Album Review: Taylor Swift – Fearless
Taylor Swift’s much anticipated sophomore album finds her at a point of transition, on the brink of two very different and conflicting musical directions—one of which builds on the foundation of her enormously successful self-titled debut, while the other dismisses that foundation entirely. Fearless is a slightly bipolar album that dips its feet into both pools, Swift seemingly caught between the girl she was and the woman she’s becoming, unsure of which path to embrace musically.
There are moments of brilliance on Fearless, moments when Swift’s oft-cited “potential” takes a big step forward towards realization; in the midst of that process she tangibly surpasses most of her peers in terms of artistic achievement, moving beyond simple mastery of craft to tap into a well of emotional sincerity. And there are moments when her songwriting appears to take a step backward, when it feels artificial and forced, when it seems unfocused and preoccupied with what its own image.
Taylor Swift suggested that its namesake had a unique talent for narrative structure and a true gift for building living characters—characters who seem real and who remind us of ourselves. There are a number of songs on Fearless which not only confirm that suggestion, but which show real growth and maturity as a songwriter—where Taylor Swift often struggled to get past the surface of its character’s emotions and conflicts, Fearless, at its high points, is piercingly honest and surprisingly bittersweet. In the eerily real “Fifteen,” Swift takes on the role of advice-giver as she waxes on the difficulties and experiences of high school, like an older sister who recognizes the mistakes she’s made.
Likewise, the album’s pinnacle track “White Horse” moves past the superfluous anger and knee-jerk spitefulness at the root of songs like “Picture to Burn” and “Should’ve Said No” to get to a deeper, more personal post-breakup place. On “White Horse” (co-penned by Liz Rose) Swift opens her broken heart and fully comes into her own as a songwriter on a song that anyone would be proud to have written.
Where Fearless fails, however, is when it rejects that artistic growth and instead embraces an idyllic world that revolves around first kisses and homecoming dances. On “White Horse,” Swift declares, “I’m not a princess/This ain’t a fairytale,” but on the album’s first single, “Love Story,” she more or less implies that love is, in fact, a fairytale.
And that’s the point at which Fearless, aside from developing two confusing images of Swift, disregards its predecessor–Taylor Swift may have been somewhat immature and, to a point, naive, but it was nonetheless a collection of organic compositions which sprouted from Swift’s own experiences and observations. Too often Fearless feels like an album that is supposed to be about young love instead of just being about that love. When that happens, the music becomes abstract and the characters lose their roundness.
So too is this true musically; on the album’s best material Swift shows off a new found sense of restraint and significantly improved singing (”Forever & Always” and “Hey Stephen” both showcase a previously untapped tonal character), while when the music shifts into bubbly-mode, or becomes more aesthetically aggressive, her voice is easily washed out, far too small for the blistering production that accompanies the majority of the album’s up-tempos (the unbearably overproduced “Change” being by far the prime example of this).
Swift simply does not have a voice made for high-soaring pop music, and the sooner she realizes this, the better her music is going to be.
It’s worth noting that most of the discussion surrounding Fearless will no doubt focus on the content of the material, and rightly it should. It is a mistake, however, to assume that because Swift is writing songs about the adolescent experience that those songs have less artistic merit or emotional complexity than songs about so-called adult situations. Here Swift fearlessly deals with issues that affect teens on a daily basis—issues that many adults would rather simply ignore. At its core, this is an album that explores the balance between romance and sexual desire at a time in life when both are new and mysterious. Swift handles those issues sensitively and aptly, and that is something that few writers—teen or adult—can claim.
Still, there are times here when her gift for storytelling seemingly gets caught up in the world it’s exploring, too insular to be nuanced, too stuck in the moment to see a bigger emotional picture. And there are, of course, times when that’s not the case at all–when Swift proves, yet again, that she truly is something special.
Swift’s songwriting is most effective when she’s being honest with herself and her audience. On Fearless, there is one half of Taylor Swift that hints at Emmylou Harris and there is one half that hints at some other, her unnamed country sweetheart.
Let’s hope she settles on the right direction.

Recommended Tracks: “Fifteen“, “White Horse“, “Hey Stephen“
If you enjoyed this article, be sure to subscribe to our feed or receive updates via email.
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Fearless // Liz Rose // Taylor Swift
Current Discussion
- Kimberly: I think the song is cute and I fear people might be taking it wayyyy too seriously. Really? is he ...
- Troy: I don't see whats so wrong with Carrie working with a pop producer for one song. Max Martin is the ...
- kurt: "What are the feelings in Nashville about using pop songwriters instead of local ones? Seems like a good way to ...
- Dan: Taylor Swift > Carrie Underwood.
- Karen: @Jon... you're so right... why argue, we're all dust in the wind anyway.. lol!! but I ...
- Jon: @Steve M. "I am secure in my belief that Underwood represents nothing more then a passing phase in country music. ...
- Rick: This song and Gwen's voice are so generic by today's radio standards this single just might work, but I highly ...
- Jon: Tweet, not twitter, dammit.
- Baron Lane: I had this confused with the with Chuck Ragan featured "The Revival Tour." Sounds like a great time.
- Rick: Stormy, did Miranda's bikini have a holster built into it? Hmm...

Is Dave Haywood going solo? This and many other of country music's most pressing questions answered in the September edition of The 9513's world famous Mailbag!
Caroline Herring likes to sing songs about life in the South. No, not exactly like Justin Moore and Jason Aldean...
The 9513's resident historian Paul W. Dennis sits down for a chat with country music legend Gene Watson.
As much as we love girl singers, we love songs about girl singers even more. Here's just a few of the many tribute songs out there.
Step away from the river and up to a jukebox, because heartbreak is only temporary, but a good song about drowning yourself—like a diamond—lasts forever.
What do you think about music labels "testing the waters" with a single before providing access to an artist's entire album?
What country artist, young or old, would you recommend as a must-listen artist to a newcomer on his/her journey through country music, and what would your essential song picks be?




4 Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URI for this postNovember 16, 2008
[...] through. And I gotta say, it wasn’t nearly as painful as I thought it would be.” — J.R. Journey “I can’t, and probably will never be able to, relate to Swift’s songs. But, I have the [...]
November 24, 2008
[...] fully comes into her own as a songwriter on a song that anyone would be proud to have written. – The 9513 “White Horse,” the spare, brooding number that premiered on Grey’s Anatomy, gives a glimpse [...]
December 18, 2008
[...] the review of Taylor Swift’s Fearless by Jim [...]
January 5, 2009
[...] Link [...]
118 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
November 12, 2008 at 11:03 am Permalink
I can’t believe you liked this pop album and yet you slammed Carrie Underwood’s amazing album.
I just lost all respect for you and this site.
This is a POP ALBUM! And she is already remixing Love Story and sent it to pop radio within weeks after it was released to country radio.
I respected you guys because I thought you were about traditional country music, and that you had some taste.
But instead- you worship this bubble gum pop star want to be, who has no vocal talent at all.. and is not country at all.
How can you possibly like a pop album and call it country— with vocals that make my dog howl? She has not improved her vocals and I think you should at least be honest about that.
Wow. I am so angry.
November 12, 2008 at 11:06 am Permalink
Worship? Wow, just because Jim didn’t turn the snark on full power doesn’t mean he loves this album. After reading the entire review, I’d say his feelings are a mixed bag – and that probably sums up the album pretty well. I say probably because I have no idea, having not listened to it yet …
November 12, 2008 at 11:36 am Permalink
ok. I am not as angry as Miranda fan (lol), because this isn’t all that important, really. But I have to agree with everything she or he said.
