Album Review: George Strait – Twang
George Strait’s 26th studio album is bookended by its rollicking title cut, a honky tonk floor-burner that brims with swaggar, and a masterful cover of the Mexican folk song “El Rey” that he sings entirely in Spanish. Between those two songs, however, Twang is exactly what you’d expect a George Strait album to be—entertaining and pleasant but entirely irrelevant once the 2010 model hits stores.
The recipe is simple: Add a dash of Cajun seasoning (“Hot Grease and Zydeco”), sprinkle in a heart-tugging message song (“Easy As You Go”) and a dreary tear-jerker (“Living For The Night”), then top it all off with a teaspoon of smooth swing (“I Gotta Get To You”) and voila! You just cooked yourself up a platinum record.
Consistency is king, and George Strait is certainly that. But at some point consistency makes way for boring repetition, and if Twang sounds the same as the previous 13 entries in his catalogue it’s at least partially because he’s been using the exact same lineup of studio musicians—with startlingly few variations—since 1992. Along with long-time producer Tony Brown, Strait and his all-star creative team know exactly how to employ their perfect formula to maximum result. Expertly recorded, Twang is an annoyingly decent album that will win at least a couple of album of the year trophies, and may sweep the three major awards shows in that category.
And it will be difficult to argue that those awards aren’t warranted. Compared to his competition, Twang will be seen as an artistic masterpiece. After all, the inclusion of “El Rey” and “Arkansas Dave,” a song written by son Bubba Strait that is supposedly “for the sake of art,” give the project an aura of creative adventure, as if Twang finds Strait stepping out of his comfort zone and pushing his own boundaries to their outer limits.
But the truth is that “El Rey” is far from a surprising entry from this particular native Texan. “King George” is singing a song with a title that translates to “The King?” Tell me the obviousness of that doesn’t just smack you in the face while screaming, “Hey! I’m clever! Look at how clever I am!”
And “Arkansas Dave,” despite the hype, is no better or more artistically compelling than “I Can Still Make Cheyenne” or any number of other songs in his songbook. The song sounds, in fact, like a Garth Brooks album cut that wasn’t quite good enough to make it onto a Garth Brooks album.
If you liked the last one, you’ll like this one. But ignore the hype. George Strait is the best businessman in country music, and he’d have you believe Twang is a mind-blowing exploration of country music’s myriad emotions and influences.
What it is, of course, is a typical George Strait album, ripe with a few excellent cuts and a whole lot of forgettable though exquisitely produced filler. But mind-blowing it ain’t. At least not if you’ve been paying attention over the past 28 years.

If you enjoyed this article, be sure to subscribe to our feed or receive updates via email.
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Current Discussion
- Terry Ridont: I think its cool. Thats what I like about indy rock artists, everything isn't the same high budget packaging and ...
- Stormy: Jon: The problem is that the progressive country music is now being called Americana. And why is it ...
- Razor X: Maybe his brother did talk him into it but what’s to say he hasn’t ‘always loved’ and ‘wanted’ to ...
- Brian: Josh Kelley will be fine. At the very least it means Katherine Heigl may show up on country award shows regularly. ...
- Razor X: Change may be inevitable but we aren't required to support it and if enough people boycott it, it doesn't last ...
- Jon: "You can’t stop “progress”… We can if we try hard enough. Um, no. Not that I think "progress" is a good ...
- Joe: When she moved from Mercury to BNA, I think we were all just allowed to think there'd be some grand ...
- sam sam: Well, Suzie, maybe if I saw his live show I'd love him. But I'm not interested in attending concerts. Radio ...
- JOHN: Personally Sherrie s voice is as pure as it gets to me. Just listened to her demo songs after reading ...
- Suzie: What is all this hate for Bucky about anyway?? He has one of the best voices in country music ...

Is Dave Haywood going solo? This and many other of country music's most pressing questions answered in the September edition of The 9513's world famous Mailbag!
Caroline Herring likes to sing songs about life in the South. No, not exactly like Justin Moore and Jason Aldean...
The 9513's resident historian Paul W. Dennis sits down for a chat with country music legend Gene Watson.
As much as we love girl singers, we love songs about girl singers even more. Here's just a few of the many tribute songs out there.
Step away from the river and up to a jukebox, because heartbreak is only temporary, but a good song about drowning yourself—like a diamond—lasts forever.
What do you think about music labels "testing the waters" with a single before providing access to an artist's entire album?
What country artist, young or old, would you recommend as a must-listen artist to a newcomer on his/her journey through country music, and what would your essential song picks be?


1 Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URI for this postOctober 7, 2009
[...] The 9513 calls the album typical for Strait ; My Kind Of Country thinks the cd worthy of the king [...]
109 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
August 11, 2009 at 10:48 am Permalink
I wouldn’t even come close to calling it mind blowing either, but I think it’s much better than his last album. Who’s been touting this album as mind blowing, anyway? “Arkansas Dave” is definitely one of the best songs on the album, though I had no idea anyone was calling that mind blowing either.
August 11, 2009 at 10:50 am Permalink
Have you been paying attention to the press releases?
August 11, 2009 at 10:51 am Permalink
Couldn’t agree more, Jim. It’s a great album, but Strait is always Mr. Consistent. I expect this kind of product from every Strait album. It didn’t blow my expectations out of the water, but it totally fulfilled them.
August 11, 2009 at 10:57 am Permalink
I think I just read one thing about how this album takes risks or something, but didn’t really expect it to be true. Press releases always embellish a bit, so I don’t take them especially seriously.
August 11, 2009 at 11:02 am Permalink
No, neither do I.
My overall sense is that there’s a great deal of hype surrounding this release–I’ve seen a lot of really positive language from a lot of people who I really respect–and it just didn’t do much for me. It’s a fine album, but really not much different than anything else he’s ever done.
August 11, 2009 at 11:10 am Permalink
Pierce’s last sentence describes how I feel about the album. I like it almost as much as It Just Comes Natural, which is my favorite recent Strait album.
August 11, 2009 at 11:17 am Permalink
Aside from the semi-knock on “Arkansas Dave,” I agree with the review that it’s pretty much consistent with his previous output. This one ranks below his last two releases for me, though. It’s kinda odd that he’s redefining and co-opting terms like “troubadour” and “twang” that don’t really fit him.
