Brad Paisley – “Waitin’ On a Woman”
Songwriters: Don Sampson and Wynn Varble
Bizarrely, it took a song written by someone other than Brad Paisley for radio to hear what the Paisley style can truly accomplish.
Brad Paisley’s music is defined by two distinctive qualities that usually require the singer to walk a fine line between brilliance and offensiveness. The first is Paisley’s wry sense of humor, which works quite well when confined to an isolated turn of phrase (”when you get a date with Bridget, make sure the tank is full / on second thought forget it, that one turns out kind of cool”) but can’t support a song, such as the disappointing “Ticks,” by itself. The second is Paisley’s rather stereotypical view of the female gender, which often results in odd metaphors (”she’s a yellow pair of running shoes, a holey pair of jeans”) and borderline condescending celebrations of his lover’s mistakes (”Little Moments”), because, after all, the poor thing just can’t help herself (”I’m Still a Guy”). While most Paisley singles that utilize these devices have been artistic disappointments, Don Sampson and Wynn Varble have written a song that employs the Paisley idiosyncrasies to great effect. Arista deserves great credit for allowing “Waitin’ On a Woman,” from the award-winning Time Well Wasted, to get a belated chance at radio.
“Waitin’ on a Woman” finds Brad once again singing about those female qualities that he finds delightfully infuriating: “I don’t guess we’ve been anywhere / she hasn’t made us late I swear / sometimes she does it just ’cause she can do it.” There is a whiff of condescension here, as, like in “Little Moments,” Brad is guilty of offering abundant examples of a woman’s imperfections while portraying himself as the guy who tolerates it all out of the goodness of his heart. But “Waitin’ on a Woman” is written and sung with just enough humility to make Brad look like a good guy without degrading his female companion, and the song is pervaded by an air of feminine mystique that makes Sampson and Varble’s reliance on relationship sterotypes seem delicately appropriate rather than insensitively obtuse.
This setting makes humor infinitely more satisfying, and the writers show great restraint in choosing lines that elicit a grin while nicely recasting the song’s theme, such as when they wryly reconcile relationships and mortality by remarking that, “I’ve read somewhere statistics show / the man’s always the first to go / and that makes sense cause I know she won’t be ready.” “Waitin’ on a Woman” is an example of Paisley’s hit-and-miss writing style fully realized, and it’s great to hear such a song on the radio, even if it was not written by Paisley himself.
![]()
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Current Discussion
- Steve M.: I don't mind songs with political overtones-after all, Woody Guthrie wrote most of his tunes with a solid political bent, ...
- Vance: Only a superfan of Carrie would think I'm bitter as her fanbase is unable to take hearing any criticism about ...
- Dan E.: Vance: You seem a little bitter.
- Dan E.: Kurt: I bet you'd be surprised at how many people are both fans of Carrie and Taylor. Only a small ...
- Vance: The lyrics are actually, “boy meets girl, girl leaves boy” Also, I’m loving her fresh music. It's not fresh music, it's cookie ...
- kurt: I personally don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with a country artist working with someone like Martin or Dioguardi if ...
- kurt: Thank you! Thank you! Carrie fans seem to think that “remixing” is the only way to make a country song ...
- Leeann Ward: Michael, That's ridiculous on more than one level.
- sam (sam): Why should we say, "You either like it or you don't. Just leave it at that?" I don't want to ...
- kevin w: I don't mind christian messages in songs, heck country has a tradition of christian messages in songs, along with the ...

Is Dave Haywood going solo? This and many other of country music's most pressing questions answered in the September edition of The 9513's world famous Mailbag!
Caroline Herring likes to sing songs about life in the South. No, not exactly like Justin Moore and Jason Aldean...
The 9513's resident historian Paul W. Dennis sits down for a chat with country music legend Gene Watson.
As much as we love girl singers, we love songs about girl singers even more. Here's just a few of the many tribute songs out there.
Step away from the river and up to a jukebox, because heartbreak is only temporary, but a good song about drowning yourself—like a diamond—lasts forever.
What do you think about music labels "testing the waters" with a single before providing access to an artist's entire album?
What country artist, young or old, would you recommend as a must-listen artist to a newcomer on his/her journey through country music, and what would your essential song picks be?




47 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
June 15, 2008 at 8:10 pm Permalink
You nailed it… great review, great song. Methinks Paisley will have his 8th straight #1.
June 15, 2008 at 9:31 pm Permalink
This is the best song Paisley has put out since “Wrapped Around” IMO
June 16, 2008 at 6:23 am Permalink
The “son, since 1952″ line was what grabbed me years ago… It will be great to hear this on the radio. Wonderful song.