Taylor is manipulating country music by remixing all her songs to pop radio– and there are no repercussions. I think that makes the country music industry look like hypocrites– with double standards- as they slammed Faith, Shania, and Leanne Rimes for remixing songs to pop. All 3 of those talented ladies sing circles around the off key horrid Swift, yet they got slammed- and Taylor gets a free pass.
something is rotten in denmark, for sure.
If this is Country music, then I may have to start listening to rap.
At least Carrie and Miranda both refuse to remix their songs to pop- and try to stay true to country, at the expense of less sales and hype.
Taylor is ALL HYPE- and NO SUBSTANCE!
November 12, 2008 at 12:09 pm Permalink
I can’t figure out why I always seem to agree with Jim on these things, but I absolutely do. This is not a bad album. I’ve only gone through it once, so I won’t back this up yet with any lyrics, but some of these songs have some real raw emotion and fine writing in them.
I’ve been as quick to bash the sloppy songwriting in “Picture to Burn” and “Our Song” as anyone. But she’s coming into her own here. In a few places I actually felt like I was listening to something off of Kathleen Edward’s “Failer” album.
Some of “Fearless” is over the top pop, and there are moments of corniness and sillyness. I thought that “Hey Stephen” was unbearably bubble gummy and I still can’t listen to “Change” all the way through. But I thoroughly enjoyed tracks like “Fifteen” and “You Belong With Me”
I wish she’d stop trying to be such a pop star and try a more rootsy approach. I chuckled a couple months ago when she was quoted as saying she’d like to do a darker, more alt-country type album- but now I really think she could pull it off.
November 12, 2008 at 12:25 pm Permalink
Mike, I havent listened to this album yet, but you are using some strong language when you invoke the great “Failer” album here…
November 12, 2008 at 12:27 pm Permalink
I had a hard time finding a legitimate top ten hit on this album. It all sounded way to poppy.
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 pm Permalink
So, I just listened to this album all the way through. And I gotta say, it wasn’t nearly as painful as I thougth it would be. Granted, it won’t be in any kind of heavy rotation for me – these songs just aren’t my cup of tea. But overall, I’d say it is a pretty solid album. And Swift obviously shows growth as a songwriter and vocalist on some tracks. While at times, she reverts back to the very things I loathed about her debut, but those very things are likely what propelled it to multi-platinum status.
‘Hey Stephen’ is very reminiscent of K.T. Oslin’s ‘Hey Bobby’ in both lyric structre and sound. I kinda like it.
‘White Horse’ seems like it could be a direct sequel to ‘Love Story’. Likewise, ‘Tell Me Why’ ‘You’re Not Sorry’, and ‘Forever and Always’ are typical Taylor Swift fare that will satisfy her demographic beautifully.
Songs like ‘You Belong With Me’, ‘The Way I Loved You’, and ‘Fifteen’ all tell the stories of high school life, romance, drama; the whole package. But, they do it well. I guess somebody has to tell the stories of these teens. ‘The Best Day’ is pretty much a re-write of George Strait’s ‘The Best Day of My Life’, and it doesn’t bring anything new to the table.
“Breathe’ is a stand-out track to me. The vocal is not overblown and she conveys real emotion in her voice. Also, it takes on a maturity to a break-up that is a new concept for Swift as she sings “Never wanted this, never wanna see you hurt, Every little bump in the road I tried to swerve, But people are people, And sometimes it doesn’t work out”. Definitely my favorite track on the album.
So while I don’t think Swift has captured just the right groove yet, she shows enough growth on this release to justify thinking she could actually be around for a while, and make the oft-painful transistion from child star to adult star.
November 12, 2008 at 12:33 pm Permalink
Kelly… it’s as surprising to me as it would be to you. “Failer” is one of my favorites. Still listen to it all the time. Don’t get me wrong- Fearless is no Failer- but some of Taylor’s writing style and phrasing completely reminds me of that album. And then some of it doesn’t. at all. I’d be really interested to hear broke down versions of some of these songs.
November 12, 2008 at 1:04 pm Permalink
Mike – I totally see what you are saying. I know you werent suggesing that “Fearless” is the new “Failer”. The fact is the songs from “Failer” were written in Edwards’ very early 20’s and therefore not too far from where Swift is now age-wise. “Failer” devoted much space to heartbreak and moving on, which is obviously prime subject matter for Swift.
November 12, 2008 at 1:28 pm Permalink
I’m pleasantly surprised with this album. I agree with the review for the most part and can definitely see some progress from her first album.
I don’t think it’s our job to develop a standard of segregation between traditional country music and the new style that is taking over our industry. Getting upset because Jim praises an artist who is on the pop-country side is only asking for a greater separation in support for what our industry is compared to what our industry was. Quality music will always be quality music, regardless of the way it is composed. Sure, many of us prefer the traditional country sound, but we have to be able to acknowledge that our genre is being transformed and still be able to give credit when credit is due. Taylor Swift deserves some credit for producing a quality album and I hope she continues to attract listeners to country radio so that they can explore the rest of our genre for themselves and make up their minds from there.
November 12, 2008 at 1:57 pm Permalink
Miranda Fan said:
“How can you possibly like a pop album and call it country— with vocals that make my dog howl? She has not improved her vocals and I think you should at least be honest about that.”
Regarding the ‘liking’ part, I don’t think it’s written anywhere that all country fans must not like pop music (which I agree this album is). As to the ‘calling it country’ part, the review never did – in fact, I seem to recall Jim’s review of “Love Story” pointing out that it could only be considered ‘country’ under the biggest tent possible (or something).
And I don’t think it’s any music critic’s job – at the 9513 or elsewhere – to attack art because it doesn’t fit its marketing. This is a pop album being marketed as ‘country,’ but that doesn’t mean it’s actually a bad album (unless you consider pop inherently bad).
November 12, 2008 at 2:28 pm Permalink
I think this was a very well-written review. Taylor Swift is tough to review–especially for the adult reviewer outside of Swift’s demographic.
I think Jim hit the nail on the head when he stated: “It is a mistake … to assume that because Swift is writing songs about the adolescent experience that those songs have less artistic merit or emotional complexity than songs about so-called adult situations.”
I can’t, and probably will never be able to, relate to Swift’s songs. But, I have the sneaky suspicion that I would have LOVED this back in junior high, when I was experiencing the same stuff she’s going through now. Sorting through complex adolescent emotions (which sometimes conflict) is tricky business and she does a great job. I think some reviewers have bent over backwards in lavishing her with praise to account for her age, but Jim doesn’t do that here.
That said, from what I’ve heard, I wouldn’t remotely call this album country. Everything about it is straight-up pop. However, country will keep her around as long as she sells; and she’ll stick around as long as she can walk easily in both worlds – country and pop.
November 12, 2008 at 2:29 pm Permalink
Mike Parker: I thought the same as Kelly when I read your comment. I haven’t listened to the album yet (just bought it loading onto my computer) so I’ll have to see where you see the similarities.
November 12, 2008 at 2:46 pm Permalink
JR:
“Breathe” stands out to me too, not because of the lyrics, but the gorgeous sound. I think the inclusion of Colbie Caillat (Her voice is perfect for harmonies) just elevates the song so much.