George Strait Will Blow Your Mind
August 11, 2009 at 11:30 am Permalink
I think this is my favorite Strait record since I’ve been reviewing them (i.e., since 2001). And “Arkansas Dave” is the bomb.
August 11, 2009 at 11:42 am Permalink
Since I was totally underwhelmed by his last album, bordering on disliking it in general, I definitely like this one better.
Okay, so I guess people have been saying this album is mind blowing after all. Ridiculous.
August 11, 2009 at 12:11 pm Permalink
Well this will be the 26th George Strait studio album in a row I’ve had no interest in purchasing.I’ve always considered George far more of a performer than an artist and his vocals just don’t convey much emotion as far as I’m concerned. Hearing George’s singles on radio was as much as I ever cared to hear. I can understand why he is so popular but he’s not my cup of tea. If I were buying an album this week my choice would be between The Hot Club of Cowtown and Wade Hayes and “Twang” wouldn’t even cross my mind. I bet Rodney Hayden’s “12 Ounce World” kicks the crap out “Twang” in terms of being a real country record…
August 11, 2009 at 12:19 pm Permalink
Certainly not “mind blowing” by any stretch, but still pretty good. And a pretty good George Strait album is still a hell of a lot better than most of what’s out there.
August 11, 2009 at 12:23 pm Permalink
So, Jim, was this review in direct response to the Ken Tucker article that Brody linked too (Brady’s link above) then?
August 11, 2009 at 12:23 pm Permalink
I also agree with much of what you said, Jim. Enjoyable, not revolutionary.
My only question is of you really think that El Rey isnt that much of a surprise? The subject matter aside, what am i missing that makes the choice by an anglo superstar to record a latin standard completely in spanish from being surprising? If he had recorded “Mi Linda Esposa”, would it have then been surprising, since its a love song and not an ode to his highness? Also, to my knowledge, he hasnt done this on other albums, so wouldnt that make this album a bit less predictable as a result?
August 11, 2009 at 12:31 pm Permalink
My review has nothing to do with Ken Tucker.
Kelly…he recorded a song that has a title which is his nickname. Think about that.
August 11, 2009 at 12:36 pm Permalink
But he repeatedly says in interviews that he thinks of George Jones as “King Jones”, as if he’s embarrassed that the nickname is applied to him. So, I wonder if he’d purposefully do a song to perpetuate that notion?
August 11, 2009 at 12:37 pm Permalink
Sorry. I meant “King George, not “King Jones.”
August 11, 2009 at 12:40 pm Permalink
It doesn’t matter. Like Kelly said, he could have recorded any one of a million other songs in Spanish. If he just wanted to record a song in Spanish, for the sake of recording a song in Spanish. But no–he picked probably the only well-known modern-era Spanish-language song that shares a title with the name essentially every country fan recognizes him by.
August 11, 2009 at 12:44 pm Permalink
I guess I just don’t find it quite so inflamatory.
I don’t mean this observation as anything more than an observation, but it almost seems like this album or positive comments regarding it made you angry (or at least annoyed), though I’m sure I’m just reading into it.
August 11, 2009 at 12:45 pm Permalink
So recording “El Ray” is an ego trip? Cause that’s what it seems like your insinuating Jim.
August 11, 2009 at 12:48 pm Permalink
Jim – I agree that the title or the song itself isnt surprising per se, but the choice to do the song in the manner in which he did surely is. Spanish language standards are hardly the norm in todays beging and overly-predictable Top 40 realm of Country…
August 11, 2009 at 12:51 pm Permalink
I don’t find it inflammatory at all. Read the review.
I didn’t call it an ego trip. Read the review.
But if I were insinuating something, it would be my hard-earned right to insinuate away. At least I’m not insinuating it’s some kind of fantastically profound artistic statement that no one could have possibly seen coming in a million years.
Come on. Listen to the record and tell me why this song fits on the album. There’s no musical connection to any of the rest of the material. And why did he pick this song? He was just feeling like celebrating Mexican machismo?
Maybe one of you sleuths can dig up the reason behind its inclusion. As for me, all I’m insinuating is that I don’t find it surprising. Which you can take away from reading the review.
August 11, 2009 at 12:58 pm Permalink
I couldnt tell you why it’s on there, thats exactly why its quite surprising to me. It’s nothing major, just the other songs make sense and are par for the course when compared to his prior releases (as you noted effectively in the review). I guess I just dont see that type of history with a song like El Rey. You asked me to tell you how it fits on the record. I cant say that it does, and again, thats why its surprising and was anything but predictable for me.
August 11, 2009 at 1:05 pm Permalink
The connection between the title of the song and Strait’s nickname may be obvious, but that doesn’t make it’s inclusion, especially being sung completely in Spanish, unsurprising. Furthermore, it doesn’t fit his humble public persona to go around calling himself “The King” or “King George,” which makes it an even more surprising venture. I’d say it’s completely out of left field.
August 11, 2009 at 1:09 pm Permalink
Ditto to Kelly.
As far as reading your review? I did.
“King George” is singing a song with a title that translates to “The King?” Tell me the obviousness of that doesn’t just smack you in the face while screaming, “Hey! I’m clever! Look at how clever I am!””
Your tone here suggested that you were pretty disgusted. At least that’s how I read it on “paper.” Perhaps I’d get a different sense if you were saying it to me directly.
August 11, 2009 at 1:11 pm Permalink
I’ll cede that including a Spanish language song in general is surprising, but I think it’s a whole lot LESS surprising when the Spanish language song you choose happens to have a direct tie to something about your career.
August 11, 2009 at 1:12 pm Permalink
Brady better said what I was trying to say in my comment at 12:36.
August 11, 2009 at 1:13 pm Permalink
Jim,
What Leeann wrote about about the tone is what I meant by ‘insinuating the song is an ego trip.’
I did read your review and then the comments, which directly resulted in my comment.
August 11, 2009 at 1:14 pm Permalink
that should be “wrote above about the tone…” not “about about”
August 11, 2009 at 1:19 pm Permalink
It’s like if I recorded a song with a title that translates to “The Critic.”
People sing music in other languages all the time. And there are a lot of country singers–many of whom some of you have pointed out in recent threads–who have sang songs in Spanish.
It would have been a much more surprising statement to release a Spanish-language song for the sake of releasing one, and I cannot presume that he would have done that when the link between this title and his nickname is so comically obvious.