June 16, 2008 at 7:33 am Permalink
Wynn Varble is a helluva singer/songwriter.
As for Brad, I like him ok, but I like the songs he sings that he didnt write better than the ones he did write. While his self-penned songs are good, (and cute and fun) they are not great. (with the exception of He Didnt Have To Be).
June 16, 2008 at 7:40 am Permalink
Matt-
While I appreciate your reviews I think you badly miss the point of what Paisley is going for in his songs.
“Ticks” works as a song. It’s a sly bit of writing where the protagonist is in his mind this suave lady killer. However the way the song is written it comes off entirely corny. I also think it’s important to note we never find out in the song how the cheesy pick-up line works. I could see a problem with it if the line worked and the song ended with the woman going off with him. However, it never leaves the pick-up guys’s point of view.
“She’s Everything” is written via metaphors but the list is a set of characteristics about his woman. It’s an interesting technique for writing the song, and avoids the typical formula for this type of song where things would just be listed. In the hands of an inferior writer it would’ve been an average song.
“Little Moments” and “I’m Still a Guy,” aren’t about being condescending or protecting a weaker sex. Rather they are about two of the fundamental elements of love- love in spite of mistakes, and love in spite of differences. Besides country radio has enough guy’s writing and singing songs right now about being broken men. Brad writes from a confident point of view and it provides a breath of fresh air from what has become the norm for men in country music.
I don’t love everything Paisley has ever done but his hit to miss ratio is considerably higher than almost any mainstream country act out there right now.
June 16, 2008 at 8:44 am Permalink
Brian: Whether or not Brad is trying to come off as condesending, he does.
June 16, 2008 at 9:07 am Permalink
Brian:
I can only guess about what Brad is “going for” in his songs, and, in the end, it doesn’t matter, because, as you explain nicely for “Ticks,” what a writer is going for and what he actually accomplishes can be two very different things. My responses to your analysis of other specific songs:
“She’s Everything:” This song was just really boring for me, and, frankly, I don’t know any woman who would be flattered to be compared to a pair of running shoes, but that’s just me.
“I’m Just a Guy:” I don’t think that this is condescending per se, I just thought that it was very rigidly stereotypical.
“Little Moments:” Like you, I doubt that Brad was trying to be condescending, but I had no trouble interpreting it that way, given that he only sings about the stupid things that his wife does while he’s the great guy who just loves her all the more because of it.
June 16, 2008 at 9:30 am Permalink
Matt:
Thanks for the response. I really wrestled with what to write because it’s hard to argue interpretations of songs. A song can be heard by ten different people and connect in that many different ways.
“I’m Just A Guy,” I cna buy as being stereotypical. I think he was giving a new spin on the country boy charming some girl that is outside his class.
“Little Moments” I can agree with for the most part but he does throw that phrase in towards the end, “When she’s layin’ on my shoulder on the sofa in the dark/ And about the time she falls asleep so does my right arm/ And I want so bad to move it ’cause it’s tinglin’ and it’s numb/ But she looks so much like an angel that I don’t wanna wake her up” That is a really sweet little touch he throws in, that saves the song for me. (For the record- this is not really one of my favorite songs by him)
With “She’s Everything,” I guess the writing style is what is throwing you or what you dislike. I’ve never taken the song as comparing a woman to these items he mentions. Rather he is thinking about his woman- what she likes, dislikes, wears, lives for. He’s laying out all the good and bad to showcase that this is the woman for him. I think he’s saying, “She wears yellow running shoes, and holey jeans.” He’s writing metaphors but they are about her, not comparing her to anything.
price and availability ok
June 16, 2008 at 9:30 am Permalink
I dont see a big difference between Brad’s songs about women and so many songs that female artists put out that pokes fun of males.
It says a lot that Country Music’s biggest offender when it comes to “insulting” women is about a woman over baking a cake or being late when Rock and (C)Rap has like 500 songs on the radio about the female body or sexual acts the lead singer can do with a female.
I’m just saying……
June 16, 2008 at 9:55 am Permalink
That Lil Wayne is a bad songwriter does not make Brad Paisley a good one.
June 16, 2008 at 10:19 am Permalink
True, but really, I’m far from a Paisley mega-fan, but his songs are far better than Kellie Pickler’s “Things That Never Cross A Man’s Mind”.
Seriously, that song was more “offensive” to men than anything Paisley has written about women.