Anyway, I was impressed with this album as well. I like her debut album, but I stopped listening to that one very quickly. I have a feeling this album will be in heavy rotation for me for a while. I like the great writing in “White Horse”, it’s a very real song that she really does a good job with.
“You’re Not Sorry” is also a standout for me.
November 12, 2008 at 3:04 pm Permalink
I loved this album. I thought the best songs were breathe, white horse, and forever and always. vocally i think she has really improved.
November 12, 2008 at 3:24 pm Permalink
Not a bad review :)
I do like “White Horse” very very much <3 I hope it gets released as a single soon
November 12, 2008 at 3:28 pm Permalink
Really 3.5 stars. WOOOOOOW! Thats ridiculous in my opinion, the songs ive heard so far have been the same bubblegum highschool popgarbage shes been dong. I really think she has potential especially writing or singing ballads, (ex. Tim McGraw, Teardrops) but Fifteen..really in my opinion that right there is whats wrong with country music.
To “Miranda Fan” I would rather them HAVE to remix a song when they send it out to pop (if they so choose to do that) than to have it that pop to begin with.
November 12, 2008 at 4:14 pm Permalink
What the heck is up with these Miranda Lambert fans and all their hate?
I would recommend actually listening to the album before you rip apart her vocals (yet again). I think on a lot of the more toned down songs, she does very well with her range and doesn’t show the girly pitchiness we saw in songs like Picture To Burn and Should’ve Said No.
November 12, 2008 at 4:17 pm Permalink
Mirandafans… I think you have to look past the pop arrangements and get down to the lyrics here.
Taylor Swift and Miranda Lambert aren’t a whole lot different when it comes to the lyrics. The arrangements are night and day- and I much prefer Miranda’s.
I downloaded two albums yesterday, both out of curiosity really- Taylor’s and David Archuletta. After listening to Archuletta’s, it’s easy to see why Swift falls in Pop Country instead of Pop. His is overproduced, trite, cliche garbage and hers is overproduced (in places), emotionally engaging, and for the most part fresh.
Try looking past the arrangement and even the setting, and you have some pretty solid country lyrics.
November 12, 2008 at 4:24 pm Permalink
Do we all have to pick a blonde?
November 12, 2008 at 4:25 pm Permalink
I am now a MIRANDA FAN fan! LOL!!
November 12, 2008 at 4:34 pm Permalink
You gotta respect Swift for sticking to her demographic.
In contrast, Underwood sings a teeny bopper “All-American Girl” then releases an ode to alcohol, one night stands (presumably… did they consecrate the shotgun wedding?), and bad decisions in “Last Name”.
Now, I’m one to enjoy the latter much more, but there’s a difference between inconsistency and diversity. Look for this theme to arise in my Zac Brown Band review next week.
November 12, 2008 at 4:38 pm Permalink
I have to say I am really pleasantly surprised with Taylor’s new album. Jim, you hit the nail on the head when you discussed Taylor’s ability to tell a story. When I was a teen and tried to write I always wanted to sound more grown up than I was…. I never would have had the balls to write a song like “Teardrops On My Guitar” or “White Horse” with the fear I’d sound too much like a teenager. But Taylor IS a teenager, and like all teens she doesn’t have the world figured out but she has this mature ability to accept that but still write it down, even if it sounds corny when she re-reads it in 10 years. She strikes me as this little Carole King (right down to the spiral hair) and I can only hope she takes the route of songwriter in her adult years, rather than trying to evolve into a Britney Spears.
As for “Fearless” specifically my automatic standouts are “Hey Stephen” (which has a beautiful breezey feeling to it), “White Horse,” “Breathe” and “The Best Day.” The major songwriting misstep for me is “Fearless” which comes across as sloppily written and rushed it.
Overall though I have to say this is a damn good record and I’ll be listening to it for a long time.
November 12, 2008 at 4:48 pm Permalink
As somewhat of a defender of Taylor in the past, I’m not liking this album so far. I prefer her first one to this one. I actually thought it was more organic.
November 12, 2008 at 4:56 pm Permalink
I like this album. I’m surprised that Mr. Malec gave it the review that he did. I thought that he would have slammed the pop aspects of it, but instead kind of glances over it. Taylor is one of my favourite newcomers to the genre, and she’s doing her part well. She is a teen titan in music, and her music shows that.
November 12, 2008 at 4:59 pm Permalink
I’ve only listened to this record once through so far, but I think I like it. It’s definitely quality.
And for the record, I’m a Miranda fan.
November 12, 2008 at 5:04 pm Permalink
“I like this album. I’m surprised that Mr. Malec gave it the review that he did. I thought that he would have slammed the pop aspects of it…”
You don’t know Jim very well ;)
The insane Miranda Fan that left the first comment actually goes by tsharky on other websites and is actually an uber Carrie fan. She’s left comments on here and on the CMA prediction post under various names and has tried dragging The 9513 through the mud on other websites on various occasions, so don’t pay her no mind or think she’s a reflection on Miranda’s fans.
November 12, 2008 at 5:06 pm Permalink
If forced to choose between the two, it’d be Miranda. If forced to pick a blonde- it’d probably be Lucinda Williams.
November 12, 2008 at 5:06 pm Permalink
Brady: I don’t know anyone on this site very well. =p I kind of just lump everyone together as a pop-country disliking group. It’s a bad assumption, I guess.
November 12, 2008 at 5:14 pm Permalink
Jim, I really enjoyed this review and am even more eager to hear the album now. I’m especially glad you make the point that Taylor’s songs aren’t necessarily “fluffy” simply because they’re about teens. Frankly, I think her songwriting skills put some older Music Row scribes to shame.
That said, if I’ve had any complaint about Taylor’s songs, it’s another thing you mention: the “don’t-get-mad-get-even” theme in her breakup songs. It’s 100% authentically high school (I admit to burning a few photos myself) but I think those songs are the hardest for the larger audience to relate to. It really struck me when I heard the song she co-wrote on Kellie Pickler’s album, which had that same tone. I’ve just found that post-adolescence I’ve been more sad than angry about relationships ending, and I’m really curious to see her explore these other angles.
November 12, 2008 at 5:33 pm Permalink
Brody: The insane Miranda Fan that left the first comment actually goes by tsharky on other websites and is actually an uber Carrie fan. She’s left comments on here and on the CMA prediction post under various names and has tried dragging The 9513 through the mud on other websites on various occasions, so don’t pay her no mind or think she’s a reflection on Miranda’s fans.
Please don’t think she’s a representation of Carrie fans either. She a fanatic that gives all of us sane Carrie fans a bad name. Even Carrie fans can’t stand her.
November 12, 2008 at 5:35 pm Permalink
Why some immature Carrie Underwood and/or Miranda Lambert fans like to bash Taylor Swift puzzles me. Carrie tapped directly into the American Idol viewing audience and Taylor tapped indirectly into the Disney Channel demographic audience and I think their core fan bases are totally different, and especially in age.
Nice review, Jim. Ultimately a dependable critic strives for objectivity and in matters of artistic endeavor, and that can be a tough thing to pull off. This review strikes me as imminently fair regarding the subject matter as it should be. I don’t care for Taylor’s style of music and would never consider buying any of her albums, BUT its still nice to know she is growing as an artist. Thank goodness one of the most powerful forces in Top 40 country music today is not regressing musically or lyrically…
November 13, 2008 at 4:15 am Permalink
This album is somewhat a disappointment when compared to the first album. This is a pop album claiming to be a country album cuz of the I-Have-Banjos-And-Violins-In-My-Songs-And-You-Don’t factor. Only several songs are good, namely White Horse, Breathe, You’re Not Sorry and Love Story. The rest are tolerable, but are mostly fillers for the album. Also its funny that people are thinking she will be the next country queen, while Miranda and Carrie sings circles around her…. but kudos to her songwriting…. she should write for Miley too
You might not know this… pop version of love story sounds worse than the “country” version L.S., so why doesn’t she sends the original version to pop stations instead, just like How Do I Live and Before he cheats?
