Album Review: Brad Paisley – American Saturday Night

CM Wilcox | July 8th, 2009 Email Share

Brad Paisley - American Saturday Night Somewhere between Mud on the Tires and Time Well Wasted, Brad Paisley went from traditionalist to traditionalish. The emergence of the new Paisley can perhaps be traced to Time Well Wasted opener “The World,” an exercise in guitar layering that signaled a definite shift from the lean, straight-ahead sound of his first three albums. While Paisley would still opt for the leaner sound on occasion, his aesthetic would increasingly rely on bigger and more elaborate production from that point forward.

The musical change coincided with the witty West Virginian’s rise to headliner status: The aptly titled Time Well Wasted Tour saw him booking arenas for the first time. Since then, even with the surprisingly spotty 5th Gear and indulgent Play intervening, a Paisley single has not once missed the top of the charts. His 10 consecutive number one hits are more than Chesney, McGraw, or Jackson have ever experienced. Even George Strait hasn’t had that sort of a run since the second half of the ’80s. Brad Paisley is on a roll.

American Saturday Night is a timely reminder of what the country audience has come to like about him. Even when the subject matter is typical, his keen eye for detail and famous sense of humor make his treatments fresh and interesting. Even his guitar playing seems to come complete with a knowing smirk.

Although the theme here is purportedly Saturday night, this feels more like Paisley’s fatherhood album. There are lots of grandpa mentions, lots of boyhood memories, lots of generational musings. Love songs like the bluesy “She’s Her Own Woman” and “I Hope That’s Me” exhibit a maturity lacking in some of the singer’s past ballads, sounding rather adult-like by comparison. The boyish charm of “Me Neither” reappears in “Catch All the Fish” and “The Pants,” but now feels more like a good-natured wink to Paisley’s past than an artistic direction in itself. The heart of the album is in songs like “Welcome to the Future” and the title track, which see Paisley easing into an armchair and commenting on the world around him from a smart historical perspective.

It’s a very good album, and a very rare one (for 2009, at least) in that it seems to have been crafted by an artist rather than recorded by a singer. But one could say the same about most of Paisley’s previous albums; he’s known as an album artist for good reason. So what is it about this latest effort that has many people calling it his best to date?

Until now, Paisley’s albums have been structured like variety shows: funny songs, love songs, a weeper or two, an instrumental, a talking song, a gospel number. That structure very clearly marked Paisley as a different sort of artist. What other contemporary stars were giving George Jones, Bill Anderson, and Little Jimmy Dickens time to joke around on their albums? Or taking the time to feature standards like “Farther Along” and “When We All Get to Heaven”? For Paisley’s traditional base, those gestures meant something.

Aside from the reprises of “Welcome to the Future,” American Saturday Night finds Paisley adopting a more typical contemporary album structure. Coupled with the thematic consistency of the material, the abandonment of the variety show format makes this album feel unified and whole in a way that previous albums haven’t. Paisley has said that the difference is that this time he means it. Indeed, this may be the best and most earnest encapsulation of the character of Brad Paisley. But that’s different than calling it his best album.

What the album has in a strong sense of character and personal connection, it lacks in diversity and differentiation between songs. Perhaps it’s no coincidence that the two songs that have been singled out as highlights by reviewers and fans alike–the title track and “Welcome to the Future”–both show up in the first 15 minutes. After that, it’s easy to get lulled into a semiconscious state by a series of enjoyable songs that you might have trouble remembering several minutes from now. It doesn’t help that two of the album’s weakest songs, the paint-by-numbers “Then” and lightweight “Water,” show up right after the first 15 minutes to kill some of the early momentum. The album features bits of Paisley’s sharpest songwriting so far, but the setting is such that they’re often washed away in the persistent tide of competent sameness.

Once a wry traditionalist upstart, Brad Paisley has turned into a major mainstream headliner. With American Saturday Night, he’s sanding away some of the rough edges and sounding more comfortable than ever in the role of contemporary superstar. Goodbye, Little Jimmy Dickens telling jokes that are only sort of funny. Goodbye, requisite gospel standard. Welcome to the future. Welcome to a Brad Paisley primed to compete on the level of Chesney and McGraw. The change has been underway for several years now, but American Saturday Night is the most convincing evidence yet that Paisley has mastered his new direction and will remain on top for a long time to come.

Forgive me if I take a moment to mourn the guy we lost along the way.

4 Stars

2 Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URI for this post
  1. [...] The rest is here: Album Review: Brad Paisley – American Saturday Night | The 9513 [...]

  2. [...] 2009 Tim McGraw – “It’s a Business Doing Pleasure With You” Album Review: Brad Paisley – American Saturday Night Blaine Larsen – “It Did” Lost Trailers – “Country Folks (Livin’ [...]

  1. Drew
    July 8, 2009 at 9:17 am Permalink

    “the two songs that have been singled out as highlights by reviewers and fans alike–-the title track and “Welcome to the Future””

    That part caught my eye, as I’d argue that those are two of the weakest tracks on the album.