June 16, 2008 at 11:12 am Permalink
I don’t think the above examples of songs written by BP are condescending towards women. But hey, that’s just my (female) perspective…
June 16, 2008 at 11:59 am Permalink
Mike: You are comparing him to Kellie Pickler. Kellie Pickler.
June 16, 2008 at 12:24 pm Permalink
“Brad Paisley’s music is defined by two distinctive qualities that usually require the singer to walk a fine line between brilliance and offensiveness.”
Truer words have never been spoken. Luckily “Waitin’” qualifies as the former. I’m excited to hear this one on the airwaves.
June 16, 2008 at 12:25 pm Permalink
As a member of the female species, lover of many things at 9513, I can truly say that there are many many things in this world that are offensive to women. Many in country music. Brad Paisley nor his lyrics would qualify, but that’s just this woman’s perspective.
June 16, 2008 at 1:08 pm Permalink
I just took the running shoes and holey jeans to represent things that are comfortable, not that she was actually running shoes or holey jeans.
The lyric to this song may be commendable, but the melody bores me to death, which is coming from a paisley fan.
June 16, 2008 at 2:13 pm Permalink
Matt, your critique really nails what bugs me about Brad’s “little woman” songs. Why do we never hear about how lucky he is that she tolerates all HIS flaws? One song like “She’s Everything” is fine — cute even — but taken as a group it really smacks of misogyny, and it’s what made me really dislike Time Well Wasted as a whole. (I remember, the album opened with the lyric “To the teller at the bank/You’re just another checking account” and my blood pressure shot up.)
I think you make a good point that “Waitin’ on a Woman” is the least offensive, and taken out of the context of that whole album it doesn’t bother me nearly as much. But I wish he’d get another schtick.
June 16, 2008 at 2:40 pm Permalink
I’ve never really loved brad paisley, his songs kind of run together with the 3 licks he can do on his guitar, but i never thought of his as a jerk till i read this.
I think “She’s Everything” is just saying the things she wears and stuff, not saying she is actually runnin shoes. Not offensive.
“The World” is about how she feels like she’s “one a millionths” but she’s “one in a million” to him. It’s not offensive.
I’ve never been offended by his songs, and still i’m not, i’m just kind of thinking he might be a jerk (but i don’t think he is really).
June 16, 2008 at 3:46 pm Permalink
Just a reminder: Nobody tries to be condescending yet it happens all the time and certainly on many songs.
Was that condescending?
June 16, 2008 at 6:06 pm Permalink
How is the lyric “To the teller down at the bank” insulting?
June 16, 2008 at 9:12 pm Permalink
No kidding, Mike–how IS that line insulting?
When I hear the aforementioned songs about women, I don’t feel as if Brad is knocking our sex as a whole. He’s not laughing at us, he’s laughing with us.
In “Little Moments,” when Brad sings about the woman backing his truck into something, it reminds me of the time I backed my car into my garage door. From inside of my garage. In “She’s Everything,” when he sings “She’s I want a piece of chocolate/ Take me to a movie” I think yeah, I have days like that.
It pains me to see people trying so hard to be sensitive to the plight of women. I want equal treatment of men and women, and in this case that means I don’t mind songs in which a man laughs affectionately about a woman’s behavior. I don’t mind because I would expect men to tolerate–heck, even enjoy–the same thing in return.
June 17, 2008 at 12:16 am Permalink
I like most of Brad’s songs, and I can’t wait to see the video for this song because I also love Andy Griffith, he was so good in that movie, “Waitress”.
June 17, 2008 at 11:34 am Permalink
I get what “The World” was trying to say, but I thought it came off as patronizing. Who is he to say that she’s just “another bank account” or “another tip”? Maybe that’s not how she’s perceived at all. And none of that should matter because he loves her? Why should she attach her entire self-worth to what HE thinks? For me personally, it was creepy and vaguely reminiscent of the kind of psychology a controlling boyfriend might use.
To be fair, I know that’s not what was intended, and I think it’s simply a case of meaning being sacrificed in service of a gimmick. Ben has pointed out Brad’s fondness for lists, and I think here it works against the sentiment of the song.
And again, it might not bother me so much on its own, but Time Well Wasted has lots of moments like this. You can justify them individually, but taken together, they give a pretty good sense of an artist’s personality and philosophy.
June 17, 2008 at 2:34 pm Permalink
Katie’s comment above is very insightful. Actually, I hadn’t noticed the trends in Paisley’s music that some people are discussing, but I definitely see them now.
