not to judge. Having said that, I do, however, have a personal life too, and that entitles me to my own set of values and belief systems that I adhere to in my own life. And here again, personally my opinion is that anyone laying their head on a pillow at night in this country ought to be here in a legal capacity. Sighhh…I could talk till doomsday, but I know it’s a losing battle. I could say so much more, but I’m going to take the HIGH ROAD because I would never intentionally do anything that would in anyway reflect negatively towards Buddy, because his fans and friends respect and love him deeply. Not because he’s perfect but because he is Buddy. And despite what you say, you most certainly DID attack him on a personal level by making the remarks…about “dumbing down” and his “flagging career” - those weren’t lyrical comments…LOL…they were just a tad bit personal to have anything to do with a legitimate discussion about lyrical content. Good try at denial though. And just for the record, calling people names is not a benevolent (umm..let me cipher here….i.e…nice) thing to do. The fact of the matter is, we may be rednecks, we may be this or we may be that, but we are all know each other and we are genuinely good people who simply could and would not stand by and let a good man be bashed. Again, as Mary said, anyone who knows him would never second guess his intention. And it is rather sad that you, BRADY, couldn’t share in a bow at the altar with a ‘good ole southern boy’ like Buddy, because he’d probably put his arm around you and also around the person at his other side -and it goes without saying both instances would be without regard to age, color, sexual orientation, nationality, race, sex, creed, or religious belief. CAUSE THAT - THAT’S A ‘BUDDY’ THANG. Sho Nuff.

  89. Brady Vercher
    March 3, 2008 at 8:08 am Permalink

    Chris N, sweet poem. I had to look up where it came from, but that makes it all the more pertinent.

    ——

    Luke, we all certainly appreciate your sacrifice to this country. I’m sure you don’t get told often enough, but thank you for you service.

    “Why lock up rapists and murderers, after all, if we are going to allow one law to be broken, why prosecute any at all?”

    Two wrongs don’t make a right and comparing illegal immigration to murder and rape is pretty daft. Why don’t we just start locking people up people for traffic violations?

    All the man is saying in the song is simply if you are an illegal immigrant, we’re tired of your crap.

    Why is it necessary to bring the Alamo into such a simple statement? That’s just one instance of everything I’ve been saying, but it keeps getting ignored.

    Hank Jr’s song is tongue in cheek and isn’t really comparable. A song isn’t automatically about slavery or race because it mentions the civil war.

    Also, I’m not part of the media and have no agenda except to highlight good country music. My opinion is just as valid as yours.

    ——

    Jane, you said, “Anyone who says anything bad about Buddy Jewell doesn’t know him, anything about him, or what he’s all about. Buddy wouldn’t do anything to hurt anyone. He is a very good, thoughtful, caring, and sincere person, not to mention a great human being, and an excellent country artist.

    I don’t remember saying Buddy Jewell was a bad person, but at the same time, his character can’t support this song.

    ——

    Cindy, so you think Don Imus appreciated the press? Did you miss the line about the Alamo.

    Buddy IS, in fact, personally backed by God. That’s what it means when you’re a Christian - God guides and directs and backs us all.

    I’m a Christian myself, but even I recognize the fallibility of a statement like that. I guess God was telling me and Buddy two different things. People do and say stupid things all the time and then claim they have God’s support, but that doesn’t make it so. Just take a look at the actions of that Westboro church.

    Thanks again for telling us for the millionth time about how upstanding Buddy is, but it really doesn’t play any part in logically supporting this song.

  90. hairandtoenails
    March 3, 2008 at 5:40 pm Permalink

    Regarding the comment “All the man is saying in the song is simply if you are an illegal immigrant, we’re tired of your crap.”

    If Buddy Jewell is really upset only about the “illegal” aspect of the situation, I assume he would not protest if the Federal Govt decided today that anyone could legally immigrate to the US simply by writing their name on a list.

    In other words, if illegal immigration was de-criminalized, I trust then that Buddy would not protest the actions of immigrants.

    I suspect that if we de-criminalized illegal immigration, Buddy Jewell would find another rationale to oppose these immigrants.

    Obviously, I’m skeptical that this is Buddy’s only message. But if that was all he wanted to say — “Please immigrate legally,” then he could have said it in a civilized manner, and without the offensive trappings of the song. Had he said that, his message would have been much more effective.