August 11, 2009 at 1:21 pm Permalink
So, is “The King of Broken Hearts” too predictable then?:)
August 11, 2009 at 1:23 pm Permalink
Yes, Leeann. Yes it is :)
August 11, 2009 at 1:42 pm Permalink
I would have to say that his album is better than Troubador. I think TWANG is on of the best albums he’s cut in the past ten years. Although they all been great to me.
Some say this is normal for George, that he always puts out a good album and this one isn’t mind blowing, well that is ok to have that opinion. What i don’t like about this review is, the writer seems upset that the King of Country music put out another great album. George has been singing for almost over 30 years and putting out GRAIT albums since the beginning. We should be happy as________- that we have an artist in country that can still make almost complete great albums year after year, and yes he puts one out almost every year or a year and a half. I love george and i hope he continues to do what he does……for those of you that don’t love what he does don’t have the heart for country. Look around, how much more pop country(t. swift) are we going to have to deal with? i say LONG LIVE THE KING! And he WILL!
KEEP TWANGING YALL!
August 11, 2009 at 2:05 pm Permalink
“those of you that don’t love what he does don’t have the heart for country.”
Not true.
August 11, 2009 at 2:29 pm Permalink
I actually found this album to be a bit of a departure for him. None of the tracks felt like “filler” to me at all. They all seemed well-written and -sung, even if “The Breath You Take” is borderline motivational-poster song.
I accept your review, Jim, even if it seemed a little snarky. (Snark seems to be your muse.) I’m not gonna shoot you down for disagreeing with me, but I’m a bit surprised at what you said just the same. That, and I certainly don’t want to start a 9513-Roughstock rivalry (I wrote the Roughstock review).
August 11, 2009 at 2:46 pm Permalink
JIM / LEANN ….. From the Strait link above: Brown was so taken with the track that he suggested Strait call the album “El Rey.” Strait disagreed. “I can call myself a troubadour,” he told Brown, “but I can’t call myself ‘the King’.”
August 11, 2009 at 2:48 pm Permalink
I just don’t understand the uptempo rock-ish crap. “Twang”, “Same Kind Of Crazy”, and “Hot Grease And Zydeco” just seem like album filler fluff, and I really don’t expect that from such a legend. Thankfully there are some high points though, such as “Arkansas Dave” like everyone else has been mentioning, “Where Have I Been All My Life?”, “Beautiful Day For Goodbye”, and “The Breath You Take”. The other ones are also for the most part pretty solid songs you’d expect Strait to take on. Except for “El Rey”… definitely put me in the bunch that doesn’t find this neat or cool or talented or whatever… it’s just dumb nonsense for a country album.
August 11, 2009 at 2:52 pm Permalink
Well I love the album, and all I see and hear are 13 great songs that I will be listening to for a long time. Dont really care to compare to past work because it’s all good to me. I like the fact that I can year after year come to rely on George’s music like an old pair of shoes. When I buy his record, I know what I am going to get, and I’m not going to be disappointed. Why change now when you’ve been on a roll for almost 30 years.
August 11, 2009 at 2:57 pm Permalink
I actually like “Twang.” “Same Kind of Crazy” was also recorded by Patty Loveless, but Strait’s version is better.
August 11, 2009 at 3:57 pm Permalink
Those who don’t understand El Rey have to understand that George comes from South Texas… He grew up around Tejano and Mariachi music, I see his performance of this song as a bit of an acknowledgement of his roots which in this part of the country has country playing parallel with Spanish music.
August 11, 2009 at 4:24 pm Permalink
I’ve only listened to the album up to “Arkansas Dave”, so I can only speak for those songs, but I like what I’ve heard so far. It isn’t mind blowing by any means, but I feel like its a step above Troubadour, but perhaps a step below It Just Comes Natural, as far as quality goes.
As far as “El Rey” goes, I wasn’t in the room when the decision to include it was made, so I would feel uncomfortable speaking to that. I like the way the Spanish language sounds, so I’ll probably like the song, if at least as a novelty kind of thing.
August 11, 2009 at 5:37 pm Permalink
Really Leeann? I much prefer Patty’s version of “Same Kind Of Crazy”- I like her phrasing a whole lot better, as well as the production and her voice too.
Anyway, I do like this album, except “Easy As You Go” which sounded grammatically nonsensical and awkward to me. “El Rey” was also blah, it didn’t sound interesting enough to me.
I really like “Arkansas Dave” though.
August 11, 2009 at 5:52 pm Permalink
Jason and Highwayman- you’re hardcore George Strait fans, obviously. That’s great. I loved George – but not very far past #7. If you’re a hardcore George Strait fan, I know that it sounds awful, and I do apologize.
That’s the beauty of hardcore fans – they keep loving an artist because they love the artist.
George just got more mainstream (although he’s always been more “country” than the mainstream) than I could handle. No disrespect to George – he’s arguably one of the most influential country artists of our time.
I haven’t listened to any albums of his since “If You Ain’t Lovin, You Ain’t Livin” – I’d hear a single of his on the radio and it just didn’t make me want to hear more.
I just miss the traditionalist movement of the 80s. And George back then was amazing.
August 11, 2009 at 6:34 pm Permalink
To me, George Strait is the king of “very good”. Almost none of his songs are great, and none are terrible. Every one of his albums rates between a B- and a B+.
George has recorded some songs worth an A but those mostly don’t get released as singles. I purchased this album this morning and have listened to it twice through – it’s another solid B to B+ – just like the rest of his albums
August 11, 2009 at 6:46 pm Permalink
“And it will be difficult to argue that those awards aren’t warranted.”
Funny to read this in a review devoted mostly to doing just that.
I’m also curious as to when taking risks became a relevant criterion by which to evaluate country records.
August 11, 2009 at 7:27 pm Permalink
Chris,
I actually like “Same Kind of Crazy” on this album, but kind of cringe when I hear Patty do it. I think she sounds a bit off key there.
August 11, 2009 at 11:11 pm Permalink
If’s he has the same backing band since ‘92, then why can’t he make another album like “Easy Come, Easy Go”?