  2. Mike Parker
    July 8, 2009 at 10:28 am Permalink

    Really solid review. I agree with most of it. I did notice the lack of the gospel standard and really missed the old timers, but there is still a formula here. So many of these songs recall others in his catalog- not necessarily a bad thing- but it’s still there.

    Brad Paisley is easily my favorite contemporary top 40 country artist since Garth. He can play, he can sing, he can write, and he can flat out entertain. this wasn’t my favorite Paisley album, but it’s still really enjoyable and fun to listen to.

  3. MEL
    July 8, 2009 at 10:37 am Permalink

    No is the gospel song it talking about answer prayer it saying prayer are answer just not the way you wanted it to be asnwer…. i love this album i think it his best yet……… that saying alot coming from a hard-ore paisley fan like me

  4. Andrew Lacy
    July 8, 2009 at 10:47 am Permalink

    Great review and right on the money. A little while back we had a thread asking who would follow George Strait as artist of the decade for the 2010s, and if this album is any indication it looks like Brad is going to run away with it.

  5. Karlie
    July 8, 2009 at 12:04 pm Permalink

    This is one of the best commentaries on Brad I’ve read. Great job.

  6. Noeller
    July 8, 2009 at 12:04 pm Permalink

    Interesting review. Glad to see I’m not alone in thinking that “Then” was a really weak effort on Brad’s part, if only because he’s set the bar so high in the world of love ballads. Sloppy and lazy, it seemed like a song hashed out in 10 minutes, trying to re-create the magic from other hits.

    I would argue one posters comment that Brad can sing – in fact, I would say that Brad is one of the weakest vocalists right now, relying a lot on the auto-tune function in ProTools. Certainly, though, nobody can deny the guitar playing. Possibly the best in the world right now.

    I, too, miss the Kung Pao Buckaroos, but hopefully it won’t be the end of the line.

  7. Lucas
    July 8, 2009 at 12:36 pm Permalink

    Brad Paisley really is more talented than anybody in country music.

  8. Leeann Ward
    July 8, 2009 at 2:50 pm Permalink

    What’s even the point of commenting? I always agree with you, anyway. Right down to the rating. Why would things change now?:)

    Great review, of course. I agree that this is excellent commentary on Paisley’s music as well.

  9. Dan Milliken
    July 8, 2009 at 3:59 pm Permalink

    Excellent review.

  10. Cowboy Blue
    July 8, 2009 at 5:22 pm Permalink

    Hell Yeah, even the 9513 can’t resist this as a great project. If there was any album by any artist out there worth hearing right now for fans all across the country music spectrum, this would be the one.

    I have a lot of bad opinions concerning this website, but its great to see that even you guys, some of the toughest critics around, are giving Paisley of all people his due credit at this point.

  11. SW
    July 8, 2009 at 5:46 pm Permalink

    Nice review; I’ve thought from first hearing it that “Then” was a poorly rethought version of “It Did” from his 5th Gear album. Lyrically, thematically, and melodically they are very similar songs. Personally I like “It Did” better, but who’s to say. It’s my opinion that what sets Brad Paisley away from the pack is his sense of humor, especially when directed at himself.

  12. Leeann Ward
    July 8, 2009 at 6:56 pm Permalink

    “Then” is definitely one of the weakest songs on the album.

  13. Clemson Brad
    July 8, 2009 at 7:28 pm Permalink

    “Welcome to the Future” may be my early entry for Worst song of 2009. Absolute trash IMO. it’s a song that tries to make a statement…but I feel that it comes off forced and goofy more then anything. It may be my least favorite Paisley song of all time.

  14. PaulaW
    July 8, 2009 at 8:13 pm Permalink

    I just went to listen to ‘Welcome To The Future’. Didnt make it all the way through. Of course, I’m not much of a Brad fan in the first place. I think he’s got some guitar talent, but all his self-penned songs are beginning to sound alike. I like him best on his ‘outside’ songs.

  15. Mike M.
    July 8, 2009 at 11:35 pm Permalink

    Nicely done. As a fan of Brad Paisley’s music, I agree with the general vibe of the review. I liked this album well enough(even some of the less popular songs, such as “Then” and “Water”). But while I thought this was a good album, there was something for me that just held it back a bit from some of his previous releases, such as Mud on the Tires, Time Well Wasted, and even 5th Gear. It just doesn’t feel right not having the traditional hymn(though “No” fit in decently), or not having Dickens, Anderson, Jones, etc. goof around with the cornpone humor. It almost seems as if Paisley’s reacting to some of the minor criticism he got from his last album, which seemed too “jokey” and “formulaic” to some. Even in interviews, he’s been talking about wanting to “mean” what he’s saying with this album, and it’s clear that even in the novelty numbers, the humor/non P.C. nature is toned down a bit. It’s not necessarily a bad thing…but I always liked his goofy songs for the most part, and I hope he doesn’t completely abandon the silliness.

