Album Review: Gene Watson – In a Perfect World
It’s been a year of cover albums, with a trio of legends recording a collection of old favorites, an up-and-comer disguising Texas standards as new material, and everything in between. With few exceptions, these projects have left me feeling less than satisfied, despite the fact that listening to talented, even legendary, vocalists performing some of my favorite songs ought to prove an exceptionally pleasant experience. I didn’t understand the discrepancy until I listened to Gene Watson’s new cover album, In a Perfect World.
Artists record cover albums for a lot of different reasons, but in interview after interview, the phrase “I’ve always wanted to” reoccurs with great frequency. Implementation of one’s desire to record classic material is commendable, even though mainstream artists’ interpretations seldom stray too far from the originals. Nonetheless, some artists have very effectively used such projects to make a statement. Dwight Yoakam’s bold reinterpretations on Under the Covers made a statement. So did cover albums by Martina McBride and Alan Jackson: while these projects adhered strictly to the original recordings (Martina’s ridiculously so), they were recorded with beneficent intent during the artists’ commercial primes.
However, when an artist like Gene Watson releases a collection of standard-interpretation covers in the year 2007, it’s hard to view it as anything other than self-indulgence. Certainly, there are many worse ways to act selfishly and Gene Watson has earned the right to choose the material that he records. Furthermore, the album is not exactly an unpleasant listen: it’s one of the genre’s greatest vocalists singing some killer songs, and I was tapping my foot and nodding my head throughout. Nonetheless, it’s important to call this collection what it is: a piece of work that’s entirely insignificant on an artistic and commercial level.
Few will purchase it and those that do won’t be particularly inspired unless they have some special affinity for Gene Watson. No Rascal Flatts fans will start to listen to Merle Haggard records and no critic will present this project as an example of Gene Watson’s enduring talent.
Judging by the album’s two originals, we can perhaps be thankful that Gene didn’t tackle that kind of project. Lead single “I Buried Our Love” sounds just like Montgomery Gentry’s latest release, and the dubious hook, “I buried our love but it won’t rest in peace,” doesn’t hold its own weight well. “In a Perfect World” is improved by some great country instrumentation, but the lyric tries just a little too hard to sell the heartbreak.
Plenty of famous duet partners join Gene on the classic covers, but their strong – if sometimes barely discernable – vocal performances generally fail to bring anything refreshing to the recordings. Rhonda Vincent’s backing on “Together Again” is a notable exception and a fine example of what the album could have been.
No fan of real country music will dislike this album and many will probably enjoy it. However, it’s really not worth the money. What should artists like Gene Watson be recording? One word: Wagonmaster.

If you enjoyed this article, be sure to subscribe to our feed or receive updates via email.
Popular Stuff
Sponsor
Tagged In This Article
Current Discussion
- Terry Ridont: I think its cool. Thats what I like about indy rock artists, everything isn't the same high budget packaging and ...
- Stormy: Jon: The problem is that the progressive country music is now being called Americana. And why is it ...
- Razor X: Maybe his brother did talk him into it but what’s to say he hasn’t ‘always loved’ and ‘wanted’ to ...
- Brian: Josh Kelley will be fine. At the very least it means Katherine Heigl may show up on country award shows regularly. ...
- Razor X: Change may be inevitable but we aren't required to support it and if enough people boycott it, it doesn't last ...
- Jon: "You can’t stop “progress”… We can if we try hard enough. Um, no. Not that I think "progress" is a good ...
- Joe: When she moved from Mercury to BNA, I think we were all just allowed to think there'd be some grand ...
- sam sam: Well, Suzie, maybe if I saw his live show I'd love him. But I'm not interested in attending concerts. Radio ...
- JOHN: Personally Sherrie s voice is as pure as it gets to me. Just listened to her demo songs after reading ...
- Suzie: What is all this hate for Bucky about anyway?? He has one of the best voices in country music ...

Is Dave Haywood going solo? This and many other of country music's most pressing questions answered in the September edition of The 9513's world famous Mailbag!
Caroline Herring likes to sing songs about life in the South. No, not exactly like Justin Moore and Jason Aldean...
The 9513's resident historian Paul W. Dennis sits down for a chat with country music legend Gene Watson.
As much as we love girl singers, we love songs about girl singers even more. Here's just a few of the many tribute songs out there.
Step away from the river and up to a jukebox, because heartbreak is only temporary, but a good song about drowning yourself—like a diamond—lasts forever.
What do you think about music labels "testing the waters" with a single before providing access to an artist's entire album?
What country artist, young or old, would you recommend as a must-listen artist to a newcomer on his/her journey through country music, and what would your essential song picks be?