June 17, 2008 at 2:48 pm Permalink
If you want to see more of the True Paisley, think about his guitar playing. Yes, he’s a great guitar technician, and he can run a bunch of notes together fast. But when he does that, he’s just a monkey pounding on a typewriter. He does it often enough, one day, something melodic might come of it. Compare that to I dunno, Eric Clapton or Mark Knoppfler (Dire Straits guy.) Sometimes fast, sometimes slow, always phrased and beautiful. Those guys are not playing lists of notes, they are telling old stories.
June 18, 2008 at 3:31 pm Permalink
The thing that bugs me about Brad is that he seems like a suck up! Always wanting to be the center of attention. His songs are boring and they all sound a like to me! Never any different range in his voice. He’s the guy in school that always played up to the teacher to her face, then mocked her afterwards. Sorry, but JMO!
June 19, 2008 at 1:44 pm Permalink
I thought “Ticks” was clever, expertly crafted, catchy and fun. I was surprised it wasn’t a huge hit; and that some people didn’t seem to “get” it.
With all the cliche’d song ideas done over and over, we need a break sometime. And we need artists and songwriters to take SOME kind of chance and maybe keep us awake ….
June 24, 2008 at 4:16 pm Permalink
I agree with this review and am glad that Brad’s latest single is not something satirical in nature but this song was on his album “Time Well Wasted” not “5th Gear.” Anyone know why that is?
June 24, 2008 at 8:15 pm Permalink
I like Brad but I’m very disappointed that he agreed to be in Snoop Doggs video of “My Medicine”
The message of the song isn’t the direction country should go in.
June 25, 2008 at 9:30 am Permalink
CCF: There are already quite a few good drug songs in country music. Can’t we decline Snoops song because it is poorly written instead of its subject matter?
June 25, 2008 at 1:07 pm Permalink
The pimping of the wife or girlfriend and the use of the f-word. Like you said poorly written. I’m just dissapointed that Brad is embracing it.
June 25, 2008 at 1:19 pm Permalink
I’m disappointed in Brad too, but I hate the idea of saying a subject should be taboo.
June 25, 2008 at 1:28 pm Permalink
Heidi,
They just decided to do things that way. It’s not the first time (Keith Urban just went back to a record three releases ago for “You Look Good In My Shirt”) and it won’t be the last time.
June 25, 2008 at 1:44 pm Permalink
It’s my understanding that Brad had a video concept in mind for the song and it took a while to get the star (Andy Griffith) that he wanted. Hence the delay.
Keith Urban remade “Shirt” to promote his upcoming live DVD, so I’m thinking this is just a coincidence rather than a trend.
June 25, 2008 at 1:47 pm Permalink
@Stormy,
I gotta ya. I’m not really oppose the the subject matter as a whole, maybe with differnt lyrics.
June 25, 2008 at 3:09 pm Permalink
I heard quite some time ago that Paisley wanted to go back and release this song. So, I also think the timing is coincidence.
Brad always sings songs that are left of center. so I’m not surprised that he’s supporting this song. It seems to go along wih his twisted sense of humor. I guess I just don’t have a problem with the song though, because I just take it as something fun, which is what I suspect is what Brad is doing.
June 25, 2008 at 6:58 pm Permalink
Brad Paisley is left of center? Can you give some examples, besides the fact that he shows up in a Snoop Dogg video. Why must we put a political label on a musicians that don’t release political songs. If anything, I would say Brad’s songs don’t support your analysis.
June 25, 2008 at 7:22 pm Permalink
Sorry, I wasn’t meaning to put a political label on him. By saying “Left of center”, I did not mean to imply that he is a leftist or any other political persuasion. I simply meant that he doesn’t always think the way that most lyricists do. It works for some and not for others.
June 26, 2008 at 5:45 pm Permalink
As an educated, professional woman, I have to respectfully disagree with many of the comments about Brad’s music. I find Brad’s lyrics to be very wide-ranging and definitely not offensive. He can go from a hilarious play on a real-life farmer-boy fantasy (TICKS) to a serious and welcomed perspective of the woman he loves (She’s Everything). In songs such as “I’m Still A Guy” he appeals to the blue-collar boys who captivate the hearts of women everywhere, much like Trace Adkins’ “Ladies Love Country Boys”. I can’t help but listen to his lyrics and think of my own husband…not in an offensive way, but rather in a ‘laughing at our differences’ kind of way. In contrast, ‘She’s Everything’ is a man enjoying every little imperfection of his wife along with all the wonderful things about her. My interpretation is that it’s the imperfections and simplicities we have that make us perfect to our spouses. If someone told me I looked “great in anything” I would be flattered, not offended.