November 13, 2008 at 8:02 am Permalink
Great comments everyone. A few points I’d like to touch on:
First of all, as has been pointed out, I wouldn’t exactly say that this review demonstrates my worshiping of Taylor Swift (hallowed be her name).
It’s an album that has very appealing qualities and certain distinct weaknesses, and I’ve tried to balance those here. For those of you who think the rating was too high, might I remind you that this is the same rating I gave to Blly Ray Cyrus’ latest album, a half-star below what I gave to Crystal Shawanda’s.
Secondly, do I even need to point out the irony that people are criticizing this album for being pop by holding up Carrie Underwood as an example of country? That’s a bit like the hen calling the kettle the pot, isn’t it?
Lastly, regarding the pop/country issue…
It’s something I specifically avoided in this review, other than to discuss the fact that when Swift’s music slips into a pop aesthetic, it isn’t very good.
The truth is that we spend a lot of time talking about what is country and what isn’t. I’m even going to be talking about it later today in my post CMA Awards commentary. It’s a topic that merits careful consideration and lengthy discourse. But that doesn’t mean that every piece of music criticism surrounding a so-called country artist must deal with that question, and, in this case, I felt like there were more important things to discuss. Taylor Swift might be pop, or she might be country, but, for the most part, you’ve already made up your mind about which one she is.
So I decided to spend my 800 words focusing on the substance of the music.
November 13, 2008 at 9:17 am Permalink
“That’s a bit like the hen calling the kettle the pot, isn’t it?” Mix metaphors much?
Seriously, though, I know what you’re saying. When I listened to her first album, I was pleasantly surprised at some songs and unpleasantly surprised at others. I didn’t think that it had much of a country sound to it at all, save for the occasional fiddle, but it didn’t irk me because the songs were usually strong enough. I’m 21 and I still don’t know how to write as personally as Taylor does, but then again I’ve never been in a relationship…
WHY do people argue country/non-country anyway, and why can’t we just accept that a well-constructed song is a well-constructed song? Sure, Taylor’s production and senses are closer to pop than to neotraditionalism, but she has a sense for lyric and melody, concepts that existed way before there was such a thing as a musical genre.
November 13, 2008 at 10:25 am Permalink
Personally the reason is because most of her songs are going to chart high on country chart when they’re basically pop
November 13, 2008 at 11:03 am Permalink
I agree with the comments about Taylor’s growth as a writer (and maybe a vocalist?), but from a marketing perspective, I agree with Gerald. I’m a music director at “airhead” country radio, and every Taylor Swift single past “Teardrops” has me scratching my head. Taylor Swift’s core demographic is NOT the same as ours. We tailor (pardon the pun) to soccer moms who may or may not change the channel when Taylor comes on the radio, depending on whether or not their kids are with them. It’s very hit or miss. I haven’t been in the business long enough to know if artists who no longer fit the country mold leave the genre (like Matchbox 20 and Maroon 5 left rock). Does that happen? Is that what happened to Shania?
November 13, 2008 at 1:03 pm Permalink
I wouldn’t put up a fight if country radio didn’t play her music. But I’d want them to remove all traces of Rascal Flatts and Jessica Simpson while they were at it.
On kind of a side note, I was listening again to Fearless and it struck me just how wordy Swift’s songs are.
November 13, 2008 at 2:04 pm Permalink
Wow you guys are tough here, I guess you have to be super critical to hang in. Well my thoughts are Taylor has an amazing talent for writing, but she needs to start writing more mature stuff to see if her career will sustain past the kids and teeny boppers. So I give her that talent, but really does every song have to be the about the same thing every time it get’s boring. Even the song Kellie performed last night co written by Taylor if I hadn’t of known that before hand I sure would have guessed it. Hopefully in the near future we will see some more material of substance.
Now why on every blog no matter what the topic about a certain female, do they always get compared to Carrie, and she gets dragged through the mud. It is good when someone succeeds at something I don’t know why people try to knock down someone who has not let stardom change her or her values, stays out of trouble and is good at what she does. Try just enjoying it, it is alot a waste of time to always being negative.
November 13, 2008 at 2:10 pm Permalink
amen Vp, lets sit back and enjoy the talent while we have it, you don’t know what you got until it’s gone. Please, lets stop comparing her to Carrie, she will never be Carrie, she is just Taylor. She does need to eventually write more mature material, but right now, this is her, so let’s appreciate the talent we’re staring at even if we all don’t like her.
November 13, 2008 at 2:12 pm Permalink
Isn’t comparing Taylor Swift to Emmylou Harris a hanging offense? If not, it ought to be!
November 13, 2008 at 2:14 pm Permalink
Yeah, except I didn’t compare Taylor Swift to Emmylou Harris, I said that there were moments on the album that hinted at Emmylou Harris.
November 13, 2008 at 2:20 pm Permalink
You’re coming dangerously close to treading in shark-infested waters, Jim. ;-)
November 13, 2008 at 2:21 pm Permalink
Why am I not surprised that there is very little country music in Taylor’s iPod? And ditto for Sugarland. I can remember a time when country music produced artists that actually grew up listening to the genre and knew something about it and its history.
November 13, 2008 at 2:28 pm Permalink
Are stealing my comment about trying just to enjoy it DUDE cause I think you tried to use some reverse phycology on me. Not gonna work. I did not insult TS, I complimented her whether I like her songs or not, and as for Carrie if you read correctly I just posed the question of why always the comparisons to her, don’t you think there is a reason why everyone is always compared to her, think about that one really think and see what you come up with.
November 13, 2008 at 2:30 pm Permalink
I’m curious- for those of you who have commented that you like Taylor’s first album better, which songs exactly do you find better than what is on Fearless? While I believe the first album had a few moments of genius (Teardrops On My Guitar and Cold As You- even if the latter wasn’t a very good example of her vocals) the new album refrains from any mentions of “you won’t let me drive your truck? Well fine I’m dating all of your friends now and I’m going to spread a rumor that you’re gay so nanny nanny boo boo I win!”
November 13, 2008 at 6:58 pm Permalink
Songs like “Tim McGraw” and “Our Song” are fine examples of the success of her writing skills, as well as her vocal skill. Those songs are truly enjoyable, but its just that I found none in Fearless that is as good as those two above
November 14, 2008 at 11:28 am Permalink
Mimi– you are so wrong. You think every person who doesn’t like Taylor is tsharky. Talk about a paranoid obssession with someone just because they legitimately call Taylor out for what she is— a bad singer and a pop sell out.
All Taylor fans try to blame every bad review on a few people– pretending no one could possibly dislike taylor’s singing, etc… so they attack one person who is not even on this board, and did nothing wrong- to try to make it out like Taylor is loved by everyone. NOT! (tsharky always uses her real name and never hides under false names. I respect that).
It is really funny actually, and sad. I am a grown man and if I say I don’t like Taylor, i am called someone named tsharky. Talk about delusional rabid fans.
I am perfectly capable of making up my own mind- and this album is pop. Period. It is also bubble gum horrid pop with lyrics that are clique and done before, and better.