  91. Cindy2
    March 3, 2008 at 6:12 pm Permalink

    2 Points..
    I’ve posted here before, and I see that there is someone with the same name as me..thats not me, just to be clear (I’m the James Otto/Mando Saenz fan..)
    So from here on, I’ll be Cindy2.

    For HairandToenails…I believe in, what I think, is your main point..the tacky-ness of the song distracts from the message. But I don’t think we need to let in everyone, and that doesn’t make us bad. Mexico is extremely strict with regards to its southern border, and our enlightened friends to the north give preference to professionals in certain fields. We are the place where anyone can come and improve their lot in life. All I want is for them to do it legally, and don’t cut in front of the people who follow the rules.

    Hey Brady–how about the Mando Saenz review, by the way???

  92. Hollerin' Ben
    March 3, 2008 at 7:11 pm Permalink

    Apparently Buddy Jewell is a modern day saint, a patriot, a historian, and a champion of all mankind.

    I have never met Buddy Jewell. He might be very nice. He may shake and howdy with the best of them. I notice on his website he has a picture of himself grinning and giving the thumbs-up with a disabled child, this may be indicative of his strong character.

    None of that makes a difference when it comes to analyzing this song. Those of us who have responded negatively to the tune have listed specific reasons, i.e. the aggressive tone Jewell takes towards immigrants, the needless and inflamatory inclusion of the Alamo, and his callous disregard for their welfare as human beings.

    The Jewell apologists responses have largely been comprised of the following
    1.”How dare you talk about Buddy that way? I’ll have you know that he’s a modern say saint, a patriot, a historian, and a champion of all mankind”

    and 2. “I am soo enraged by the issue of illegal immigration, both on principle and in practice (WHY MUST I PRESS 1 ON THE TELEPHONE!!!!!!!) that I applaud any song which is antagonistic towards Mexicans.”

    amazingly, no matter how many words are capitalized mid-sentence, their arguments are less than persuasive.

    To address a point that the apologists have raised, in one line of the song, Jewell does distinguish between Legal and Illegal immigrants. However, the title of the song isn’t “This ain’t your country of origin” it’s “This ain’t Mexico” and the instrumentation is specifically Mexican, and the things he says he likes (their “Margaritas” and “Fajitas” etc etc) are all specifically Mexican, not too mention the Alamo reference, which seems to serve no point aside from being a vague point of contention between Buddy and Mexicans.

    All of that adds up to the song being xenophobic and….wait for it……racist.

    And as far as Buddy’s Christianity, I obviously can’t speak to the strength of his faith, but if this song is an indication, then by his own words he is “tired of footing the bill” to “feed” mexican immigrants.

    Also, judging by the song, he thinks that the poor are to be bullied and mocked when they become inconvenient.

    These viewpoints and attitudes are not in accord with Christianity. However, as I stated above, this song may not be representative of his inner convictions. Of course, by trying to profit from a song that is so antithetical to Christianity and his own convictions is, in and of itself, not a sign of high character.

    In conclusion, my objection with this song has nothing to do with the political policy it advances per se.

    I object to this song as a person who thinks that its wrong to bully and mock the weak and the poor.

    I object to this song as a person who thinks its wrong to misrepresent immigrant workers as “invaders” who are somehow responsible for the Alamo.

    and I object to this song as a fan of country music, because I hate to see an American artform be used as a medium for thoughtless xenophobia.

  93. Joyce
    March 3, 2008 at 7:37 pm Permalink

    Oh my, finally was able to make it here…the original link (ah–hem) seems not to get one here to make a comment…

    I totally agree with Cindy, Mary, Angie, Jane, Kathy, Luke and ect …..Who is footing the bill for folks who are not here legally??? Surprise…us the taxpayers…Folks are truly fed up with the situation…

    I do think that if a person from any other country wants to be in the United States then do it by legal means…Welcome all that truly want to be here legally and become a citizen…

    Everyone has an opinion….and….everyone should be free to express his/her opinion….I had tired all morning and this afternoon to get here to post a comment….kept getting Error and finally page unavailable….Why was that…Only yesterday, I had no problem clicking the provided link and coming here…What could have been the problem….Could it be that Buddy fans were making their voices heard??? Most likely..
    Thanks to Kathy for this link…..