    Paisley is still easily my favorite artist among the big mainstream acts, and the album is certainly not bad by any stretch. But, I just hope the new direction doesn’t completely overtake Paisley, and he loses the soul/personality in his music that fans have come to appreciate.

  16. Todd
    July 8, 2009 at 11:44 pm Permalink

    Spot on review CM!! I’ve gotta say based upon the first several listens this album ranks right up there with “Part II” as my personal favorite Paisley Albums. The two weakest song on the album imo are the singles that have been released so far and they’re both solid songs, everything else on there is amazing!

  17. Steve Harvey
    July 9, 2009 at 4:48 am Permalink

    I think this is his best record since MUD ON THE TIRES, but that’s still his ultimate for me. Although this one may grow on me more.

  18. Leeann Ward
    July 9, 2009 at 7:31 am Permalink

    I think “The Pants” is non-P
    C enough for his fans that like that kind of stuff from him. Personally, I’m kind of glad he took some criticisms to heart, if he did. 5th Gear really was a low point and I would have hated it if it had been repeated.

  19. Cybrus
    July 9, 2009 at 6:51 pm Permalink

    Brad Paisley is hit or miss with me. Whereas “Then” is considered a weak song on this site, I liked it from the first time I heard it. It’s not the best constructed love song released, but it is a easy love song to listen to.

    If that’s the flip, on the flop side “Welcome to the Future” is a miss for me. I’m sure it’ll be played in heavy rotation as all Brad’s songs do and will be another chart topper for Brad, but I don’t care for it much.

    Good review, though. I’m not used to seeing many mainstream artists get high ratings here. I’m going to have to sample a few tracks off the CD to see if I’d be willing to buy it. :)

  20. Steve Harvey
    July 12, 2009 at 10:53 pm Permalink

    This record has grown on me over the past week – I don’t care for Then, Water of Catch All The Fish. The title track is great, Welcome to the Future is also very strong, but my favourite is probably She’s Her Own Woman, which (as was pointed out in the review) has a real maturity to it. This album discards a lot of cutseyness that I’d begun to dislike about his post-TIRES catalogue.
    Also, I should mention that once again, Frank Rodgers has done an absolutely masterful job with the production – that guys a freaking genius! Listening to all the elements in American Saturday Night, which never feels cluttered, yet really create so much of the songs atmosphere, it’s bloody brilliant…

  21. Gloria
    July 13, 2009 at 9:04 am Permalink

    Brad Paisley is boring. All his songs sound a like and his voice is always the same range. Welcome to the Future sounds like something else he sang before. He’s not the savior of country music like some people obviously thinks. JMO!

  22. Tom
    September 3, 2009 at 6:42 am Permalink

    whenever i buy a brad paisley album, i can’t help feeling that i got a little more than i paid for.
    quite an achievement for the artist and a welcome pleasure for me.

  23. David Jones
    September 6, 2009 at 9:43 am Permalink

    Great review, CM. I agree about this being a fatherhood album. You can see Brad’s songwriting fingerprints all over this album. “I Hope That’s Me” is one of the best songs, in my opinion, and should be a single. I wish the record was more traditional, though.

  24. Jay Mac
    September 17, 2009 at 11:05 am Permalink

    Great album Brad. Here’s another interesting article on Brad Paisley http://itsallaboutmusic.tv/bradpaisley

Leave a Comment


Sponsor

New American Voices Video

Tagged In This Article

Current Discussion

  • Paul W Dennis: actually, during the 1980s country was "Reagan Democrat"
  • Jon: Since this is basically just the flip side of Dan E.’s claim – he says it’s getting better, you say ...
  • Jon: And pop wasn’t so bad during the yesteryear. When the music made much more sense and singers actually sing songs. Since ...
  • Stormy: I grew up in the 1980's when country was solidly blue collar democrat.
  • Please!: that song featured on CNN sounds just like rhythm of the falling rain.. anyone else hear it? The whole thing ...
  • Jon: Funny to see Patsy Cline’s name turn up in the middle of a diatribe about pop influences. Yes, I am fully ...
  • luckyoldsun: A woman singer did a song a ways back about "A Bottle of Wine and Patsy Cline."
  • luckyoldsun: Some male singer a couple of years ago had a weird song about riding in or buying Loretta Lynn's Lincoln.
  • sam (sam): Jesse - lets take on your own terms that science claims that the world is here by accident. But its ...
  • Dan E.: Jon: I really do feel sorry for your loss of sight. Maybe that's why you can't comprehend, you just can't ...

Recently Reviewed Albums

  • carrie-icon
  • Sam Bush - Circles Around Me
  • Dolly Parton - Dolly
  • Drew Kennedy - An Audio Guide to Cross Country Travel
  • Toby Keith - American Ride
  • svicon
  • closer-to-the-bone
  • revolution