I see no real talent in her songwriting- and I see no talent in her singing.
November 14, 2008 at 11:36 am Permalink
I hate to keep going back to this point, but does anyone else think it’s odd that all these Carrie Underwood fans are criticizing Taylor Swift for not being country?
November 14, 2008 at 11:36 am Permalink
Jim— I actually agree with some things you said- but Carrie is much more country then Taylor because she never remixes her songs to pop, and panders to the MTV crowd like Taylor. Taylor is trying to have her cake and eat it too– and that is fine. Carrie’s new album is much countrier then her original album, whereas Taylor’s went even more pop then before.
But the problem is- country music slammed all the other ladies who remixed their songs to pop… so why are they giving Taylor a free pass?
Jim– if you could honestly answer that question for me, I would greatly appreciate it, since you seem to be pretty well informed on this subject. Thank you.
November 14, 2008 at 11:39 am Permalink
Jim, most of them are the same delusional person.
And by the way for anyone interested, TexasFan is tsharky.
November 14, 2008 at 11:46 am Permalink
Stop bashing me for having a valid opinion. I am not tsharky but I respect her opinions on other boards–and she is not insane, nor am I. The people who bash her everywhere are jealous Taylor fans who hate that she tells the truth. I applaud her honesty.
I am from Texas and I am a grown man. I have as much right to my opinion on country music as you do… and I have never bashed the 9513. so please stop trashing other people for having an opinion different from yours.
The only names I go by are MirandaFan and now-TexasFan- interchangeably, since to me, Texas and Miranda are one and the same.
Taylor is over-rated and way over-exposed. It is going to come back to haunt her eventually when people stop giving her a free pass for her bad live performances.
I have heard every excuse in the book for her: her mike didn’t work, she was sick, she was nervous, her dress weighed her down (that was original), she will get better with age, etc. She can’t possibly be sick or have a bad mike at every concert and live show for 3 years. sorry. Won’t fly. she is very confident on stage- not nervous- so that is not the problem.
Well- Leanne Rimes and Carrie Underwood both sang beautifully, and on key, at age 14, when both were approached for record deals. Though Carrie’s deal fell through due to a management change in Capitol records, I have her demos and some are on youtube. At age 14, she was already 10 times the singer Taylor is at age 18. Age does not really improve your singing voice much. You are either meant to sing, and born with a beautiful voice and tone, or you are not. Taylor is not meant to be a vocalist.
November 14, 2008 at 11:47 am Permalink
Brady– I am not tsharky and if you continue to call me that, you are lying. I like her though– so I am not offended. But stop trashing me. thank you.
November 14, 2008 at 11:48 am Permalink
Ps– how is one delusional just because they tell the truth about Taylor’s singing?
Why can’t you just accept the fact that some of us call a spade a spade?
Talk about the thought police.
November 14, 2008 at 11:50 am Permalink
Brady Vercher– how the heck do you know tsharky’s email address anyway? You don’t.lol And if you publicly disclose mine- you will be liable for breach of internet privacy. Thank you. Have a nice day.
November 14, 2008 at 11:52 am Permalink
You do remember making the first comment on this thread, don’t you, Miranda Fan?
November 14, 2008 at 11:56 am Permalink
Tsharky, you are so transparent. Please give up your crusade. It makes you look like a fool. I’ll bet you didn’t even listen to the Ts album did you? You just bash her incessantly just cause YOU hate her. Can someone ban her??
November 14, 2008 at 12:01 pm Permalink
And while we’re at it, can someone get RedMaz off the CMT blog? I mean, really.
November 14, 2008 at 12:02 pm Permalink
Oh, and “internet privacy” is an oxymoron.
November 14, 2008 at 12:09 pm Permalink
Ok can we stop this bickering and attacks? I am sorry if I over-reacted in my first post. I read it after and I should have counted to 10 before posting, good rule.
I was mad when I first read your review, Jim, and I over-reacted- so for that I apologize to you. I disagree with you, but I had no right to say I lost respect for you or this site. I still like this site and I often agree with you. It just seems that you guys are very harsh to CArrie’s albums, – yet you praise Taylor’s, and that makes no sense to me.
I guess I did assume you were a traditional country fan because you list many core traditional acts as your favorites. I thought that was why you often blasted contemporary country album’s like Carrie’s. So when you praised Taylor’s 100% pop album, to me, it seemed hypocritical and unfair. I now read your comments that you actually like some pop country, so I was wrong to assume.
I love Trisha Yearwood, Martina, Reba, dolly, Loretta, etc.– and see great merit in Ashton Shephard etc. I also love Miranda and Carrie. Kellie Pickler has some potential and a decent voice- but she hasn’t found that huge hit song yet that fits her voice.
Aside– Mimi is a rabid delusional Taylor fan trashes carrie on many boards, and has a personal vendetta against Carrie fans. Mimi thinks the whole world is in love with Taylor– so anyone who dislikes her, is tsharky. lol classic.
November 14, 2008 at 12:13 pm Permalink
Brady- yes I over-reacted in my first post and I apologize. But I was so sure you guys would have a problem with Taylor’s pop remixing, etc, and pop album, that I was shocked to read this review.
Can you guys at least answer my question: Why is country music not calling Taylor on the pop remixing, when they slammed Faith, shania, Leanne Rimes and others who remixed their songs and album to pop to manipulate sales? Is there a reason she is getting a free pass?
I am interested in your opinions on this. Please stop attacking, and I will do the same.
November 14, 2008 at 12:29 pm Permalink
The only reason I asked is because you forgot to change your teesharky@XXX email address when you left that comment. We can cross reference your email addresses and IP addresses and determine all the names you’ve used. So, if you don’t stick to one name or refrain from posting multiple times in a row, we’ll have to remove your comments and ban you. Oh, and you’re not from Texas, either.
November 14, 2008 at 12:34 pm Permalink
Aside– Mimi is a rabid delusional Taylor fan trashes carrie on many boards, and has a personal vendetta against Carrie fans. Mimi thinks the whole world is in love with Taylor– so anyone who dislikes her, is tsharky. lol classic.
Oh dear tsharky, you are sorely mistaken. I don’t even like Ts as I’m not a teenage girl. You, on the other hand, need to get a grip on reality like now. I actually think you need mental help as you say the same thing over and over again about TS on every Carrie/country board there is. Didn’t you just get banned from the biggest fan site? That should tell you something….
November 14, 2008 at 2:25 pm Permalink
Miranda Fan said Can you guys at least answer my question: Why is country music not calling Taylor on the pop remixing, when they slammed Faith, shania, Leanne Rimes and others who remixed their songs and album to pop to manipulate sales? Is there a reason she is getting a free pass?
All of these singers remixed their song years before Taylor when being pop-country wasn’t as acceptable as it is today. All genres have styles changes over the year and progress. Those artists were some of the first. Really who cares if she remixes them to pop. It not likes its on country radio its on pop.
November 14, 2008 at 3:11 pm Permalink
Can we like all 3- all for completely different reasons? Most of the TS bashing is because she can’t sing (which I agree with) but that doesn’t mean she can’t be a great singer/songwriter. CU has a great voice, and some good songs, but every time she opens her mouth I hear the sound of Nashville’s gears spinning. ML is the outsider with a decent voice and some really good songs. But she’s doesn’t seem quite comfortable in her own skin (at least on the occasions I’ve seen interviews and performances). They can all co-exist peacefully.