    Enjoy the discussion….after all that is all this is… folks opinions…..nothing more…

    I AM PROUD TO SUPPORT BUDDY JEWELL AND HIS MUSIC…

  94. NJ
    March 3, 2008 at 8:27 pm Permalink

    ITS MY TIME, I TOO AGREE WITH, CINDY,MARY,ANGIE,JANE, KATHY, JOYCE,LUKE,and ect.
    I want to say that if you don’t know BUDDY JEWELL, then keep your mouth shut.Buddy is one of the best singer,song writers,anywhere.He is a Kind ,Loving,A true CHRISTIAN FAMILY MAN.I TOO AM SICK OF ALL THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS COMING TO THE U.S. and WE PAY ALL THE TAXES.I HAD A LOT MORE TO SAY BUT MOST OF IT HAS BEEN SAID. BUDDY, YOU HAVE A NUMBER ONE HIT SONG.
    WE LOVE YOU,KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.
    THIS AINT MEXICO

  95. Cindy
    March 3, 2008 at 11:59 pm Permalink

    Brady - no, I didn’t miss the line about the Alamo and I intentionally ignored the comment about Don Imus because it simply isn’t relevant to this discussion, therefore, to comment on Imus would be like comparing apples to oranges.

    In regards to the Alamo - the bottom line is that individuals fought for and gave their lives for reasons they believed in. And in the end, by doing so, Americans effectively demonstrated the point that indeed, “This Ain’t Mexico”.

    Unfortunately, it seems unavoidable to continue to discuss this song without a political rant of some kind. But, rest assured, my intention is that this is the last post I will make here. And I can with good conscience say that I have stated my observations and perspective with all the humility, integrity, and heart of a fair-minded individual, a compassionate AND out-spoken advocate for those less fortunate, a frequent writer, and always and forever - an undaunted Jewell fan.

    In my opinion, I think we’d all be better off if we could fairly consider and accept that this song has an upbeat, lively tune with cleverly rhymed lyrics that catches the spirit of what is undeniably a “hot topic” today in this country. Knowing Buddy, I believe it was well-intended and meant to be thought-provoking and at the same time - entertaining. So why can’t it be accepted for what it is - a song, period. Again, imho, I think it could be argued that to a great degree, it was also mindful and respectful to those who ARE here LEGALLY. I think if it were viewed that way, perhaps critics would be far less inclined to point fingers and yell ‘Yes, but’ and simply enjoy the song for what it is, a song, purely entertaining with a well-intended message.

    One thing we all seem to agree on is that no one has the right to tell us what to think, so despite the lyrics of any song, individuals are free to make up their own minds. Ideally, we should sift through the fog of politics, prejudice and even personal taste when objectively examining anything. And on this subject, since we (Buddy fans) have the advantage of true perspective, we opted to use it wisely by coming here and honestly attempting to share our opinion and views - views that are based on factual information that we personally know to be true; not hearsay, rumor, political spin, or innuendo. We would also hope to encourage those who don’t know Buddy to research him a little further, visit his website, message board, and myspace accounts and listen to his other wonderful music – but most of all – we hope to encourage those who don’t know him at all to educate yourself MORE before passing judgement.

    The illegal immigration controversy will likely continue on for many years, as there are no ‘quick fixes’ to complex political issues. But have no doubt, Buddy will also continue on to write and record great songs. I certainly don’t hesitate to tell others about this particular song, as I am proud of the writers for having the guts and foresight to stand in awe of the many potential challenges and meeting them head on.

    Politics is a fact of life, always has been and always will be. Oftentimes, how music is critically received has much to do with the present climate/leanings of the media world. Thus, it is not uncommon for art to be judged as much for the perceived politics of its maker than for any artistic merit it may genuinely contain. Like many artistic endeavors that resonate personally with their creators, I feel sure that this song was a collaborated vision, which the artists ultimately believed personified not only Americans but also freedom-loving, law-abiding people everywhere.

    Lastly, at the end of the day – this song may be reviled by some, ignored by others, but always adored by true Buddy fans. Frankly, I think it’s seldom that artists and their songs have had to bear such detailed scrutiny, but I would almost guarantee that all great ones do. So your review may ultimately end up illustrating that point beautifully. So again, I sincerely thank you for that.