August 12, 2009 at 1:27 am Permalink
Paul, I consider George the king of pleasantness, competency, and complacency in mainstream country music. His music has always struck me as really “nice” but rarely if ever involving on any level. George has a real ear for picking fine songs and giving them a fine vocal treatment on fine albums that bore me to tears. I had the same problem with Alabama’s music. Most of the highly successful mass market mainstream country music lacks enough uniqueness to make it interesting to me, and I consider George a poster boy in that regard…
August 12, 2009 at 8:48 am Permalink
What is wrong with you people? All Im reading is mind blowing and revolutionary, etc. George is none of that. And his fans dont expect that from him. He puts out the same consistant music every single album and look where it has gotten him. 30 years in the business some would dream of. Let others be revolutionary. Cause those others are the ones who’s popularity have taken a turn for the worst. Twang is country music. You want revolutionary? At least George still has the guts to still put the fiddle and steal guitar in his music. I see this website is for what country music has become. Candy Country for little girls. Go listen to your crappy Taylor Swift.
August 12, 2009 at 8:57 am Permalink
Funny to read this in a review devoted mostly to doing just that.
No, I think they’ll be warranted. And I think it’s pretty clear that my review says as much. But I’ll look forward to reading your review, which I’m certain will be published in a very widely read paper or magazine somewhere.
I’m also curious as to when taking risks became a relevant criterion by which to evaluate country records.
1998.
August 12, 2009 at 10:52 am Permalink
seriously?? George is George and that is why fans flock to his concerts and buy his every CD. It is a great album. If you prefer the new less country stuff and the less talented artists… go for it. But DO NOT put down the king of country!!
August 12, 2009 at 11:11 am Permalink
“I’m also curious as to when taking risks became a relevant criterion by which to evaluate country records.”
It’s not necessarily, but man does it get boring listening to the same record over and over. That’s why I dread getting bluegrass albums lately.
August 12, 2009 at 11:30 am Permalink
Chris N., Me too. Bluegrass DOES sound like the same record over and over. But I don’t think George Strait albums do.
August 12, 2009 at 12:11 pm Permalink
What’s different and exciting to many is that there are songs written by him and his son. It might be the usual mix of songs, but in an era of electric guitars and bubble-gum country, George has put out another album of real country love songs, life messages and foot-stomping music that has made him El Rey de musica country.
August 12, 2009 at 12:32 pm Permalink
No, I think they’ll be warranted. And I think it’s pretty clear that my review says as much. “But I’ll look forward to reading your review, which I’m certain will be published in a very widely read paper or magazine somewhere.
But I’ll look forward to reading your review, which I’m certain will be published in a very widely read paper or magazine somewhere.”
Ah. This sounds too much like the reverse of “What right do you have to criticize a song when you haven’t written a hit song” argument that’s never worked for me.
August 12, 2009 at 12:33 pm Permalink
Oops, I just meant to quote this part of Jim’s comment:
“But I’ll look forward to reading your review, which I’m certain will be published in a very widely read paper or magazine somewhere.”
August 12, 2009 at 12:36 pm Permalink
The difference, of course, Leeann is that we all know Jon is capable of writing good reviews, and that he has written good reviews in the past.
Snarky, perhaps, but I’d actually like to read his review.
August 12, 2009 at 12:39 pm Permalink
Oh, I’m sorry! I’m really slow today! For some reason, I thought you were responding to the comment above yours, not Jon.
August 12, 2009 at 12:44 pm Permalink
I’m slow today, too. It’s been one of those weeks. Are we in a full moon or something?
August 12, 2009 at 1:16 pm Permalink
About bluegrass. Country music will always be my number one, but there are honestly some days when I feel I could drop country music and only listen to bluegrass for the rest of my life. I’m not even close to being well schooled in that area, but there’s just something about it that catches me in a way that country music doesn’t always manage to do.
August 12, 2009 at 5:01 pm Permalink
I like this album, I think its one of his better ones in the last decade. Some say that he isn’t pushing his limits as much as some say he is. However, I think its fair to say for Strait he is pushing his limits, especially when you consider he is even writing some of the material on this album.
August 12, 2009 at 5:36 pm Permalink
first off all you people that are putting down this record obviously dont know real country music at it’s best. It amazes me how dumb people are they consider keith urban,racal flatts, and carrie underwood country Ha my ass. George Strait makes the best albums and best songs every year thats why the man is in the hall of fame. I thought this album was the best he has come out with to date and that is saying alot for a guy who has more number albums and hit’s than anyone else in country music history.
August 12, 2009 at 7:03 pm Permalink
Is this better than “It Just Comes Natural?”. Now that was a tight album!
August 12, 2009 at 7:07 pm Permalink
Mind blowing? No. But, it is pleasantly surprising. From the 3 co-writing credits, to the excellent outlaw narrative, “Arkansas Dave,” to the full-on Mariachi, Twang is easily Strait’s best artistic effort to date.
If it be because Strait was away from the superficial confines of Nashville, the ocean air in the Keys, or coming to terms with his legacy, Strait has never sounded more confident and in control.
I feel Twang is a transitional album – transforming Strait from commercial monopoly, to county music preservationist and re-defining pioneer (hopefully).
August 12, 2009 at 8:10 pm Permalink
“‘Funny to read this in a review devoted mostly to doing just that.’
No, I think they’ll be warranted. And I think it’s pretty clear that my review says as much.”
Well, I disagree that that’s clear, at least to me. If an album’s full of “boring repetition” with only a few excellent cuts and a lot of forgettable filler, why does it warrant awards?
“But I’ll look forward to reading your review, which I’m certain will be published in a very widely read paper or magazine somewhere.”
I’m not surprised that it’s escaped your attention – I certainly wouldn’t expect anyone to be keeping a watchful eye on my career – but in fact, I haven’t written a review of anything at all since No Depression folded its print edition, and I hadn’t written more than a handful of reviews going back several years before that. I’m mostly out of the journalism bidness these days, so I hope you weren’t looking forward to that too much.
Chris N., if you’re hearing the same record over and over again in the bluegrass releases you’re getting, maybe you’re listening for the wrong things – i.e., maybe too much for concept and not enough for execution. Oddly enough, I think roots music genres bear a kind of curious similarity to classical music in that regard – and yes, I know that may be too compressed an argument to be comprehensible, but it’s all I have time for now ;-).