1 Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URI for this postOctober 2, 2007
[...] Gene Watson – In A Perfect World No fan of real country music will dislike this album and many will probably enjoy it. However, it’s really not worth the money. What should artists like Gene Watson be recording? One word: Wagonmaster. — Matt C. [...]
14 Comments
RSS for comments on this post | Trackback URI for this post
October 2, 2007 at 1:36 pm Permalink
This review seems tough, but fair.
“Furthermore, the album is not exactly an unpleasant listen: it’s one of the genre’s greatest vocalists singing some killer songs, and I was tapping my foot and nodding my head throughout. Nonetheless, it’s important to call this collection what it is: a piece of work that’s entirely insignificant on an artistic and commercial level.”
great quote. well done.
October 2, 2007 at 2:11 pm Permalink
Did you REALLY listen to this album?? Several top critics and publication are claiming it to be one of the finest albums of 2007. Try checking your facts on what is a cover before you write for an article also.
October 2, 2007 at 2:17 pm Permalink
I’ve just bought this Gene Watson album and have not stopped listening. This is PURE country music from one of the genres finest country music singers – ever. I also bought your referenced Wagonmaster release. NOT EVEN close. I would like to get my money back on THAT one! And you talk about covers. Just because a guy who can no longer sing due to old age, COVERS a Johnny Cash song does not make it the hip album that the PR spinmeisters want you to believe. Do you work for Porter’s label? You should try really listening to country music for a change. THen you might know a master like Gene Watson when you hear it.
October 2, 2007 at 3:05 pm Permalink
i like both albums. however, i think porter wagoner’s ‘wagonmaster’ is clearly the better work. not to take anything away from mr. watson, who has a great voice. wagoner, on the other hand, recorded a completely classic masterwork. if anyone can listen to ‘wagonmaster’ and not at least recognize the inherent beauty in it, they…well, they have problems.
oh, and oliver–if you want to get rid of your copy of ‘wagonmaster’, e-mail me. i’ll be glad to take it off your hands and put it the hands of someone…less ageist, perhaps. :)
October 2, 2007 at 3:27 pm Permalink
Watson’s label (which has recently released similar albums by David Ball and Confederate Railroad) appears to have established a financial model based on releasing albums of readily recognizable songs performed by readily recognizable — but otherwise unsigned — acts. The sad, sorry fact is that our choice is probably either A.) Gene Watson singing overly familiar covers or B.) Gene Watson not getting to make a record at all.
October 2, 2007 at 4:44 pm Permalink
Ivana: where do I have my facts wrong? I’ve read several other reviews of this album and while most of them are more positive than my own, none that I’ve read call it one of the best albums of the year.
Chris: I didn’t like the David Ball and Confederate Railroad albums either. It’s a business model with absolutely no artistry. I’m also not sure that a persistent Gene Watson couldn’t record a more original record, though it may mean pulling a Porter Wagoner and getting far away from the Nashville establishment.
October 2, 2007 at 5:21 pm Permalink
Matt -Today, I saw it in CountryMusicPeople where it’s the CD of the Month. The critic there wrote “Probably the best album I have heard in 2007″. I’ll have to try to research where else I saw that written but I found this Associated Press critic’s comment (I read it in the San Francisco Chronicle)”Few country singers should dare take on such chestnuts as Merle Haggard’s “Today I Started Loving You Again,” Wynn Stewart’s “Let Me Be the First to Go” or Buck Owens’ “Together Again,” but Watson gives them all a sweet, late-night reading that stands out….(new) gems like “What Was I Thinking?” and “She’s Already Gone” prove Watson can make contemporary songs sound like timeless classics. He’s never sounded better, which is saying something.” Maybe not the best album of 2007 per se, but decidedly a nicer review than your statement of “it’s not worth the money” for which I vehemently disagree with you.
Bottom line: I really appreciate real country music and Gene Watson has delivered just that. I respectfully disagree with your review of the album.
October 2, 2007 at 8:02 pm Permalink
Matt: You are correct, although he would also likely need a patron like Porter had in Marty Stuart. I doubt that, left entirely to his own devices, Porter would have made “Wagonmaster.”
October 2, 2007 at 9:22 pm Permalink
Chris makes a good point about the producer. Marty Stuart turned out to be Porter’s “Rick Rubin” for “Wagonmaster.” While a very good producer, Brent Rowan isn’t gonna be confused with ‘out of the mainstream’ (for country) producers.
As for this record, it’s done remarkably well but I can see where someone would call it the best of 2007 and some, like Matt, wouldn’t be trilled by it.
October 2, 2007 at 9:53 pm Permalink
“Few country singers should dare take on such chestnuts as Merle Haggard’s “Today I Started Loving You Again,” Wynn Stewart’s “Let Me Be the First to Go” or Buck Owens’ “Together Again,” but Watson gives them all a sweet, late-night reading that stands out…”
It seems like “Today I Started Loving You Again” and “Together Again” have been covered by just about everyone. I only listened to a few tracks on the album so far, but Watson’s interpretation of “Together Again” definitely sounds like the stand out track on the album.
October 4, 2007 at 4:38 am Permalink
I think that artistry needs to be appreciated in and of itself. Too many seem to overrate the value of innovation, thinking of it as a goal rather than a means. The concept of innovation is “value-neutral” as innovation can be very bad (think: Hitler, Stalin, Vlad the Impaler) as well as good.
This CD is a clear triumph of the singer’s art. I have WAGONMASTER and it too is good, but this disc will find its way into my changer far more often than the Wagoner disc (and yes I am a Porter Wagoner fan – I have 35 of his vinyl LPs)
October 5, 2007 at 2:17 am Permalink
very strong points Paul
October 16, 2007 at 7:33 pm Permalink
I finally got a copy of the CD while up in South Carolina (I couldn’t find a copy anywhere in Orlando) and it turns out my original assessment was correct – 4.5 stars with the lack of any uptempo numbers keeping it from being a 5 star effort. No one sings ballads as well as Gene Watson except possibly Ray Price. The album isn’t innovative, merely excellent
November 17, 2007 at 9:57 am Permalink
while i was familiar with the 3 true classics on this album (great versions) i found the rest of the songs a refreshing change of pace from the rehashed 70’s rock and roll that is current country radio…album of the year? of course not…it has no drum loops or songs about dying children or songs that pander to patriotism for an easy hit….whoever does not like this song that claims to like country music is probably a rascall flatts fan.
Leave a Comment