    I don’t want to sound like a broken record, (pun intended) but again, those who know Buddy Jewell know he has been tried and tested many times over. He has been through a lot while pursuing his career and he finally made it and has lasted, despite any “flagging opinions” to the contrary. And we can all stand tall and say unequivocally that in the end, he (too) will always be remembered, just like the Alamo.

  96. Leeann
    March 4, 2008 at 6:24 am Permalink

    Politics aside. Even if this song had completely different words, even of the words were absolutely unoffensive to anyone, this song has horrible production and Jewell’s voice does not sound good. He does not sound as he has in previous albums, one of which I own. His voice actually sounds as if it’s aged, even though I know that’s not physically possible yet. So, even if the lyrics, which happens to be an integral part of a song, were brilliant, I still wouldn’t like the song. Now, “Ring of Fire” is catchy, even though the words aren’t necessarily a masterpiece. “This Ain’t Mexico” is not catchy, despite the lyrics.

  97. Leeann
    March 4, 2008 at 7:08 am Permalink

    He’ll always be remembered, just like the Alamo? Whoa!

  98. Lynn
    March 4, 2008 at 10:34 am Permalink

    Wow, what a HORRIBLE song. I live in San Diego, a huge border town, and no country radio DJ would DARE to play that song here.

    The spanish culture has permeated our way of life, and while this is still a difficult issue, it would be incredibly hypocritical to deny the contributions of Mexican culture and labor to our society, which we all enjoy (whether we know it or want to admit it). And big shock, but most of these people pay taxes - yes they do it under false social security numbers (which they are required to have to work - you know, for construction companies in order build your homes). They are not leeches on society. In most cases, their children are American and those kids know no other life. They work incredibly hard (at jobs you don’t want), because, for the most part, their sole reason for being here is to send money back home to their relatives so that they can survive on a daily basis.

    (Honestly, if the government really wanted to solve the immigration issue, they’d help boost the Mexican economy. As long as there are incentives to come here, they will find a way. It doesn’t matter how many fences you build and laws you pass. How the EU dealt with Eastern Europe is a great example of how to make that work.)

    For me, the most insulting part of this song may be the use of the Mariachi music. I can’t believe he had the gall to put his anti-Mexican tune to traditional Mexican music.

    Finally, maybe someone should tell him that country music is currently trying to find a way to tap into the hispanic market in the U.S (not to antagonize it). For that reason alone, I’d be surprised if any radio DJs play the song.

  99. helena
    March 7, 2008 at 6:31 am Permalink

    You can call me an old fashioned, close minded, flag wavin’, red neck gringa but this ain’t Mexico. Have any of you left wing nuts really listened to the song or has your bias precluded you from really doing so?

  100. Chris N.
    March 7, 2008 at 9:44 am Permalink

    It isn’t? Holy frijoles, I thought this was Mexico. Thanks!

  101. Leeann
    March 7, 2008 at 10:39 am Permalink

    Helena,

    Ithink all of us have *actually* listened to the song…and a lot of us have even commented on the song outside of its offensive lyrics. The way I figure it, if I can’t get the song to sound good through my Bose speakers, it’s just not good enough for me. And this song just doesn’t even come close to passing my admittedly simple test.

  102. hairandtoenails
    March 7, 2008 at 11:00 am Permalink

    I agree with Leeann. Most people have probably listened to the song, after all, a simple mouse click under the “thumbs down” logo will play the song on your computer. Thats how I listened to it.

    Also, Helena accuses the critics of being “left wing nuts.” I can’t speak for others, but I am a moderate centrist, and I often vote for republican candidates. People like Rudy Guiliani or Mike Bloomberg appeal to me, and these people are not hard core leftists. But even if I was a nutcase, left, right or other wing, simple insults such as “left wing nut” would not discredit my thoughts on the song.

  103. JLP
    March 9, 2008 at 9:58 pm Permalink

    First, people this is an election year for president and this is probably an issue,immigration along with other things like high Gas Prices! Second, I am glad to hear Buddy Jewell sing again. Also, I agree with NJ I met Buddy Jewell personally and he is a nice man with strong Christian Values.I might make people upset but I hope the song goes number 1. I will always be a Buddy fan and I hope his family is blessed beyond measure. I agree with NJ Buddy we love you and keep up the good work. God Bles