August 12, 2009 at 8:41 pm Permalink
Jon, I think you should write album reviews for The 9513 just to show Jim Malec how to do it right! (lol) Bluegrass could be your specialty so that Juli Thanki can concentrate on Americana artists like say The Belleville Outfit, Kendel Carson, and Amanda Shires for example! (lol)
Jon, I’m still waiting for your take on The Lovell Sisters and an album review of “Time To Grow” would be appreciated! (Hey, nothing ventured, nothing gained…)
August 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm Permalink
What a bunch of fools. There is several possible #1 hits on this CD, including: Where Have I Been All My Life, Easy As You Go, Living For The Night, and The Breath You Take.
“Twang” will win several album of the year awards, and rightfully so. As far as stretching his boundaries, “El Rey” and “Hot Grease and Zydeco” certainly do that.
I will take the consistency of George Strait any day over the crap that Kenny Chesney and Rascal Flatts are feeding the blind sheep out their.
You guys keep the “fun in the sun, let’s have a beach party” songs. I’ll keep real country music from one of the few who know how to do it well: King George.
August 12, 2009 at 9:27 pm Permalink
I’m with highwayman on this one. For me, George’s consistency in both his sound and song selection are a part of his charm. I love the fact that his style hasn’t really changed in over 15 years and that he still manages to make it sound fresh today. I can honestly say that I’ve never disliked any George Strait album and this one is no exception. Yes, he has released a few songs I don’t care for (”River Of Love”), but overall, I rank him as one of my top male vocalists of all time. I may sound like a diehard fan, but it’s the truth.
August 12, 2009 at 10:22 pm Permalink
I’d like to see ‘The King of Broken Hearts: A Tribute to Jim Lauderdale’, where instead of cutting two Jim Lauderdale tracks, every track on the record is a Jim Lauderdale tune. It could include new songs and songs King George never cut but were recorded by other artists like You Don’t Seem To Miss Me or Whisper. Actually now that I think about it: George Strait and Jamey Johnson sing Doin’ Time In Bakersfield. Can you hear it now? Playing honky tonk sonatas in a room without a view…
August 12, 2009 at 10:39 pm Permalink
Is it just me, or does it seem odd that anytime a commenter doesn’t like a review here, he or she naturally assumes the writer must prefer Swift, Chesney, Flatts, etc.?
August 12, 2009 at 11:09 pm Permalink
No, it seems perfectly sane and logical to make those conclusions.
August 12, 2009 at 11:17 pm Permalink
Expertly recorded, Twang is an annoyingly decent album that will win at least a couple of album of the year trophies, and may sweep the three major awards shows in that category.
Why does it annoy you that the album is decent?
August 13, 2009 at 8:41 am Permalink
Why does it annoy you that the album is decent?
I called it “annoyingly decent” because an album recreated for the 26th time shouldn’t be good the 26th time around. But it is, and that’s a credit to Strait.
August 13, 2009 at 9:33 am Permalink
Actually, I found this to be a more eclectic mix than he usually offers up. I don’t understand why people always seem to divide into two camps where Strait is concerned: those who claim that he’s become too mainstream and those who claim that he’s just doing the same music over and over again. Both can’t be correct.
Where are the Mexican folk songs on the previous 25 albums? I can’t believe I’ve missed them all. How is this album a recreation of Right or Wrong , Does Fort Worth Ever Cross Your Mind , #7, Holding My Own or the Pure Country soundtrack? Are you seriously suggesting that all of these albums are completely interchangeable? And why do I get the feeling that a radical change in musical direction would result in accusations that Strait has “lost touch with his roots”?
I don’t consider myself a Stait superfan by any means, but I have enjoyed most of his work with very few exceptions. He is one of the very few mainstream artists still worth listening to. I think he deserves more credit than you’re giving him.
August 13, 2009 at 9:44 am Permalink
26 recreations is an exaggeration. But if you don’t see the similarities between the composition and construction of every Strait album since Pure Country, then I don’t think you’re looking very closely.
And this is exactly why I commented on the inclusion of “El Rey” in the first place–including one Mexican folk song doesn’t suddenly transform an otherwise typical effort into something profound or unique. It’s a George Strait album with a Mexican folk song.
August 13, 2009 at 9:55 am Permalink
There are similarities to be sure but I don’t think they’re as extensive as you’re suggesting. I thought Somewhere Down In Texas was a much better album than It Just Comes Natural . I don’t think they’re that similar to each other, or to Troubadour , for example, which is less traditional than most of his earlier work.
If I had to rank his discography, I’d rank his 80s albums higher than most of his recent ones, but I’ve enjoyed them all to one extent or another. With all the sub-par music that’s coming out of Nashville these days I don’t understand why everyone’s always so quick to criticize the one guy who’s never put out a bad album in nearly 30 years.
August 13, 2009 at 6:21 pm Permalink
This is the first time I’ve ever read a
review by you. I do know this much. The
most irrelevant comment was the Garth
Brooks line. Brooks doesn’t even belong in
the same category as Strait. It’s like
comparing your work to Chet Flippo. You
don’t belong in the same sentence with a
legend like Flippo. The other irrelevant
comment in your review was how “Twang”
would be irrelevant a year from now. This
is Strait’s best album ever and will go
down as such. There is more variety on
this relsease and his venture back into
songwriting deserves at least a mention
by you. How do you not even make note of
it? Unbelievable! As far as your review,
forgettable as far as I’m concerned. I would
be surprised if Strait even enjoys the
nickname “King George.” He probably looks
at it the same way Elvis did. Elvis hated
being called the “King.” Trying to tie
“El Rey” to Strait being nicknamed “King
George” is quite a stretch on your part.
And finally, produce the quote from Strait
saying anything about this release being
“mind-blowing.” I watched the entire Strait
interview on the MCA website about “Twang”
and didn’t see anything close to that. He
was as humble as he’s always been.
August 13, 2009 at 6:57 pm Permalink
Woah. Funky formatting Packman.
August 14, 2009 at 3:57 am Permalink
“26 recreations is an exaggeration. But if you don’t see the similarities between the composition and construction of every Strait album since Pure Country, then I don’t think you’re looking very closely.”
Yet to be answered is the question of why this is a bad thing, unless you believe that songs and performances are pretty much fungible – and therefore not really very interesting in and of themselves – so that albums have to be different in composition and construction in order to be truly meritorious. And in my opinion, such a belief runs counter to aesthetic (sorry) values that are pretty much intrinsic to country music.
August 14, 2009 at 8:47 am Permalink
Yet to be answered is the question of why this is a bad thing,
Yet to be answered is why you think that just because I happen to be writing for an online publication I am required to answer every question posed about one of my reviews.