November 14, 2008 at 3:18 pm Permalink
I like all three of them
November 15, 2008 at 1:30 am Permalink
When I first heard this album my initial impression was similar to others here…this isn’t country. The voice is country, but the music…well, it’s missing something. It was then that I realized the album was a pop production and for whatever reason the producer chose to do this, and ignore Taylor’s totally awesome Country voice and roots. Now after saying that, as a Pop Production, it is more than adequate, in fact because of the strength that Taylor herself puts into the writing and her singing’ it should do quite well in the pop realm. In fact, if I was a true pop fan, I would rate this album quite high. Unfortunately I personally hate to see Taylor take this path; I miss the catchy tunes from the first album with their country charm. Listen to the country version and then the pop version of “Teardrops on My Guitar” and you will understand what I am saying.
From a country standpoint, country fans are simply disappointed in this album. That disappointment is not with Taylor, who wrote wonderful songs and sang her heart out, but with the horrible arrangements and musical choices that were made to accompany her fine lyrics. After “Love Story” I was encouraged that this album would top the first one, and I’m afraid it will not from a country standpoint unless it is remixed. “Beautiful Eyes” is another example of good arranging, and what country fans really wanted to see in this album. I really feel bad for Taylor because it’s simply not her fault. Her management team, producers, arrangers and all just didn’t deliver a beautiful country sound. Another example of what I’m trying to say is Shania’s “Forever and For Always,” I personally like the country mix better because it IS Shania. The same goes for Taylor. This album could have been mixed with more of a country feel and still crossed into the pop realm. I only hope that there is a learning curve, and that we will hear our Taylor singing sweet ballads with nice country overtones again. Thank you and God Bless.
November 15, 2008 at 8:49 pm Permalink
Ya um MIRANDA FAN Taylor has a AMAZING voice way better than Carries (My Opinion) But dont talk that way about her that way!!! Geez CARRIE SOUNDS POP TAYLOR IS ALL THE WAY COUNTRY! TAYLOR WORKED HER WAY UP TO THIS AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE YOU TRY!! CARRIE GOT FAMOUS ON AMERICAN IDOL.
>.<
TAYLOR IS AMAZING.
November 15, 2008 at 8:51 pm Permalink
Still AGGRAVATED AT MIRANDA FAN
November 15, 2008 at 11:53 pm Permalink
Taylor has never been country.
November 16, 2008 at 7:32 am Permalink
“Taylor’s totally awesome Country voice and roots.”
Her what??? Taylor has never sounded like a country singer to me (or indeed an awesome singer of any genre). At most, she’s been a pop singer with a country label, even by the standards of modern radio-pop-country. Though I guess it says sommething when even fans of that pop-country are disappointed.
November 16, 2008 at 9:39 am Permalink
I’m a fan of pop-country and I’m not disappointed at all of this album. Taylor does sound pop-country as someone before said listen to pop album and her and there are many difference.
November 17, 2008 at 8:39 pm Permalink
Angerfie Fan said, “Ya um MIRANDA FAN Taylor has a AMAZING voice way better than Carries (My Opinion) But dont talk that way about her that way!!! Geez CARRIE SOUNDS POP TAYLOR IS ALL THE WAY COUNTRY! TAYLOR WORKED HER WAY UP TO THIS AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE YOU TRY!! CARRIE GOT FAMOUS ON AMERICAN IDOL.”
I think that was pure heresy in music. She never would have gotten thru Simon Cowell in the auditions with that voice. I, myself can sing definitely better than her.
As for the author of this review,it may seem redundant but how come Carrie got her cute butt kicked with Carnival Ride while Taylor got almost an adoration with those weak vocals and please…average songs. Fearless can’t even compare to Carnival Ride when it comes to quality of the songs. Let alone the vocals. Gosh! Perhaps you just praise with whose in with the teens now. I am almost expecting greater reviews for Miley Cyrus’ upcoming albums from you…Gosh!
November 17, 2008 at 8:43 pm Permalink
First of all, I did not write the Carnival Ride review that appears on this site–although I did write one which was published in Denver and Houston, and it was probably more harsh that the The 9513 review. Simply, I think Underwood oversings every song on the album, and I thought the songs were very weak.
November 17, 2008 at 8:54 pm Permalink
“Simply, I think Underwood oversings every song on the album, and I thought the songs were very weak.”
My thoughts, exactly. That’s two things we agreed about today. Scary, isn’t it?
November 17, 2008 at 9:03 pm Permalink
Since we’re on the Carnival Ride discussion….
I thought that the album was nice and that the review here wasn’t very fair, IMO. I loved most of the songs on the album, and while she did oversing, she didn’t sound horrible doing it.
November 17, 2008 at 10:41 pm Permalink
I really liked both carrie and taylor album.They very different types of voices. Carrie has great vocal talent and taylor has her way of singing where she emphasis certain words. I thought carrie vocals were fine but some of her songs became boring compared to her last cd like in i know you wont and I told you so sounded the same. I thought both album were really good but Taylor progress more on her second album then Carrie did.
November 18, 2008 at 12:01 am Permalink
Gosh, Carrie’s a powerhouse. It’s a given that she will sing her songs on notes that Taylor can’t even sing in her dreams. And you call that oversinging. Then tell Mariah Carey she’s oversinging her songs, too. And what kind of progess did Taylor have on her second album? More teeny bopper songs about boys boys boys. Look at how Carrie handled “Just a Dream”. Perhaps Taylor has a better song than that one. Or correct me if I am wrong. It’s like you are actually telling me that Taylor can sing Just a Dream better than Carrie (since Carrie was oversinging)…And vocally Taylor and Miley Cyrus is eons better than Carrie…Haha.
November 18, 2008 at 12:40 am Permalink
Calm down people, just because this isn’t your cup of tea doesn’t mean you should bash on it non-stop. Carrie fans should stop commenting on how “bad” Taylor is, even if she is, as that makes Carrie fans look bad. The reviewers favor Fearless over Carnival Ride, period. So stop flaming.
November 18, 2008 at 9:02 am Permalink
With all this site’s adoration of teeny bopper’s songs, and giving Taylor Swift a free pass rather than slamming her (like what others did when Shania, Faith and LeaAnne tried some poppish material and these women are ‘great’ vocalists) I think it’s safe to say that this site deserves to be renamed…”www.taylorswiftgetsafreepasswhilethegreatvocalistdeservestorot.com.”
Yea, teen songs can be very honest and true but this review just seems to suggest it’s way better than deeper country songs like Just a Dream, Gunpowder and Lead & Anyway. I just read this sites review about Carrie’s All-American Girl and it was totally bashed calling it lame and every insulting word that went into the dictionary. It was a cute, honest song too just like Taylor’s ‘cute’ songs (and that was other people’s opinion not mine) but gosh, this site really hates Carrie’s soaring choruses and deeply admires Taylor’s weak vocals adding Taylor has more honesty, etc. Was Carrie’s AAG pretentious? Or you just hate her just like that.
All I read from your comments about Carrie were all about her singing songs in the stratosphere, that shes was oversinging and such. Then why don’t you bash Taylor’s voice which was so obviously reliant on pitch correction during the recording process.
Honestly for me, Fearless is a tribute to the studio magic that can be done in the 21st century. I’ll hold my word on that. And please give me a youtube link where Taylor Swifts less oversinging can be called a magical performance and then tell me she’s better live than Miranda or Carrie or Martina…
November 18, 2008 at 9:19 am Permalink
I don’t get this notion that one has to be in the “Taylor camp” or the “Carrie camp.” Both of them have very destructive to country music.