Brad Paisley is one of the only artists (with the exception of Dierks Bentley) that both my husband and I can appreciate together. His guitar picking is impeccable not only on all of his songs, but also in concert. We’ve been fortunate enough to see many of his shows over the past few years and are always blown away, especially when compared to many of his country-counterparts such as Kenny Chesney, Tim McGraw and even Dierks Bentley. His band is world-class and his fiddler can compete with the best of the best especially on songs like “Whiskey Lullaby” and “When I Get Where I’m Going”
I enjoyed reading everyone’s comments very much and thought I’d add my own view as a big Brad Paisley fan. I hope you can appreciate my perspective, as well. I’m looking forward to the release of Waitin’ on a Woman. I have a feeling it will be another #1 hit for him. Thanks.
June 26, 2008 at 6:34 pm Permalink
As an educated, professional woman, I have to respectfully disagree with many of the comments about Brad’s music.
I wonder what the opinion will be for the poorly educated, unreliable woman?
June 27, 2008 at 1:00 pm Permalink
I wonder what the opinion will be for the poorly educated, unreliable woman?
I didn’t mean for it to come across that way at all! Its just that many of the comments left seemed to imply that women who enjoy Brad’s music must be pushovers…and as my husband can attest, that I am not. I appologize if I offended, that was not my intent.
June 30, 2008 at 3:10 am Permalink
Wow…congrats to y’all. I didn’t realize the semi or all-around seriousness of Brad’s interpretation! I must say that I read all comments and now have a new face of Brad…thanks a bunch. Not sure if that’s complimentary or not, but it certainly left my brains a reelin and mood a grieving. But for a final answer: I think he’s just having fun and for someone who was polished in country music all his life, I think he knows the in’s and out’s of what makes a great single, regardless of how much controversy is spewed over by fans and the like.
July 18, 2008 at 2:21 am Permalink
My two cents.. Very, very few country artists can make me laugh and cry on the same album. His writing is clever, funny and touching. His way of “listing” things (She’s Everything) is a short way of tying things together when making a point, “She’s saturday out on the town/a church girl on sunday/a cross around her neck/and cuss word cuz it’s monday”. This shows the versatility, changes and the things he knows about his girl because she is his. The song is very sweet (from a girl’s point of view). “Ticks” cracked me up, what a line! It’s meant to be light and funny. Some of his relationship songs, “waiting on a woman” included, seem to focus on the differences between a man and a woman. It’s in spite of and because of these basic gender differences that they click, it shows acceptance and keeps things interesting.
August 24, 2008 at 4:28 am Permalink
This entire chain is unbelievable! The simple fact is. There’s no condescension intended in any of the aforementioned lyrics. True, an uptight princess with polar propensity may find a lyric or three of Brad’s offensive but come-on; consider the source of the angst. However even some of the enlightened; dare I say men, seemed to use this opportunity to jump the feminine title wave, agreeing with a few uptight broad’s over analyzation of some damn country song lyrics. Lets get real, Brads is; “laughing all the way to the bank, cause it all just seems so funny, a bunch of guys like us, in a big tour bus makin that easy money” You see… if you listen to the entire CD he unlocks it all for you. “Cause when your a celebrity it adios reality” we must have a lot of celebrities opinions in this chain.
September 1, 2008 at 7:33 am Permalink
I only got about half-way through these critiques because I got bored with their length.
I just wanted to say that, as a female in a happy marriage with a “guy’s guy” (much like Paisley himself), I believe that Paisley’s aforementioned songs are FUNNY and REALISTIC. That is what I love about his writing, and that is why my husband is also a fan.
So, no need for all this offense at an alleged condescending tone, when the man is just being FUNNY. He obviously loves his woman as my husband loves me. They can tease us all they want because they know they can’t live without us. That is the charm to the songs.
October 12, 2008 at 3:31 pm Permalink
I don’t have a problem with Brad or his music in general and I don’t think he’s condescending to women in general.
That being said, I do not like this song. It says that women being late for everything is cute. Well my dad has spent 22 years waiting for my mom who is late for EVERYTHING constantly with complete disregard to the rest of the family. It is not cute. It is infuriating. (Not that I don’t love my mom; I do. I love almost everything else about her. Just not her perpetual lateness.) I hope to heaven that when I grow up and get married I will not make my husband sit around and wait for me all the time.
Every time I hear this song, I roll my eyes and think, “You think it’s cute now, you wait 20 years and see how cute it still is.” But I suppose we might as well let him have his happy delusion while it lasts. :)
October 12, 2008 at 4:20 pm Permalink
a lady is never late – it’s always the genleman, who comes too early.
Leave a Comment