Just because I recognize the fungible nature of similar songs and performances doesn’t mean that I have to be willing to write-off the fact that the genre as a whole shares certain aesthetic values that will, most of the time, render music that falls within a limited (but variable) framework.
In the context of George Strait, I do believe that the songs he’s released since 1993 are more or less fungible. That’s both a good thing and a bad thing, and had I been writing my review from a purely scholastic standpoint I would have omitted subjective terms such as “annoyingly decent” in order objectively reflect the level of technical achievement displayed on Twang.
I would have omitted these subjective statements, in that instance, because the fact that Strait has been able to produce a consistent, essentially high-quality product for years on end speaks highly to his talent and his musical sensibilities.
But a review is not a piece of journalism in the strictest sense nor is it a piece of scholarship. And I do believe, as I pointed out in this review, that it’s a bad thing when an artist’s music becomes stagnant–regardless of the level of quality of the music in question.
The reason, of course, if because once you’ve seen 26 pictures of fruit baskets, you’re going to start looking for–and rightfully expecting–variations. An artist who draws essentially the same fruit basket over and over may in fact be creating art that people will enjoy by hanging on their walls, but there is little creative exploration involved in replicating the same thing over and over. And when there is little creative exploration involved in production, the product is more a craft than a piece of art.
I believe–and it is wholly personal opinion–that Strait is essentially drawing pictures of fruit baskets. Of course there are various differences between the pictures he draws, but, in my opinion, not enough to make them interesting in the context of his body of work. They are perfectly fine fruit baskets, and I most certainly couldn’t draw one. But they are still fruit baskets. They all contain grapes, bananas and apples. The fact that he chose here to add in a pear doesn’t fundamentally change the whole picture. It’s the same picture he always draws–just with a pear.
You could say that make it not the same picture at all. Obviously that’s technically right. But from an artistic standpoint, the inclusion of the pear hasn’t altered the central point or theme of the work. At least not in the educated, experienced and well-informed opinion of this commentator.
That does not mean, however, that I think every country album must be absolutely unique in order to be considered meritorious.
August 14, 2009 at 9:32 am Permalink
Does it not seem contradictory to you to simultaneously argue that an album is stagnant yet decent? To be sure, there have been times when Strait could have shaken things up a bit more, but I think there was an effort to do so this time, which you seem to be overlooking.
To be sure, there are artists that become stagnant and offer recycled product, but they tend to crash and burn rather quickly. It’s not possible to sustain a career that is stagnant for nearly 30 years.
August 14, 2009 at 9:38 am Permalink
It does not seem contradictory to me, because the product is very, very good. It just doesn’t change much.
I disagree with you that it’s “not possible to sustain a career that is stagnant.” Sure it is, if you continue to deliver high-quality product.
“but I think there was an effort to do so this time, which you seem to be overlooking.”
If there was an effort, I think that effort was unsuccessful. More than that, however, I think there’s a perception that there was an effort. Which is why I keep going back to inclusion of “El Rey” (which I recognized as a masterful performance) and “Arkansas Dave.” Yes, they are different than what he normally cuts, but they don’t fundamentally change the album as a whole. I would urge you to really consider that–to really listen and ask yourself whether there is any continuity between those tracks and the album. The inclusion of those tracks create an aura of creative exploration and appear to shake things up, but do they really? Do they actually change the whole in a significant way?
August 14, 2009 at 9:48 am Permalink
You’re full of crap. George’s consistency is what makes him the incredible artist that he is. And seeing as how I have every one of George’s albums and know every song by heart, I consider myself somewhat of a ‘George Strait buff’ and proudly say that Twang is one of my favorite albums that George has ever made.
August 14, 2009 at 9:56 am Permalink
I think there are differences between this album and his previous ones, aside from “Arkansas Dave” and “El Rey”. He seems to be going for a more contemporary, middle-of-the-road sound on some tracks, such as “Living For The Night” and “The Breath You Take” — probably to ensure that he remains popular with country radio. “Same Kind of Crazy” isn’t the type of song usually associated with Strait and “Hot Grease and Zydeco” is a bit of a stretch for him as well, though I’m not terribly impressed with the latter. Other tracks like “Out of Sight, Out of Mind” and “He’s Got That Something Special” are vintage Strait. All in all, I think this is a pretty eclectic mix.
August 14, 2009 at 10:03 am Permalink
You’re welcome to that opinion. I disagree with you, obviously, and would urge you to go back and re-listen to those post 1993 albums. But of course we don’t have to agree on this.
August 14, 2009 at 10:19 am Permalink
I dunno, “You’re full of crap” is a pretty persuasive argument.
August 14, 2009 at 10:25 am Permalink
I think, despite what any of us think, from a commercial standpoint, the mans got it figured out. At the end of the day, I think its pretty obvious that George Strait, at this point at least, is in it for the sole purpose that its his job. In my opinion, he’s never struck me as someone that needs to make music. He talks often about how he wont pick up a guitar once between tours and if he’s not recording an album.
I know i’ve mentioned this before, but I’ll mention it again: I don’t know when being artistically profound was a requirement. Music is a business. The key for a lot of artists is to find enough new to keep people interested, but enough of the same to not spook anyone. Yes, he probably could have recorded an album that had a lot more variation than Twang does. He could have stretched his artistic legs a little more. But then again, why don’t we ask Chris Gaines how well a move like that can work out.
August 14, 2009 at 10:36 am Permalink
COME ON!! Let’s not start another Chris Gaines discussion, please!
August 14, 2009 at 10:37 am Permalink
Point taken–but if critics didn’t examine the artistic profoundness of an album there would be little reason to review an album. Does anyone really want me to write a review detailing whether or not an album will sell a lot of records? I could go through, point-by-point, based on my music business education and industry experience, and make what would most likely be a relatively accurate prediction.
But what would be the point of that? I might as well go get a job at a label.
I don’t think readers read reviews to help them make buying decisions. I think readers read reviews because they want to have a deeper understanding or familiarity with the music in question. Perhaps a wonderful review can influence some minds, but our main value to the musical community is being a source of well-informed, thoughtful commentary that inspires people to think, discuss, argue and explore.
August 14, 2009 at 10:37 am Permalink
I’m not wanting to start another Chris Gaines discussion, I’m just saying there’s commercial danger in stretching that creative muscle too far.