November 18, 2008 at 2:47 pm Permalink
Aljid Taylor has shown progress in her writing like in white horse and breathe and vocally she has hit new tones like in forever and always. Personally i thought Carrie’s first cd was better than carnival ride with before he cheats and Jesus take the wheel. I do really like Just A Dream. Coming off a cd that sold 7 plat i think expectations were a little higher when it came out and that the rating could have been lower because she can achieve better. I think it said something like that at the bottom about it not being bad but disappointing.
November 18, 2008 at 2:48 pm Permalink
And Taylor and Carrie are my two favorite country singers so its not because i don’t like Carrie.
November 18, 2008 at 7:11 pm Permalink
I also think that Taylor cant sing well at all. She has great writing skills and can out perform Carrie 10 to 1, but singing personally , Carrie has the better voice. I think Miranda’s voice is just as good as Carries, ive been to 6 of Miranda’s shows and never heard her miss a note, plus she doesnt “scream” or oversing like Carrie tends to do. Miranda also has songwritting skills like Taylor, although i think Miranda writes much better songs, and is much more mature (She did win ACM album of the year ;) ) Miranda also has AMAZING concerts! Alot of its opinion but 9 out of 10 people will admit Carrie and Miranda can sing circles around Taylor. And in my opinion Carrie and Taylor are both about the same amount pop (too much i think but…) Miranda is by far the most country, and if anything treads a little closer to “Texas country” or rock sometimes, but is usually pretty traditional, “More like Her”, “Bring me down” and “Dry Town” for example. Taylor did have “Teardrops” and “Tim McGraw”, and Carrie had “Dont Forget”….
November 18, 2008 at 7:20 pm Permalink
FYI i still think the best female vocalists are Trisha Yearwood, Martine McBride, Lee Ann Womack and Miranda. Others that are better than half the crap out there that arent recognized are Julie Roberts, Ashley Monroe, Amy Dalley, Racheal Procter, and Cyndi Thompson.
November 18, 2008 at 8:16 pm Permalink
Honestly, I don’t dislike Taylor at all. It’s just when it comes to reviews, this site keeps trashing Carrie’s vocals while totally ignoring Swift’s horrid voice focusing only on the content of her teeny bopper songs. It’s really unfair. That’s why I have a feeling this site’s full of Taylor Swift fans. Wahehehehehe…
November 18, 2008 at 8:30 pm Permalink
ALJID–do you think Swift’s vocals are bad on the album, or do you think they are bad in general? Because, in this review, I am only taking into consideration her vocals on Fearless. Her live vocals may or may not be weak–that’s another discussion for another topic.
Swift’s vocals on Fearless, auto-tuned though they may be, are stronger than her vocals on Taylor Swift.
November 19, 2008 at 1:24 am Permalink
But Jim, how can you be so negligent about the qualities of her vocals while you and your company keep on telling Carrie’s oversinging and that her voice is too thin, or she was having too much vocal gymnastics. I just don’t get it. All-American Girl was too bubbly too everyone here in this site and the vocals soared too much on the choruses like there was nothing good in the lyrics and the song. While Swift’s songs were more bubbly yet you praise its creativity? Where was the creativity? It was cute? AAG also a cute song. Just tell us if you hate Carrie and Nashville. Or prove me wrong about your fairness if you were ever between the two ladies….
November 19, 2008 at 6:52 am Permalink
Did you actually read my review of “All American Girl?” Because I never used the word bubbly, and my main problem with that song relates to gender role issue and the presentation of women in music.
So I really don’t understand where you’re getting this whole “bubbly” thing from, nor where you’re going with it.
November 19, 2008 at 10:31 am Permalink
I surrender. I guess this site will always favor Taylor Swift over Miranda Lambert and Carrie Underwood because she’s improved with her writings about boys boys boys whilst the other 2 stayed safe with boy-i’m-gonna-kill-ya-songs(Miranda) and powerful-over-the-top-choruses(Carrie). I think you may actually be a teenager Jim(kidding) or maybe Miss Swift brought back a lot of teenage memories to you. You really seem to like her…Wahehehehehe…..
November 19, 2008 at 12:34 pm Permalink
Great review! I really like this album (listened to it 10+ times), but your review really opened my eyes on things Swift should work on. Much appreciated!
November 19, 2008 at 8:39 pm Permalink
Honestly, your opinion is worthless. If you think Taylor Swift is in the same caliber as Carrie Underwood that’s enough proof that you’re full of crap.
November 19, 2008 at 8:51 pm Permalink
What are you guys talking about? This review has nothing to do with Carrie Underwood.
November 19, 2008 at 11:41 pm Permalink
Haven’t you heard, Jim? The rule is that you must be fiercely devoted to one young blonde female artist and vehemently denounce all others.
November 20, 2008 at 12:59 am Permalink
Chris N. said, “Haven’t you heard, Jim? The rule is that you must be fiercely devoted to one young blonde female artist and vehemently denounce all others.”
That was really funny….
November 22, 2008 at 3:22 am Permalink
Haha, so funny that people think that you have to be in either the Carrie or Taylor camp. I happen to like them both but can definitely say that Carrie has much better pipes, but that is all relative. Just enjoy both of their albums; they’re both good for the country genre, although you can of course argue that they both implement too much “pop” into their songs.
November 24, 2008 at 12:43 am Permalink
To Jim, if Taylor really has improved her vocals, then why does she need a lot of pitch-correction and auto-tuning in her songs just to sound in tune? It was very evident in the production of her songs. Her latest vocal performance at the AMA 2008 just proves my point.
November 24, 2008 at 2:49 am Permalink
I’ve tried…really…bought her albums for my daughters. I leave the room when it plays. I mute the TV when she sings live on TV and awards shows. Sorry, not my cup of tea.
December 1, 2008 at 10:43 pm Permalink
I saw Taylor Swift in concert January and was amazed by how great she sang. I would say she was equally as strong as Carrie vocally. I was pleasantly surprised. But she was playing in a small theater rather than an arena. Still, she was not pitchy or flat like she is during Award Shows. Maybe its just nerves that get to her. I would recommend both Carrie and Taylor to see in concert…I think if I was trying to not be biased I would have liked Taylors concert, but I knew ALL carries songs…every word…so thats why its too close for me.
December 2, 2008 at 4:16 am Permalink
Comparing Swift and Underwood vocally is just plain wrong. Carrie really does have some pipes… she can flat out sing from a technical standpoint. Swift on the other hand, has neither the voice or the control to be a good vocalist.
December 2, 2008 at 7:32 am Permalink
Just found this site and after reading a few reveiws came to this one…
My first and last post on this site….
Carrie Vs Taylor.. Differant!! both young and sexy and thats where the comparason ends.. I like both thier Music.. I like if for a diferant reason to why I like Garth or Toby or Strait…
Enjoy music for what it is, if the song makes ya feel good then its achived its goal.. All this pick aparting of the lyrics and the tunes reminds me opf english at high school… Waste of time.. Just enjoy the music!
December 2, 2008 at 11:59 am Permalink
Yeah, whatever you do, don’t treat music like art!
December 14, 2008 at 8:15 pm Permalink
DAMN!!! I hate people who hate the new music taylor has been putting out. Taylor is one of the best singer/songwriters who writes from the heart and barely lipsychs. Great songs from the album anyway. Plus, I DON’T GET IT!! WHY IN THE NAME OF GOD WOULD SOMEONE EVEN VIST A SITE FOR ARTIST THEY HATE!??