August 14, 2009 at 10:39 am Permalink
“I’m just saying there’s commercial danger in stretching that creative muscle too far.”
There can be, and I think this is especially true in country music. The core country audience has never impressed me as being especially interested in creative exploration, and I honestly think that’s something artists struggle with. Some of these guys which they could be stretching their creative muscles, but they can’t. Even Rucker is an example of this–the guy turned in an album of stuff that was “too country.”
August 14, 2009 at 2:46 pm Permalink
Jim, given your metaphor, would you say that Strait is Cézanne-like in his consistency? I mean, I think that’s what you’re saying, but you leave me with the suspicion that you’re actually comparing him to someone from one of those Starving Artist Showroom places.
August 14, 2009 at 5:48 pm Permalink
“‘Yet to be answered is why you think that just because I happen to be writing for an online publication I am required to answer every question posed about one of my reviews.”
I don’t think that. I made a simple statement of fact: the question I raised hadn’t been answered. Although the fact that you’re resposnsible for about 1/5 of all the comments made about this review suggests to me that you might answer a reasonably framed and apposite question; you’re not exactly taking a hands-off position here.
“Just because I recognize the fungible nature of similar songs and performances…”
Well, um, the point is that whether and to what extent songs and performances are similar is, in at least some respects, a matter of perspective. There are certainly plenty of listeners – some of them have weighed in on the topic already – for whom these songs and performances of Strait’s are sufficiently distinguishable from others.
“The reason, of course, if because once you’ve seen 26 pictures of fruit baskets, you’re going to start looking for–and rightfully expecting–variations. An artist who draws essentially the same fruit basket over and over may in fact be creating art that people will enjoy by hanging on their walls, but there is little creative exploration involved in replicating the same thing over and over. And when there is little creative exploration involved in production, the product is more a craft than a piece of art.”
Well, that’s one way to look at it (though why you should need to resort to analogies is a little mysterious; can’t you talk about music as music?). But it’s not the only way to look at it, and in fact – to stick with your painting analogy – it may simply be that you’re looking at the pictures from too far away, or not taking enough time to look at them, like a guy who walks into an exhibit of abstract art and walks out five minutes later saying “they all look the same.” Or, returning to music, like the guy who says “I’ve got one recording of Beethoven’s Fifth, and since all of them have the same notes, why would I want more than one?” Those guys are certainly entitled to their opinions, but I don’t know that I would describe them as educated, experience and well-informed. Even if they would.
As for the distinction between craft and art, let me suggest that to the extent that it exists, it resides someplace other than in the degree of creative “exploration” – which is used here as a covert synonym for “doing something obviously, unmistakably different than what you’ve done before” – that A Critic discerns in a piece of work.
August 14, 2009 at 8:35 pm Permalink
George is my number one artist of all time, and today I just bought his album (just got paid today, was broke all week until then lol).
Just did a full listen. Overall, I’m disappointed. There are no terrible songs on the album, just a fair amount of boring, mediocre, filler-ish tunes on it. The best tracks are the title track, “Arkansas Dave”, “El Rey”, and “Out of Sight, Out of Mind”. “The Breath You Take” is good, but not quite there and I like the current single, but it’s not the best.
Surprisingly, I much enjoy Troubadour to this. Much more exciting IMO. This album will be on my iPod but I don’t see much hope of me listening to a whole lot. At least I have Jack Ingram, Patty Loveless, and David Nail’s albums to look forward to!
August 15, 2009 at 2:58 pm Permalink
Forgot to add “Living For The Night” to my original post about the keepers of the album… I always forget about the pre-album release singles when looking at albums in my iTunes since they were added earlier.
After quite a few more listens, I’m going to go with “Beautiful Day For Goodbye” as my favorite so far. Simple yet strong, and a flawless delivery.
August 15, 2009 at 3:16 pm Permalink
“I always forget about the pre-album release singles when looking at albums in my iTunes since they were added earlier.”
Edit your tags so all the tracks get sorted together under the same album title.
I noticed last night that Twang was the #1 album in the iTunes Store — that’s #1 overall, not just country sales. So much for the notion that country fans don’t buy digital downloads.
August 15, 2009 at 5:47 pm Permalink
How I miss the George Strait of the 80’s and early 90’s.
August 16, 2009 at 8:36 pm Permalink
I’ve now listened to this cd a few times and I’m still not overly impressed with this one.
August 17, 2009 at 12:00 pm Permalink
That’s a pretty bold statement to make about El Ray in suggesting George did it on an ego trip. This is not George’s style of marketing. Have you even read the lyrics to El Ray? The word king is used in one line in the chorus though it is repeated. it refers to a man who has separated from his lover and no one understands him but in his mind he is still king. It is a lot like “The King of Broken Hearts” and fits with his style of lyrics yet you want to seize it because of the title and make yourself look smart. Perhaps you should then speculate that when he recorded “Marina Del Ray” that he was foretelling or suggesting what his title would some day be!
August 17, 2009 at 9:21 pm Permalink
I think the song “Marina Del Ray” is about leaving your love in a California town by the same name.
not sure what the song “El Rey” is about. I would have to hear it sung in English to really get the meaning. I’ve read the lyrics but just can’t get the feeling.
August 17, 2009 at 9:39 pm Permalink
Sigh.
Songlations anyone? http://community.livejournal.com/songlations/23736.html
Yo sé bien que estoy afuera
Pero el día que yo me muera
Sé que tendrás que llorar
(Llorar y llorar, x2)
I am fully aware that I am out
But the day that I die
I know that you will have to cry
(Cry and cry, x2)
Dirás que no me quisiste
Pero vas a estar muy triste
Y así te vas a quedar
You will say that you did not love me
But you will be very sad
And that is how you will stay
Chorus:
————————————-
Con dinero y sin dinero
Hago siempre lo que quiero
Y mi palabra es la ley
With money and without money
I always do what I want
And my word is law
No tengo trono ni reina
Ni nadie que me comprenda
Pero sigo siendo el rey
I have no throne nor queen
Nor anyone who understands me
But I continue being king
————————————-
Una piedra en el camino
Me enseño que mi destino
Era rodar y rodar
(Rodar y rodar, x2)
A stone on the road
Taught me that my destiny
Was to roll and roll [*rodar = to roll; to roam]
(To roll and roll, x2)
Después me dijo un arriero
Que no hay que llegar primero
Pero hay que saber llegar
Afterwards an arriero told me
That one need not make it first [*llegar = to make it, to arrive]
But one must know how to make it
[Chorus]
Or else there is always http://babelfish.yahoo.com Bablefish
It can traslate from and to a great many languages. Now can we all untwist our knickers about the song being in Spanish?
August 20, 2009 at 12:58 am Permalink
The only thing that I have to say is, who ever said that consistancy is not a desired trait in country music today? Sure, all these “one hit wonders” have the potential to leave listeners with a song stuck in their head all day, but two weeks later, it’s all forgotten.
George Strait has produced steady country music for 30 years, a magnificent feat in any career, especially the entertainment business. It amazes me that this artist, who has “no surprises” up his sleeve still draws sell out crowds 30 years from where he started. When you buy a Strait album, you know what to expect. “No smoke, no lights, just me and my guitar. You think anybody would buy that?” Well George, I say yes.
For a man to produce this “old style” country and still be able to compete with today’s style of pop country, I believe that’s something worth giving credit to. This album is nothing but Strait music, and I think this is just what die hard Strait fans are ready for. I tip my hat to Mr. Strait for giving us the music to tap your foot to and I am thankful there is still an artist out there who influences many people to be who they really are.
August 22, 2009 at 12:29 am Permalink
I read most reviews on here and the reviewer and others on here just over analyze every lyric and song and sometimes you just need to like a record because you like it instead of disecting it. To me a reviewer’s opinion is no better than anyone else’s. Everyone hs they likes and dislikes and opinions.
August 25, 2009 at 9:54 am Permalink
Twang deserves to be #1 CD. George may be consistent but he still is the best. Also, I applaud his songwriting skills as well as his son’s Bubba. Dean Dillon is perhaps one of the best songwriters there is. “The Breath You Take” takes my breath away.
You go, George!!!!!
August 25, 2009 at 2:09 pm Permalink
rodney,
I do know what real country music is and I don’t hear very much of it on this effort. I’ve been a fan of Strait’s since the mid 80’s. Over the last decade and a half I’ve been disappointed in his music more often than not.
August 25, 2009 at 4:01 pm Permalink
Rick,
I agree with Rodney Hayden’s 12 oz world being more country than Twang is. I remember when Strait recorded cds like that and I sure miss them.
October 3, 2009 at 6:11 pm Permalink
This review is nothing but the ranting of a jealous never-was want to-be country singer trashing on someone who is popular for the sake of publicity, and that is blatantly obvious.
The author acknowledges that one of the best qualities George Strait offers to the music industry is his ability to remain relevant and consistent, but then turns to say that consistency is boring. This argument should make anyone interested in music a bit suspicious of this particular reviewer. Of course what could be more logical than to reject years of conventional wisdom proving that consistency, when done right, is a valuable asset to any musician.
Then to ad insult to his review he is willing to assert that George Strait is some sort of egocentric freak using the title of the song ‘El Rey’ to suggest that he is King; and everybody has been dumb enough to believe that he is actually a modest, humble singer and rancher. That is an insult not only to a beloved country music icon, but also to generations of fans.
The writer then proceeds to create a glorious straw man fallacy by suggesting that anyone is proclaiming the album to be mind blowing. The CD isn’t ‘hyped’ at all to my knowledge. The only thing I’d heard said about it were the date it went on sale and that it looked like it would be another great album from George Strait. That’s an accurate description.
The industry is full of creeps like this who write only trash to draw attention because they themselves could not be successful at doing the job they are so quick to criticize the next guy for doing, and then accept money to do it. I hope that the credibility of this writer is viewed by the public as being completely shot, and he will be dismissed from his post as ‘professional reviewer’, an occupation becoming more and more out dated with the times, as now anyone who has heard a piece of an artists work can quickly and easily share their opinions over the internet for free.
With that out of the way I would like to speak about the music itself so that people with an interest in potentially buying the CD can make an informed decision about the album. In my personal opinion, the album is a good piece of work by a great singer. It offers a wide variety of songs with a few songs of reflection, a few chart-worthy country radio songs, and some fun, up-beat swinging songs. In one of the few points, if not the only one, that I can agree with the writer about is “If you liked the last one, you’ll like this one” because George is just as can be expected, great. “[It] is a typical George Strait album, ripe with a few excellent cuts.” (In case you read only my comment I would like to make it clear that I give the reviewer more credit than is deserved with that quote as I left out his remark about the most of it being filler.)
Weather you’re a long time fan or a newcomer to the world of country music I believe that you will find the album to be a very enjoyable work that does range in emotion, and offers a feel of what country music should be. If you don’t believe me, all of the tracks are available on the internet to be heard or you can get a copy for yourself.
P.S. If the proprietors of this website or any other would like to throw their money away to have someone with no experience criticizing other people’s work, you can see that I am available and have a knack for criticizing, so call me and I’ll do it for half the price.
October 3, 2009 at 8:00 pm Permalink
After reading the other comments I would like to say that I agree with only about four other people on here, especially, Razor and David Allen. A critics opinion IS no better than anyone elses.
And to be clear I am not the same Jay who commented on August 11, 2009 at 3:57 pm.
Like I said if anyone wants to throw their money away on cheap critics call me, cause I can be as good as any ‘professional critic’.
October 5, 2009 at 12:28 pm Permalink
George Strait’s new album Twang is the bomb!!!! I absolutely LOVE it, even the last song on the album, El Rey. Yes, its a little different from the other stuff he’s done but that dont matter cause its great. After listening to CD after CD its nice to hear something a little different. But it don’t matter what kind of song he sings. . . He’s still the KING and always will be!!!!
October 27, 2009 at 6:24 pm Permalink
Has anyone even seen the lyrics in english, has nothing to do with being “the king” its about being the king of your own world, and every man is a king in his own world, it has nothing to do with being proud or humble.
I am fully aware that I am out
But the day that I die
I know that you will have to cry
You will say that you did not love me
But you will be very sad
And that is how you will stay
With money and without money
I always do what I want
And my word is law
I have no throne nor queen
Nor anyone who understands me
But I continue being king
A stone on the road
Taught me that my destiny
Was to roll and roll
Afterwards an arriero told me
That one need not make it first
But one must know how to make it
Leave a Comment