December 14, 2008 at 8:20 pm Permalink
alos to add on to my little rant, I personally think that carrie and taylor are uncomparable and this never ending arguement should just stop. Carrie has a great voice but sometimes (not too often) her voice can be a little overbearing and I can’t excatly stand it. Not everyone can sing that high
December 16, 2008 at 6:24 pm Permalink
Master Luke, you make very valid points in your comment. Although I consider myself to be a Taylor Swift, it does sometimes bother me that her music is pretty much pop music disguisted as country. She is treading between the two genres, which could be a good or bad thing depending on your viewpoint. I consider her debut album a lot more country than ‘Fearless’…the title track itself, and songs such as Hey Stephen, You’re Not Sorry, The Way I Loved You, Change, and especially Forever & Always are blatantly pop songs. I really like her new album, but it is true that she is straying even further from the country genre.
However, I must say that it is not Taylor’s management or producers’ fault for the pop-sounding ‘Fearless’. Taylor was a co-producer herself for ‘Fearless’, and was every bit involved in arranging the songs. Judging from the fact that she is on an ‘indie’ label and has always been very connected with the songwriting process, I’m quite positive she had ample amount of input on her album. She even said before that she got even more say on how the songs sounded on her sophomore record, and there are videos that you can find on YouTube showing Taylor recording several songs in the studio for ‘Fearless’.
I think Taylor just makes music because she loves to do it and has a gift for songwriting. I don’t think she necessarily thinks “Oh, does this sound too pop or too country?” I’d say that she is influenced by country music but arranges her songs to her own personal liking.
May 4, 2009 at 2:31 am Permalink
this review is gud (nd bad, at points), but y does carrie get dragged into it so much??????? v all know that she (carrie) is a gr8 vocalist. if u don’t, bad 4 u. taylor is not a gr8 vocalist, nd i am sick nd tired of her singing songs abt boys!!!!!!!!!! at least carrie doesnt do that.
gud points: taylor’s songwriting is better than her debut, which means i will not hve to hear abt daddy bashing some ex-bf b-cuz he cheated on taylor. (THANKS, GOD!!!!!!!!!!!)
bad points: most of her songwriting requires me 2 hear abt boys (again, like every other ts song isn’t like that, actually change and fifteen and the best day aren’t) and ur right, it does sound more pop than country. so pop-country fits better, but at least u can hear a touch of country (in the base of the songs if u listen 2 it very intently). nd daddy interferes again in ‘love story’ by not allowing romeo 2 meet her (wat’s that daddy-in-the-song’s problem? can’t taylor date a guy in peace????????? apparently, not) nd y do all d boys end up begging 4 forgiveness? i expect anything’s possible, this, after all, is a fairytale-type album.
conclusion: this is like a teen girl’s diary (gud, very gud) but a diary of a teen girl with a mindset limited to boys, boys nd boys again (bad, very bad). nd it claims to b country (gud) but unfortunately, 4 d most part it is not (bad).
fav tracks: white horse, tell me why, fifteen, youre not sorry, the best day nd of course love story. (worth listening, they’re sensible, see? can’t say much abt love story cuz of daddy interfering, but its a very catchy song).
taylor dis is better than ‘taylor swift’ :) but not as gud as other COUNTRY albums :(. hopefully, u’ll do better next time. waiting 4 u 2 release ur next album. in d end, i am diplomatic, ain’t i?? actually, i’m not (hahaha) but still, i like it.
May 22, 2009 at 7:53 am Permalink
why do you people bash taylor so much??? i’m not her fan or anything, but even carrie underwood’s carnival ride is classified as country pop (some might disagree). and even shania twain is country pop. so why do you bash taylor so much????????? please reply.
May 22, 2009 at 11:40 am Permalink
I thought we can to a consensus that Shania was pop back in 2002.
May 24, 2009 at 5:19 pm Permalink
taylor’s vocals are improving, but she does not have the skill or range that carrie does. i’m a pretty rabid taylor fan, with little interest in carrie, but that much i can admit.
i think poor taylor is mixed up and getting caught up in her fame…sometimes she comes across as immature, and i think that’s probably somewhat valid. and i think that’s why her music has taken such a “poppy” twist. something i have difficulty with is everyone saying that something isn’t “country” while not clarifying what is “country.” I think people are just reluctant to change, a little bitter, and disillusioned.
May 24, 2009 at 6:52 pm Permalink
How is Taylor “change?” How is she any different than everything else that is going on in mainstream country right now?
May 24, 2009 at 7:12 pm Permalink
The fact that her lyrics are actually half-decent is a rather dramatical difference.
May 24, 2009 at 8:31 pm Permalink
How is she any different than everything else that is going on in mainstream country right now?
The only difference is her CDs are selling while most of the others’ are not. Other than that, you’re right, it’s just more of the same.
June 1, 2009 at 9:22 am Permalink
I am from Tx. and I do not appreciate taylor swift as being a country singer.For 1 she cannot sing worth a damn,(my opion)let alone to be called country.She is a fabricated fake and even tho she may be making it in the country music world,you could only cover her up for so long.She is a women of 18 and has a voice of a 5 year old.Every one knows it except those under 12 years old,who sucker their parents to buy her stupid songs.We in Tx. are starting a hate group of Taylor Swift.We will not watch CMA untill you get her out of our country music.Also,I am sick of people saying that she is well liked in Nashville.I work in Nashville,and she is about the most hated person there.If I were a performer I would be ashamed to be performing on the same stage as taylor swift.She is a disgrace to the coubtry music world.
August 19, 2009 at 5:52 pm Permalink
@Gaetano. You are a retard with horrible taste in music! Taylor’s awesome! She’s got the brains and the talent, her songs are great, and you are a stupid arrogant jackass! Everyone with sense loves Taylor and knows how great she is and how incredible her songs are. You can go f*** yourself; nobody agrees with you. Why can’t you just let people like what they want to like? And for the record, it’s not just kids who love Taylor, it’s anyone with a brain who likes her!
STOP BASHING HER!!!
September 27, 2009 at 5:52 pm Permalink
I think both of her CDs are great. I do like Fearless a little better though. Every song, whether it’s in a country format or a pop format, is excellent.
Discounting random people on this post, new people keep loving on this CD week after week.
After 45 weeks on the Billboard 200, this CD still remains in the top 8 and her debut CD is still in the top 50! This country sensation has complete staying power.
Her re-release of Fearless is dropping by on October 27th, 2009 with 6 new songs. This CD will probably reclaim a number one that week.
There shouldn’t be any competition between Taylor and Carrie because they are both talented country artists that sell extremely well. They give what the public expects from them – fun music that will last for a very long time.
September 27, 2009 at 6:16 pm Permalink
Erik: Her lyrics are halfway decent? Half way from decent to where?
October 26, 2009 at 12:47 pm Permalink
Today’s the day for “Fearless: Platinum Edition”. Of the new songs, “Jump Then Fall” is a standout!
November 4, 2009 at 9:22 am Permalink
“Fearless” is back to number 3 on the Billboard 200. It sold over 109,000 copies this week.
Her debut album is breaking records by surpassing Nickelback for longest appearance on Billboard 200. Nickelback logged in 156 weeks. Her debut has reached 157 weeks and is still performing strong. The one cd that can probably beat it will be her second cd, “Fearless.”
Leave a Comment